Another "family values" Republican hypocrite

[Tommy Brown is Right]

Requiter2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Nah, as usual, it is YOU that is "changing the subject. You and your ilk seem to do that every time you've lost. The title of this thread is "Another "family values" republican hypocrite". But you're not even happy changing that are you? No, you now want to change it from abortion to partial birth abortion. Sadly you've lost this one as well.
<quoted text>No, I'm not "brainwashed" at all. That would again be you, who continues to support candidates that have no intention of changing abortion laws, yet continue to garner your support by telling you they do.
I keep insisting that abortion is legal because it is. Do I think all are done to save a life...no. So let me ask you....do you think all abortions should be outlawed even when the woman's life would be forfeit?
What about Ensign's parents paying off his mistress to the tune of $96,000? What about Ensign resigning as chairman of the Republican Policy Committee? Why are you afraid to comment on those you support?

I think we should start a frank discussion about the morals of the Democrats and the Republicans and see who has the preponderance of morals. I think we should start with Teddy Kennedy, and then maybe discuss Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski. I remember well Chappequidic and a person who lay in a car for hours drowning without help. Charles Rangel and his tax evasion scemes - and he is Chairman of the Ways and Means Committe. Talk about hubris, the Democrats rule hands down. One has to look long and hard for a renegade Republican, but all I have to do is talk about ANY Democrat and I could go on for hours about how dismally immoral they are!

About the money given to the mistress, how do we know they were trying to silence her? This is Requiter’s opinion because he is jaded from having been a Democrat for so long! These people have no heart; just a cold stone is in there. YES...abortion is legal. It takes a cold heart to kill an innocent baby!

On the other hand, Monica knew that if anyone found out about the affair she and Bill had, Bill would say she was a lying bimbo! She knew that when dealing with Democrats to keep the evidence is very important (the dress with the stain.) Hillary didn’t divorce Bill because she had political aims and goals. I can’t think of a single honorable Democrat other than maybe Lieberman – and I wouldn’t vote for him because he is too liberal. All the others are liars, cheats, and crooks! IT is the party of ACORN, fraud and corruption!

A bill was brought up that would saved an aborted baby that had a viable chance to live, but Obama would have none of that. He would have the baby die alone on a trash heap! So much for the morals of Obama!

[WVA70]

Requiter2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
No, that's not what we were discussing. Maybe you should try looking at the title of this thread. It's called "Another "family values" Republican Hypocrits".
YOU are the one who is changing the subject. But you weren't just happy with that...once you lost that argument, you changed it to "partial birth abortion". Whine away, name call all you like, but those are the facts. You obviously don't recall what you have written, but that's understandable.
Your first mention was of abortion(not partial birth abortion) in post #58:
"Democrats are at the top of the list as having no "family values" as abortions are atrocious and Democrats are pro-abortion."
Having lost that argument you switched to "partial birth abortion". You're just not smart enough to see that you've lost that as well.
<quoted text>
Any political club that supports allowing the birth mother to die supports murdering the innocent.

You lose again. Abortions are murder. if the mother's life is at stake, then they try to deliver the baby and give it too a chance at life. This is not the way the democratic party sees it. They support abortion, destroying the life of an innocent child and not allowing it a chance at life just because the birth mother doesn't want the child.

Usually miscarriages occur in early pregnancy if an anomaly occurs. As pregnancy advances, if a woman's life is threatened by the pregnancy then those with moral values and "family values" will attempt to deliver the baby and give it a chance at life, not to abort the baby for the sake of killing it. The smallest known preemie weighed 9.9 ounces, so they can make it. This is what moral individuals do, but Democrats have no morals and don't see it this way. What you democrats support is murdering the baby to just "get rid" of the baby by having an abortion regardless of what trimester of pregnancy. An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus resulting in or caused by its death. Abortions fall under the heading of "family values" whether you like it or not; therefore, Democrats have no "family values."

