Judge gets stern after latest Floyd d...

Judge gets stern after latest Floyd delay

There are 34 comments on the www.theunionleader.com story from Jan 23, 2009, titled Judge gets stern after latest Floyd delay. In it, www.theunionleader.com reports that:

The defendant is told to pay court costs and that he needs to get along with a lawyer.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.theunionleader.com.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#22 Feb 27, 2009
sophie bean wrote:
LSD, you are the LAST person who should be criticizing him, since your tactics are identical.
REALLY they are? I don't have a blog that is in lockdown mode from public comment, or prevent ANYONE from expressing their views. I don't forge signatures nor do I harass, humiliate and lie about government officals.

You received an apology from me which is more than I can say I received from you for all your insulting comments. It is YOU who can't let it go, not me, and keeps dragging it up.
Going going gone

Bullhead City, AZ

#23 Mar 6, 2009

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#24 Mar 7, 2009
he was railroaded
sophie bean

Waitsfield, VT

#25 Mar 8, 2009
Lower Slower Delaware wrote:
<quoted text>REALLY they are? I don't have a blog that is in lockdown mode from public comment, or prevent ANYONE from expressing their views. I don't forge signatures nor do I harass, humiliate and lie about government officals.
You received an apology from me which is more than I can say I received from you for all your insulting comments. It is YOU who can't let it go, not me, and keeps dragging it up.
How fascinating.
An "apology" - get your dictionary - is "I'm sorry, I was wrong" and not "how stupid of you to take offense at my lies about you."
An apology would include "I really have no idea about the accuracy of my source" or, more correctly, "my source was assuming that you are someone online who has posted and IS a relative of Liko Kenney's - I now understand that you are not that person."

Again, it's not an apology, and is not accepted. I'll "let it go" when I see a REAL apology. No, you'll be sorry to hear, I am not holding my breath until that happens.

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#26 Mar 8, 2009
At the time I was told the information about you I had no reason to doubt the 3 sources. They unlike you did speak to me on the telephone and provide me with information to verify who they were. I'm not going to say "my source was assuming" when the person unequivocably swore that you and she were sisters. You can take it up with that person not me!

You say you aren't the person they claim you are so I APOLOGIZE FOR BELIEVING THEM.

Now there is your apology, now move on and keep your snide barbs directed at me to yourself.
sophie bean

Waitsfield, VT

#27 Mar 9, 2009
I'd be delighted to take it up with that person if they weren't quite so chickenshit as to remain anonymous.
Bring it.

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#28 Mar 9, 2009
sophie bean wrote:
I'd be delighted to take it up with that person if they weren't quite so chickenshit as to remain anonymous.
Bring it.
You're welcome for the apology.....I won't hold it waiting for a thanks from you......it's easier to bitch.

You're anonymous as well ......so your posturing about "bring it" is meaningless.

I'll be more than happy to give you the names, emails sent to me and phone numbers of the 3 people but I'm not doing it in this forums.

“We Surround Them”

Since: Mar 09

NJ and NH

#29 Mar 10, 2009
Curiosity wrote:
DTRT:
You have to be a family member or wife of. Let him serve his time and hopefully get some mental health services....stop trying to protect him...he needs help.
I have never met Mr. Floyd. I have to wonder... if you didn't do anything wrong, had your rights trampled by the DOS, the media, C. King, Judges... would you just blindly let them cart you off to jail if you could not afford an attorney? Mr. Floyd has consistantly said his rights are being violated... he hasn't talked to the media... can Alma Jean, the Kenney Family, witnesses like Brett Beausoleil or Leavitt say the same thing?
sophie bean

Waitsfield, VT

#30 Mar 11, 2009
Lower Slower Delaware wrote:
<quoted text>You're welcome for the apology.....I won't hold it waiting for a thanks from you......it's easier to bitch.
You're anonymous as well ......so your posturing about "bring it" is meaningless.
I'll be more than happy to give you the names, emails sent to me and phone numbers of the 3 people but I'm not doing it in this forums.
How charming. YOU, LSD, let's not forget, are the one who accused me in this forum for disagreeing with you because I was LK's aunt. You offered zero proof for your completely false and absolutely unsubstantiated lie. And you act as if it is MY obligation to disprove your LIE, made by someone who is still so cowardly as to refuse to come forward and say "I was wrong" - who will not be identified to this day. If you think for one miscrosecond that I would give you any way to contact me personally, you are out of your mind. The burden of "proof" lies entirely and exclusively with you and your cowardly source, and I assume that anyone reading here has the brains to realize that neither you nor your cowardly "source" has the slightest shred of proof that your claims are anything but totally fabricated horseshit.

