Lawmakers scrutinize constituents on gay rights

Feb 10, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The News Tribune

To understand the "no" vote cast on same-sex marriage by Rep. Steve Kirby, a Tacoman who usually sides with his fellow Democrats, look at how the people in his district voted in 2009 on the successful referendum giving gay couples "everything but marriage." In its new shape after post-census redistricting, Kirby's diverse South Tacoma and east ... (more)

Comments
1 - 3 of 3 Comments Last updated Feb 11, 2012

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 10, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

From the article:

...“My adopted family raised me as they raised their own children, with strong Christian values,” Shin said in a statement crediting his adoptive family for saving his life.“To this day, I cherish those values and try to live my life in accordance with their teachings. Therefore my vote against passage of this bill was one that was deeply personal.“

So, Mr. Shin, it is insufficient for YOU to be obedient to YOUR parents, the rest of us must also obey them as well?

It would NEVER have even occured to me that the reason you were elected was be in a position to force others to obey YOUR Mommy and Daddy.

What an INFANT !!

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 10, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

He says that he voted against it because his constituents voted 55% against gays in the election. Sometimes you lead, and sometimes you follow. I guess this guy is a follower. I just hope he never makes it to the position of a judge who oversees Civil Rights cases. If he had been on the court African Americans would still have no civil rights.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 11, 2012
 
I wonder how biased the language of any repeal referendum will be, considering the person in charge of approving the ballot language is non other than the anti-gay republican attorney general who's running for governor this this.

Gee, what a happy coincidence for the anti-gays.

Any rational person who think that would be a conflict of interest, considering he's publicly stated his opposition to marriage equality and vowed to overturn any such legislation if he's elected gov. Unfortunately he's actually leading the Dem candidate in all the polls.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Lakewood Discussions

Search the Lakewood Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
slenderman Jul 22 slenderman 2
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Washingto... (Oct '10) Jul 22 EasyEed 710
US Army Says This Aircraft "AUGGIE" Never Existed. (Feb '13) Jul 21 Danielle Collins 16
DanCollins888 More Rearers Than Topix Fircrest Jul 21 Danielle Collins 6
PG-13 Topix Fircrest - Now Sexually Deviant (Sep '13) Jul 21 Danielle Collins 4
DanCollins888 Jul 15 cyberfest 5
It's time to celebrate the right kind of pride Jul 13 RevKen 2
•••
•••

Lakewood News Video

•••
•••

Lakewood Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Lakewood People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Lakewood News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Lakewood
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••