Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in 2010?

Posted in the Lebanon Forum

Comments (Page 2,927)

Showing posts 58,521 - 58,540 of138,512
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64490
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuh wrote:
<quoted text>
I am against women in combat - and even more so for drafting of women...and make no mistake, there can ALWAYS be a time in the future where some pin head Washington politician has power and thinks it's a good idea to send your sons (and now daughters) to some out of the way shat-hole half way around the world you've never heard of....to "defend our nation".

Thank you for your service. As well as all my other fellow Vets on here. Sorry I had to shorten your quoted text but I ran out of characters to reply. All can still read your original. LOL

Putting aside the obvious battlefield conditions of differing medical issues from personal hygiene that often occur in battle, as well as the physical strength requirements, I will add the following.

I agree and I would also like to add that conditions with our current "enemy" are much different than in the past.

Most cultures, including ours, have always put women on a different level to be protected and cherished. This is not the case in the middle east where sharia law is dominant among the aggressors. They have no respect for women.
They do, however know our feelings on this and would certainly use it in their favor by, instead of just killing, targeting the women for capture and yes even public torture and degradation. Can you imagine seeing one(or some) of our fighting women stripped and tortured in public? Can you imagine what that will do to their comrades in arms? As far as that goes, can you imagine what it would start in this country as well. No one in a turban would be safe on the streets or in prison. What affect will this have, mentally, on the men who are serving? While it is true that a man who is ticked off can be brutal, a combat unit must be of the same mind and use the tactical advantage of the unit. Not doing so can endanger the entire unit and dramatically decrease its effectiveness. They know that a bunch of soldiers operating emotionally and independently will be easier to overcome and destroy.

I also agree with the effectiveness of a volunteer force over the draft but if it were to become necessary I still would want to keep women out of it for the above reasons. However, this being said, IF women want to use the equality argument, they should then have the responsibility of registering for the same draft. With equality and freedom comes responsibility. In the case of women wanting to be equal and go into battle alongside the men, then they should share the responsibility of registering for the draft and being called to service if that were necessary, just like the men who do not want to register or serve.

I personally think that no one WANTS women to register. I think it is being floated merely as a tool to discourage them from pressing for "equal rights to fight in combat on the front lines". There are plenty of roles more suitable for them and less dangerous for the unit.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64491
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
I realize Rush is not a popular guy on here and personally, I find fault with him as well. However, there is no comparison between Rush and Al Jazeera. The owners and a lot of supporters of Al Jazeera would like nothing more than to inflict harm on Americans at any cost. You can research this for yourself. They also oppose any rights for women and gays. Rush or any other republican don't want to deny rights to anybody. Al Jazeera flaunts killing of Americans. Rush bashes liberals. Those are two separate things. I don't deny RS has the right to state an opinion. Yes she does. However, that is not all she does. She bullies others who think differently than her. I am simply pointing out the hypocrisy at what she posts when she bashes Fox News and alleges they distort the truth and tries to steer everyone and anyone away from them. Yet she is willing to give Al Jazeera a try,a supposed news source that is totally against most things liberals are for. Why would you give any news source a try when it is very clear what their intentions are - to help promote their beliefs while slandering our country and our people.
I realize you probably agree with RS's stance on politics and I do realize it is your right to do so. I have no issues with people being Liberal or Democrat and standing up for what they believe in. However, your post above completely contradicts what RS does. She gives an opinion and then criticizes others for having one. That is the part I disagree with. Her wanting to try out Al Jazeera to see opposing views while trashing another news source that has opposing views is not only hypocritical, it is ludicrous.
Al Jazeera English, Al Jazeera Arabic, its all the same owner. They are anti-American. It's no secret. Why would any American abet that cause?
I know you haven't been on this thread a long as I have...but those who have, know I tape Rush everyday, so I can hear his blovating when I have time....that doesn't make me a Republican does it ? If I did the same with Al Jazerra again spelling ?? would that make me a Muslim ?
Come on "Pete", news is news from all sources and I see nothing wrong with accessing any that is available....I still retain enough sense to form an opinion no matter the slant given by those presenting it.
I think we as a country have a lot to learn and remember about the history of the Middle East, and the role of Great Britian and later the USA in why we are where we are in that region.
For instance, Great Britain CREATED Iraq out of three different populations...in effect three separate "countries". Small wonder there has been infighting for generations....
The USA put the Shah of Iran into power and supported him even as his people turned against him....
I think we need to hear the opinions of the people in these countries, with regard to these and other issues, in order to understand them and why they think as they do.
I have never watched Al Jazeera but if they provide another perspective from the Middle East, I might just want to hear it, and it might not hurt others to as well.

