criminal cyberbullying
wvlaws

Princeton, WV

#1 Dec 22, 2012
WEST VIRGINIA CODE
61-3C-14a. Obscene, anonymous, harassing and threatening communications by computer, cell phones and electronic communication devices; penalty.
(a) It is unlawful for any person, with the intent to harass or abuse another person, to use a computer, mobile phone, personal digital assistant or other electronic communication device to:
(1) Make contact with another without disclosing his or her identity with the intent to harass or abuse;
(2) Make contact with a person after being requested by the person to desist from contacting them;
(3) Threaten to commit a crime against any person or property; or
(4) Cause obscene material to be delivered or transmitted to a specific person after being requested to desist from sending such material.
(b) For purposes of this section:
(1) "Electronic communication device" means and includes a telephone, wireless phone, computer, pager or any other electronic or wireless device which is capable of transmitting a document, image, voice, e-mail or text message using such device in an electronic, digital or analog form from one person or location so it may be viewed or received by another person or persons at other locations.
(2) "use of a computer, mobile phone, personal digital assistant or other electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, the transmission of text messages, electronic mail, photographs, videos, images or other nonvoice data by means of an electronic communication system, and includes the transmission of such data, documents, messages and images to another's computer, e-mail account, mobile phone, personal digital assistant or other electronic communication device.
(3) "obscene material" means material that:
(A) An average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, would find, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, is intended to appeal to the prurient interest, or is pandered to a prurient interest;
(B) An average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, would find, depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexually explicit conduct consisting of an ultimate sexual act, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, an excretory function, masturbation, lewd exhibition of the genitals, or sadomasochistic sexual abuse; and
(C) A reasonable person would find, taken as a whole, lacks literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
(c) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly permit a computer, mobile phone or personal digital assistant or other electronic communication device under his or her control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.
(d) Any offense committed under this section may be determined to have occurred at the place at which the contact originated or the place at which the contact was received or intended to be received.
hayfeild

Reedy, WV

#2 Dec 22, 2012
its called freedom of speach
lulz

United States

#3 Dec 22, 2012
phawk the police!!
LOLZ

Elkview, WV

#4 Dec 22, 2012
Awww, someone got their feelings hurt by something someone said about them on Topix.... Because it was probably true... Waaaaaa!!!!
Realist

Loretto, MN

#5 Dec 23, 2012
hayfeild wrote:
its called freedom of speach
No it's not. A personal attack or harassment of another person is not freedom of speech.
wvlaws

Princeton, WV

#6 Dec 23, 2012
hayfeild wrote:
its called freedom of speach
it's not considered freedom of speech when people have killed thereselves over stuff like whats posted on this trash site. freedom of speech is a different thing then what this is about! i will post you a copy of the freedom of speech so you will know what is about!
wvlaws

Princeton, WV

#7 Dec 23, 2012
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. The freedom is not absolute; the Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded from the freedom of speech, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.

Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent lawless action, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.

Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
lulz

United States

#8 Dec 23, 2012
Post some boobie pix while your at it too..we love pix!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lewisburg Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sheriff's Race 3 min maybe 36
Good women 1 hr HLM 7
36% approval rating. Get ready for a war 11 hr Josh 11
Dr. Mary Ann Mann 12 hr Way over priced a... 9
Everyone gets slammed if Affordable Care Act re... 15 hr Barry O 68
Just like a Republican 17 hr Josh 27
Great lawyers Wed Counsel 5

Lewisburg Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Lewisburg Mortgages