Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52052 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45338 Nov 23, 2013
Scott wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are comparing yourself to animals huh...... Good call!!!!
Um, dipshit, humans ARE animals, no comparison is required.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45339 Nov 23, 2013
Scott wrote:
maybe someday you will be able to actually learn how to post a link like the big boys.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45343 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Dogs lick butts and eat shit.
What are you suggesting???
And humans circumcise their young and eat with utensils. Both those facts say absolutely nothing about dogs. Just like saying "dogs lick butts and eat shit" says nothing about humans.

Feel free to try again stupid cur. Nothing funnier than watching you post "arguments" drafted in the 1990s thinking you are actually making a point of any kind!

Smile stupid cur!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45344 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
You say that being gay is no guarantee against procreation. I'm disturbed by this comment. Homosexual activity does not and can not result in offspring. 
Unless you know of cases of male anal sex resulting in fertilization within a male's anal canal, or a woman's tongue containing sperm which she deposits into another woman's vagina through the act of oral sex, I think it's VERY safe to say homosexuality is not reproductive. 
This is almost too ridiculous to discuss. 
Now, you do bring up the (meretricious) argument that being heterosexual is no guarantee of procreation. 
The reason this argument is invalid is because in the example of the heterosexual who decides not to have children, it was the heterosexual's decision for reasons UNRELATED to his genetically predisposed proclivities. Thus this decision is no fault of evolution, as the heterosexual was armed with the correct sexual urges needed to reproduce. Whether he takes that and runs with it, is irrelevant.
While gays may have the ability,(functioning genitals) this is certainly NOT enough. In order to fully promote action, evolution equips two qualities: Ability (just mentioned) AND willingness. The gay is missing the correct WILLINGNESS -the genetic urge to have heterosexual relations. This wrong wiring IS a genetic defect.
Remember healthy instincts differ from defective ones in that healthy instincts are the ones that yield very strong urges towards INCREASING the likelihood of survival. 
We have hunger throughout the day because it's a healthy urge to push us to seek nourishment. We have the same urge with thirst as we need hydration. If our brains are healthy we should have a similar hunger for heterosexual sex because it is also pushes us towards survival based behavior: sex that can result pregnancy. 
OF COURSE wiring that promotes urges towards the gender that can't lead to pregnancy is anti-survival and consequently defective.
These issues are very black and white. To deny them is to deny the will of evolution.
Now, it's time to put the heat lamp on you.
It is easily proven how homosexuality is an evolutionary defect. As I've said a thousand times, It serves absolutely no productive function in furthering the human species.
In fact it's highly destructive because the afflicted person is damned to stop their genes from entering the next generation AND the genes of their lovers as well.
Aside from rather blindly cheerleading for homosexuality because it's your 'home team,' what practical reason do you have that leads you to believe it's worthy of defense?
and all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty Dumpty together again.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45345 Nov 23, 2013
Scott wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays lick butts!!
So do straights. We gays just don't typically spend time talking about other people's sexual habits. That seems to be a defect that only permeates with straight people.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45346 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please post a peer reviewed study proving it.
Snicker.
There are no peer reviewed studies of imaginary constraints. The onus is on you to prove the constraints. Good luck with that moron.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45347 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Who do you think you are kidding.
Perfect! This is perfect. This will now be the only response any of your posts requires. Thank you. Succinct and to the point.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45348 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, I am talking about scientific evidence.
YOU have no valid argument so first you try to bring God in, now you want to argue from 'public record?'
LOL, limp wristed silly stupid!
Who do you think you are kidding?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45349 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Both expose ss marriage as an oxymoron.
Smile.
Who do you think you are kidding?

Smile cur.
Are you serious

Waterloo, IL

#45350 Nov 23, 2013
39,070 posts on the same stupid subject? You people need to get lives. There are other things to do on the internet. You will never convince gay people they shouldn't exist and you will never convince some people to just let them be. Enough already.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#45352 Nov 23, 2013
Are you serious wrote:
39,070 posts on the same stupid subject? You people need to get lives. There are other things to do on the internet. You will never convince gay people they shouldn't exist and you will never convince some people to just let them be. Enough already.
Golly, whatever would we do without you telling us how to use the internet and our time properly?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#45356 Nov 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Both expose ss marriage as an oxymoron.
Smile.
Repeating the same sh1t exposes you as the moron.

