sex offender registry

Posted in the La Porte Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 16 of16
LA PORTE CITIZEN

La Porte, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 15, 2010
 

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 15, 2010
 
AGUAYO,JOSEPH 12/28/1981 M W
4905 VALLEY VIEW
BARBEE,PATRICK JAMES 02/07/1958 M B
10122 RUSTIC ROCK RD
BARNES,DEMARCUS JOSEPH 11/15/1985 M B
1400 N 10TH ST 28
BREAUX,ANDREW LEE JR 01/09/1960 M W
718 S KANSAS ST
BROWN,BRIAN ORLISERA 09/05/1959 M W
803 N 11TH ST
BYARS,RICKI DALE 05/15/1962 M B
10438 QUIET HILL
COBORN,ROBERT DEAN 10/05/1961 M W
1400 N 10TH ST 33 SOUTH
COCHRAN,JAMES DANIEL 03/10/1957 M W
1005 WILLOWCREEK
CONLEY,LILIA SOCORRO 09/08/1962 F W
8296 OAKHAVEN RD
CUARON,JUAN GABRIEL 02/14/1980 M W
401 NORTH 13TH
DAVID,LYNN BATES 10/20/1961 M W
3003 S BROADWAY ST 7
DAVIS,JOHN EDGAR 09/15/1956 M W
3030 SOUTH BROADWAY 34
DICKERSON,RICHARD ARNOLD 07/21/1977 M W 10106 CARLOW
ELLIFF,DON 08/29/1949 M W
3814 BARRACUDA LN
ESCARENO,DAVID HERNANDEZ 06/06/1962 M W 8523 ELMHAVEN
FLORES,VENTURA III 02/06/1979 M W
201 S 5TH ST
FONTENOT,LARRY DALE 07/07/1962 M W
113 N 4TH
FRAZIER,PATRICK ALAN 04/26/1989 M W
317 S 6TH ST
GARCIA,ANTONIO LIMAS JR 02/03/1963 M W
3332 SCOTCH MOSS LN
GARZA,DAVID CHRISTAIN 09/09/1990 M W
618 BAYRIDGE RD
GOLDEN,JASON KEITH 03/18/1975 M W
10431 RUSTIC GATE RD
GUITERREZ,ISRAEL 10/31/1976 M W
917 S IOWA ST
GUTIERREZ,RODOLFO RUDY 01/20/1975 M W
8906 BULL RUN
HARPER,CRAIG ASHLEY 09/20/1963 M W
231 BAY ST
HEIDRICK,JOHN MICHAEL 01/03/1957 M W
218 S 8TH ST
HENDERSON,DAVID LEE 04/27/1945 M W
1414 SOUTH BROADWAY 22
HERNANDEZ,FRANK 10/20/1952 M W
3202 CLARKSVILLE ST
HIGHFIELD,JEFFREY RAY 12/20/1980 M W
10006 OLD ORCHARD
HILL,DELOYD JR 12/12/1954 M B
10438 CARLOW LN
HOGUES,TROY EDWARDS 02/26/1983 M B
826 BAY RIDGE
HUCKABAY,WILBUR RICHARD 01/22/1957 M W
1400 N 10TH ST 29
KELLY,REBECCA KAY 01/09/1970 F W
1303 MISSION DR
KIESSLING,JOSHUA BARRETT03/17/1978 M W
1211 W B ST
KING,REGINALD 03/18/1954 M W
2942 IVY DR
KISS,ANTHONY DANIEL 07/06/1981 M W
9206 CARLOW LN
LAURENT,RICKIE BRIAN 08/03/1955 M W
800 W MAIN ST 22
LOPEZ,GONZALO RODRIGUEZ 09/06/1951 M W
9803 BLUE BIRD ST
MADISON,RALPH SHEPPARD 03/27/1964 M W
821 WILLOW CREEK DR
MARLER,CHRISTOPHER DALE 11/02/1958 M W
319 FALK AVE
MARTIN,CHARLES RAY 05/23/1939 M W
820 EASY ST
MC-COVERY,PAUL DARNELL 12/27/1967 M B
308 E MAIN ST
MENDOZA,MARIO 01/16/1966 M W
10928 OAKWOOD COURT
MOODY,JIM RUSSELL 11/23/1971 M W
502 S HOLMES ST
MOSHER,SIDNEY JR 03/14/1956 M W
717 HWY 146 N 16
NIXON,TRAVIS CLINT 06/23/1987 M W
410 N SHADY LN
NUTT,TRAVIS 12/16/1976 M W
706 NORTH 13TH STREET
PENA,JOSE ANGEL 12/02/1976 M W
205 S 5TH ST 3
PERRY,DEVIN JAMES 06/10/1981 M W
10458 RUSTIC GATE RD
ROBERTS,KERRY BRIAN 10/16/1978 M W
707 S HOLMES ST
ROWTON,CHARLES JASON 02/08/1976 M W
315 N 2ND ST 60
RULE,HOLLY ANNETTE 06/19/1962 F W
811 NORTH 12TH STREET
SALINAS,CLAUDIO ALBERTO 07/19/1985 M W
10911 N L ST 12
SHAVER,BENNY EUGENE 02/10/1971 M W
10011 CHARMONT RD
SILVAS,DANIEL JR 12/09/1980 M W
415 S 5TH ST
SMITH,CHRISTOPHER JAMES 06/09/1978 M W
3210 ANDRICKS RD
SMITH,LARRY DORNELL 07/18/1945 M B
8414 BEECHAVEN RD
SWANAGAN,FRED NELSON 08/21/1951 M B
10018 CATLETT LN
WHITLOCK,RYAN LEE 12/03/1975 M W
11030 DEAF SMITH
WILLIAMS,DONALD HERSCHEL10/09/1936 M W
308 S UTAH ST
WORD,CHRISTOPHER LEE 11/01/1976 M W
10443 ROCKY HOLLOW RD
LA PORTE CITIZEN wrote:
concernedmommio

