Dem want to confiscate firearms

Dem want to confiscate firearms

Posted in the London Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
jenny lied

Barnesville, GA

#1 Feb 14, 2013
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation to Confiscate Firearms(90 Days to Turn in Weapons)
The Gateway Pundit ^| February 14, 2013 | Jim Hoft

Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.

Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:

Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.

Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:

4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:

(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;

(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or

(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.

5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
John

Waneta, KY

#2 Feb 14, 2013
jenny lied wrote:
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation to Confiscate Firearms(90 Days to Turn in Weapons)
The Gateway Pundit ^| February 14, 2013 | Jim Hoft
Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.
Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:
Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.
Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:
4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:
(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;
(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or
(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.
5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
Why does someone that lives in one state, post on topix in another state abount a law in another state. What's the point?
jenny lies

Barnesville, GA

#3 Feb 14, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>Why does someone that lives in one state, post on topix in another state abount a law in another state. What's the point?
I live in London. Do you live in tyner?
Jenny is a lib dem that get on here all the time and says NOONE want to confiscate anyone guns. She like you lies. Will you agree that it the dem that want to take people guns. Or are you a closed minded person like jenny who will refuse to believe the facts when they are provide.
Please get help for your mental problem.
Jesse

Harrison, AR

#4 Feb 14, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>Why does someone that lives in one state, post on topix in another state abount a law in another state. What's the point?
Just because it shows someone posting from another state does not necessarily mean they are in the shown state when they post.
Also the post about gun confiscation is true.Idiot lawmakers like the ones that introduced the Missouri bill live in every state in this country.It has also been discussed by the POS governor in the state of New York is just one more shining example.
jenny lies

Barnesville, GA

#5 Feb 15, 2013
Breaking: MN Democrats Introduce Law to Confiscate Guns… Using Same Language as MO Democrats
Gateway Pundit ^| 2/14/13 | Jim Hoft

THIS IS AN ORGANIZED NATIONAL EFFORT FOLKS…… This is not a coincidence. It is a concerted effort.

Missouri Democrats are pushing a bill to confiscate guns giving gun owners 90 days to turn in their weapons. Minnesota Democrats are pushing the same bill.

Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals this week. Gun owners will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed. Dana Loesch has more details.

Here is the language:

4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:

(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
helen

Sevierville, TN

#6 Feb 15, 2013
Where that jenny fruit loop?
HelpMe Gov

London, KY

#7 Feb 15, 2013
jenny lied wrote:
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation to Confiscate Firearms(90 Days to Turn in Weapons)
The Gateway Pundit ^| February 14, 2013 | Jim Hoft
Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.
Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:
Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.
Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:
4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:
(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;
(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or
(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.
5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
So I have 90 days to sell every citizen of Missouri an assault weapon at "panic" prices. I do love capitalism.
henry

London, KY

#8 Feb 17, 2013
So where are the libtard on this subject. They claim NOONE would be taking guns and they have been showed to be wrong. Libturd just hate it when the truth comes out.
Bruce

Manchester, KY

#9 Feb 17, 2013
Of course we want to take your firearms. It can't be demanded all at once. We will take what we can get each time we start the hype. Eventually we will have these redneck hillbillies where we can come in and take their resources without a fight.

Bruce.
Nancy

London, KY

#10 Feb 17, 2013
Gun Control Advocates & Liberal Media Bias Evident in Coverage of Mass Shootings
examiner.com ^| 16 February, 2013 | Winston Dorian
When you look at recent mass shootings that have occurred recently there is one specific incident that is very rarely if ever mentioned by the liberal media and Gun Control advocates.

The Ft. Hood Shooting is never cited or discussed or even mentioned by the Anti's and Gun grabbers like Bloomberg, Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, McCarthy or Cuomo. They only cite the Tucson, Aurora and Sandy Hook events as reason to restrict law abiding citizens their rights. WHY?

One must make a few assumptions to uncover why they rarely if ever cite the Ft. Hood mass shooting in their quest to deny law abiding citizens their 2nd Amendment rights.

It has not received the attention nor coverage that other mass shooting have received because it occurred on a military installation while Obama was the Commander in Chief.

It has not received the attention nor coverage that other mass shooting have received because the perpetrator was Muslim and it is not politically correct because the President himself sympathizes with the Muslim plight across the world.