Still married. What have science, your brand of religion, and you been able to do about that?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#45357 Nov 23, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Perfect! This is perfect. This will now be the only response any of your posts requires. Thank you. Succinct and to the point.
KiMerde has a number of copy and paste responses which he can pull from his..........

repertortoire

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#45358 Nov 23, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
KiMerde has a number of copy and paste responses which he can pull from his..........
repertortoire
his repertoire also....
Bull Schmitt

Saint Louis, MO

#45359 Nov 23, 2013
Sam wrote:
+++++++GOD NOW APPROVES OF SAME-SEX-MARRIAGE!!!+++++++ God has changed His mind regarding Homosexuality!. God can change His mind on matters if He wants to, there are instances in the Bible where God does just that!. This time is no different. God has certainly been answering the big Gays prayers lately!, with their recent Supreme Court victories and all. God wouldn't answer me, a Straight guy!. You know, I once asked God for a wife, 5 months later, He gave me a wh**e!. I do admit, I did used to blaspheme God a couple years on down before this, but I stopped this. I figured this was the reason God raped me. If God didn't want to give me a wife, He sure as Hell didn't have to give me that rotten wh**e!!!. Because God bestowed this evil upon me, my blaspheming Him returned with a vengence!!!. I lay it on old God now and I don't care if I do go burn forever, HAHAHAHAHA!!!. I blaspheme God real good now, I do it more then I ever did and I am a might proud of that fact, HAHAHAHAHA!!!...GIVE ME ANOTHER WH**E GOD!!!!!!!!!.
At least there is sex in Hell. Straight sex, Gay sex, mixed sex, whatever kinda sex ya want. What kinda sex do ya get in Heaven?
The Truth

United States

#45360 Nov 23, 2013
Google Gays. There's no such thing. Its a mith.
The Lie

Los Angeles, CA

#45361 Nov 23, 2013
A myth is that there's no such thing as Googling Gays.
The Truth

United States

#45362 Nov 23, 2013
Google are gays born that way. Can you think for yourself?

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45363 Nov 24, 2013
"Continually a kind of 'desperate logic' from you.

When you bring up the instances where some heterosexuals are infertile and use that to rationalize homosexuality you are demonstrating very poor critical thinking skills. Sorry to be so blunt but it's bleeding far too heavy to leave unaddressed.

I've already discussed the two components nature uses to promote itself: ability and willingness. In the example of the infertile heterosexual, there is indeed a biological defect: he does not have ability to reproduce.

It's been long established that nature is not without flaw -this is hardly a surprise. In ALLl members, straight or gay, there are persons who are infertile (and in both sexualities there are members that don't care to date or just end up alone, etc..,)-WE GET THAT.

But the difference that is SHOUTINGLY obvious even considering cases of infertility, is that the heterosexual method may result in reproduction say, 90% of the time. In the homosexual method reproduction has never, let me emphasize: N E V E R occurred.

It's baking with 9 pieces coming out and the 10th a failure versus the method where the tray ALWAYS comes out empty.

Homosexuality cannot produce offspring. In procreation the genes of the parents are passed (naturally or even artificially) to the child. AGAIN this is why there can be NO QUESTION: homosexuality is an evolutionary defect.

Which brings us to another absurd comment of yours; gays can procreate.

Even in an artificial scenario, HOW are the parents of those two gay men or two gay women passed to the child? Maybe gay Rob might use Sara as a surrogate to simulate a sexual reproduction (notice a member of the opposite sex is involved). BUT either way, WHERE IS ROB'S BOYFRIEND'S genes in this equation?!? The child that results will have NO RELATION WHATSOEVER TO ROB'S boyfriend; not even the tiniest twinkle in his eye.

So even in artificially induced conditions, two dads or two moms ARE NOT producing a child together. If the champion to the homosexual's way to obviate reproduction is through artificial means, the best that can come of it is one parent doomed to have no genetic relation to the child whatsoever. This is HARDLY "homosexual procreation" (and I can imagine for the one member who has the genetic relation to the child that is equivalent to a perfect stranger; it must be often be disheartening).

Again, heterosexuality potentially can and usually does result in reproduction -and a reproduction that enjoys having both parents genetic legacy in the child, homosexuality cannot do EITHER.

I can't imagine why you brought up such squalid reasoning?

Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?

For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.

Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!

Really you can't possibly be this dim.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#45366 Nov 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
......
For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.
Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU.........
And fortunately, gay folks falling in love, marrying, and forming families won't stop a single heterosexual from having sex and making babies. Not ANYWHERE in the world.

And we are very good at raising the abandoned and unwanted offspring from all that heterosexual breeding, so it's a win-win for everyone, especially the kids.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kingston Mines Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10) 17 hr SligieForMayor 179
Most haunted house in Pekin. (Jan '10) Feb 14 Irene 85
Starkey Feb 14 vday 1
Childers Jan '18 stokestcwriter 1
hey, chinks! (Apr '07) Jan '18 stokestcwriter 157
News Meth problem makes comeback in Pekin area (Jan '08) Jan '18 Concerned Pekin r... 52
Broke city of pekin continues to give tax monie... Jan '18 Bill 5

Kingston Mines Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Kingston Mines Mortgages