Palin Brings Book Tour to Ohio

[Wolfman57]

NehaRain.. You mean Nancy Pelousy??? You know her husband has a good racket going on in Kalifornia "Arnold Speak".. He apparently owns a lot of real estate and just conveniently has been awarded various contracts, etc. They have been keeping him under the radar. Nancy Pelousy can equate to the typical DUMB Democrat as much as former Chappaquiddick Olympic swimmer Ted Kennedy. Yes, they both have a lot in common with Urban America! Just don't let urban America through their gated community...

[SheliaP]

I agree with the view that Sarah Palin and her family were unfairly dragged through the mud by the media in a way they didn't deserve. But the hypocrisy of the posts here is incredible. You all say that it's ok for Palin's daughter to have a baby out of wedlock, as long as she's Christian and forgiven, and has a family around her with the financial means and togetherness to support both the daughter and her child. Ok, I get that--in a difficult family situation, that's the ideal--family pulls together to help one of its own. But what about the opposite case? A young woman gets pregnant, doesn't have a family that cares about her, doesn't have the means to support herself, and ends up on welfare as a result. Then she's ghetto trash? A lot of the stories on this website deal with women in situations that could be just like that--whether they're "Christian and forgiven" usually isn't mentioned in the articles. So how do you folks justify judging someone's morals and viciously attacking their character if you don't know all the facts--you only hear what the media chooses to tell you? I would think by now that it's pretty obvious that the media is in business to sell stories, not report all the facts. And if the media plays on the Palin family's difficulties for political motives or what have you, don't you think it's also possible that the media plays on the stories of ordinary folks as well? I haven't personally known too many people whose story has made it on the news, but I have known a few in the past 50 years or so. And in every case, the news ended up twisting some aspect of the story or the facts involved.

[blue moon]

NehaRain wrote:

<quoted text>
You can always tell a far left woman a mile away. They hate God, country, married straight women, babies and shaving under their arms.

OMG I've found a good place to visit. I'm Christian and live the far right and love to hang here if I may.
Sweet words to my heart. Hello pitypat, hello NehaRain. May I hang around with you smart women?

[Pitypat]

Wolfman57 wrote:

Greetings to all my posting pals here. Pitypat, Norwood is in the Cincinnati area of Ohio.. Wolfman travels quite extensively.. I see the Liberals have not made it to this posting site yet... They are still posting defenses of the two black males who nearly beat to death the KSU student on another story. Happy Thanksgiving to all of you.. Keep up the fight.

Thanks. I knew it was near one or the other.

[Pitypat]

YourMomtheMaker wrote:

There aren't enough props on earth to get this elected. She didn't have the prerequisite intellectual schooling. Her IQ of 120 is one point UNDER Brittany Spear's. No offense Brittany. You are loved as a pop star, where you belong.
About Sarah. I predict she encounters some legal trouble around her son Trigg at some point. Her Down's baby is a tad too functional around the male dominated heavyweight orbit of politics that she is so drawn to. Be very careful, Sarah. Ignorance is no excuse for the law-- and the world is filled with people who love scandal.

Jealous are we? You sound bitter. There is no comparison to her and Brittney. Brittney is a s-l-u-t and I don't use that word. Legal trouble around Trig? Oh please. You libs will make up any story. Sounds desperate. I guess if you didn't think she had a chance you wouldn't bother with her. Your president is the one who should have the legal problems. We can only hope.

[Pitypat]

SheliaP wrote:

I agree with the view that Sarah Palin and her family were unfairly dragged through the mud by the media in a way they didn't deserve. But the hypocrisy of the posts here is incredible. You all say that it's ok for Palin's daughter to have a baby out of wedlock, as long as she's Christian and forgiven, and has a family around her with the financial means and togetherness to support both the daughter and her child. Ok, I get that--in a difficult family situation, that's the ideal--family pulls together to help one of its own. But what about the opposite case? A young woman gets pregnant, doesn't have a family that cares about her, doesn't have the means to support herself, and ends up on welfare as a result. Then she's ghetto trash? A lot of the stories on this website deal with women in situations that could be just like that--whether they're "Christian and forgiven" usually isn't mentioned in the articles. So how do you folks justify judging someone's morals and viciously attacking their character if you don't know all the facts--you only hear what the media chooses to tell you? I would think by now that it's pretty obvious that the media is in business to sell stories, not report all the facts. And if the media plays on the Palin family's difficulties for political motives or what have you, don't you think it's also possible that the media plays on the stories of ordinary folks as well? I haven't personally known too many people whose story has made it on the news, but I have known a few in the past 50 years or so. And in every case, the news ended up twisting some aspect of the story or the facts involved.

Because usually the ghetto trash keeps having babies and stays on welfare. You can bet Bristol is more careful now. It is the ghetto trash that doesn't learn from their mistakes. They don't change their lives. Oh yes, they go to church, they are forgiven and they do it again. You don't think God doesn't know the pattern. You ask forgiveness and you learn. They don't. Yes, Bristol has family that cares and supports her. So to you that is wrong? Sorry if the black folks haven't learned this concept yet. Could be part of the problem, don't you think?

[Pitypat]

blue moon wrote:

<quoted text>OMG I've found a good place to visit. I'm Christian and live the far right and love to hang here if I may.
Sweet words to my heart. Hello pitypat, hello NehaRain. May I hang around with you smart women?

Howdy Blue Moon. Another person is always welcome. Smart women? Nahh.
We are Wolfman57's harem :)

[SusanL_]

SheliaP wrote:

I agree with the view that Sarah Palin and her family were unfairly dragged through the mud by the media in a way they didn't deserve. But the hypocrisy of the posts here is incredible. You all say that it's ok for Palin's daughter to have a baby out of wedlock, as long as she's Christian and forgiven, and has a family around her with the financial means and togetherness to support both the daughter and her child. Ok, I get that--in a difficult family situation, that's the ideal--family pulls together to help one of its own. But what about the opposite case? A young woman gets pregnant, doesn't have a family that cares about her, doesn't have the means to support herself, and ends up on welfare as a result. Then she's ghetto trash? A lot of the stories on this website deal with women in situations that could be just like that--whether they're "Christian and forgiven" usually isn't mentioned in the articles. So how do you folks justify judging someone's morals and viciously attacking their character if you don't know all the facts--you only hear what the media chooses to tell you? I would think by now that it's pretty obvious that the media is in business to sell stories, not report all the facts. And if the media plays on the Palin family's difficulties for political motives or what have you, don't you think it's also possible that the media plays on the stories of ordinary folks as well? I haven't personally known too many people whose story has made it on the news, but I have known a few in the past 50 years or so. And in every case, the news ended up twisting some aspect of the story or the facts involved.

Your post in a round about way stated the reason, with liberal views thrown in. No one ever said it is OK to have a child out of wedlock. But here is the difference, Sarah Palin and people like her take care of their own. They step up to the plate and take care of their responsibilities, they don't pass it on to somebody else. They help that daughter anyway possible, even raise that baby if that is what it takes. But they do it on their OWN, even if it means getting a second job to do so. The other scenario you threw out there - they are dependent on the government. We the working people have to pay for that young woman and her baby with our tax dollars. It is a fact that many of these "young women" you mentioned who don't have families, their mothers were probably in the same situation, it snowballs. Then these women keep having more babies, the more babies, the bigger the welfare check - resulting in more taxes out of the paychecks of working men/women. Also resulting - children with mothers who could care less what they are doing, just as long as that check keeps showing up in that mailbox. Most of these children don't have the same father's, most don't even know who their father's are. We all know the outcome of that is not very good.

Hypocrisy? Not at all, just not blinded by the facts. We are able to distinguish the two scenario's you threw out and not use them as a comparison, because they're not comparable. But don't take my word for it, just drive by your county welfare office.

