Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310378 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

STO

Vallejo, CA

#287904 Mar 4, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>You're avoiding answering a direct question.
I'm not. I don't see the point. When I give explanation, just like with Numbers 5, the response is "No it's not."

If I didn't think the answer would fall on deaf ears, I'd be happy to educate Gtown. He's not open to knowledge. He thinks the Bible is a joke.

It's that pearls before swine thing, ya know.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287905 Mar 4, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
STO is NOT "...convinced that numbers 5 is justifying women killing their unwanted child."
Take a refresher in reading comprehension.
Abortion was used as a means to determine a woman guilty of adultery during biblical times. That's what Numbers 5 is about and what STO's been discussing. Pregnant woman drinks the bitter water and either aborts and guilty of adultery or she does not abort is innocent of adultery and able to receive her husband's seed.
Seems silly, doesn't it? But that's how it was back in the iron age. And that's according to my NIV bible over 20 years old now. You notice STO uses the KJV, not the NIV? Yet both say the same thing. Go figure.
Katie, be honest here. STO mentioned this biblical reference to justify abortion. Foo does it often as well. BOTH are incorrect. It doesnt justify killing as choice. God FORBIDS killing.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#287906 Mar 4, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
For cryin' out loud. And how does the test determine if she cheated? By aborting a pregnancy causeed by another man. I've already evidenced this with translations.
You don't have to accept it. I don't really care. But if you want to argue the opposite, then get your proof together. Give a rebuttal. "No it's not!" is not a rebuttal.
No, it's not! You're right, STO.

<wink>
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#287907 Mar 4, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
But, don't you find it interesting to see all the wailing and crying over the Holocaust..
What "wailing and crying" were you refering to? I havn't seen any wailing or crying, except of course from some whining little bitches like yourself - who likes to make incendiary ignorant comments when you dont get your way.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287908 Mar 4, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
My pro-choice position is not opinion.
I never said it was relevant to any woman. I said it is relevant to this debate. My personal opinion regarding the choices, is not relevant to the debate.
You're not manipulating anyone. In fact, it's YOU who is being ridiculous. And childish.
Enjoy your impotence.
Why are you afraid to reveal your personal opinion?. The abortion argument is based on our personal opinions. If you are against the act of abortion then you would never support a woman EVER choosing it. If you have NO issue with the act of abortion then you support a womans choice to abort.

Abortion kills an innocent humans life. I am against it.

You?
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#287909 Mar 4, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>

According too Foo, Jews don't consider a fetus a person, so why the name, circumcision and burial.
What part of "the BABY was born by C-section" confused you?

You truly are stupid.
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#287910 Mar 4, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> God FORBIDS killing.
You clearly havent read a bible.

BTW he forbids MURDER.

Not the same thing.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287911 Mar 4, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not. I don't see the point. When I give explanation, just like with Numbers 5, the response is "No it's not."
If I didn't think the answer would fall on deaf ears, I'd be happy to educate Gtown. He's not open to knowledge. He thinks the Bible is a joke.
It's that pearls before swine thing, ya know.
Prolifers disagree on abortion. Hes disagreeing with you on bible passages. So? Since when has THAT ever stopped you from debating?

Your avoiding answering.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287912 Mar 4, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what Katie said.
I maintain, a fetus determined to be viable who is delivered and attached to ALS, but dies anyway, was obviously not viable. It was unable to survive outside the womb.
I think she is saying it is a fetus.
According too Foo, Jews don't consider a fetus a person, so why the name, circumcision and burial.
Interesting indeed ;)
Bit-O-Honey

Mooresville, NC

#287913 Mar 4, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what Katie said.
I maintain, a fetus determined to be viable who is delivered and attached to ALS, but dies anyway, was obviously not viable. It was unable to survive outside the womb.
THIS baby was not viable due to injuries sustained by his mother and him.