And now, any of you can believe any damn thng you please, I am finished with you.

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#31 Mar 11, 2009
Sophie,
You asked for an apology, and you demanded an apology, you got it now get lost. I don't want your personal information I can't be bothered. You are as insignificant as my alcoholic drug abusing ex wife. Furthermore you can stuff your holier than thou attitude and "bring it" attitude where the sun doesn't shine.
The only shit of any kind coming forth is from you, you talk out of both sides of your mouth condemning King in one post and defending him in another.
As far as the coward comment F**K YOU, I put my real name out there and got the stick shoved up my ass and broke off while you were busy praising King. So who's side are you really on ?

I knew you wouldn't be enough of a person to woman up and offer an apology for all the untruthful horseshit posts you made about me, but that's okay because the readers all know who the bigger person really is.

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#32 Mar 11, 2009
Sophie lets not forget all the things you accused me of for months in these forums either. Of course that's just your King type hypocrisy shining through.
sophie bean

Waitsfield, VT

#33 Mar 11, 2009
"All the things" of which I've accused you...
Yes, let's ennumerate, shall we?

1) using the same "debating style" as CK?

2) insisting that I am LK's aunt with NO proof

3) calling CK a "tarbaby" and then claiming that it wasn't a racist slur

See, the problem is really semantics because I tend to understand "accusation" as something quite different than you do.
IF you really want to pursue this (trust me, you do not), please clarify:
1) you don't use precisely the same tone and level of discourse as CK?
2) who your source is for insisting that I am LK's aunt, or failing that, anything that resembles proof of the same - and if you can and will do neither (as we both know right now is the case), I strongly suggest that you shut the heck up
3) explain again to me how the use of the word "tarbaby" in this context is not a racist slur

And by the way, genius, being able to see CK's points of concern while completely detesting his methods is not "hypocrisy."

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#34 Mar 11, 2009
King's points of concern, KING's an anarchist. EXACTLY what defense is there for anyone murdering a police officer in the line of duty?
sophie bean

Waitsfield, VT

#35 Mar 11, 2009
Have I EVER, for one single solitary second, implied in any way, anywhere, that LK was "justified" in murdering (the word that I have used consistently) McKay? No.
Have I agreed with Chris King that there are reasons for concern about LE behavior overall in this area of NH? Yes.
Have I agreed with CK that Kelly Ayotte's acquittal of Gregory Floyd BEFORE any kind of investigation had been BEGUN was completely inappropriate and likely illegal? Yes.
For what it's worth, I tend to agree that King is an anarchist.
Therefore, since we know that no anarchist in history has EVER had a SHRED of justification for their position, no one is EVER allowed to agree with such a person about ANYTHING.

What the hell?
There might even be one or two things that I would agree with Rush Limbaugh or Dick Cheney about (actually, I like flyfishing, so I DO agree woth Cheney about something - must be a sign of the apocalypse)
Is that considered "hypocrisy"?
*rolleyes*

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Littleton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chris and Loretta case Jul 24 curouis 1
News Man drowns while swimming in northern NH brook Jul '17 gruntled 1
PATRIC McCARTHY: THE REAL EVIDENCE (Aug '11) May '17 gruntled 1,385
Murder in Campton (Feb '06) Mar '17 camp david 102
Affordable vacation/retirement/year round Manuf... Mar '17 Kellixoxo 1
A plea for information - Do you know what happ... (Sep '16) Sep '16 letsfindanswers 1
Shaw's Sucks! (Aug '09) Sep '16 Sherpa 26

Littleton Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Littleton Mortgages