Son of Las Vegas judge in custody after girl's death

[greg]

A tragic accident occured. All were out too late. Some were drinking.The son of a judge was involved. According to at least one person who won't shut up !! The mother is at fault. If I was a juror I would think that All persons involved in the accident were at fault. The family situation has nothing to do with fault. This boy was not to be out and driving, therefore he is responsible for his actions. Only HIM !Not the parents, or anyone else. He knew what he was doing when he violated a court order.Stop dealing with him as though he is two years old. I remember being his age and would have realized when I got into that vehicle that I wasn't supposed to and did it anyway. Add the alchohol and here we are.I believe he assisted at the accident site because he knew he had no choice,and just possibly because Dad is a judge,this might go away. Think 16 and what would be going through your mind ! Again The justice system will sort this out. Time will tell.

[Haunting]

greg wrote:

A tragic accident occured. All were out too late. Some were drinking.The son of a judge was involved. According to at least one person who won't shut up !! The mother is at fault. If I was a juror I would think that All persons involved in the accident were at fault. The family situation has nothing to do with fault. This boy was not to be out and driving, therefore he is responsible for his actions. Only HIM !Not the parents, or anyone else. He knew what he was doing when he violated a court order.Stop dealing with him as though he is two years old. I remember being his age and would have realized when I got into that vehicle that I wasn't supposed to and did it anyway. Add the alchohol and here we are.I believe he assisted at the accident site because he knew he had no choice,and just possibly because Dad is a judge,this might go away. Think 16 and what would be going through your mind ! Again The justice system will sort this out. Time will tell.

Greg,

You can't mean what you say: "THE FAMILY HAS NOTHING TO WITH FAULT."

Two parents, to each teenager, and seven teenager's who were involved in this tragedy, calculating 14 parents. IN THIS PARTICULAR NEWS STORY ON VIDEO. The mother of one of the teenager's, was putting blame on another parent.

WHAT DID YOU SEE AND WHAT DID YOU HEAR?

Also, both parents to Michael Mosley, who attended court about Michael's driving record, before the November 14, 2008 accident. Heard SUPPOSEDLY, what the judge ordered, regarding Michael, driving to and from school, along with no teenager's in the vehicle. I would think that all three parties: were wrong!

Shouldn't parents, be responsible for "what" their under 18 years of age children do? and what do parents do, when they don't share the same roof?

Shouldn't the parent "who" had custody of Michael, that night 11/14/08, be responsible for allowing/not allowing him to be driving AFTER SCHOOL ENDED, THAT EVENING AND KNOWING IF OTHER KIDS WERE IN THE VEHICLE?

BOTH PARENTS, ALLEGED NOT HAVING MICHAEL MOSLEY!

I do agree, that Michael knew "if" he should have been driving or not!
I also agree, that he knew if he should have been driving, even with a low level of alcohol. Although, I would like to believe that Michael stopped, because he knew that was the RIGHT THING TO DO, not because of his
father's profession.

I do believe, that Judge Voy, will make the right decision, based upon, the evidence at hand, regarding his violations on his drivers license, AND NOT BECAUSE OF ANY INVOLVEMENT with the accident, that David Jensen created and pleaded guilty to.

Regarding the mother, to Michael, did you read the list of lawsuits?

I know it has nothing to do with the accident, yet I felt compelled to check it out, to see if the posts written (whether by one person, or several) had any validity. Very interesting!

[greg]

Haunting wrote:

<quoted text>
Greg,
You can't mean what you say: "THE FAMILY HAS NOTHING TO WITH FAULT."
Two parents, to each teenager, and seven teenager's who were involved in this tragedy, calculating 14 parents. IN THIS PARTICULAR NEWS STORY ON VIDEO. The mother of one of the teenager's, was putting blame on another parent.
WHAT DID YOU SEE AND WHAT DID YOU HEAR?
Also, both parents to Michael Mosley, who attended court about Michael's driving record, before the November 14, 2008 accident. Heard SUPPOSEDLY, what the judge ordered, regarding Michael, driving to and from school, along with no teenager's in the vehicle. I would think that all three parties: were wrong!
Shouldn't parents, be responsible for "what" their under 18 years of age children do? and what do parents do, when they don't share the same roof?
Shouldn't the parent "who" had custody of Michael, that night 11/14/08, be responsible for allowing/not allowing him to be driving AFTER SCHOOL ENDED, THAT EVENING AND KNOWING IF OTHER KIDS WERE IN THE VEHICLE?
BOTH PARENTS, ALLEGED NOT HAVING MICHAEL MOSLEY!
I do agree, that Michael knew "if" he should have been driving or not!
I also agree, that he knew if he should have been driving, even with a low level of alcohol. Although, I would like to believe that Michael stopped, because he knew that was the RIGHT THING TO DO, not because of his
father's profession.
I do believe, that Judge Voy, will make the right decision, based upon, the evidence at hand, regarding his violations on his drivers license, AND NOT BECAUSE OF ANY INVOLVEMENT with the accident, that David Jensen created and pleaded guilty to.
Regarding the mother, to Michael, did you read the list of lawsuits?
I know it has nothing to do with the accident, yet I felt compelled to check it out, to see if the posts written (whether by one person, or several) had any validity. Very interesting!

Youu must be the same bitch who won't shut up!! Go Away !!!!!!!!!!

[Haunting]

greg wrote:

<quoted text>
Youu must be the same bitch who won't shut up!! Go Away !!!!!!!!!!

Greg,

Why can't you answer the questions, that have been addressed to you?

You certainly, can "dish" out your opinion, yet another person can't give
out their's or ask important questions about the parents!

I pity you and those around you! Your name calling only shows, YOU, have no self-esteem.

My questions are valid on this topic, and I personally feel, that Judge Voy will consider these questions, when making a decision on how he is going to rule on Michael Mosley. I firmly believe, that the foundation of a child, starts with the parenting, as does manners.

[greg]

Haunting wrote:

<quoted text>
Greg,
You can't mean what you say: "THE FAMILY HAS NOTHING TO WITH FAULT."
Two parents, to each teenager, and seven teenager's who were involved in this tragedy, calculating 14 parents. IN THIS PARTICULAR NEWS STORY ON VIDEO. The mother of one of the teenager's, was putting blame on another parent.
WHAT DID YOU SEE AND WHAT DID YOU HEAR?
Also, both parents to Michael Mosley, who attended court about Michael's driving record, before the November 14, 2008 accident. Heard SUPPOSEDLY, what the judge ordered, regarding Michael, driving to and from school, along with no teenager's in the vehicle. I would think that all three parties: were wrong!
Shouldn't parents, be responsible for "what" their under 18 years of age children do? and what do parents do, when they don't share the same roof?
Shouldn't the parent "who" had custody of Michael, that night 11/14/08, be responsible for allowing/not allowing him to be driving AFTER SCHOOL ENDED, THAT EVENING AND KNOWING IF OTHER KIDS WERE IN THE VEHICLE?
BOTH PARENTS, ALLEGED NOT HAVING MICHAEL MOSLEY!
I do agree, that Michael knew "if" he should have been driving or not!
I also agree, that he knew if he should have been driving, even with a low level of alcohol. Although, I would like to believe that Michael stopped, because he knew that was the RIGHT THING TO DO, not because of his
father's profession.
I do believe, that Judge Voy, will make the right decision, based upon, the evidence at hand, regarding his violations on his drivers license, AND NOT BECAUSE OF ANY INVOLVEMENT with the accident, that David Jensen created and pleaded guilty to.
Regarding the mother, to Michael, did you read the list of lawsuits?
I know it has nothing to do with the accident, yet I felt compelled to check it out, to see if the posts written (whether by one person, or several) had any validity. Very interesting!

OH! It's you again. The Terry hater! When I see one of your names that you use I don't even read them anymore. Get A Life and some sessions with a shrink!!

[Haunting]

greg wrote:

<quoted text>
OH! It's you again. The Terry hater! When I see one of your names that you use I don't even read them anymore. Get A Life and some sessions with a shrink!!

Greg,

You lie! If you don't read these anymore, than why respond with your stupidity! It is obvious you don't read logical statements, and the recommendation for a shrink is good advise, for Terry. Please pass that
tid bit of information on to her.

