Dirtbag and Maura Murray

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#133 Nov 16, 2012
sounds threatening.Why does Beagle scare the police so much?First amendment.
hannah_b

Sweden

#134 Nov 17, 2012
Mar Shill wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason for that "hannah" is quite simple ... you are Beagle (i.e., the scumbag Alden Olsen, who posted those awful videos because he, meaning you "hannah," are so self-involved and mentally ill that you think it is okay for you to make use of a sad missing person in disgraceful manner to bring attention to yourself, constantly foul up otherwise meaningful public discourse about the case, and mitigate your pitiful loneliness through those awful films you made and posted, as well as the waste of words and space you post on various forums). And the simple HS level trick you are using to get your your post to show up as being from Sweden, which does not fool anyone, sometimes causes your posts to post twice.
You are one of the most disgraceful and disgusting people I have ever come across Alden.
I am not Beagle nor have I anything to do with his stupid videos. Anyone who has average language skills should be able to tell the difference between my posts and Beagleīs. no matter what moniker he uses. This is just ridiculous. And Beagle, stop using my name. Why donīt you post under your real name like you do at websleuths.
hannah_b

Sweden

#135 Nov 17, 2012
Northwestern DA wrote:
<quoted text>
Disgraceful and disgusting is absolutely correct. We are going to crush him and his Detective Dirtbag blog and his stupid new video like the garbage can maggot he really is. Lt. Robin Whitney has already ordered Det. Ricky MacMillan to make him squirm and then kick him off his attention-hogging internet stage for good. Alden Howes Olson, aka Beagle and many other names, will soon be gone for good. Nothing will be left of him. Nothing.
I seriously doubt this person is really a DA. A DA would know he might lose his job over postings such as these.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#136 Nov 17, 2012
hannah_b wrote:
<quoted text>
Why donīt you post under your real name like you do at websleuths.
You mean like this?
hannah_b

Sweden

#137 Nov 17, 2012
Alden Howes Olson wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like this?
Yes. Thank you.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#138 Nov 17, 2012
Varsagod!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#139 Nov 19, 2012
Happy Thanksgiving to Jack Levin.

&fe ature=plcp
John Green

Easley, SC

#141 Jan 16, 2013
I feel the Beagle should be banned from the Internet for all eternity and everything that he has ever written, filmed or otherwise appeared in, said or wrote or whatever should be completed deleted from all sites and all the world internet back up sites in eastern Europe. Then he should be exiled from the United States. That's just how I feel. My two cents.
Shack

Groton, MA

#142 Jan 16, 2013
John Green wrote:
I feel the Beagle should be banned from the Internet for all eternity and everything that he has ever written, filmed or otherwise appeared in, said or wrote or whatever should be completed deleted from all sites and all the world internet back up sites in eastern Europe. Then he should be exiled from the United States. That's just how I feel. My two cents.
Agree, add my two cents....

“"Dancing with wolves"”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#143 Jan 17, 2013
John Green wrote:
I feel the Beagle should be banned from the Internet for all eternity and everything that he has ever written, filmed or otherwise appeared in, said or wrote or whatever should be completed deleted from all sites and all the world internet back up sites in eastern Europe. Then he should be exiled from the United States. That's just how I feel. My two cents.
While I've never condoned the vidios and I've not always agreed with everything Beagle has said, he has said some interesting and intelligent things through the years.I think your punishment is a little harsh for the crime? Exile him from the US?? Seriously?

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#144 Jan 18, 2013
Have to say I agree with wowzer on this one.

Jackassery at its finest, though more compassionate than saying he deserves a beating I suppose. Maybe I should wait around to see if "exiling" is compassionate code for "sending on a free vacation." If that is the case, sign me up to be exiled as well. So far their collection is up to four cents. I wonder how much it costs to get someone exiled these days?

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#145 Jan 18, 2013
And of course IMHO you are both correct. Not that I need to tell either of you that.

Isn't always amazing how many people think that free speech should only be in the domain of certain people? But anyone that doesn't think or agree with them, they shouldn't have that right?

If you don't agree with him you have two options. You can attempt to change others minds with your free speech rights, or you can ignore it. Then there are the ones who want tar and feathering, or exile or complete and total censorship of others views.

I wish history/citizenship classes in this country taught, along with other things, that the specific reason the amendment was put there by the founding fathers was so that DISSENTING/OTHER/CONTRARY opinions would always be able to be heard. Not for the masses. If his speech rises to the level of being illegal there are ways to deal with that as well. I don't think it does. Unpleasant speech can be ugly but it is protected.

Bill
sophie bean

Farmington, ME

#146 Jan 18, 2013
Agree with Wowzer, Amy and WTH, which happens rather rarely. I thought Beagle at best insane and at worst a jerk and maybe a danger, mostly to himself, but if we're gonna start banishing and punishing everyone with whom we disagree, it's gonna get pretty nasty.

On the other hand, reviling and ridiculing posters whose opinions differ from your own, as is happening currently on the other thread, with some of the same players as here, is pretty much the same damn thing, now isn't it?
Nancy France

Houston, TX

#148 Jul 2, 2014
The only dirtbag in Maura's besides the person who killed or took her is JAMES RENNER . This man knows dick so he blames her poor dad . Problem is people , many, saw Maura during the wreck . Nobody saw Fred . I wish Fred would file a suit against this hack scumbag liar .
brad

New London, CT

#149 Dec 2, 2014
why let a 50y/o guy who lives in his parents basement and chronically masturbates have one second of thought in your head?really look at him, god punished him with his looks far worse than anyone else can! thats why he has to masturbate all the time
KaliChaos

Spring Hill, FL

#151 Apr 11, 2016
Beagle wrote:
The private investigators associated with the Maura Murray case are, like those in other unsolved cases of the murdered or vanished, a bunch of ambulance chasers. They come out of the woodwork and attach themselves to the families of the victims with claims of great but phony sympathy. They say they offer free service in the name of justice and victims' rights, but they seek only self-promotion.
They accomplish this by the repeated use of the same strategy. They dangle a pet suspect or so-called "person of interest" in front of the family. They often call attention to these POIs by vaguely associating them with their alleged proximity to a crime scene, or the availability to them of a suspicious vehicle, or their resemblance to a sketch.
Not surprisingly, these efforts rarely, if ever, pan out. The cases of Molly Bish and Holly Piirainen are two examples. Several times PIs have come up with their pet suspects. News coverage has been carefully orchestrated to associate not only the POI with a sensational crime, but to, in effect, advertise the services and skill of the PI by crediting him with uncovering a so-far "hidden" criminal.
Remember Tom Shamshak's "discovery" of Rodney Stanger, someone he virtually accused of having murdered Molly Bish solely on the basis of Stanger's supposed access to a white car, his vague resemblance to a sketch, and a mere ten minute conversation Shamshak had with Stanger? Shamshak got great press out of his claim, which amounts to terrific free advertising and a boost to his prestige. But the actual case went nowhere because real cops didn't buy it. How easy it is -- and how cowardly - to promote yourself at the expense of a mentally disturbed, imprisoned criminal.
The PIs that have attached themselves to the Maura Murray case, like those in the Bish and Piirainen cases, are leeches. They are worse than the psychics and oddly named forensic astrologers that keep trying to take advantage of the pain and confusion of a victim's family members. They maintain their "presence" in the case, and thereby their contact with family, by participating in online threads and chat-rooms, by being Google detectives.
The battle lines in these internet confrontations, such as those seen in the Topix/Franconia threads, are increasingly clearly drawn. Each side has its proxy proponents, its meanly aggressive avengers, its sock puppets.
The PIs are like snake oil salesmen. They appear to offer great virtue, comfort, and eventual resolution, but they thrive on nothing more than false innuendo, puffed-up rumor, and virtual lies.
Rather funny to call someone out for being a coward and a leech with all things considered. Seems a tad bit hypocritical but you clearly like the attention don't you. Feeling grand yet? Superior maybe? They all do. A well deserved "downfall" will be entertainingly sufficient....

Since: Aug 16

Location hidden

#154 Aug 31, 2016
Beagle wrote:
Barring really exceptional circumstances, LE is not in the business of concealing an adult runaway's identity. If Maura took off, they are not going to waste their time on court hearings, putting her on a cold case list, etc. There's a good chance that Maura had some apparent injury and LE could not rule out its source, which I doubt was domestic. An apparent injury could easily explain both why Maura's photo from the ATM was not released and why Atwood's ID of her was relied upon by police (because it was specific enough, it went beyond just a jacket and jeans).

The Hadley police officer would never have given Maura a break simply because he took pity on her or because she was crying. In Hadley, this does not happen even in a case of shoplifting, let alone drunk driving. The liability is too high. What if she jumped into another car and killed someone? There would be a record that the officer had let her go. The officer is not going to be that stupid or irresponsible. It's not like Maura was the sister of the police chief and so the responding officer gave her a ride home.

Neuro-muscular diseases exist on a continuum. Those with Multiple Sclerosis, for example, have good days and bad days. The side-effects of drugs can also be very episodic. Maura may have been able to drive a car properly some of the time, but not all the time. Maybe her Saturn ran fine, but she or her family said otherwise in order to conceal her inability to drive well. After all, don't most athletes, especially as teens, get their permit and license asap? Why the delay?

1. Maura got her license, if the story is true, about three years after her contemporaries.

2. Maura did not drive the Saturn much, perhaps not because of some mechanical problem with the car but because of some problem with her arms and legs, with her reaction time.

3. Maura had two crashes in two days. She may have had three crashes in four days if she hit Vasi. She was not arrested for Hadley/Corolla crash, so she probably was not driving drunk.

4. Maura was probably positively identified by Atwood because of something unique about her appearance, such as an injury.

5. The ATM video was probably withheld because of something unique about Maura's appearance - probably the same thing Atwood noticed.

6. Maura could no longer run well competitively.

Put it all together and it looks more like a case of someone with some kind of disease who decided to get away. Maybe for good. Since there was no indication that she entered the woods, and very little likelihood of her having been the victim of an opportunistic abduction, then she probably was traveling with someone who was driving another vehicle. But why take two vehicles, especially if one doesn't run very well and isn't worth much?

I'm not trying to exclude other possibilities; after all, there are many to choose from. I am simply trying to point out some things that have not received much attention.
Maura was never positively identified by Atwood. Ever. He said something to the effect that "he thought it was her or could be her"
Rachel

Pittsford, NY

#155 Dec 15, 2016
Beagle wrote:
Seems the "Maura Murray & Dirtbag" thread has been rendered inaccessible, at least for the past 20-24 hours. Maybe some kind of Topix glitch. Who knows. Below is what Beagle posted on the now-inaccessible "Maura Murray and Dirtbag" thread.

BTW, don't overlook the "Warning from Italy" thread, too.
******
Instead, let's go with a much older male over 40 and very married had become quite frenzied when this young woman would not let go of their relationship. In fact she had moved back to the area to resume, continue their relationship? Even though he lived in....for something different, something new...let's say he lived north of Boston, but still in MA. Let's go with that. Two accidents within a short time? Nothing like a stressful relationship tug of war to get one's mind off her driving. He wanted to make up with her after one more heated, hurtful argument. He, "Honey, I'm sorry let's get back together, make up." How cozy, Valentine's day that week? He had a plan for her which did not include happily ever after? He banked on the fact that several other young women had disappeared in NH and people would believe the same perp had abducted Maura. She made preparations to spend the week with him. He knew this was not about to happen. Let's try this theory. They did not travel in tandem....he drove north from eastern MA...she drove north from Amherst, planning to meet. She knew he would be by, this is why she refused assistance from the bus driver. This is why she took that route. Friends, acquaintances described her as secretive. When tears began flowing, her married gent became fearful that she might blow the whistle on their relationship, maybe she was threatening to tell the wife. Maybe she had called his house. Who knows. What we do know is that Maura remains missing.
Det Columbo

Ellsworth, ME

#156 Dec 18, 2016
Rachel wrote:
<quoted text>

******
Instead, let's go with a much older male over 40 and very married had become quite frenzied when this young woman would not let go of their relationship. In fact she had moved back to the area to resume, continue their relationship? Even though he lived in....for something different, something new...let's say he lived north of Boston, but still in MA. Let's go with that. Two accidents within a short time? Nothing like a stressful relationship tug of war to get one's mind off her driving. He wanted to make up with her after one more heated, hurtful argument. He, "Honey, I'm sorry let's get back together, make up." How cozy, Valentine's day that week? He had a plan for her which did not include happily ever after? He banked on the fact that several other young women had disappeared in NH and people would believe the same perp had abducted Maura. She made preparations to spend the week with him. He knew this was not about to happen. Let's try this theory. They did not travel in tandem....he drove north from eastern MA...she drove north from Amherst, planning to meet. She knew he would be by, this is why she refused assistance from the bus driver. This is why she took that route. Friends, acquaintances described her as secretive. When tears began flowing, her married gent became fearful that she might blow the whistle on their relationship, maybe she was threatening to tell the wife. Maybe she had called his house. Who knows. What we do know is that Maura remains missing.
Sounds like You know more about the story than most. This does not seem like just your theory.

WHAT DO YOU REALLY KNOW....??
Nhp311

Concord, NH

#157 Dec 18, 2016
jwb wrote:
<quoted text>

Wow Dude- I never picked up or ever thought that hannah was beagle Ever- I know the folks that like to just pick on people rather than care or talk about Maura are big into moniker changes while blaming others for the same thing. Wowzer and Snowey are the two biggest culprits that come to mind. A matter of fact Snowey doesn't even go by Snowey any more Okay? Nobody calls her out right Wowzer? aka Bart
Jwb is an angry little troll. Pay him no mind. He loves to hear himself blab.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Littleton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Affordable vacation/retirement/year round Manuf... Mar 15 Kellixoxo 1
Murder in Campton (Feb '06) Feb '17 Det Columbo 101
COlumbos HOuse of SPam (Mar '14) Jan '17 John Green 372
News Bethlehem postmark adds a holy touch Dec '16 Norris God of Thu... 20
now we hear on cnn russia may send more e mails Nov '16 vote for hillary 1
A plea for information - Do you know what happ... (Sep '16) Sep '16 letsfindanswers 1
Shaw's Sucks! (Aug '09) Sep '16 Sherpa 26

Littleton Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Littleton Mortgages