UNFORTUNATELY, this thread has a lot of bullies....and that drives people to their respective corners rather than looking at the reasons WHY people disagree. The internet is a double edged sword in that regard, since a lot is posted that would NEVER be said face to face....
That allows a more open exchnge. BUT it also opens the door to some who just throw bombs to get attention. I have seen MANY people bully "Sassy" to her corner and then criticise her for giving back what she got. Just my take "Pete" for what it's worth.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64492
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Honestly wrote:
<quoted text>
you dem/lib don't like rush because he has such a following. You dem/lib do not have too many radio talk personalities except in gay San Fran.
Maybe that's because they know that we can't be spoon-fed propaganda and we'll just lap it up like we're starved for it without ever questioning any of it, like you Teapublicans do?
We check out information from whatever Source we can get it and then, think about it and come to our own decisions...something you Teapublicans seem to be unable to do! You know you do it, we know you do it, and the Republican Party Leaders know you do it! They lead you around like little stray Puppies and you never object to it!
If you weren't afraid of the truth,and if you were secure in what you claim to believe, you wouldn't object to whatever anybody put up because you could counter it, but you can't...so you do! it's all you know to do, try and stop anybody from expressing an opposing point of view. That's what your Party does and that's what you do, try to keep People from having a choice, to make their own decisions about which one is the best for the Country and for them. You should be called the "Mushroom Party" because you definitely are in the dark and full of chit and you want to keep everybody else that way, too!
Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64493
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuh wrote:
Found this today while researching some Columbine details. It is based on a book called Columbine, and showed me how many things I "knew" were off-base.
Here are seven common myths about that tragic day:
Myth #1: The Columbine killers were social misfits who were bullied by their classmates.
Truth: Eric Harris was a lady’s man, a charmer who had a number of good friends at school. Dylan Klebold went to the prom the weekend before the shooting.
Both killers attended football games, dances, and school plays. Despite the media reports, neither of them were linked to the “Trench Coat Mafia.” Nor were they part of a street gang or known to dress in Gothic style.
Myth #2: The Columbine killers planned a shooting spree inside the school.
Truth: Columbine was a failed bombing. Eric and Dylan planted a bomb inside the cafeteria and then went outside to wait for it to explode. Their initial plan was to shoot students who tried to escape the building in the aftermath. Only once the bomb failed to ignite did they make their way inside to begin shooting students.
Myth #3: The Columbine killers targeted certain kinds of students.
Truth: Although initial news reports claimed the Columbine killers had targeted minorities, jocks, and Christians, the killing was indiscriminate. Their initial plan was to blow up hundreds of students in the cafeteria. When the bombs failed to go off, they killed students randomly. Interestingly enough, Eric’s friends described him as a sports enthusiast, and two of his best friends were Asian and African American.
Imagine that. The press got it wrong. What a surprise.

Lessee. Did they get Sandy Hook wrong too? They DID, didn't they?

Maybe the problem in this country isn't the people. Perhaps it's the MainStream Media who report things wrong or to support their agenda, and when they're caught bury on page 22 below the Macy's Big sale ad.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64494
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Nuh, you have a very good opinion, about what goes on in war........with just men on both sides of you(watching your back). Now with the issue of adding women, that I beleive will add more problems, to all kinds of issues that men face during war.
Whenever men, even in a war zone have the chance to have sex with the locals they will. Now if we add females to protect our sides, that will cause internal damage(because she is just a piece of female meat to have sex with) to our fightning unit, and that will cause a crack in bonding that any fightning unit needs to stay alive.
I do apologize if I offended anyone about this issue.
All valid points as well. Don't forget as well that many women love sex and with multiple partners. I do not see a win/win in this subject at all.

BTW I am not one to apologize for mine or require an apology for an opinion. We all have the right to our own and most adults can agree to disagree. I am never offended by someone stating their opinion. I may disagree but I don't take it personally, unless someone expresses an unfounded(no proof) opinion about me. While I have done this in the past, it is because it was first done to me and I felt that they were firm believers in the "Golden Rule" and were doing to me as they wanted me to do to them. I was merely obliging them. LOL

OMG is the world coming to an end? The, normally, fighting factions of this thread are actually agreeing on something. LOL
Really Sassy

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64495
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Nuh, you have a very good opinion, about what goes on in war........with just men on both sides of you(watching your back). Now with the issue of adding women, that I beleive will add more problems, to all kinds of issues that men face during war.
Whenever men, even in a war zone have the chance to have sex with the locals they will. Now if we add females to protect our sides, that will cause internal damage(because she is just a piece of female meat to have sex with) to our fightning unit, and that will cause a crack in bonding that any fightning unit needs to stay alive.
I do apologize if I offended anyone about this issue.
So what you are saying is that because the males can't act like a damn human then the females should not have equal rights? Yea that makes good sense.
Nuh

South Pittsburg, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64496
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you are saying is that because the males can't act like a damn human then the females should not have equal rights? Yea that makes good sense.
War is different than behind the keyboard philosophy.

