Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17056 Jul 2, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Well obviously you read it. What's the matter DZ are you not sufficiently qualified to wear the badge of honor? The "green square" …..now those folks are funny. They are as funny as watching the chimpanzee's at the zoo.
You don't wear a green square because you wear a a rainbow colored triangle. I had rather wear the square.
guest

United States

#17057 Jul 2, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your link admits to dropping 3.4 million children from their study. These children are people and are also drawing temporary welfare assistance just as anyone else on the program. These children are costing money just the same as the adults on these programs. Why should they be excluded ? Just to help you prove a false point.
Yeah and it also shows that Baldwin didn't count government employed folks as workers. So count the children as welfare recipients but also count all government workers as employed. Why should government workers be excluded? They work and pay taxes too.
Not to mention Rector's statement from the HF - "Separately, senior research fellow Robert Rector of the conservative Heritage Foundation gave us a broader definition of welfare -- 79 federal programs -- though even by that measure, he told us by phone, "Welfare recipients do not outnumber workers." "

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17058 Jul 2, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Dontcha just love those right wing chain mails,
Course you might want to open both eyes...
http://markmartinezshow.blogspot.com/2013/03/...
Yeah, you looney left wing liberal lunatics don't post stuff from chain mails, huh? lol Your double standard is as old as your race card excuse. You vote Democrat because you believe the governnment can do a better job of spending the money you earn than you can. POOR YOU.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17059 Jul 2, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
oooops, pants still on fire...
http://www.politifact.com/georgia/statements/...
...The writer, Michael Cembalest, examined the histories of nine Cabinet positions for the comparison. The departments they headed were Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation and Treasury:
...Chu headed the electronics research lab at AT&T Bell Laboratories; Donovan served as managing director of Prudential Mortgage Capital Co.; and Salazar has been a partner in his family's farm, and he owned and operated a Dairy Queen and radio stations in his home state of Colorado.
Three other Obama appointees had legal experience in the private sector: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner worked for Kissinger Associates, a consulting firm that advises international corporations on political and economic conditions overseas.
Cembalest said that he did discount the corporate experience of Clinton, Vilsack and Locke. Cembalest acknowledged fault in missing Salazar's business background, saying he would have given him a full point if he had it to do over again. Cembalest said Chu and Donovan did not represent the kind of private-sector business experience he was looking for when doing his study. Cembalest said he did not mean for his research to be used for political ends.
Exactly what has Obama done to help you personally? Just curious.
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#17060 Jul 2, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly what has Obama done to help you personally? Just curious.
Now that's a Right Wing post that demonstrates exactly the difference between Right Wing Wackos and Normal Americans.

We Normal Americans can actually consider the effect policies have on the country and our fellow Americans - not just "what's in it for us."

But hey... self-centered personal greed is the RWW trademark.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17061 Jul 2, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just silly DZ. Nobody was making anything "all about" anything. The poster linked some specific sites that have been proven to contain distorted information. That information came from specific RWW chain emails. There are lots of them. The ridicule was specific about specific chain emails. Now if the links that you posted are accurate then why certainly there ought to be a stop put to fraud. You have engaged, to a small degree, it the type of distortion that I have been referring to when you say "...all about..." . It just isn't true.
Okay. Just curious. Link after link after link from reputable sources have been posted in regard to the fallacies of Obamacare. Not one response from you libs has been forthcoming. Actually, many links from reputable sources(CNN, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Blooomberg,Real Clear Politics, to name a few) pointing out various problems with what is going on with this administration and yet, there has not been one response from you left wingers. Why not? Instead, you carry on criticizing the conservatives and offer nothing to support your criticism except your opinion. Why is that?
Other than flip flopping on the gay marriage issue, what specifically has Obama done for you?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17062 Jul 2, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
By all means shed light on the fraud, and when your state legislators want to slash the administrative budget (systems development, manpower for case work) for these types of departments shed light on that too, cause it's admin that oversees this stuff.
Oh the terrible ridicule to point out the misinformation, the lies, to think that sock puppet may never post again.
rotfl You voted twice for Obama, the biggest LIAR in the country. Oh, myyyyyyy. The irony of your post is monumental.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17063 Jul 2, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you reign above ALL who post here with your twisting & spinning- distortions. Don't EVEN try that. The point is, welfare recipients out number employed Americans. Only the LIVING can be honest wage earners. The living, dead, prisoners & your cat can draw welfare. And you don't see a problem? Okay, done here, you just answered the question, DUMBOCRATS grow dumber as each day passes. Moving along..... I hate bickering with fools.
Well, think about it. The Dems were perfectly fine with DEAD people voting for Obama. They can't function without cheating and/or being lied to.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17064 Jul 2, 2013
Who wrote:
Aetna will exit California's individual health insurance market.
One of the looney left wing lunatics on this forum actually posted that California was doing quite well with Obamacare. He didn't provide a link, btw. A couple of days later, I posted a link from the Wall Street Journal explaining how California was having a HORRIBLE time with Obamacare due to costs. Actually, Chickenbutt posted that California was doing very well. The left wingers have NO IDEA what they are supporting. They are so brainwashed, all they know is that if a conservative is trying to educated them, they HATE the information, don't believe it and HATE the people trying to warn them.
Someone is going to have to foot the bill for Obamacare. The young and healthy simply aren't going to do it. The wealthy AREN'T going to do it because they can figure out ways to avoid it. The poor CAN'T do it. Who does that leave? Any guesses?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17065 Jul 2, 2013
Who wrote:
Aetna Letter Warns Customers:'Many People Will Pay More For Health Insurance' Under Obamacare.
For a while, I was posting a link every day from Real Clear Politics(the site that looney lefters sent me to during Obama's first campaign) declaring the forthcoming calamity of Obamacare. There were NO posts in response from the looney left wingers on here; only some idiot judging the information as clueless, nuts and spam. THAT is how intelligent the left wingers on this formum are.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17066 Jul 2, 2013
Who wrote:
The Insiders: Democrats are trying to suppress the confusion and hide the cost of ObamaCare.
It doesn't matter how many times you try to warn the brainwashed and great unwashed. They simply won't believe it until it's too late.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17067 Jul 2, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh ?
Did that make sense to you when you wrote it ?
Absolutely. 100%. If you don't understand it, you need to step away from the crack pipe. It's very clear.
Who