Grow up already. Why would you deliberately make yourself look so dumb?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287914 Mar 4, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
What part of "the BABY was born by C-section" confused you?
You truly are stupid.
You're not paying attention. Obviously.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#287915 Mar 4, 2013
Forum wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you take out your organs after God put
them there?
They are yours.
Men remove womens breasts because they are criminals.
So why did you God create cancer?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#287916 Mar 4, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> It's not uncommon for people to resent converted/changed people. If you notice its the proaborts ( those who are either killing what God has created or supporting those that do) that don't believe his testimony and who like to remind him of his sinful past ( which he has repented and asked Gods forgiveness for).
You are angry because you can't convince others about your interpretations of the bible. The KJV of the bible has added words that God has forbidden(go read the back of your bible wheere it explains this). Perhaps that is why your interpretation is a bit different.
I'm not angry.

The KJV is not perfect. Have you read its Preface?

That's why we study. That's why we use a Strong's Concordance.

I don't resent Gtown. I simply don't believe him.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#287917 Mar 4, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Katie, be honest here. STO mentioned this biblical reference to justify abortion. Foo does it often as well. BOTH are incorrect. It doesnt justify killing as choice. God FORBIDS killing.
Nobody is trying to justify abortion. It needs no justification. It's a medical option for unwanted/unhealthy pregnancies.

STO, as far as I understand it, is disputing the oft made claim that abortion is forbidden due to what the bible says. Well, in Numbers 5, it wasn't forbidden. It was used to determine if a woman was guilty of adultery.

I don't know why, after all this time, you haven't used the excuse of Jesus' coming to wipe out the old ways of the old testament. Just as I don't know why you cherry pick parts of the old testament to confirm your own prejudice and hypocrisy.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287918 Mar 4, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Going by that Pew Research site, Catholics are swiftly in agreement with jews that they dont want their medical decisions dictated by faith based beliefs.
Unless of course you're going to claim that 51% of catholics aren't really catholic because they hold diffrent views than you.... That would suck, since it would drasticially reduce the numbers of catholics you and your kind could MISREPRESENT.
Abortion is forbidden for Catholics Jews Muslims and Christians. So their decision to abort goes against their faith.

There are many who are CIINO, JINOS AND MINOS. They abort and don't care about offending their God. That's nothing new dear.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#287919 Mar 4, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Katie, be honest here. STO mentioned this biblical reference to justify abortion. Foo does it often as well. BOTH are incorrect. It doesnt justify killing as choice. God FORBIDS killing.
God does not forbid killing.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#287920 Mar 4, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
THIS baby was not viable due to injuries sustained by his mother and him.
Grow up already. Why would you deliberately make yourself look so dumb?
She's combining separate conversations and still not understanding how, straight across, viability determined on a fetus happens *before* delivery. If *after* delivery the newborn is attached to ALS and does not survive, it obviously was not viable.

I do not know why she believes I am confused about this or why she is displaying her own confusion about this.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287921 Mar 4, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
THIS baby was not viable due to injuries sustained by his mother and him.
Grow up already. Why would you deliberately make yourself look so dumb?
prove it
STO

Vallejo, CA

#287922 Mar 4, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's not! You're right, STO.
<wink>
Ha!

I see they pulled the same sh^t with you...
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<thud>
Neither of you has gotten what I've said. And you're both confusing topics, projecting your confusion on to me and stating these are my beliefs when not.
Thank you, though, for showing what level your comprehension rests at and how easy it is for you to be dishonest (to put it nicely).
"projecting your confusion on to me and stating these are my beliefs when not."

Often, I don't think they are confused. I think they got nuthin', so they have to make up sumthin.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#287923 Mar 4, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
God does not forbid killing.
Oh no?

So God has no problem with Mom killing her newborn or twelve yr old? Or man killing his gf?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lake Forest Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 41 min CHARON 1,265,113
Review: Law Offices Of George Castrataro 3 hr skinnydippingjudg... 125
News Missing 5-year-old Florida girl likely was abdu... (Feb '09) 10 hr zazz 97,465
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) Mon Ariel Sharon 70,149
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) Sun budd 54,341
Election Who do you support for County Commission in Flo... (Oct '10) Oct '10 Francis Michael J... 3
News West Park's Lake Forest Volunteer Fire Departme... (Jan '09) Jan '09 Lars Was A Criminal 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Lake Forest Mortgages