OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, Sta...

OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Question 756

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 11, 2010

1,571 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Delbert McFarland

Broken Arrow, OK

#34956 Jan 2, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>Will you help take care of the elderly?
yea why?
Delbert McFarland

Broken Arrow, OK

#34957 Jan 2, 2013
Tammara had her pantys tied i a knot now shes all pissed off just like her rival Dusty.
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#34958 Jan 2, 2013
Delbert McFarland wrote:
<quoted text>yea why?
Somebody will have to.

Since: Jul 12

Oklahoma City, OK

#34959 Jan 3, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>Somebody will have to.
The elderly and a select handful of less-than-enabled people are the only ones who need to be approved for tax returns any form of welfare. Inversely, we need to cut spending in as many ways as possible.

The government doesn't directly create cashflow or expedite the economy. It can't. Mathematically, it can't. Brilliantly enough, we have a president who is creating *more jobs* in government positions, thus tolling on the value of the dollar and the exchange of money.

Best of all, banks are dropping the value of the dollar by protectionist spending (basically, not spending at all unless it stands a chance to profit).

This duality is the reason why the government needs to take the initiative, increase taxes and drop services.
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#34960 Jan 3, 2013
When this nation rejects the elderly it will crumble faster than what it is now. Good rid'ens.
Rick

Haskell, OK

#34961 Jan 3, 2013
Rick

Haskell, OK

#34962 Jan 3, 2013
Edumikated girl from Dusty Land.

Since: Jul 12

Oklahoma City, OK

#34963 Jan 4, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
When this nation rejects the elderly it will crumble faster than what it is now. Good rid'ens.
Riddance. It's Riddance, you ignorant putz.
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#34964 Jan 4, 2013
DistinctlyOK wrote:
<quoted text>
Riddance. It's Riddance, you ignorant putz.
Hey city slicker, its rid'ens down here.

Since: Jul 12

Oklahoma City, OK

#34965 Jan 4, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>Hey city slicker, its rid'ens down here.
Yes, obviously it's different where the apostrophe has lost its contractual ability to shorten words.
Rational Tulsans

Pryor, OK

#34966 Jan 4, 2013
For a stupid non educated young fool, you sure talk a lot.
Justaminute

Oklahoma City, OK

#34968 Jan 5, 2013
After a nice break from politics I came back to find that Republicans in Congress have less favorable ratings in the polls than syphilis. HA HA

And they are going to use the debt ceiling again as a hostage to try and blackmail their way into destroying social security, Medicare and Medicaid.

Republicans and the Somali pirates have a lot in common.

Bye bye Republicans, all we Dems have to do is stand back and watch you destroy your party. It's almost going, going, gone.
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#34969 Jan 5, 2013
Justaminute wrote:
After a nice break from politics I came back to find that Republicans in Congress have less favorable ratings in the polls than syphilis. HA HA
And they are going to use the debt ceiling again as a hostage to try and blackmail their way into destroying social security, Medicare and Medicaid.
Republicans and the Somali pirates have a lot in common.
Bye bye Republicans, all we Dems have to do is stand back and watch you destroy your party. It's almost going, going, gone.
I don't care for eiether party, everyone gets to stand back and wave bye,bye to the whole country. Just wait and see.
TAMARA

Edmond, OK

#34970 Jan 5, 2013
What I find interesting is both Democrates and Republicans are upset with both parties over one thing that should never been messed with no matter who would do it. I donot care if it was a Democrat or Republican president but it just so happened to be Bush Jr. that did it and that was mess with what the employees paid into So. Security. I am glad that this was not extended! Before Bush Jr. both employer and employees were each paying towards the employees So. Security 6.2%. This should never been changed.Self employed's payments never got a cut and some self employed have as hard as time as some of the working people. If this cut had never been given the employees would not know to be missing this money now.