It has not received the attention nor coverage that other mass shooting have received because the victims were military personnel and they just don't have the same impact as civilians and children for good demagoguery.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
and get what please

London, KY

#11 Feb 17, 2013
Bruce wrote:
Of course we want to take your firearms. It can't be demanded all at once. We will take what we can get each time we start the hype. Eventually we will have these redneck hillbillies where we can come in and take their resources without a fight.
Bruce.
Oh my! yes we in New york want your rednecks welfare cards, your sister/wife cheap cracker jack ring ?
trust me I'm just visiting this state my god I need to leave asaap!!!
ps, I hope they come and take all your guns!!!
maybe you will work at a j o b then and not clutch your pistols!
they did sign up

London, KY

#12 Feb 17, 2013
Nancy wrote:
Gun Control Advocates & Liberal Media Bias Evident in Coverage of Mass Shootings
examiner.com ^| 16 February, 2013 | Winston Dorian
When you look at recent mass shootings that have occurred recently there is one specific incident that is very rarely if ever mentioned by the liberal media and Gun Control advocates.
The Ft. Hood Shooting is never cited or discussed or even mentioned by the Anti's and Gun grabbers like Bloomberg, Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, McCarthy or Cuomo. They only cite the Tucson, Aurora and Sandy Hook events as reason to restrict law abiding citizens their rights. WHY?
One must make a few assumptions to uncover why they rarely if ever cite the Ft. Hood mass shooting in their quest to deny law abiding citizens their 2nd Amendment rights.
It has not received the attention nor coverage that other mass shooting have received because it occurred on a military installation while Obama was the Commander in Chief.
It has not received the attention nor coverage that other mass shooting have received because the perpetrator was Muslim and it is not politically correct because the President himself sympathizes with the Muslim plight across the world.
It has not received the attention nor coverage that other mass shooting have received because the victims were military personnel and they just don't have the same impact as civilians and children for good demagoguery.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
yes, they signed up for duty, and paid the price cause they DID NOT weed out their own nuts!!!
GO Mr. Obamma!!!!!!!!!!
Bruce

Manchester, KY

#13 Feb 17, 2013
Obama is an honest man. I believe him when he says he is a Christain. So don't tell me about how he was raised during his formative years. He like most children have no choice. Even his drug use as late as college comes from the ills projected by white society. Muslim schools and parents doesn't have any effect on the children.

Bruce.
how much we save

London, KY

#14 Feb 17, 2013
jenny lied wrote:
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation to Confiscate Firearms(90 Days to Turn in Weapons)
The Gateway Pundit ^| February 14, 2013 | Jim Hoft
Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.
Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:
Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.
Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:
4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:
(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;
(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or
(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.
5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
Whew, cheap prices on guns are soon to come !!!!!!!!!!
I'm going to arm my thugs with them cheap show me state guns that have to be sent out of state (coming to a gas station robbery near you soon!)
Funny

London, KY

#15 Feb 17, 2013
Bruce wrote:
Of course we want to take your firearms. It can't be demanded all at once. We will take what we can get each time we start the hype. Eventually we will have these redneck hillbillies where we can come in and take their resources without a fight.
Bruce.
What recources???? I don't see much around here anyone would want.
Bruce

Manchester, KY

#16 Feb 17, 2013
Funny wrote:
<quoted text>
What recources???? I don't see much around here anyone would want.
These so called poor are sitting on the largest natural gas reserve in the world. Families that you would think are "on the draw" own or is heirs in millions of acres of timber, coal, gas and cheap labor. Unlike the city where they have already assigned rent controlled cages.

As for anyone "wanting," it's need. I bet you didn't make that post using wind power.

How can we go head to head against uneducated hillbillies when some of our own are so ignorant?

Bruce.
Obama

London, KY

#17 Feb 17, 2013
If you voted Obama, SHUT UP!!
not all

Cincinnati, OH

#18 Feb 17, 2013
henry wrote:
So where are the libtard on this subject. They claim NOONE would be taking guns and they have been showed to be wrong. Libturd just hate it when the truth comes out.
who came to your door for yours, anyone?
Bruce

Manchester, KY

#19 Feb 17, 2013
not all wrote:
<quoted text>who came to your door for yours, anyone?
In due time, in due time.

Bruce.
Bruce

Manchester, KY

#20 Feb 17, 2013
It is very simple. We want the citizens when they are ragged and tired from protesting their lack of representation. To just go home.

Until we get their guns they may go home and then return with their guns. We had to disarm the Native Americans before we took what they had. We had to beat down the South so we could steall their cotton profits. We will have to disarm the rednecks if we want total socialism. Just look at history.

Bruce.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

London Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 50 min who cares 148,999
Single woman over 40 (Aug '15) 59 min Freethinking 23
Ricky Smallwood 1 hr Huh 3
News Georgia Fugitive Found In Ky. Waives Extradition 2 hr Johnny Reb 1
Laurel River Road 2 hr someone who knows 66
Laurel Cookie Factory -- what do you think? (Jun '08) 3 hr cell phone internets 9,238
Democrats .... Ha! 3 hr Trump supporter 6

London Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

London Mortgages