#5190 Mar 17, 2013
Keep sticking it to those 'pukes'. Love it when you call them out and they run from your questions. Just don't expect any answers any time soon.
#5191 Mar 20, 2013
All bad choices
#5193 Mar 20, 2013
What have the Democrats done right in the past 4 years. They have destroyed this country. This country should be based on two things. The Bible and the Constitution. Neither of which any democrats defend. Ashamed to be lead be these Liberal losers.
#5194 Mar 20, 2013
Dems could barely do anything at all in the past 4 years with all the GOP obstruction. Why no mention of any of that, moron?
Did Faux News not clue you in on this?
Well, since you want to talk about "destroying the country" without specifics ... allow me to do the honors here!
Why no mention of Mitch McConnell saying in '07 that he was going to block Dems every chance he got by insisting on 60 votes to pass anything out of his Senate since they would then have to rely on Republican votes to get anything accomplished? Or how he then told his GOP senators that under no circumstance were they to vote with Dems on anything less they incur the party's wrath for being bipartisan?
No mention of those RECORD number of GOP filibusters - over 360 of them - since 2007 when the Republicans lost their majority in the Senate? No mention of their collective political temper tantrum that required so many cloture petitions by Democrats?
No mention how Republicans have effectively imposed an unprecedented blockade on the Obamas nominees for dozens of seats on the federal judiciary? And no mention of Senate Republicans having imposed record wait times on Obamas nominees delays more than FOUR TIMES longer than judicial nominees experienced under President George W. Bush? And no mention of Republican Sen. Mike Lee's vow to unilaterally block all of President Barack Obama's nominees submitted to the Senate in his testimony to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on 2/1/2012?
No mention of Rush Limbaugh (whom GOP politicians apologize to) saying on the air on 01/16/09, before Obama even took office: "I Hope Obama Fails. Somebody's gotta say it."
No mention of the secret meeting Republicans had in Washington on January 20, 2009 - the eve of Obama's inauguration - and no mention of 15 people who attended this meeting? No mention of how Republican House Representatives Eric Cantor (Va.), Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Jeb Hensarling (Texas), Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) and Dan Lungren (Calif.) were there? No mention of Republican Senators Jim DeMint (S.C.), Jon Kyl (Ariz.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), John Ensign (Nev.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.)? No mention of Newt Gingrich or Frank Luntz being in attendance? Is it because the four-hour meeting was spent plotting out ways to win back political power by obstructing Obama's legislative platform and especially his economic agenda regardless of how much it hurt the country and EVERYBODY in it?
No mention of how they plotted to suddenly stop supporting any Stimulus Legislation, even though they all supported the Bush/Cheney Stimulus legislation?
Why no mention of how at the meeting, Rep Kevin McCarthy said: "We've gotta challenge them on every single bill." or his insistence that the GOP "Show united and unyielding opposition to the presidents economic policies."?
No mention of how Newt Gingrich said after their four hour dinner on January 20, 2009 "Youll remember this as the day the seeds of 2012 were sown."?
No mention of how two months later, Rep. Pete Sessions said in a March 2009 interview in the National Journal that Republicans should follow the model of the Taliban in its battles against President Obama? He said "Taliban Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban. Insurgency is the way they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- is an example of how you go about to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that Insurgency may be required when [dealing with] the other side".
And I'm not done yet!
#5195 Mar 20, 2013
And since you brought up "destroying the country" ...
Why no mention of S. Carolina Senator Jim DeMint saying of blocking Obama's health care on 07/17/09: "If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him."?
And no mention of the extremely typical, anything-but-bipartisan, GOP party-line 3/22/10 vote where every single Republican in the House voted AGAINST the health care bill?
And no mention of McConnell saying on 3/16/10 that repukes would 1) vote unanimously to filibuster Democrat-proposed banking reforms and 2) vote to protect Wall Street from regulation by pretending to want harsher regulations against them even though what they are proposing is already in the regulations? Or how this was on the VERY same day the SEC was getting ready to prosecute Goldman Sachs for their part in this debacle? Or how this was conveniently just after McConnell got back from a trip to get contributions from big bankers to help kill reform?
And no mention of Republicans voting against the Conrad-Gregg fiscal commission legislation - that seven REPUBLICANS sponsored - as soon as Obama started endorsing it?
And no mention of the corporate whore GOP voting to continue subsidies for Big Oil? Or how those who voted to extend the budget-busting, corporate welfare got SEVEN TIMES more money from Big Oil than those who didn't?
And no mention of the GOP voting down a Dem bill to PUNISH companies who outsource?
And no mention of repukes REPEATEDLY voting down jobs bills after running on "JOBS JOBS JOBS!" to get elected in 2010?