La Porte, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 15, 2010
 
you can look these up on www.familywatchdog.com also
smc

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 15, 2010
 

Judged:

2

I cannot stand sex offender registries because they lump everyone together and too many people are too ignorant to look up what the person was accused of before forming a lynch mob.

I would take a guess if you looked up each one of these people's offenses, there would be numerous offenders that should be dropped off the list like a 17-year old who had sex with his 16-year old girlfriend.

Primetime did a great episode on this and one man did indeed have sex with his younger girlfriend (by a year). Her father was supportive of their relationship, but got mad at the young man for something unreleased and reported him for statutory rape. Because of the laws in their state, the young man was forced to register as a sex offender. He described all the jobs who would not hire him and all the neighborhoods he and his wife (he married the girl he dated) were ran out of. People protest a sex offender moving into the neighborhood, but many will not look up the background as to what the offense was.

I don't think anyone with children would want someone who molests young children as a neighbor, but there is a complete difference between a person like that and the person I described above.

smc

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 15, 2010
 
Whoops, that sentence should say "got mat at the young man for something unrelated..."
my turn

Katy, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 15, 2010
 

Judged:

2

smc wrote:
I cannot stand sex offender registries because they lump everyone together and too many people are too ignorant to look up what the person was accused of before forming a lynch mob.
I would take a guess if you looked up each one of these people's offenses, there would be numerous offenders that should be dropped off the list like a 17-year old who had sex with his 16-year old girlfriend.
Primetime did a great episode on this and one man did indeed have sex with his younger girlfriend (by a year). Her father was supportive of their relationship, but got mad at the young man for something unreleased and reported him for statutory rape. Because of the laws in their state, the young man was forced to register as a sex offender. He described all the jobs who would not hire him and all the neighborhoods he and his wife (he married the girl he dated) were ran out of. People protest a sex offender moving into the neighborhood, but many will not look up the background as to what the offense was.
I don't think anyone with children would want someone who molests young children as a neighbor, but there is a complete difference between a person like that and the person I described above.
I agree. One of the people listed in the previous posting should not, in my opinion, be a registered sex offender. I too, hate child molesters. But the young man that I know of is not a child molester. He was a foolish teenager who did a foolish thing.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 15, 2010
 

Judged:

1

Did you check the list? I went through the birthdays that would make the offender less than 21 years old, and I compared the offenders age at the time the crime was committed to the age of the child being molested. The closest I could come up with that would match your senerio, is a 20 year old with a 14 year old, and a 20 year old with a 15 year old. I am sorry but that is not star crossed lovers, that is an older male being a predator of a young female. This is not the old west, and we are not in Mexico, so those types of offenses are not acceptable.

smc wrote:
Whoops, that sentence should say "got mat at the young man for something unrelated..."