If you disagree, fine, go get in one.
Really Sassy

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64497
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

NTMD8OR wrote:
<quoted text>Thank you for your service. As well as all my other fellow Vets on here. Sorry I had to shorten your quoted text but I ran out of characters to reply. All can still read your original. LOL

Putting aside the obvious battlefield conditions of differing medical issues from personal hygiene that often occur in battle, as well as the physical strength requirements, I will add the following.

I agree and I would also like to add that conditions with our current "enemy" are much different than in the past.

Most cultures, including ours, have always put women on a different level to be protected and cherished. This is not the case in the middle east where sharia law is dominant among the aggressors. They have no respect for women.
They do, however know our feelings on this and would certainly use it in their favor by, instead of just killing, targeting the women for capture and yes even public torture and degradation. Can you imagine seeing one(or some) of our fighting women stripped and tortured in public? Can you imagine what that will do to their comrades in arms? As far as that goes, can you imagine what it would start in this country as well. No one in a turban would be safe on the streets or in prison. What affect will this have, mentally, on the men who are serving? While it is true that a man who is ticked off can be brutal, a combat unit must be of the same mind and use the tactical advantage of the unit. Not doing so can endanger the entire unit and dramatically decrease its effectiveness. They know that a bunch of soldiers operating emotionally and independently will be easier to overcome and destroy.

I also agree with the effectiveness of a volunteer force over the draft but if it were to become necessary I still would want to keep women out of it for the above reasons. However, this being said, IF women want to use the equality argument, they should then have the responsibility of registering for the same draft. With equality and freedom comes responsibility. In the case of women wanting to be equal and go into battle alongside the men, then they should share the responsibility of registering for the draft and being called to service if that were necessary, just like the men who do not want to register or serve.

I personally think that no one WANTS women to register. I think it is being floated merely as a tool to discourage them from pressing for "equal rights to fight in combat on the front lines". There are plenty of roles more suitable for them and less dangerous for the unit.
I will agree you have valid reasoning for why you feel females don't belong on the front lines. However you are missing the one big issue here. Who are you to make the decision for anyone else when it comes to equal rights? You shouldn't have the right to decide what's best for me. That's my choice just as you have yours. Don't you agree with that?

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64498
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe that's because they know that we can't be spoon-fed propaganda and we'll just lap it up like we're starved for it without ever questioning any of it, like you Teapublicans do?
We check out information from whatever Source we can get it and then, think about it and come to our own decisions...something you Teapublicans seem to be unable to do! You know you do it, we know you do it, and the Republican Party Leaders know you do it! They lead you around like little stray Puppies and you never object to it!
If you weren't afraid of the truth,and if you were secure in what you claim to believe, you wouldn't object to whatever anybody put up because you could counter it, but you can't...so you do! it's all you know to do, try and stop anybody from expressing an opposing point of view. That's what your Party does and that's what you do, try to keep People from having a choice, to make their own decisions about which one is the best for the Country and for them. You should be called the "Mushroom Party" because you definitely are in the dark and full of chit and you want to keep everybody else that way, too!
And when you cannot come up with a valid argument, you resort to name-calling as above. You call everyone who does not hold your opinion "Teapublicans" You have also called us "idiots". That is just a couple of the names you have used. Regardless of what you may think you have seen. The term "Teapublicans" is not generally used in public. In fact you are the first and only person I have seen using it. And you ALWAYS use it in the context of an attempt degrade the opposition.

I cannot count the number of times that you have posted your "opinion" using the exact same talking point phrases that I hear repeatedly from every liberal on the radio. And you say are "stray puppies on a leash"?