[Haunting]

Let me add:

Hate is an emotion, I have no emotion to the mother, therefore, I don't hate
Terry, or the other parents who had children involved in this accident.

[Victim of Terry Mosley]

RESEARCH.......

December 16, 2008, article in The Las Vegas Review Journal, link:

http://www.lvrj.com/news/36219879html...

Terry Mosley writes a comment.

tmosley wrote on December 17, 2008 08:16 a.m.

"The ADULTS INVOLVED, directly and indirectly should ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY and FOCUS on PREVENTING ANOTHER TRAGEDY.

Makes sense to me,....what about you, Greg and VegasLady...makes sense, to look at these adults, who happen to be parents!

These are Terry Mosley's words!

[Dear TK]

When will you realize the people did not elect Terry Mosley? They did not put their faith in her as they did in Donald Mosley. Terry Mosley's finances are certainly in a shambles. She's been denied the court-ordered child support the judge refuses to pay. Her relationship with her son appears to have been destroyed because Donald Mosley, according to the former Nevada Supreme Court justice in the custody case, is disinterested in co-parenting and refuses to abide by the judge's orders for shared custody.
And it was Judge Mosley, not Terry Mosley, who went on TV after the Hyten accident and admitted he is not capable of controlling his son's behavior while in town or gone. Terry Mosley could be the biggest deadbeat in town but that absolves Judge Mosley of nothing. Get over yourself already, T.K.

[Dana Gentry]

You are right, Terry Mosley is the biggest deadbeat in town, just like the
irresponsibility of the journalist WHO REPORTED THE NEWS STORY. Unfortunately, there are people who have put their "faith" in Terry Mosley, they are now called PLAINTIFFS.

Once again, it was Terry Mosley WHO contacted you, Dana Gentry! Your own words which are on tape, said: "Terry Mosley, called you",on Saturday, November 15, 2008, therefore your quote disputes, any "first" in the matter of who, what, when, where and why, but the HOW was through the mouthpiece of a reporter, called Dana Gentry, who can't get over herself. Investigative reporting lacks from this irresponsible reporter. What is your motive? The election is over, Judge Mosley won, yet your OBESSION OF JUDGE MOSLEY, IS LIKE THAT OF THERESA FIGLIUZZI-MOSLEY, who by the way is NO MOTHER THERESA that is why the relationship with her son, has been destroyed. Show the court order of child support, Judge Mosley won custody of Michael Mosley in 1998, where was Terry's child support in the years, that Judge Mosley had custody? Glad to see you, you got stirred up, you still can't take it! Remember T.K., isn't a public figure!

[Felony]

Public Access for Henderson Township Court:

http://cvpublicaccess.co.nv.us/pa/

Input name: Dana M. Gentry (Resnick)

Cases:

1) 01CH000336 Defendant

2) 03CRH000357-0000 Defendant

3) 03CRH000387-0000 Defendant

4) 03PCH000347-0000 Defendant

5) 03PCH000433-0000 Defendant

6) 07CRH002579-0000 Defendant / Arrest Warrant

7) 07PCH002504-0000 Defendant

Looks like: two peas in a pod

Irresponsible Journalist, who can't balance a check book!

Have any foreclosures to add to your reputation?

How many warrants have been issued?

[VegasLady]

Felony wrote:

Public Access for Henderson Township Court:
http://cvpublicaccess.co.nv.us/pa/
.....

Your link does not work. Did you forget something?

[Felony]

It works, but "someone" isn't allowing it to work from this blog.

Google the link.....it works, and it shows all cases.....if not, try the Clark County website, which will lead you to the Henderson Cases....

Amazing how certain, individuals can use certain advantages, to prevent the public from knowing "their" illegal actions....would that be considered unethical?....Hopefully another server will be find, to expose this journalist.