Jefferson, GA

#17068 Jul 2, 2013
HHmmmmmmmmmm-

"In what sounds like a science-fiction novel come to life, one scientist says he is close to being able to affix one person's head to another human body."

So let's say we use IO's head with the body of a donkey. Would anything change?

Or we use Oh my's head on guest's body, would anything change?

So I say this scientist would make no money in Florida as the State is over run with liberal brainless donkeys, or in Georgia by exchanging one brainless head for another brainless head.(of course the body would not know the difference.)








“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17069 Jul 2, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Recent a well-regarded Right Wing Wacko scientific study revealed that the Chicago Cubs won the 2012 World Series.
The author of the study explained that he discounted the other 14 National League teams because their uniforms were unattractive, and he discounted all 15 American League teams because .... well .... they're in the American League.
Right Wing Wackos everywhere in Chicago lauded the study as an outstanding example if RWWs love of science.
There aren't any conservatives in Chicago. Chicago is comprised of looney liberal lunatic thugs. Hmmmm.... Didn't our illustrious thug president "work" there? rotfl

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17070 Jul 2, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah and it also shows that Baldwin didn't count government employed folks as workers. So count the children as welfare recipients but also count all government workers as employed. Why should government workers be excluded? They work and pay taxes too.
Not to mention Rector's statement from the HF - "Separately, senior research fellow Robert Rector of the conservative Heritage Foundation gave us a broader definition of welfare -- 79 federal programs -- though even by that measure, he told us by phone, "Welfare recipients do not outnumber workers." "
So your report is skewed and not accurate and you admit that. I think that Mystery Man has all you libs upset. You haven't even tried to defend all the rest of the statements that he listed in that long post. Maybe they are all dead on correct. Obviously there is nothing that you can say to prove otherwise. You guys find one or two things that you might be able to distort and then declare the whole post is wrong. How typical.
OMTE

