Well JBH you must have heard that even Russia knows who holds the responsibility of the chemical weapons. After all who has been selling it o them? The sellers know who has demonstrated a lack of responsibility in keeping those weapons secured. It may take you a while to figure it out but they already have that figured out.This is the most ridiculous fallacy coming from US, by just saying about chemical weapons, by calling redline by predetermining to jumping to conclusion.
When Obama says if he won't act, that would lose credibility--maybe his credibility is to the rebels.
But the world does not allow US to strike Syria. So that has no credibility by just thinking that does not care what the world says TO STRIKE, as well as in UN MATTERS, as Bush did.
US is the other party, by saying Syria used chemical weapons.
But Syria Assad says he has not used chemical weapons. But does the world have to act on this from what Obama says? US has chemical weapons too and there are over 40 countries also have.
It is up to the world if there is a court to look into it, that US is not policeman nor prosecutor, but the third party.
When the other party Syria says of not using chemical weapons, both US and the other party must be present, to show their case, and that is impossible as it will take a lot of time and procedure. ONE is too naive and unrealistic to be jumping to conclusion that the world will go by one side of what Obama and Kerry say that is their absolute proof and evidence, but that is not how it works. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE to waste on time to go by looking into Syria again and again.
When the other party Syria proves it is not true and they Syrians have not done it, then US is in deep trouble by falsifying to commit atrocity.
But the world might have no time for this, simply that is the credibility to rule out of any strike by US---that Obama does not know even where and what the credibility IS ABOUT.
UN might have to rule out US saying, because the public business of credibility of what the world wants is not to strike Syria--ASSAD SAYS HE DID NOT USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS--US EVEN SAYS HE IS LYING AS ALL OTHER SIDES SAY US LYING TOO--WHAT IS THE POINT BY MAKING THIS NUISANCE BY OBAMA?
The public business matter is in the UN as UN can reject and disapprove anything as not worthwhile.
In a crisis situation it is not always a viable solution, to say, oh lets just hold it right there, freeze, we have to take this to court. LOL
A court can latter be set up to address any violations to our humanitys rights. Think its called the Hague Court think its in Geneva. What do you think ? LOL they have warrants for the Bushwhacking gang outstanding. They have some questions for them. U.S. wont give them up. USA harboring fugitives? Hmmmm