[Correction]

VegasLady wrote:

<quoted text>
Your link does not work. Did you forget something?

http://cvpublicaccess.co.clark.nv.us ./pa/

[Correction CORRECTED]

VegasLady wrote:

<quoted text>
Your link does not work. Did you forget something?

http://cvpublicaccess.co.clark.nv.us/pa/

[VegasLady]

After searching per your instruction, I see four or five CLOSED cases, all but one of which have to do with a bad check.(The other seems to have been filed against two people, Dana Gentry being one of them.)

There is no apparent way to find out what the specifics of the cases are as that information does not appear to be linked through. And no, I didn't spend more than 10 minutes; just not worth my while.

How do I know it's the same Dana Gentry?

Do you have an actual point or is it just a hobby of yours to attempt to "out" public figures?

BTW, the subject of the attached article is STILL Michael Mosley & how he BROKE THREE LAWS.

Nothing you have written under ANY of your assorted screen names has changed that.

I strongly suggest you get a life that does not include a PC.

[SINS OF A REPORTER]

When you go to the link, and you input Dana Gentry's name, her maiden name is Resnick, and ALL CASES, under the name Dana Gentry is the same person. When you click on the case number to the far right, it will give you information about the case(s).

I don't agree, that a reporter, takes misleading information, because they want to be "first" in "what" they think is NEWSBREAKING INFORMATION, without looking at themselves in the mirror first, especially when they themselves have been ACCUSED of writing checks with insufficient funds. In my opinion, that is FRAUD.

Michael is under house arrest, for violating what a previous judge ordered. I look at that as a consequence to a bad decision.

I don't believe in character assassination on a minor, to get at the father, because he is a judge. I do believe in reading articles with an open mind and understanding what is the real truth, when I see an agenda in play by a reporter, who is deliberately misleading readers, as well as viewers, I will expose the bad choices, that this reporter or any reporter has made in their life, especially when they are an adult and as an adult should know better.

This forum, gives anybody the "right" to give their opinion on the character's in play, even the reporting, which has proven to be wrong.

No DRAGRACING
No DRIVING DRUNK

[Looking Back]

As I read the comments from this thread, it is amazing how accurate some of the comments are regarding Terry Figliuzzi Mosley and the reporter Dana Gentry.
1) Terry Figliuzzi Mosley ~ gets arrested on Friday, March 13, 2009, for bad checks ~ and then the reporter Dana Gentry who continues to write about other's misfortune and drags peoples names in the mud, through her profession, as a journalist, has insufficient checks out herself, and immediately has an attorney friend go pay her "hot check" after HOW MANY MONTH'S, to over a year!
2) Terry Figliuzzi Mosley who goes by the name Tara Mosley or Marie Figliuzzi, at this time, has HOW MANY WARRANTS out on her, as of today?
Where is the "great" reporting from Dana Gentry to expose the abuse that Terry/Theresa has done to numerous victims in Coney Island, N.Y., California, and ALL THE VICTIMS IN CLARK COUNTY.
The real story was sitting in front of you, when you were sitting in the Johnson's home, while Terry was claiming Judicial Corruption~The corruption is all the names that she has used in using other peoples credit cards to buy things to put up a front of her lifestyle.
Thank Goodness, the camera from the Jon Ralston show took video pictures of the Johnson's furniture, which the day of Terry's eviction, May 4-5, of 2009, allows the police to use as evidence. Curiosity ~ will Dana Gentry now testify AGAINST her friend Terry Mosley, or will she continue to believe the deceit from this woman? Reality, Terry and Dana are too much alike ~ why Greenspun allows this reporter to continue, is beyond me ~ he must not care about slander or libel.

[calibrat]

Driving-Drinking Laws wrote:

If the laws & punishments were harsher than what they are, people of all ages would think more before breaking one of these laws.
It's a senseless crime that could have been averted, and the little girl alive and attending school.

IF she had been wearing her seatbelt she might be alive too..He was wrong drinking and driving but her not wearing a seatbelt also added in her death.

[Need to know]

http://www.ktnv.com/global/Category.asp...

Mother ~ Terry Figliuzzi Mosley - DID NOT APPEAR IN COURT FOR HER SON.

She told the court, "she was out of town" or could it be, because of the arrest warrants that have been issued for her?

How many warrants do you have Terry/Theresa/Marie/Tara?
How many names are you using?