[Sam]

Tommy Brown is Right wrote:

Here is the family values president at work: http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/wor... . We have another Bill Clinton in the making! The world is going through a financial crash and Obama is focused on some woman's A##! Michelle better keep a close eye on that idiot!
I had to laugh out loud when I saw this picture! It is emblematic of the Democrat Party! Obama's fall from grace will be hard. I can see the look in his eyes that it won't be long before he will be saying: "can you define the word SEX?"

He couldn't BEGIN to compete with the horn dog nasties of Bush

http://images.google.com/imgres...

[Sam]

Mr Family Values God speaks to ME ex-president, Bush the volleyball "handler"

http://images.google.com/imgres...

[WVA70]

Tommy Brown is Right wrote:

Here is the family values president at work: http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/wor... . We have another Bill Clinton in the making! The world is going through a financial crash and Obama is focused on some woman's A##! Michelle better keep a close eye on that idiot!
I had to laugh out loud when I saw this picture! It is emblematic of the Democrat Party! Obama's fall from grace will be hard. I can see the look in his eyes that it won't be long before he will be saying: "can you define the word SEX?"

I agree Tommy. He was looking at her in such a lewd manner. It's a matter of time before he starts touching.

[Sam]

Sam wrote:

Mr Family Values God speaks to ME ex-president, Bush the volleyball "handler"
http://images.google.com/imgres...

Lewd what you want? Take a look at Bush and his bad drunk self at the Chinese olympics. And he is doing this in front of Laura. Ah, republican values.

[Sam]

Say. Why is it all the republicans that followed Newt are now having affairs and cheating on their wives? This is the group who promised the nation morality after Clinton was impeached. Seems the term hypocrite falls on them pretty hard. Here you are one day preaching about being faithful and the next day you're using tax dollar money to have affairs or your mom and dad are paying hush money.

Is religion that superficial that it doesn't work?

[Sam]

Seems as though yet another hysterical lie is being exposed by the media against the republican party. Liars and crooks and hypocrites. Republicans just can't seem to stop being who they are.

http://www.yahoo.com/

[Just Asking]

Requiter2008 wrote:

<quoted text> That's evident.
<quoted text>
Abortion is a life saving procedure that can spare a womans life.

It is also a dangerous procedure that can end a womans life. It is a medical procedure. What do you expect? ALSO, statistically women REGRET the decision to have an abortion just as he said, physically, emotionally and spiritually.
The procedure can also result in a womans inability to have future children, or as you democrats call it, future abortions.

[Just Asking]

CONCEDED DEFEAT? You are the one who is stepping back from my argument. YOU ARE beyond BLUE BLOOD. If Satan was running against a Jesus Christ you would still vote for Satan because he was a democrat.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE, without resorting to name calling, and degrading personal epitaphs why don't you call me up on my challenge.
I challenge you to create a list of EVIL, criminal Republicans. I will make a list of Democrats that fall into the same category.
The winner will be the person with the larger, longer list.

If YOU REFUSE, then you are conceding defeat.
This will be a big eye opening experience for you.

[Sam]

Just Asking wrote:

CONCEDED DEFEAT? You are the one who is stepping back from my argument. YOU ARE beyond BLUE BLOOD. If Satan was running against a Jesus Christ you would still vote for Satan because he was a democrat.
PLAIN AND SIMPLE, without resorting to name calling, and degrading personal epitaphs why don't you call me up on my challenge.
I challenge you to create a list of EVIL, criminal Republicans. I will make a list of Democrats that fall into the same category.
The winner will be the person with the larger, longer list.
If YOU REFUSE, then you are conceding defeat.
This will be a big eye opening experience for you.

Give it up Ashville. You lost. Change the subject in a new thread. See if anyone cares.

BTW, how do you define a hypocrite? AND you already conceded defeat.

[WVA70]

Sam wrote:

<quoted text>
Give it up Ashville. You lost. Change the subject in a new thread. See if anyone cares.
BTW, how do you define a hypocrite? AND you already conceded defeat.

Don't put words in someone's mouth and don't answer a question with a question. Sound familiar? How do you define Ranae and Cookie_Parker and others all over these forums? Are you all the same, even forgetting to change your name and answering your own posts with a post? LOL.

[Sam]

WVA70 wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't put words in someone's mouth and don't answer a question with a question. Sound familiar? How do you define Ranae and Cookie_Parker and others all over these forums? Are you all the same, even forgetting to change your name and answering your own posts with a post? LOL.

You are a subject changer. And I forgot. To you republicans there is really only one democrat on these forums.

So, how about it? You concede defeat old delusional one who sees ghosts? Do you know what the topic of this thread is? Are you embarrassed yet about not being able to defend those religious wing nuts who think god has appointed them and all rules do not apply to them, Ensign and Sanford?

The movement in the U.S. is incorporated in the United States as a tax-free 501(c)(3) organization operating under the name The Fellowship Foundation. While they conduct no fundraising operations, they reported revenues of more than $12 million in 2003 from donations. Its mission statement is:

To develop and maintain an informal association of people banded together, to go out as "ambassadors of reconciliation," modeling the principles of Jesus, based on loving God and loving others. To work with the leaders of other nations, and as their hearts are touched, the poor, the oppressed, the widows and the youth of their country will be impacted in a positive manner. It is said that youth groups will be developed under the thoughts of Jesus, including loving others as you want to be loved.

Their primary activity is to develop small support groups for members of Congress, businesspersons, and anyone else who is interested in the teachings of Jesus. Prayer groups have met in the Pentagon and at the Department of Defense. They have connections to the CIA.[5]

There is no official membership of the group. Most members of Congress who participate are from the Republican Party but some Democrats such as Hillary Clinton, Doug Coe has been a spiritual mentor for Clinton, participate as well.[6][7]

Senators who have been cited as members of the organization include Don Nickles and James Inhofe of Oklahoma, Charles Grassley of Iowa, Pete Domenici of New Mexico, John Ensign of Nevada, Bill Nelson of Florida, Conrad Burns of Montana. Members of the House who have been cited as participants include Frank Wolf of Virginia and Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania.

South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford is also a member of The Family.[1]

[WVA70]

Sam wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a subject changer. And I forgot. To you republicans there is really only one democrat on these forums.
So, how about it? You concede defeat old delusional one who sees ghosts? Do you know what the topic of this thread is? Are you embarrassed yet about not being able to defend those religious wing nuts who think god has appointed them and all rules do not apply to them, Ensign and Sanford?
The movement in the U.S. is incorporated in the United States as a tax-free 501(c)(3) organization operating under the name The Fellowship Foundation. While they conduct no fundraising operations, they reported revenues of more than $12 million in 2003 from donations. Its mission statement is:
To develop and maintain an informal association of people banded together, to go out as "ambassadors of reconciliation," modeling the principles of Jesus, based on loving God and loving others. To work with the leaders of other nations, and as their hearts are touched, the poor, the oppressed, the widows and the youth of their country will be impacted in a positive manner. It is said that youth groups will be developed under the thoughts of Jesus, including loving others as you want to be loved.
Their primary activity is to develop small support groups for members of Congress, businesspersons, and anyone else who is interested in the teachings of Jesus. Prayer groups have met in the Pentagon and at the Department of Defense. They have connections to the CIA.[5]
There is no official membership of the group. Most members of Congress who participate are from the Republican Party but some Democrats such as Hillary Clinton, Doug Coe has been a spiritual mentor for Clinton, participate as well.[6][7]
Senators who have been cited as members of the organization include Don Nickles and James Inhofe of Oklahoma, Charles Grassley of Iowa, Pete Domenici of New Mexico, John Ensign of Nevada, Bill Nelson of Florida, Conrad Burns of Montana. Members of the House who have been cited as participants include Frank Wolf of Virginia and Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania.
South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford is also a member of The Family.[1]

Yeh Ranae; oh I mean Cookie_Parker; no I mean Sam, there are numerous democRAT hypocrites. Why didn't you answer "just asking's" question. That's because democRAT hypocrites far out number republicans. And yes, I did change the subject because I think it is hiliarious that you get on here and pretend to be more than one person in support of the democRAT hypocrites . Concede, concede, concede, when I concede, as you call it, I'll be the first to let you know. Go take you anti-psychotic meds.