And why no mention of Boehner playing politics with a routine debt ceiling vote when it was something the current GOP leaders had no problem raising a combined 19 times to the tune of FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS under Dubya?
Why no mention of Boehner walking away from a deal that had $3 in cuts on the table for every $1 in revenue - more in tax cuts then repukes even initially asked for - because raising even one penny of revenue broke a pledge that the GOP signed ... TO A LOBBYIST named after a muppet?
Or how Obama had also agreed over the coming decade to cut $250 billion from Medicare spending and $310 billion from other domestic entitlement programs (farm subsidies, education programs, etc) and a change in Social Security cost-of living adjustments which would save about $125 billion more?
Why no mention of how the people who issued the downgrade blamed REPUBLICANS FOR the downgrade right there on Page 4 of the official Standard & Poors "Research Update" (the actual report on what they did and why) published on August 5th, saying: "We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act." and also "The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy."
And why no mention of how the resulting downgrade cost us about $3 trillion in our markets and how Boehner said it was "98% of what he wanted"?
And why no mention of Mitch McConnell saying on 10/25/10: "The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
Why no mention of how the GOP's focus would NOT be on job creation, NOT be on health care reform to everybody's benefit, NOT be on paying for the $800 billion dollars in deficit-exploding tax breaks they want to shower on the rich, NOT be on bringing the troops home from the wars they started based on things they never found and never even put on the damn budget books, and definitely NOT be on fixing the GOP-created mess from the last time they had power?
And I'm still not done yet!
#5196 Mar 20, 2013
And since you brought up "destroying the country" ...
Why no mention of this admission that if the economy got worse, the jobless rate increased, wars continued, and if everyone's lives sucked worse and worse ... that it was all perfectly fine with them? Why? Because dammit ... they had a political agenda against Obama to attend to!
Why no mention of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill (that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act) and sent the economy over a cliff in 2008? Or how these three guys were not Liberals or Democrats but ALL CONSERVATIVES AND REPUBLICANS?
Why no mention of the CFMA 2000 - yet another republican bright idea? Of how it prevented the govt from exerting ANY oversight on the derivatives markets or how it allowed privately written derivatives to eventually reach a potential exposure of some $52 trillion, well in excess of the capital reserves of the companies who wrote them?
And why no mention of Dubya's two wars that were started based on lies, that were never paid for and never even put on the budget books; those repeated Bush tax cuts for the "job creators" that led to the loss of 661K and 818K jobs the last two months Dubya was in office and to the unemployment rate you're complaining about now; or Dubya's underfunded NCLB that pushed funding onto states that were already strapped for cash; or Dubya's TARP; or Dubya's joke of a Medicare Part D?
Why no mention of how Obama immediately inherited all that and (as an added bonus!)... even worse then no cooperation at all from Republicans ... a blatantly-stated Republican plan to make him fail so they could put Romney (an elitest, no specifics, lying, draft dodging, flip-flopping, middle-class destroying, outsourcer in chief) in office so he can double or TRIPLE-down on the same failed policies that didn't work the last time they were forced on everybody?
FACT: America isn't in decline and recession because too FEW of the Republican Party's ideas were implemented - we're in decline because too many of them were implemented. Dubya got everything he asked for as every single Republican idea was tried between 2000-2008. And after Americans punished them for their failed policies at the voting booth, Republicans have done nothing but throw a political temper tantrum and block any and all progress going forward.
See ... it's like Republicans come into a room, shit in the middle of the floor, take away the mop, hide the bucket, then complain "The room smells like shit!!!"
Well, speaking of "losers", it looks like us voters found the mop and bucket just in time for the election in November didn't we? We sent Romney "surging" back to the Caymans (the land of the flag he flies so proudly on his yacht) and made damn sure you guys lost seats in both the Senate AND the House didn't we, "losers"?
You got anything else you feel like mouthing off about, "loser"?
I'll be here to keep smacking the piss out of you (with SPECIFICS) if you do.
#5197 Mar 20, 2013
Got you republican boys by the ass didn't he!!!!!!!!
Whats that........choking on all that B.S. in your mouth your trying to spread...
Step back and take a deep breath, now say your sorry to reagan was a menace.
Either that or put out some answers!!!!!!!!
By the way, I beat you to the puch for judging reagan. Looks nicer with those signs.
Have a great day chewing...chomp..chomp
Very well done....reagan was a menace.
Go get em.
#5198 Mar 20, 2013
What makes methamphetamine such an attractive high? Meth users report that after taking the drug they experience a sudden "rush" of pleasure or a prolonged sense of euphoria, as well as increased energy, focus, confidence, sexual prowess and feelings of desirability. However, after that first try, users require more and more of the drug to get that feeling again, and maintain it. With repeated use, methamphetamine exacts a toll on the mind and body, robbing users of their physical health and cognitive abilities, their libido and good looks, and their ability to experience pleasure. Here's how the body reacts to meth and the consequences of long-term abuse.
