lib say _jenny_ own a assault weapon

lib say _jenny_ own a assault weapon

Posted in the London Forum

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
it true

United States

#1 Dec 17, 2012
MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Talks Gun ‘Confiscation’
Newsbusters ^| December 16, 2012 | Dan Gainor

Liberals always say they don’t want to take away guns. But give them an awful tragedy like the Newtown, Conn. shooting and they get bolder and more honest. MSNBC host Ed Schultz showed a rare bout of such honesty during a brief Twitter exchange Saturday. Schultz asked “Why should anyone own an assault rifle ?” and followed it up by saying “it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.”

“The Ed Show” host wasn’t done his attack on gun rights.“The NRA needs to state the case why assault weapons are needed by anyone,” he claimed. And after that, he told one poster that “a Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon.” That last bit is surely a surprise to both gun owners and Congress which didn’t include handguns in its previous assault weapons ban.

Since jenny own 2 glock will she give them up because of what her buddy ed said?????
yep

Morehead, KY

#2 Dec 17, 2012
it true wrote:
MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Talks Gun ‘Confiscation’
Newsbusters ^| December 16, 2012 | Dan Gainor
Liberals always say they don’t want to take away guns. But give them an awful tragedy like the Newtown, Conn. shooting and they get bolder and more honest. MSNBC host Ed Schultz showed a rare bout of such honesty during a brief Twitter exchange Saturday. Schultz asked “Why should anyone own an assault rifle ?” and followed it up by saying “it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.”
“The Ed Show” host wasn’t done his attack on gun rights.“The NRA needs to state the case why assault weapons are needed by anyone,” he claimed. And after that, he told one poster that “a Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon.” That last bit is surely a surprise to both gun owners and Congress which didn’t include handguns in its previous assault weapons ban.
Since jenny own 2 glock will she give them up because of what her buddy ed said?????
probably because ed's a left winger almost as fruitloopy as she is.
FYI

United States

#3 Dec 18, 2012
So where is that fruitloop jenny When a libtard want to take her gun.For some dumb reason she think lib don't want to take guns.Hopefully sge not planning on killing anyone with her assault weapon.
curious

United States

#4 Dec 18, 2012
Glocks arent assault weapons goobers
Satans Toothpicks

Houston, TX

#5 Dec 18, 2012
curious wrote:
Glocks arent assault weapons goobers
Neither is this. AR 15 Pistol.

http://www.rockriverarms.com/index.cfm...

The largest school killing in the US was in 1927 with dynamite, 44 dead.
curious

United States

#6 Dec 18, 2012
Satans Toothpicks wrote:
<quoted text>Neither is this. AR 15 Pistol.
http://www.rockriverarms.com/index.cfm...
The largest school killing in the US was in 1927 with dynamite, 44 dead.
True, a AR15 isnt a assault weapon, BUT i think you missed the point of him calling Jennys glocks assault weapons

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#7 Dec 18, 2012
You will start to hear this (il)logic from many of the gun grabbers:

"You can shoot someone with a gun. That's an assault. Thus, all guns are used for assaulting another and all guns are assault weapons."

Wait and see.

Of course, gun legislation isn't going anywhere, the Republicans control the House. All this posturing by both sides and the glorification in the media is simply taking the pulse of the nation.

People will be talking about something else come January.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#8 Dec 18, 2012
Ha! Just checked Ed's Twitter feed. He said "some Republicans want guns in schools."

A reply?

Pat Miletich &#8207;@patmiletich
@edshow Some democrats feel the same way, Ed.

Pat Miletich is the man. If you don't know who he is, go back to MLP.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#9 Dec 18, 2012
LOL

Pat Miletich &#8207;@patmiletich
@piersmorgan I remember when you got sacked in England for putting British troops at risk w fake torture photos. You are a clown!

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#10 Dec 18, 2012
it true wrote:
MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Talks Gun ‘Confiscation’
Newsbusters ^| December 16, 2012 | Dan Gainor
Liberals always say they don’t want to take away guns. But give them an awful tragedy like the Newtown, Conn. shooting and they get bolder and more honest. MSNBC host Ed Schultz showed a rare bout of such honesty during a brief Twitter exchange Saturday. Schultz asked “Why should anyone own an assault rifle ?” and followed it up by saying “it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.”
“The Ed Show” host wasn’t done his attack on gun rights.“The NRA needs to state the case why assault weapons are needed by anyone,” he claimed. And after that, he told one poster that “a Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon.” That last bit is surely a surprise to both gun owners and Congress which didn’t include handguns in its previous assault weapons ban.
Since jenny own 2 glock will she give them up because of what her buddy ed said?????
Why shouldn't the NRA and gun-nuts state their case as to why someone needs an assault rifle? Besides the completely true fact that crazy people are drawn to them and love to use them to kill innocent citizens. I think I'll mention that not even 24 hours after the school shooting another small child was killed during a shootout with a nutcase with an AK-47 in Alabama (he also shot a police officer before a SWAT team killed him).