[Sam]

WVA70 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeh Ranae; oh I mean Cookie_Parker; no I mean Sam, there are numerous democRAT hypocrites. Why didn't you answer "just asking's" question. That's because democRAT hypocrites far out number republicans. And yes, I did change the subject because I think it is hiliarious that you get on here and pretend to be more than one person in support of the democRAT hypocrites . Concede, concede, concede, when I concede, as you call it, I'll be the first to let you know. Go take you anti-psychotic meds.

You really believe there's only one person who gets the IP server address of Indianpolis? Are you that void of internet action? Let me advise you. I can find right now about 15 people on various topix forum who post like you do from where you do. Do you really think people are that unique? As to your problem figuring out why there are more than one user of Indianapolis IP server addresses then it's for both AT&T and Comcast. Clue to clueless WVA persona. Not everyone on an Indianapolis IP server address lives in Indiana.

But hey, you deflected from the topic furthering showing your inability to discuss anything. You lose an argument and off goes the tangent.

Stay in the hills man. You are clueless about not only politics on here.

[WVA70]

Sam wrote:

<quoted text>
You really believe there's only one person who gets the IP server address of Indianpolis? Are you that void of internet action? Let me advise you. I can find right now about 15 people on various topix forum who post like you do from where you do. Do you really think people are that unique? As to your problem figuring out why there are more than one user of Indianapolis IP server addresses then it's for both AT&T and Comcast. Clue to clueless WVA persona. Not everyone on an Indianapolis IP server address lives in Indiana.
But hey, you deflected from the topic furthering showing your inability to discuss anything. You lose an argument and off goes the tangent.
Stay in the hills man. You are clueless about not only politics on here.

I never said anything about Indianapolis, Indiana and I never said nothing about an IP address. I am clearly aware of IP addresses and provider locations. We all have one unique IP address, but many have the same provider locations. You came to this conclusion, not me, so why are you changing the subject? Are there so few democRAT supporters that you have to pretend to be one of many faces? LOL.

[Just Asking]

Sam wrote:

<quoted text>
Give it up Ashville. You lost. Change the subject in a new thread. See if anyone cares.
BTW, how do you define a hypocrite? AND you already conceded defeat.

You democrates do not understand. While I agree that the two men are definately hypocrites I did not concede that they make all other republicans immoral.

You fail to see that I have challenged your dear friend and fellow democrat to a challenge that he knows better than to accept.
This makes him a coward, another form of democrat.

[Sam]

Just Asking wrote:

<quoted text>
You democrates do not understand. While I agree that the two men are definately hypocrites I did not concede that they make all other republicans immoral.
You fail to see that I have challenged your dear friend and fellow democrat to a challenge that he knows better than to accept.
This makes him a coward, another form of democrat.

YOu made the immoral case. That's a strawman. I don't think it was ever an issue.

It is a bogus challenge because he never made the claim that all republicans are immoral. You made the claim. You back it up. Show an honest moral republican.

[Sam]

WVA70 wrote:

<quoted text>
I never said anything about Indianapolis, Indiana and I never said nothing about an IP address. I am clearly aware of IP addresses and provider locations. We all have one unique IP address, but many have the same provider locations. You came to this conclusion, not me, so why are you changing the subject? Are there so few democRAT supporters that you have to pretend to be one of many faces? LOL.

Your claim was I was two other people. You made the claim.

Now you are changing your stand. Twist and shout all you want. You gave yourself away. I think Indiana voted for Obama. I think there are more than one person in Indiana.

[WVA70]

Ha, ha, ha. I am beginning to feel so sorry for you. You refuse to give a concise answer by making false statements. You are unable to discuss anything in a precise manner. I SAID that you are on Topix pretending to be more than one person in your support for democRATS. You pretend to be Ranae, Cookie_Parker, Sam and others. You have also replied to your own posts Ranae. Nowhere did I mention that I knew you were more than one person by your IP address or location, so don't add your own words to MY statement. You are more amusing than informative. You give yourself away throughout the Topix forum. LOL.