#5199 Mar 20, 2013
Ignoramus I hope and pray your SSI check know longer exist and you have to get a job.
#5200 Mar 20, 2013
My God man grow up and get off the $450.00 monthly check get a JOB and grow up.
#5201 Mar 20, 2013
Excuse me meth head every name you mentioned below is or headed to prison so what is your pathetic point..
#5202 Mar 20, 2013
Roland Burris/Rodger Moore/Internet Guy/Dr Phil/GOPvsUSAjr/Obama Suks/SSI/Rich Daley/Roland/KK Harvard/Grade School/Nancy Pelosi/No Mo Homo/Seymour/illiterate/Rahm/I CE/Barney Frank/Fat Pt Quinn/Straight/Dick Face Durbin/Rev Jackson/Obama/GOP VS USA/olandf/Truth/Madigan/Mayor daley/Roland/Rev Wright/Working Man/SON/Dick Face Durib/Olive Oil/Hillary/Union/Dr Philsimpson/Charlie Rangle/Pelosi/Obama is a Meanace/Bush/OMG/Idiot Joe Biden/Michelle/Illeterate/Obam a was a menace/Obama Suks/Media Matters/Huffington/Repub Puke/Really Ignorant/Carl/Dumbocrats/Harry Reid/Rod Blagojevich/Democrap Puke/Dr Phill/Regan was a Genius/Obama is a Homo
Four more posts and still no answers?
Again ... who's "Regan"? Did you misspell that because you're a moron or because you were referring to the post-Alzheimer's Ronnie?
And what conservative site did you copy those posts from? And by "copy", I mean post WORD FOR WORD and try to pass it off as your own like you did posts #4992,#4993,#4994 and #4996!
Care to tell us?
No? LOL ... imagine that!
I'll just re-post what I said way back in #1278 in response to your following drivel in post #1215:
"Illiteracy appears to to be your strong suite let me help over estimated is two words I could go on but it would be pointless your grammar is horrific."
Did you ever figure out that:
1) The word "overesitmated" isn't two words - that it's ONE word you illiterate jackass?
2) Or that it's strong SUIT ... not strong "suite" you illiterate jackass?
3) Or that your ENTIRE POST is one whole run-on sentence you illiterate jackass?
Well? Did you?
I'm still waiting for an answer here ... since April!
How much more time do you need?
I'd be REALLY embarrassed if I were you! Calling people illiterate when your post is riddled with mistakes? And then trying to call me out on a mistake that it turns out was correct ... because you have the IQ of afterbirth?
And since you never answered those questions there, I'll just KEEP POSTING IT to you ... over and over ... until you answer them you illiterate jackass.
Get the pattern?
#5203 Mar 21, 2013
Yes, you never know!
#5204 Mar 21, 2013
Not a one should run
#5205 Mar 21, 2013
learn to spell ....it is NO....not know.....
I do not rely on SSI or SS to live. That is a dream that all republicans feed themselves to degrade anyone who does not agree with them.
Try posting with one name and not 40.
Keep jabbing and sticking them.....reagan ia a menace.
For sure the dick faced one, he loves the attention !!!
#5207 Mar 21, 2013
reagan is a menace......
I think you butt hurt all them republicans?
Now don't you just feel really bad?
OH, HELL NO. WHAT WAS I THINKING.
#5208 Mar 21, 2013
Look at all the time these idiot pukes spend voting down posts of mine and yours since they can't refute anything that's in them!
They've been reduced to spending hour after hour changing all those positive ratings on my posts to negative ratings and vice versa for the other guy's (40-name-Durbin).
Hey hopeless? We know you're reading all these and then voting on them ...
COME OUT, COME OUT, WHEREVER YOU ARE!!!
#5209 Mar 21, 2013
Can you put down the meth pipe sober up and complete a full sentence.
#5210 Mar 21, 2013
You need psychiatric help drugs are an escape from your miserable life.
#5211 Mar 21, 2013
Idiot pukes brilliant you must be a product of CPS Gay boy.
Add your comments below
|The Local Gatehouse Media (May '15)||Sep 25||gatehouse lies again||24|
|Most haunted house in Pekin. (Jan '10)||Sep 5||former pekinite||63|
|the heck with Saul, better call Burt (Aug '15)||Aug '16||burt bad||7|
|Topless 'Midget' Wrestling Costs Bar Its License (Sep '08)||Aug '16||Jillian Dworak||14|
|Ryan Voice (Apr '13)||Aug '16||Jillian Dworak||9|
|Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10)||Jul '16||OldManBenny||72|
|Lisa Conn Murder (Feb '13)||Jul '16||Guest||23|
Find what you want!
Search Kingston Mines Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC