The 2nd Amendment was to Protect Slav...
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Bloomingdale, IN

#63 Jan 25, 2013
Elmer Gantry wrote:
So, let me address all of you moron/Republicans/Tea baggers/gun nuts with one question:
You continue to demand that our elected members of the U.S. Congress
1) increase high levels of U.S. military spending, AND;
2) protect your firearms on the claim of your 2nd Amendment right to "bear arms" so that you will have the small arms to protect you and your family from the U.S. military.
Welll Elllmer, partial truths are so easy to write. And after all, a Moeron is a terrible thing to waste.

Indianapolis, IN

#64 Jan 25, 2013
Ralph wrote:
<quoted text>Welll Elllmer, partial truths are so easy to write. And after all, a Moeron is a terrible thing to waste.
You must be Moe pretending to be a detractor.

You are bested Moe!

Bloomingdale, IN

#65 Jan 25, 2013
Blake wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be Moe pretending to be a detractor.
You are bested Moe!
You must be a liberal, adjusting truth to your needs.

Bloomingdale, IN

#66 Jan 26, 2013
Ralph wrote:
<quoted text>The following is my opinion(s).
1 So called assault weapons bans are the camels nose under the tent.
2 Joe Biden while currently recommending shotguns for property protection, will at a later date be amazed at the damage that a shotgun can cause.
3 The government will figure out that a six shooter can in theory kill six people, with the appropriate extras, more quickly.
4 After revolvers and pump shotguns are judged
too dangerous for people to own, government determines a single shot weapon can kill one, and when reloaded, kill again.
5 It will be obvious to government at that time that the public can not own any gun, so as in Nazi Germany, Communist Russia and China, Cambodia, all will be conficated.
What is the point? The point is that any restrictive law, that denies law abideing, sane citizens, the right to own weapons that are currently legal, is wrong, and in my opinion a pathway to total government seizure of weapons.
To the debunkers, history will prove me right if laws proceed to a point of a ban.
We must do what we can to assure a legal right to self defense.
If you do not want to own a gun, don't, but do not deny others that right due to your ignorance of history, American, and world.
The lowly .25 acp will kill with a well placed shot. And a day without offending someone is like a day without sunshine.
Any law reguarding weapons bans would need to apply to senators and congressmen also. Are we indeed citizens with a right to self-defence, or serf/subjects?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lawrence Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
sarah 1 hr Truth 3
News Fire puts family of 8 out of their Indy home 9 hr Crimestopperz 1
House fire very suspicious 9 hr Crimestopperz 1
scarborough junk yard (Mar '13) 20 hr Still looking 18
Black lives are Worthless 23 hr Kojak 24
melinda at Honda Fri to know 9
What Color are those Pilce Impersonators? Fri melanin 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Lawrence Mortgages