Barack Obama proves to be mortal husband

[MsMe]

Jessica B wrote:

<quoted text>
That's just kind of sad, Free.

Oh please, I get chit here from posters here all the time simply because they don't like the articles I bring here. But if you'll notice those threads pretty much have people commenting on them.

Does any one else bother to bring stuff here to comment on? the one person who does puts ridiculous headlines on them that have nothing to do with the thread, you never know what your going to get with that one. So if they are not willing to post their side then all they're going to get is what I come across.

Given the chance to poke a stick at those who hate 'repukes' and 'repugs' is not something I'm willing to pass on.

[MsMe]

Huhhuh wrote:

<quoted text>
Sounds better when you remove one of the quotes you made doesn't it? It is true that you're good to laugh at. BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh jeeze, your sense of humor has left the building....

[Wiley Coyote]

MsMe wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh jeeze, your sense of humor has left the building....

I have posted two stories today that readers could discuss in a thoughtful way. Your posting is simply to raise hell and stick it to democrats with a source that is unreliable and with pictures that were apparently altered. That is not honest, that's lying. There's nothing funny about that. Nothing. If you want to have an honest, open discussion, then find some articles that make some sense. Yours usually do not. You've jumped on Ghost Dog for his "Repug" comments, but yours, directed at democrats, are of the same tenor. Again, pot calling kettle.

[MsMe]

Wiley Coyote wrote:

<quoted text>
I have posted two stories today that readers could discuss in a thoughtful way. Your posting is simply to raise hell and stick it to democrats with a source that is unreliable and with pictures that were apparently altered. That is not honest, that's lying. There's nothing funny about that. Nothing. If you want to have an honest, open discussion, then find some articles that make some sense. Yours usually do not. You've jumped on Ghost Dog for his "Repug" comments, but yours, directed at democrats, are of the same tenor. Again, pot calling kettle.

I have posted other articles today.Sorry you missed them. This is not a strickly serious board and I have no intention of only posting threads for a serious,honest open discussion discussion.

If you don't like the threads I post you are more than welcome to not post on them. And no, my posting articles about what cap and trade really means is no way the same as GD and his 'repuke' tirades.

[Buncy da Baptist]

Interposing something here in the conversation between Wiley and FiFi, one must acknowledge that FiFi does take some perverse joy in trolling with farfetched tales, such as proclaiming the gospel truth of the shocking canard by the Republican precinct official that a black man overpowered her and carved a "B" in her face with a hunting knife.

FiFi has a sort of a Munchhausen syndrome imagination and her stories ring about as true Susan Smith's.

[Audie Murphy]

MsMe wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh please, I get chit here from posters here all the time simply because they don't like the articles I bring here.

You need a special request chit.

[Wiley Coyote]

MsMe wrote:

<quoted text>
I have posted other articles today.Sorry you missed them. This is not a strickly serious board and I have no intention of only posting threads for a serious,honest open discussion discussion.
If you don't like the threads I post you are more than welcome to not post on them. And no, my posting articles about what cap and trade really means is no way the same as GD and his 'repuke' tirades.

Queenie, it is almost impossible not to post a counter to your obvious lies and half-truths. You talk about Ghost Dog and his prevarications, but you are not any better. And yes, your attacks on elected officials who happen to be democrats are exactly the same as GD's attacks on "repugs." You both sound identical, just substitute one party for the other in both your rantings and ravings, most of which border on just plain fiction.

[BGG]

Wiley Coyote wrote:

<quoted text>
Queenie, it is almost impossible not to post a counter to your obvious lies and half-truths. You talk about Ghost Dog and his prevarications, but you are not any better. And yes, your attacks on elected officials who happen to be democrats are exactly the same as GD's attacks on "repugs." You both sound identical, just substitute one party for the other in both your rantings and ravings, most of which border on just plain fiction.

Pure party propaganda and blind loyalty play right into the hands of the politicians and is what keeps them in power and allows them to get away with their self aggrandizement. They know the "faithful" will rush to the defense because of the letter beside their name.

[Wiley Coyote]

BGG wrote:

<quoted text>
Pure party propaganda and blind loyalty play right into the hands of the politicians and is what keeps them in power and allows them to get away with their self aggrandizement. They know the "faithful" will rush to the defense because of the letter beside their name.

I could not agree more!! "Yellow dog" democrats and republicans are a blight on the American landscape. That "yellow dog-ism" is what keeps the Congressional membership in power and allows them to line their pockets and continue to build a power base. Unless and until the American people start thinking for themselves, and vote for the person rather than the party, then we are doomed to continue the same-old, same-old business as usual in Congress, with that business being lining pockets and building up power!

[Patriot]

Wiley Coyote wrote:

<quoted text>
Queenie, it is almost impossible not to post a counter to your obvious lies and half-truths. You talk about Ghost Dog and his prevarications, but you are not any better. And yes, your attacks on elected officials who happen to be democrats are exactly the same as GD's attacks on "repugs." You both sound identical, just substitute one party for the other in both your rantings and ravings, most of which border on just plain fiction.

So true. Thank you.

[Jessica B]

MsMe wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh please, I get chit here from posters here all the time simply because they don't like the articles I bring here. But if you'll notice those threads pretty much have people commenting on them.
Does any one else bother to bring stuff here to comment on? the one person who does puts ridiculous headlines on them that have nothing to do with the thread, you never know what your going to get with that one. So if they are not willing to post their side then all they're going to get is what I come across.
Given the chance to poke a stick at those who hate 'repukes' and 'repugs' is not something I'm willing to pass on.

Nothing wrong with posting article to generate discussion. Posting articles to deliberately make people angry and stir up sh**? I think you're better than that Free, if you let yourself be.

[tarheelborn]

Looking at that 1 picture is like reading 1 paragraph of an article and thinking you know the whole story. Video proof, ladies.

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex...

[Buncy da Baptist]

tarheelborn wrote:

Looking at that 1 picture is like reading 1 paragraph of an article and thinking you know the whole story. Video proof, ladies.
http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex...

Well, it's obvious he was looking down and to his right to get his footing and chivalrously reach for the hand of the lady to his right whom he's helping down the steps. If he had been leering you would have seen it in his face-- and the pause would have been longer, instead of a split second. Every man caught leering always has that look in his eyes.

He didn't. But if he had, it would be all right. Take that from an old hand at the quick and subtle sizer-upper of the magnificent female body. Men look. Get used to it.

[Cary]

tarheelborn wrote:

Looking at that 1 picture is like reading 1 paragraph of an article and thinking you know the whole story. Video proof, ladies.
http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex...

You have no sense of humor at all.

[Buncy da Baptist]

Cary wrote:

<quoted text>
You have no sense of humor at all.

Huh? It was an excellent analogy alluding to the shallow thought processes of righties.

[Bruno]

Jessica B wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing wrong with posting article to generate discussion. Posting articles to deliberately make people angry and stir up sh**? I think you're better than that Free, if you let yourself be.

Or not.