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64499
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Nuh, you have a very good opinion, about what goes on in war........with just men on both sides of you(watching your back). Now with the issue of adding women, that I beleive will add more problems, to all kinds of issues that men face during war.
Whenever men, even in a war zone have the chance to have sex with the locals they will. Now if we add females to protect our sides, that will cause internal damage(because she is just a piece of female meat to have sex with) to our fightning unit, and that will cause a crack in bonding that any fightning unit needs to stay alive.
I do apologize if I offended anyone about this issue.
You didn't offend me, Dunlapian, the truth from People who KNOW, on any subject, never offends me!
Believe it or not, I actually agree with the points that both of you have made. But, I would like to present something that occurred to me, for both of your opinions...do you think that some Men's protective Nature toward Women will distract them and cause additional problems? Will the Men take unnecessary risks in the heat of battle to help or save a Female that they might not do for a Man, thinking he wouldn't need the help as badly as a Woman does? Also, will the death of a Woman affect the Men worse than the death of a Male, that they're fighting along side? A guilt feeling , thinking that he should have protected her because she's a Female? I'm just wondering and I'd like to hear both of your views on these questions.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64500
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

Honestly wrote:
<quoted text>
you dem/lib don't like rush because he has such a following. You dem/lib do not have too many radio talk personalities except in gay San Fran.
Like him ??? Chuckles !! He provides me with a LOT of laughs.....many more once I began keeping track of how long it takes for some of the contributors on this thread to post his opinions as their own...some nearly word for word !
I admit that at my age it doesn't take much to amuse me and this is one of those things I have come to enjoy !!

As usual, you are wrong again !

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64501
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine that. The press got it wrong. What a surprise.
Lessee. Did they get Sandy Hook wrong too? They DID, didn't they?
Maybe the problem in this country isn't the people. Perhaps it's the MainStream Media who report things wrong or to support their agenda, and when they're caught bury on page 22 below the Macy's Big sale ad.
We do have a problem with all this "Breaking News". ALL networks that cover them immediately bring in every "expert" they can find to make assumptions. This only confuses the facts, and since most Americans do not follow every "breaking News" story to its conclusion, and most networks drop it in the aftermath to only a mention, the public does not know what actually happened.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64502
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuh wrote:
Found this today while researching some Columbine details. It is based on a book called Columbine, and showed me how many things I "knew" were off-base.
Here are seven common myths about that tragic day:
Myth #1: The Columbine killers were social misfits who were bullied by their classmates.
Truth: Eric Harris was a lady’s man, a charmer who had a number of good friends at school. Dylan Klebold went to the prom the weekend before the shooting.
Both killers attended football games, dances, and school plays. Despite the media reports, neither of them were linked to the “Trench Coat Mafia.” Nor were they part of a street gang or known to dress in Gothic style.
Myth #2: The Columbine killers planned a shooting spree inside the school.
Truth: Columbine was a failed bombing. Eric and Dylan planted a bomb inside the cafeteria and then went outside to wait for it to explode. Their initial plan was to shoot students who tried to escape the building in the aftermath. Only once the bomb failed to ignite did they make their way inside to begin shooting students.
Myth #3: The Columbine killers targeted certain kinds of students.
Truth: Although initial news reports claimed the Columbine killers had targeted minorities, jocks, and Christians, the killing was indiscriminate. Their initial plan was to blow up hundreds of students in the cafeteria. When the bombs failed to go off, they killed students randomly. Interestingly enough, Eric’s friends described him as a sports enthusiast, and two of his best friends were Asian and African American.
Myth #4: The Columbine situation was a hostage standoff.
Truth: It is true that news reports initially treated the situation at Columbine as a hostage standoff, perhaps due to the fact that police officers did not enter the building until more than 40 minutes after the shooting began. But the Columbine killers never planned to hold hostages. Their goal was total destruction, not particular demands. It took three hours for the SWAT teams to find the killers (3:15 p.m.). They had been dead since 12:08, just forty-nine minutes after the attack began.
Myth #5. There were no warning signs that could have prevented the Columbine massacre.
Truth: Other parents had complained about Eric Harris, multiple times. Both Eric and Dylan had been arrested before. Thirteen months before the shooting, investigators discovered evidence that Eric was building pipe bombs. Dozens of pages of obscene threats on the internet were also documented. The sheriff’s department covered up the initial evidence that signaled the threat.
Myth #6: Cassie Bernall was martyred for her faith in God.
Truth: According to the eyewitness under the table with her, Cassie was shot when Eric poked his shotgun under the table and said,“Peekaboo.” The 911 tape verifies this testimony.
The martyr story arose from the testimony from another student in the library, Craig Scott (brother to victim, Rachel Scott), who recounted a conversation that took place across the room. Valeen Schnurr was the one who actually professed her faith in God, and this took place after she was shot. As she lay bleeding, she prayed,“Oh my God, don’t let me die.” Dylan turned around and asked her,“God? Do you believe in God?” Valeen said,“Yes, I believe in God.” When the killer asked why, she replied,“Because it’s how my parents raised me.”
Myth #7: Columbine students and teachers were able to communicate with each other via cell phones.
Truth: Though some students were able to call newscasters, the teachers and students hiding in the school were unable to communicate due to the ear-piercing fire alarm that blared for hours. The sprinkler system flooded the cafeteria, and the fire alarm and strobe lighting caused difficulty in communications with the SWAT team. Much of the terror and confusion that day was caused by the nerve-wracking alarm system that interfered with communication.
I'd like to know the Name of the Book and it's Author.
Really Sassy

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64503
Feb 1, 2013
 
Nuh wrote:
<quoted text>War is different than behind the keyboard philosophy.

If you disagree, fine, go get in one.
You Sir, don't need to get nasty just because I questioned your weak reasoning. The guy with the black hat had legitimate reasons for his beliefs and many of which I may agree with but to say that because men can't control their sexual urges is a legitimate reason is pure ignorance on your part. So yes I disagree and no I want be doing any such thing but I'd certainly pave the way to send your backward ass.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64504
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I am still following the story in Midland City, Alabama where a NUT killed a School Bus Driver and is till holding a 5 year old special needs(autistic) boy hostage in an underground bunker.

His neighbors knew he was not right and watched him build this bunker.

He was supposed to be in court Wednesday morning for "menacing" charges. Instead he took this boy hostage because the "cops were going to come for him".

Neighbors say he has been known to stay in this bunker for as many as 8 days in the past. They have reported that he has fired shots above cars that were tearing up his self-made speed bump on the dirt road and he killed a neighbors dog with a lead pipe for coming onto his property.

A lot of red flags here.
Really Sassy

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64505
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NTMD8OR wrote:
<quoted text>We do have a problem with all this "Breaking News". ALL networks that cover them immediately bring in every "expert" they can find to make assumptions. This only confuses the facts, and since most Americans do not follow every "breaking News" story to its conclusion, and most networks drop it in the aftermath to only a mention, the public does not know what actually happened.
As an American citizen rather than listening to half truths and misleading details one should educate themselves on the facts from several sources before letting the heart take over and running into the streets demanding freedoms be taken away.
Nuh

South Pittsburg, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64506
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
You Sir, don't need to get nasty just because I questioned your weak reasoning. The guy with the black hat had legitimate reasons for his beliefs and many of which I may agree with but to say that because men can't control their sexual urges is a legitimate reason is pure ignorance on your part. So yes I disagree and no I want be doing any such thing but I'd certainly pave the way to send your backward ass.
Spout off and act all tough - but when it comes right down to it...NO, you won't volunteer to fight and possibly die - but you will offer your opinon on something that you have absolutely no first hand knowledge about.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64507
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

And we wonder why people have little faith in our legal system.

Ohio man attacks ex-girlfriend in courtroom while she was trying to get restraining order. No judge, no bailiff in the in the courtroom. The Sheriff blames budget restrictions for not allowing for an officer in every courtroom. Go figure.

http://www.ksat.com/news/Caught-on-camera-Man...
Nuh

South Pittsburg, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64508
Feb 1, 2013
 
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd like to know the Name of the Book and it's Author.
How do you review a book like Columbine? It’s hard to say,“I enjoyed the book.” After all, it’s one of the most frightening, tragic, disturbing books I’ve read in a long time. And yet, it is so meticulous in its research and so compelling in its presentation that one can’t help but admire how well the author, Dave Cullen, told the story.

I thought I knew the basic facts about the deadly shooting at Columbine High School in 1999. I was wrong.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64509
Feb 1, 2013
 
Nuh wrote:
<quoted text>
War is different than behind the keyboard philosophy.
If you disagree, fine, go get in one.
Thank-you Nuh, I almost responded to that post.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 58,521 - 58,540 of138,512
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Lebanon Discussions

Search the Lebanon Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
"who" 59 min Anonymous 2
Mapco off So. Hartman 6 hr Lisa 1
Election 2014 and child abuse (Jun '13) 8 hr Bit by the Byrd 4
TN Tennessee Hunting Rights Amendment (Oct '10) Wed BOB 8,588
Where has Attorney Adam Parrish run off to? Wed Blue Devils 11
TN Should state mandate immunizations? New require... (May '11) Tue Inthefield 8,866
Wilson sheriff's deputy, school board member su... (Jun '13) Jul 8 A taxpayer 23
•••
•••
•••
Lebanon Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Lebanon Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Lebanon People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Lebanon News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Lebanon
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••