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 15, 2010
 
Just a foolish thing? Where does foolishness stop and predatory molestation begin? Is it just foolishness the first time he is caught, or is it the sign of a deeper psychological problem being discovered?
my turn wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. One of the people listed in the previous posting should not, in my opinion, be a registered sex offender. I too, hate child molesters. But the young man that I know of is not a child molester. He was a foolish teenager who did a foolish thing.
concernedmommio

La Porte, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 15, 2010
 
I believe that there should be special allowances for teenagers (other than rape)for consensual sex between a boyfriend and girlfriend under the age of 18. Really think about it...most males and females could all be considered sex offenders. Mad Daddy's and Mommy's should look at thier precious little angel fisrt and ask the question if he or she is really the devil in disguise. Of course there's a difference if it's say a 17 year old with a 10 year old or something along the lines of that. I feel all cases need to be handled separately and to the degree of the offense. They do have 1st degree murder and 2nd degree murder.

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 15, 2010
 
The cases, as listed specifically to zip code 77571, have nothing to do with an 18 year old and a 16 year old boyfriend/girlfriend. So that is not what we are talking about here, and not (I presume) what the OP intended the discussion to be about. I also believe that it is correct to say that there are special layers of charge for the "romeo - juliet" offenders, I have heard people in the law profession speak of this catagory of sex offender and they are listed as a "low" threat and are given a much shorter period of time that their name must be included in the offender data base.
The data base itself, when fully navigated allows for complete understanding of what crime was committed, the ages of the criminal and victim, the status/level the crime is considered, and the period of time the offender will remain active in the data base. That pretty much covers your concerns for the misunderstanding of someones name being on that list.
concernedmommio wrote:
I believe that there should be special allowances for teenagers (other than rape)for consensual sex between a boyfriend and girlfriend under the age of 18. Really think about it...most males and females could all be considered sex offenders. Mad Daddy's and Mommy's should look at thier precious little angel fisrt and ask the question if he or she is really the devil in disguise. Of course there's a difference if it's say a 17 year old with a 10 year old or something along the lines of that. I feel all cases need to be handled separately and to the degree of the offense. They do have 1st degree murder and 2nd degree murder.
NUCKING FUTS

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 15, 2010
 
There are these type people that live in our neighbor hoods that are not even registered. Do not trust just anyone with your child. Even the ones you think you can trust are the wrost ones.
lietome

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 15, 2010
 
LaPorte Citizen, you are absolutely right. Very well put.
my turn

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Feb 15, 2010
 

Judged:

1

I was mistaken. The case I was referring to is not listed above. It involves two high school students. The boy pulled a girls skirt down in front of some other students. Though it was a terrible thing to do, should he be lumped in with child molesters?
Don't get me wrong, I'd be furious if it were my daughter. I just think the punishment should fit the crime. I don't know the boy. I just heard the story several years ago.
sowwy21

La Porte, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Feb 15, 2010
 
Those kind of people are just gross.
No1Mom

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 19, 2010
 
smc wrote:
I cannot stand sex offender registries because they lump everyone together and too many people are too ignorant to look up what the person was accused of before forming a lynch mob.
I would take a guess if you looked up each one of these people's offenses, there would be numerous offenders that should be dropped off the list like a 17-year old who had sex with his 16-year old girlfriend.
Primetime did a great episode on this and one man did indeed have sex with his younger girlfriend (by a year). Her father was supportive of their relationship, but got mad at the young man for something unreleased and reported him for statutory rape. Because of the laws in their state, the young man was forced to register as a sex offender. He described all the jobs who would not hire him and all the neighborhoods he and his wife (he married the girl he dated) were ran out of. People protest a sex offender moving into the neighborhood, but many will not look up the background as to what the offense was.
I don't think anyone with children would want someone who molests young children as a neighbor, but there is a complete difference between a person like that and the person I described above.
I agree with your comments but what about those under 18 who actually do commit rape and are convicted? They don't have to register and are more protected than the victims! I know of one who convicted rapist who sits next to your sons & daughters at the HS everyday! And does it piss me off, you bet it does. He should be in jail!!!
lietome

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Feb 20, 2010
 
No1Mom wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with your comments but what about those under 18 who actually do commit rape and are convicted? They don't have to register and are more protected than the victims! I know of one who convicted rapist who sits next to your sons & daughters at the HS everyday! And does it piss me off, you bet it does. He should be in jail!!!
What you have posted is very disturbing. Do you mean a juvenile commited this act and that is why he is not reported on the predator list? How is he not punished?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 16 of16
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

La Porte News Video

•••
La Porte Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

La Porte Jobs

•••
•••
•••

La Porte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••