[Alabama]

Sarah Palin is playing you fools like a puppet. Keep making her rich, she smart enough to know your fools will hang on to every little word she says, and I bet she's laughing all the way to the bank. But if you come to think of it, if you fools voted for Bush you fools will believe anything. I hope she does get in the White House, and then and only then you fools will realize how stupid and brain washed you really are. I can bet if Sarah was 50 pounds heavier none of you fools would give her a second look, you silly people are only caught on the way she looks, nothing more, kind of sad if you think about it, because she has a brain of a fly. LOL but again, you fools keep trying to put that clown in the white house, you better brush up on your spanish and muslim speaking because I can bet within 2 months of that clown being in office AMERICA WILL BE TAKEN OVER. So instead of you bright fools trying to put someone in office because of your spiteful hateful ways, you people need to wake up and smell the freakin coffee. Because if she gave up on being a govern, THE WHITE HOUSE IS UP FOR THE TAKEN

[SusanL_]

Alabama wrote:

Sarah Palin is playing you fools like a puppet. Keep making her rich, she smart enough to know your fools will hang on to every little word she says, and I bet she's laughing all the way to the bank. But if you come to think of it, if you fools voted for Bush you fools will believe anything. I hope she does get in the White House, and then and only then you fools will realize how stupid and brain washed you really are. I can bet if Sarah was 50 pounds heavier none of you fools would give her a second look, you silly people are only caught on the way she looks, nothing more, kind of sad if you think about it, because she has a brain of a fly. LOL but again, you fools keep trying to put that clown in the white house, you better brush up on your spanish and muslim speaking because I can bet within 2 months of that clown being in office AMERICA WILL BE TAKEN OVER. So instead of you bright fools trying to put someone in office because of your spiteful hateful ways, you people need to wake up and smell the freakin coffee. Because if she gave up on being a govern, THE WHITE HOUSE IS UP FOR THE TAKEN

A socialist Muslim has already taken over the White House, you "fool". America already is being slowly taken over by far-left ideologies with non-Christian values, you "fool". Everything you fear will happen if Sarah Palin is in the White House, is happening right now with your Obama in office, "fool."

Wow, shooting fish in a barrel...

[Pitypat]

Alabama wrote:

Sarah Palin is playing you fools like a puppet. Keep making her rich, she smart enough to know your fools will hang on to every little word she says, and I bet she's laughing all the way to the bank. But if you come to think of it, if you fools voted for Bush you fools will believe anything. I hope she does get in the White House, and then and only then you fools will realize how stupid and brain washed you really are. I can bet if Sarah was 50 pounds heavier none of you fools would give her a second look, you silly people are only caught on the way she looks, nothing more, kind of sad if you think about it, because she has a brain of a fly. LOL but again, you fools keep trying to put that clown in the white house, you better brush up on your spanish and muslim speaking because I can bet within 2 months of that clown being in office AMERICA WILL BE TAKEN OVER. So instead of you bright fools trying to put someone in office because of your spiteful hateful ways, you people need to wake up and smell the freakin coffee. Because if she gave up on being a govern, THE WHITE HOUSE IS UP FOR THE TAKEN

Who's the fool here? You think we follow her for her looks? NO, that is you. You voted for the president because he was black. He sure didn't have the qualifications and is proving that everyday. You really have no clue.

[blue moon]

Alabama wrote:

Sarah Palin is playing you fools like a puppet. Keep making her rich, she smart enough to know your fools will hang on to every little word she says, and I bet she's laughing all the way to the bank. But if you come to think of it, if you fools voted for Bush you fools will believe anything. I hope she does get in the White House, and then and only then you fools will realize how stupid and brain washed you really are. I can bet if Sarah was 50 pounds heavier none of you fools would give her a second look, you silly people are only caught on the way she looks, nothing more, kind of sad if you think about it, because she has a brain of a fly. LOL but again, you fools keep trying to put that clown in the white house, you better brush up on your spanish and muslim speaking because I can bet within 2 months of that clown being in office AMERICA WILL BE TAKEN OVER. So instead of you bright fools trying to put someone in office because of your spiteful hateful ways, you people need to wake up and smell the freakin coffee. Because if she gave up on being a govern, THE WHITE HOUSE IS UP FOR THE TAKEN

Enough said you voted for travelingon the down low president..... great job he's doing "NOT" carry on fairyland lady. Get rich quick Sarah!!!!!

[NehaRain]

Wolfman57 wrote:

NehaRain.. You mean Nancy Pelousy??? You know her husband has a good racket going on in Kalifornia "Arnold Speak".. He apparently owns a lot of real estate and just conveniently has been awarded various contracts, etc. They have been keeping him under the radar. Nancy Pelousy can equate to the typical DUMB Democrat as much as former Chappaquiddick Olympic swimmer Ted Kennedy. Yes, they both have a lot in common with Urban America! Just don't let urban America through their gated community...

How many children does multi millionairess Nancy Fancy have? I'd reckon a few since she is a good Catholic woman. She sure did earn her millions in the honest Demo way.

[NehaRain]

blue moon wrote:

<quoted text>Enough said you voted for travelingon the down low president..... great job he's doing "NOT" carry on fairyland lady. Get rich quick Sarah!!!!!

I can only hope Sarah makes as much from her autobiography as Obama made from his. Of course, the ONE, wasn't fact checked. So many little lying ditties in his book. He said Michelle was with him in Bali [when he had to get away to concentrate and finish his book]. Hmmmmmmmm.........does Michelle remember those times?

[NehaRain]

Pitypat wrote:

<quoted text>
Who's the fool here? You think we follow her for her looks? NO, that is you. You voted for the president because he was black. He sure didn't have the qualifications and is proving that everyday. You really have no clue.

Okay, okay, I do admit that I appreciate her looks more than Ted Kennedy's. I admit I like her legs better than Michelle's. Now, about the *arm thang*, I've never seen Sarah's arms. As for Sarah's wardrobe, I've also got to admit that it appeals to me more than the flowered floozy belt under the boobs look. Shallow, shallow is my name!

[SheliaP]

Pitypat wrote:

<quoted text>
Because usually the ghetto trash keeps having babies and stays on welfare. You can bet Bristol is more careful now. It is the ghetto trash that doesn't learn from their mistakes. They don't change their lives. Oh yes, they go to church, they are forgiven and they do it again. You don't think God doesn't know the pattern. You ask forgiveness and you learn. They don't. Yes, Bristol has family that cares and supports her. So to you that is wrong? Sorry if the black folks haven't learned this concept yet. Could be part of the problem, don't you think?

Why are you bringing race into this? Black folks? I'm talking about any young woman that might have been raised in a bad environment and then found herself pregnant and alone. For someone who claims she isn't bigoted, you sure manage to put your foot in your mouth time and time again.

Some young women do commit the same mistakes as their parents, and some of them commit the same mistakes over and over again. That's a separate issue, although an important one. But what I'm talking about is the tendency for posters here to just assume that if a young woman makes a mistake and has no support structure in her life (like a good family), then her morals and character are raked over coals when you don't know her and are basing your judgment solely on what the media tells you. That's just ignorance.

These forums are supposed to be places to discuss issues and ideas, not assassinate other people's character. That form of argument, if you can call it argument, is called "ad hominum." (Latin for "against the man"), and its the weakest form of argument there is--equivalent to playground taunts and name-calling. And what is its purpose in the end?

[Pitypat]

NehaRain wrote:

<quoted text>
Okay, okay, I do admit that I appreciate her looks more than Ted Kennedy's. I admit I like her legs better than Michelle's. Now, about the *arm thang*, I've never seen Sarah's arms. As for Sarah's wardrobe, I've also got to admit that it appeals to me more than the flowered floozy belt under the boobs look. Shallow, shallow is my name!

Gotta agree with you there.

[blue moon]

Pitypat wrote:

<quoted text>
Gotta agree with you there.

Yes that makes three of us.
Make that money Honey, sign those books.
One minute she sign's 5.5 books.
You go girl......

[NehaRain]

Did anyone read the Globe and National Enquirer this week? I sped read them while standing in line at Giant Eagle this afternoon. Some interesting things being printed about Obama. At least these two rags are equal in their sensationalism.

[hunky]

NehaRain wrote:

Did anyone read the Globe and National Enquirer this week? I sped read them while standing in line at Giant Eagle this afternoon. Some interesting things being printed about Obama. At least these two rags are equal in their sensationalism.

yes I HAVE. Obama's ex-gay lover Larry Sinclair is coming out of the closet to try and bury the president.
Oh yeah and he is dying of cancer. Or aids or throat cancer. Hummmmm it all makes since. Swallow, inhale, the road is a ruff one in the life of a man on the down low.
The world is going to shit in a obama hand / mouth banger they say.