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#11 Dec 18, 2012
FYI wrote:
So where is that fruitloop jenny When a libtard want to take her gun.For some dumb reason she think lib don't want to take guns.Hopefully sge not planning on killing anyone with her assault weapon.
Who is wanting to ban all guns or restrict our right to protect ourselves? No one.

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#12 Dec 18, 2012
Satans Toothpicks wrote:
<quoted text>Neither is this. AR 15 Pistol.
http://www.rockriverarms.com/index.cfm...
The largest school killing in the US was in 1927 with dynamite, 44 dead.
Go try to buy dynamite. You cannot buy it without all kinds of red-tape and having to show it is for legitimate purposes. Also, if caught with it without all required paperwork you will be arrested. The only reason it's even still legal is dynamite has uses in other things such as construction. That's why there are far less murders by use of dynamite. The only use for assault weapons ..... killing people ..... no other use.
Enlightener of Jenny

Jenkins, KY

#13 Dec 18, 2012
Ha, shows what you know about a so called assault weapon.

If a burgular breaks into my house or tries to harm me and my family and they'll find out WHY I need an assault weapon.

I wouldn't use a measly handgun or a single shot. It would be 30 rounds. Any intruder inside a home should not be leaving that home alive. THAT's why people need assault weapons. Read it, understand it, and leave other's freedoms alone.

It's evil people who commit crimes and kill, NOT guns.
Enlightener of Jenny

Jenkins, KY

#14 Dec 18, 2012
That would be my LEGITIMATE reason for owning assault weapons. Dispatching threats to my life or my family's
WillyP

Bowling Green, KY

#15 Dec 18, 2012
___Jenny___ wrote:
<quoted text>
Why shouldn't the NRA and gun-nuts state their case as to why someone needs an assault rifle? Besides the completely true fact that crazy people are drawn to them and love to use them to kill innocent citizens. I think I'll mention that not even 24 hours after the school shooting another small child was killed during a shootout with a nutcase with an AK-47 in Alabama (he also shot a police officer before a SWAT team killed him).
You got any other constitutional rights in mind that I need to prove a need before I can use 'em? Methinks you have things a tad backward. BTW, so called "assault weapons" are used in a very tiny percentage of illegal shootings in the US. Something like 3%.

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#16 Dec 18, 2012
Enlightener of Jenny wrote:
Ha, shows what you know about a so called assault weapon.
If a burgular breaks into my house or tries to harm me and my family and they'll find out WHY I need an assault weapon.
I wouldn't use a measly handgun or a single shot. It would be 30 rounds. Any intruder inside a home should not be leaving that home alive. THAT's why people need assault weapons. Read it, understand it, and leave other's freedoms alone.
It's evil people who commit crimes and kill, NOT guns.
The best home protection ..... a shotgun. It's easier in the dark to hit a moving target that's shooting back at you. Even using a hunting rifle that's high powered you are likely to shoot through the wall and kill your own children or wife in the bedroom or someone else in the house next door. But if you keep hoping hard enough maybe someday you will get your dream of getting to use your big gun to kill someone rather than just have it to show off to people.
Satans Toothpicks

Las Vegas, NV

#17 Dec 18, 2012
___Jenny___ wrote:
<quoted text>
Go try to buy dynamite. You cannot buy it without all kinds of red-tape and having to show it is for legitimate purposes. Also, if caught with it without all required paperwork you will be arrested. The only reason it's even still legal is dynamite has uses in other things such as construction. That's why there are far less murders by use of dynamite. The only use for assault weapons ..... killing people ..... no other use.
One stick of Dynamite = One gallon of Gas and a flare pen, dumbass.

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#18 Dec 18, 2012
It appears to me the primary reason for fruitloops owning assault rifles is for bragging purposes and to show off. The problem is there are people who use them for the weapon's real purpose ..... to kill as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Street gangs and dangerous militia groups (such as the Sovereign Citizens who have murdered at least six police officers in ten years) love them. The companies which manufacture assault rifles make a lot of money from that market group.
Satans Toothpicks

Las Vegas, NV

#20 Dec 18, 2012
Jenny is a dumb Bioch, doesn't have a clue.

Gun deaths 2011 = 31,000

Assault weapons deaths 2011 = 323

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#21 Dec 18, 2012
Satans Toothpicks wrote:
<quoted text> One stick of Dynamite = One gallon of Gas and a flare pen, dumbass.
You also are not allowed to defend your home by planting claymore bombs in your yard. Ralphie, sell the assault rifle before you shoot your eye out. Buy a shotgun.

Btw, I realllyyyyyy hope you are not living close to me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

London Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 19 min another viewer 163,745
Laurel Cookie Factory -- what do you think? (Jun '08) 1 hr Bud 9,447
TDEC employees 2 hr Sue 1
Ivanka get 100 million for women entrepreneurs 2 hr Way to go girl 5
25 years and fired 3 hr outoftowner 4
Donald J Trump in Bible Prophecy 5 hr One way 3
DNC didn't pay overtime. 6 hr it true 4

London Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

London Mortgages