What is is funny to me that people in both parties are to narrow minded to see that because of their narrow mindness that they are the ones that will destory this country. We just can't have one party having full rein in running this country! We need to come up with a way to balance and check what is good for this country. I heard this morning that because of tightening of the reins on people over $400,000 in how much they can claim when it comes to their donations that this might really hurt places that help the needy and such. But I do realize that the higher income people should be paying in more federal taxes. I also heard that as far as us people only about 60% actually do pay federal taxes. I did not like the 40 million or was it 400 million being given to Hollywood to make pictures here in the U.S. and didnot like the millions of dollars being given to Nascar to help them get up and running better. If they are given this money to them and other like them then why not to S. S., Medicare and Medicaid?
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#34971 Jan 5, 2013
TAMARA wrote:
What I find interesting is both Democrates and Republicans are upset with both parties over one thing that should never been messed with no matter who would do it. I donot care if it was a Democrat or Republican president but it just so happened to be Bush Jr. that did it and that was mess with what the employees paid into So. Security. I am glad that this was not extended! Before Bush Jr. both employer and employees were each paying towards the employees So. Security 6.2%. This should never been changed.Self employed's payments never got a cut and some self employed have as hard as time as some of the working people. If this cut had never been given the employees would not know to be missing this money now.
What is is funny to me that people in both parties are to narrow minded to see that because of their narrow mindness that they are the ones that will destory this country. We just can't have one party having full rein in running this country! We need to come up with a way to balance and check what is good for this country. I heard this morning that because of tightening of the reins on people over $400,000 in how much they can claim when it comes to their donations that this might really hurt places that help the needy and such. But I do realize that the higher income people should be paying in more federal taxes. I also heard that as far as us people only about 60% actually do pay federal taxes. I did not like the 40 million or was it 400 million being given to Hollywood to make pictures here in the U.S. and didnot like the millions of dollars being given to Nascar to help them get up and running better. If they are given this money to them and other like them then why not to S. S., Medicare and Medicaid?
I agree, its like a never ending circus.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#34972 Jan 5, 2013
TAMARA wrote:
What I find interesting is both Democrates and Republicans are upset with both parties over one thing that should never been messed with no matter who would do it. I donot care if it was a Democrat or Republican president but it just so happened to be Bush Jr. that did it and that was mess with what the employees paid into So. Security. I am glad that this was not extended! Before Bush Jr. both employer and employees were each paying towards the employees So. Security 6.2%. This should never been changed.Self employed's payments never got a cut and some self employed have as hard as time as some of the working people. If this cut had never been given the employees would not know to be missing this money now.
What is is funny to me that people in both parties are to narrow minded to see that because of their narrow mindness that they are the ones that will destory this country. We just can't have one party having full rein in running this country! We need to come up with a way to balance and check what is good for this country. I heard this morning that because of tightening of the reins on people over $400,000 in how much they can claim when it comes to their donations that this might really hurt places that help the needy and such. But I do realize that the higher income people should be paying in more federal taxes. I also heard that as far as us people only about 60% actually do pay federal taxes. I did not like the 40 million or was it 400 million being given to Hollywood to make pictures here in the U.S. and didnot like the millions of dollars being given to Nascar to help them get up and running better. If they are given this money to them and other like them then why not to S. S., Medicare and Medicaid?
==========
>>>We just can't have one party having full rein in running this country!<<<

One party would mean the country is more united than ever. It would truly be the peoples party. Matter of fact unification is how we get Constitutional Amendments. Seventy-five percent of nation comes together. One party would be great.
TAMARA

Edmond, OK

#34973 Jan 5, 2013
WMCOL wrote:
<quoted text>
==========
>>>We just can't have one party having full rein in running this country!<<<
One party would mean the country is more united than ever. It would truly be the peoples party. Matter of fact unification is how we get Constitutional Amendments. Seventy-five percent of nation comes together. One party would be great.
To me that is giving one organization to much power. Like going into a dictatorship. One party would not be giving the people any more power than they have right now. Would we still be voting for a President and we they be from the same party. I guess you mean the country would be more united like Iraq, Iran and others like them. NO THANK YOU!
Delbert McFarland

Tecumseh, OK

#34974 Jan 5, 2013
TAMARA wrote:
<quoted text>To me that is giving one organization to much power. Like going into a dictatorship. One party would not be giving the people any more power than they have right now. Would we still be voting for a President and we they be from the same party. I guess you mean the country would be more united like Iraq, Iran and others like them. NO THANK YOU!
We could make it like the good old times, North and South you know what i mean? Like the Rebels and the Confederates, you know where im goin? Kinda like Yen and Yang, you catch my drift?
TAMARA

Edmond, OK

#34975 Jan 5, 2013
Delbert McFarland wrote:
<quoted text>We could make it like the good old times, North and South you know what i mean? Like the Rebels and the Confederates, you know where im goin? Kinda like Yen and Yang, you catch my drift?
I want to move forward with improvements not backwards! Those to me were not the good old days!
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#34976 Jan 5, 2013
TAMARA wrote:
<quoted text>I want to move forward with improvements not backwards! Those to me were not the good old days!
I think he is refering to another civil war.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lawton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Has anyone used Jims Car Care Fri Floyd 2
Amber Wuergler is an Idiot Aug 26 WTF 8
Lawton Police officer Showing up Drunk for Work Aug 26 Randell 7
News Fort Sill Soldier Dies In Training Accident (Oct '07) Aug 21 Things happen 66
Texing and Driving Aug 16 Bobby Ray 1
Lawton has changed Aug 11 jeepgirl101 2
lawton cops (Oct '09) Aug 10 a lawton citizen 15
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Lawton Mortgages