Judge adds to jurisdictions' speed-camera dilemmasCalls enforcement in his Ohio district a - hig
There are 3 comments on the washingtontimes.com story from Mar 13, 2013, titled Judge adds to jurisdictions' speed-camera dilemmasCalls enforcement in his Ohio district a - hig. In it, washingtontimes.com reports that:
A judge in a county north of Cincinnati has issued a blistering ruling calling a small town's use of traffic cameras nothing more than a scam - a sensitive subject in the D.C. area where many motorists think automated enforcement is nothing more than a cash cow for local governments.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at washingtontimes.com.
#1 Mar 16, 2013
How is it possible that letters are still being sent out summoning people to hearings in Elmwood Place? This whole process has been ruled an unconstitutional sham - what are people supposed to do?
#2 Jun 30, 2013
I support any thing that will slow cars down.Too many people are probably upset that the cameras cant be programmed with the good old boy some can some cant system.How hard is it to read and obey a speed limit sign.
#3 Aug 29, 2013
Why not report these clowns for mail fraud. When they were under injunction they were clearly on the wrong side of the law. Since Ohio is too chicken to prosecute these thieves, maybe the Post Office can look into it.
Add your comments below
|Ex-police chief has sex crimes erased from record (Feb '14)||Jun 18||silver||10|
|Lockland Marathon||Jun 12||Last Laugh||1|
|Woodlawn income taxes||Jun 10||snatch1||1|
|Court ruling: What's at stake for married gay c...||Apr '15||eJohn||8|
|anyone seen moonseed?||Apr '15||dietmike85||2|
|so bored!||Apr '15||dietmike85||1|
|civil action initiated against village of lockland (Sep '09)||Apr '15||ANON||24|
Find what you want!
Search Lockland Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC