Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Carolina in 2010?

Posted in the Lexington Forum

Comments (Page 1,920)

Showing posts 38,381 - 38,400 of49,882
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39748
May 2, 2013
 
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> I'm here to say that Ted Cruz also believes that gun rights supporters will respond vigorously to the absurd attacks on law abiding gun owners, in the 2014 elections.What could be better than to see a republican stranglehold on the Senate and the House? Guess Bloomberg wasted his eleven million dollars on those"gun control"commercials.Too bad, he has a lot left.
I personally like Ted Cruz so far, he's a rising star within the party. I think we'll see Rand Paul running for the nomination in 2016, and could possible win to go head to head with Hillary. That being said, I really can't believe how hard the Cimmucrats are pushing Hillary, hasn't that horse died? Isn't there anybody else in the party that would make for a viable candidate? Between the Rulers lack of leadership and her lack of leadership in the Benghazi scandal, I would think she would be doomed but when you factor in the dumbing down of the dumbmasses, I guess anything is possible.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39749
May 2, 2013
 
TSF wrote:
You are purposefully blind. Business exists to make money. If the business cannot exist without sucking on the taxpayer's teat, we do not need them. When I spend $5 K on equipment for my business, I have to pay sales tax. When a furniture plant spends a million dollars on equipment, they do not have to pay sales tax. Both businesses provide jobs, so what is the difference? Answer: I do not have the profit margin to bribe politicians, the furniture manufacturers association does have the margin to bribe them. My business is lean and unsubsidized. The others are fat and sucking tax subsidized welfare off the NC taxpayers. Same as race car owners. When I can no longer show a profit, I will close down. That is how I like it and how it should be. The business baby momas are killing the economy and the working people of this state.
<quoted text>
I agree with the first part of your rant but it was you and your party that was singing a different tune when it came to the auto bailouts.....remember, they were to big to fail?
As a small business, you don't receive the tax breaks that large corporations do because of money. It's not the money they spend to bribe as you suggested, it's the money they generate for the tax base. If your business was generating tens of millions of tax dollars for the state then you too would be offered breaks to come or stay. You call it "sucking tax subsides" but IF YOU were offered the same subsidies, you'd jump all over them!

“Try”

Since: May 12

Houston

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39750
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>I personally like Ted Cruz so far, he's a rising star within the party. I think we'll see Rand Paul running for the nomination in 2016, and could possible win to go head to head with Hillary. That being said, I really can't believe how hard the Cimmucrats are pushing Hillary, hasn't that horse died? Isn't there anybody else in the party that would make for a viable candidate? Between the Rulers lack of leadership and her lack of leadership in the Benghazi scandal, I would think she would be doomed but when you factor in the dumbing down of the dumbmasses, I guess anything is possible.
Rand Paul...I hope not....he is not electable...On the up side, Hillary has been damaged by Benghazi, and may yet face a penalty for that.
TSF

Holly Springs, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39751
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Saying they generate tens of millions of dollars for the state is a stretch, particularly when you consider that they take even hundreds of millions in tax breaks, subsidies and forgiveness of property taxes. Everyone should pay the same sales tax rates .
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>I agree with the first part of your rant but it was you and your party that was singing a different tune when it came to the auto bailouts.....remember, they were to big to fail?
As a small business, you don't receive the tax breaks that large corporations do because of money. It's not the money they spend to bribe as you suggested, it's the money they generate for the tax base. If your business was generating tens of millions of tax dollars for the state then you too would be offered breaks to come or stay. You call it "sucking tax subsides" but IF YOU were offered the same subsidies, you'd jump all over them!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39753
May 2, 2013
 
TSF wrote:
Saying they generate tens of millions of dollars for the state is a stretch, particularly when you consider that they take even hundreds of millions in tax breaks, subsidies and forgiveness of property taxes. Everyone should pay the same sales tax rates .
<quoted text>
In your utopian world maybe they'll be world peace as well!
The bottom line is if NC doesn't offer these tax breaks, there's 49 other states that will.
NO company is offered more in tax breaks than they'll generate in taxes, that's absurd. These breaks are offered in order to lure or maintain a certain business while knowing full well they'll generate much more in taxes to recoup the breaks and then some!

“Try”

Since: May 12

Houston

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39754
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bring your businesses to Texas!
emlu

Henderson, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39755
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

waco1909 wrote:
Bring your businesses to Texas!
Sweetie, as long as your taking up dead space and masturbating with your Boy George doll, no one in their right mind would even think about bringing their business to Texas. Now have the orderlies change your diaper, get your bottle, give you your psycho injections and lock you back in your crib Sweetie.
TSF

Holly Springs, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39756
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

A prime example of paying zero sales tax and sucking off the taxpayer's teat is the Caldwell county deal 4 years ago when Broyhill (Furniture Brands Int.) was given over 4 million dollars in cash to actually cut jobs because they threatened to move if we didn't pay the extortion. Now Carolina Panthers owners have extorted 87 million dollars from Mecklenberg County taxpayers supposedly to build escalators in the BoA Stadium so the "sports fans" will not have to walk up stairs. They now claim that the Panthers are "teathered to Charlotte for 5 more years. Actually , Charlotte is the one which is teathered. The reason taxes on working people is so high is because the business baby mommas are sucking up tax dollars faster than working people can pay it in.. the incentive thing has gone way past incentives and into the area of dependency welfare for the rich.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>In your utopian world maybe they'll be world peace as well!
The bottom line is if NC doesn't offer these tax breaks, there's 49 other states that will.
NO company is offered more in tax breaks than they'll generate in taxes, that's absurd. These breaks are offered in order to lure or maintain a certain business while knowing full well they'll generate much more in taxes to recoup the breaks and then some!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39757
May 2, 2013
 
TSF wrote:
A prime example of paying zero sales tax and sucking off the taxpayer's teat is the Caldwell county deal 4 years ago when Broyhill (Furniture Brands Int.) was given over 4 million dollars in cash to actually cut jobs because they threatened to move if we didn't pay the extortion. Now Carolina Panthers owners have extorted 87 million dollars from Mecklenberg County taxpayers supposedly to build escalators in the BoA Stadium so the "sports fans" will not have to walk up stairs. They now claim that the Panthers are "teathered to Charlotte for 5 more years. Actually , Charlotte is the one which is teathered. The reason taxes on working people is so high is because the business baby mommas are sucking up tax dollars faster than working people can pay it in.. the incentive thing has gone way past incentives and into the area of dependency welfare for the rich.
<quoted text>
I don't know much about the Caldwell/Broyhill deal but I do know about the Clt/Panthers deal.
It was Mayor Foxx who approached Richardson about the city helping with the refurbishing of the stadium, NOT Richardson approaching the city. It's a known fact that Richardson is in poor health and it was Mayor Foxx who feared if Richardson passed then the new owner/owners would relocate the team. Again, it was Foxx who approached the team with the plan of using taxpayer dollars in exchange for a commitment from the team staying in Clt for the next 30 years. Both sides negotiated and compromised on LESS tax dollars than what was originally offered in exchange for a 15 year commitment,(regardless of who the owner is). This was actually smart on Foxx's behalf because the tax dollars allocated for the project would be returned in revenue for the city in less than 5 years, leaving another 10 for pure profit. Also, lets not forget that Richardson built the stadium using money generated from PSL's and his own pocket, NO TAX DOLLARS were used in the initial construction, so the city has actually been reaping the benefits for 18 years! I would say $125M tax dollars is just a small token of thanks for all Mr Richardson has done for Clt's economy!
As far as the city being "teathered", the $125M will be paid by a 1% increase in the food tax. If you don't want to support the deal, you don't have to eat in Clt, it's that simple. It's not like the city is taxing every Clt resident, ie. Cincy, Min, etc.
Since your "facts" were all wrong about the Clt/Panthers deal, it makes me wonder if they all wrong about the Caldwell/Broyhill deal as well!
TSF

Holly Springs, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39758
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Economic development is just an euphemism for corporate welfare. Another Caldwell County example is the New River Builders deal where Caldwell county taxpayers paid out $230,000 to New River Builders to "create" 35 jobs. I drive by there every day and have never seen more than 2 cars in the parking lot. So the jobs creation never happened. Did we get our money back? You guessed correctly if you said NO. Not only did we give corporate welfare to New River Builders, but we also gave them a competitive advantage over existing building supply businesses. This is the exact opposite of free enterprise brought to you by , you guessed it , republikans.
TSF

Holly Springs, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39759
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The "facts" are that 87 million dollars will be extorted from restaurants and their patrons to pay for sports arena upgrades. A true believer in free enterprise would not steal from and stress one business (restaurants) in order to subsidize another business(Panthers). What we have here is free enterprise in reverse, or not so subtlety concealed communism.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know much about the Caldwell/Broyhill deal but I do know about the Clt/Panthers deal.
It was Mayor Foxx who approached Richardson about the city helping with the refurbishing of the stadium, NOT Richardson approaching the city. It's a known fact that Richardson is in poor health and it was Mayor Foxx who feared if Richardson passed then the new owner/owners would relocate the team. Again, it was Foxx who approached the team with the plan of using taxpayer dollars in exchange for a commitment from the team staying in Clt for the next 30 years. Both sides negotiated and compromised on LESS tax dollars than what was originally offered in exchange for a 15 year commitment,(regardless of who the owner is). This was actually smart on Foxx's behalf because the tax dollars allocated for the project would be returned in revenue for the city in less than 5 years, leaving another 10 for pure profit. Also, lets not forget that Richardson built the stadium using money generated from PSL's and his own pocket, NO TAX DOLLARS were used in the initial construction, so the city has actually been reaping the benefits for 18 years! I would say $125M tax dollars is just a small token of thanks for all Mr Richardson has done for Clt's economy!
As far as the city being "teathered", the $125M will be paid by a 1% increase in the food tax. If you don't want to support the deal, you don't have to eat in Clt, it's that simple. It's not like the city is taxing every Clt resident, ie. Cincy, Min, etc.
Since your "facts" were all wrong about the Clt/Panthers deal, it makes me wonder if they all wrong about the Caldwell/Broyhill deal as well!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39760
May 2, 2013
 
TSF wrote:
The "facts" are that 87 million dollars will be extorted from restaurants and their patrons to pay for sports arena upgrades. A true believer in free enterprise would not steal from and stress one business (restaurants) in order to subsidize another business(Panthers). What we have here is free enterprise in reverse, or not so subtlety concealed communism.
<quoted text>
Seeing as how Clt is ran by the Commucrats, I could see the concealed communism argument, it's what the liberals are known for. That $87M will be recouped over a 30 year period, not exactly a major strain on those who eat out.
Exactly how is it stealing or putting stress on the restaurants?
My point is its not a tax on all Clt residents, rather those who choose to eat out. This also includes those who are just passing thru. Since I neither live nor eat in Clt, I could care less either way!

Since: May 13

Winston Salem, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39761
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

We need more minorities for judges !!!

“Try”

Since: May 12

Houston

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39762
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pro, you are a heck of an American! By the way, I thought you guys were against higher taxes? WTF?

“Try”

Since: May 12

Houston

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39763
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

By the way Pro, if you're still around, aside from Rand Paul, who do you think can motivate the republican base, as well as encourage younger voters to vote republican and grab some Southern Democrats?, Many republicans were successful in the past by getting crossover votes from the democrats, Reagan in particular.
martel

Fayetteville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39764
May 2, 2013
 
RR
TSF wrote:
Republikans are the American version of the Taliban. Pretending the female breast is a threat to society is just an excuse for trying to get their women under control. This is just a new twist on the old barefoot and pregnant tactic. Next republikans will have their women (and all women) wearing veils in public to prevent other men from being attracted . They are not so stupid as to believe that making more laws against something which is already illegal will make the events less likely. Republikans are just that insecure in their own manhood. They are sickos.
<quoted text>
Republilosers are just a little less scummy than da democraps, let's tell the truth here.TAliban? Right. Didn't the republicans go to war with da talibowels?
martel

Fayetteville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39765
May 2, 2013
 
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
How about a female weigh in on the issue of breast feeding and when and when it's not appropriate and why idiots need a breast feeding law. I have a friend and a cousin who both breast fed their children until age five. That's warped to me and pretty close to sex abuse. Breast feeding children far beyond the age of giving them a sippy cup is out of control. When a child is old enough to ask mom for the teet or reach in her blouse to grab the milk jug, laws need to be made. Breastfeeding is a natural and healthy way to feed a child during INFANCY. There are breast pumps to pump milk before leaving for an outing that a mother can use and there's no need to breastfeed in public. I don't like to see it and I'm a woman. To me it says "I'm a woman too lazy to pump milk and fix bottles before I leave and not have to whip out the jug or have my breasts leaking all over my blouse, so I'll just make not only myself uncomfortable but everyone around me."
Moar laws!! If a woman wants to breastfeed who cares? If a business owner doesn't like it, tell momma and kid to go somewhere else to feed and suckle. Or put one of those stickers on their business door showing a boob with a line going through it, problemo solved
martel

Fayetteville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39766
May 2, 2013
 
waco1909 wrote:
By the way Pro, if you're still around, aside from Rand Paul, who do you think can motivate the republican base, as well as encourage younger voters to vote republican and grab some Southern Democrats?, Many republicans were successful in the past by getting crossover votes from the democrats, Reagan in particular.
Republicans are on the demographic losing end of that stick with the democrats. Hispanics, blacks and asians vote overwhelmingly democratic.
martel

Fayetteville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39767
May 2, 2013
 
Huddin wrote:
We need more minorities for judges !!!
Yes, more minority judges!!! If we don't get more minorities, it means we hate minorities!! We don't want to be racccissss do we?
TSF

Holly Springs, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39768
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You think it will not cost restaurant owners to collect, record and pay in all those additional taxes. You think increasing the price of meals will not hurt their business? Adding tax to persons eating and giving the money to the Panthers isn't redistribution of wealth? Upward redistribution ( reverse Robin Hood) is just socialism for the rich. This welfare to the business baby mommas is slamming the working people. Its a republican form of communism.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Seeing as how Clt is ran by the Commucrats, I could see the concealed communism argument, it's what the liberals are known for. That $87M will be recouped over a 30 year period, not exactly a major strain on those who eat out.
Exactly how is it stealing or putting stress on the restaurants?
My point is its not a tax on all Clt residents, rather those who choose to eat out. This also includes those who are just passing thru. Since I neither live nor eat in Clt, I could care less either way!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 38,381 - 38,400 of49,882
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Lexington Discussions

Search the Lexington Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Woman charged with breaking into Thomasville home 10 hr WoW 1
Debate: Marijuana - Lexington, NC (Aug '10) Apr 19 Alex 21
The Bridge Church in Kernersville, NC (Feb '12) Apr 17 Noah 7
blonde guy at the gym Apr 15 curiosity 1
Review: Affordable Computers Apr 13 Rude 1
Review: Centro Musical Arco Iris Apr 8 ivan 1
Medical Treatment Apr 8 bato 1
•••
•••
•••
•••

Lexington Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Lexington People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••