Mcdonough, GA

#17071 Jul 2, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
One of the looney left wing lunatics on this forum actually posted that California was doing quite well with Obamacare. He didn't provide a link, btw. A couple of days later, I posted a link from the Wall Street Journal explaining how California was having a HORRIBLE time with Obamacare due to costs. Actually, Chickenbutt posted that California was doing very well. The left wingers have NO IDEA what they are supporting. They are so brainwashed, all they know is that if a conservative is trying to educated them, they HATE the information, don't believe it and HATE the people trying to warn them.
Someone is going to have to foot the bill for Obamacare. The young and healthy simply aren't going to do it. The wealthy AREN'T going to do it because they can figure out ways to avoid it. The poor CAN'T do it. Who does that leave? Any guesses?
If our country wasn't so busy tryin to take care of the whole world's poor and unfortunate then we could afford Obamacare. Our unemployment would disappear and everybody would have enough to eat as well, if we'd start taken care of us and only us. It sounds harsh, but it's the truth. Why are we helpin any other country, while people are starvin to death or dyin of preventable diseases in our country? We need to quit pretendin to the world that we're the leaders of the free world, when we're not. We were, but we have given it away. Now we're just about as needy and in debt as the rest of the world. Ya know?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17072 Jul 2, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Now General...
Wait ... That means your one of those useless government parasites collecting a government check,
We understand your concern about self-sufficiency.
Wait ... You're worse.... we taxpayers not only provide you with government check, we provide you with a home, free clothing, free medical care, free dental care, free transportation, four weeks paid vacation, subsidized college tuition, free training, and GASP!- a full pension when you retire at age 38 along with free medical care the rest of your life.
You Sir - are the ultimate leach - and BY GOD - we Right Wingers are tired of carrying you on our shoulders from age 18 to the day you die.
GET A REAL JOB ... IN THE LRIVATE SECTOR..
YOU GOVERNMENT DEPENDENT PARASITE.
How does one GET to be as twisted and wrong as you? Your paragraph about the free stuff is your craziest post, yet. You need therapy. You had better hurry and take advantage of your union healthcare benefit. It's going away(union requests for exemption got denied) and euthanasia just might be in your future. SH & L
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#17073 Jul 2, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>For a while, I was posting a link every day from Real Clear Politics(the site that looney lefters sent me to during Obama's first campaign) declaring the forthcoming calamity of Obamacare. There were NO posts in response from the looney left wingers on here; only some idiot judging the information as clueless, nuts and spam. THAT is how intelligent the left wingers on this formum are.
Here's a suggestion.

Attacking ObamaCare is a guaranteed loser for Right Wingers, and ObamaCare is actually consistent with Right Wingers claims of supporting personal responsibility and stopping freeloading deadbeats from obtaining free health care at the expense of responsible Americans.

It's such a good idea the entire rest of the industrialized world has already adopted a stronger version of ObamaCare and not a single country that adopted it, has ever been willing to give it up.

Right Wingers attacking ObamaCare just appear hypocritical, silly, corporate tools arguing against personal responsibility.

Instead, attack the dreaded Obama for:

- Just like Bush, Illegally bombing, kidnapping, detaining, and killing people, including American citizens;

- just like Bush, illegally wiretapping, intercepting and collecting the emails, texts, videos, and pictures Americans communicate to one another;

- Just like Bush, appointing the Wall Street banksters and überrich to control the government;

- Just like Bush, using hired mercenaries and private contractors to replace U.S. military personnel, creating trillions in profits for War Profiteers;

- Refusing to close Gitmo, whining that "Congress" won't let him", instead of telling Congress that he's sending the real terrorists to New York for trial, and turning loose anyone Congress refuses to allow in the Country; and

- Just like Bush, claiming the King's Privilege to put to death any subject that the King determines is disloyal to the crown.

Obama has, and continues to engage in lots and lots of conduct that deserves his impeachment and prosecution, just as did Bush, so attack him for the really horrible stuff he has done.

We Normal Americans would join you.

But the IRS thing .... really ... isn't that like complaining that the Captain of the Titanic didn't polish his shoes the night it struck the iceberg ?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17074 Jul 2, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that's a Right Wing post that demonstrates exactly the difference between Right Wing Wackos and Normal Americans.
We Normal Americans can actually consider the effect policies have on the country and our fellow Americans - not just "what's in it for us."
But hey... self-centered personal greed is the RWW trademark.
lol Duck and dodge. I didn't ask you because I knew you would duck and dodge. NORMAL PEOPLE must always consider their own lives when it comes to politics. THAT is how people decide which side of the isle they are on. Duh. You chose Obama because YOU are a UNION thug and he told you he would "take care of you". Plain and simple. Your self-rightousness and pomposity are hilarious. You will have to run your game on someone else. This chick ain't buying it.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17075 Jul 2, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay. Just curious. Link after link after link from reputable sources have been posted in regard to the fallacies of Obamacare. Not one response from you libs has been forthcoming. Actually, many links from reputable sources(CNN, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Blooomberg,Real Clear Politics, to name a few) pointing out various problems with what is going on with this administration and yet, there has not been one response from you left wingers. Why not? Instead, you carry on criticizing the conservatives and offer nothing to support your criticism except your opinion. Why is that?
Other than flip flopping on the gay marriage issue, what specifically has Obama done for you?
I have noticed that the libs get real upset when someone sends in one of those post which they claim is an email. I think they go after them because the progressive sites that they want to quote from have had time to try and set up responses to the old email. Somebody else has sat down and tried to figure out how to respond and spin it, and that is what they post on here.
On the other hand when You or I give actual web links they do not respond to them because they didn't have a progressive web site to tell them what to say. Therefore we get no response.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kingsland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Clinton crushes Trump. 130 days out. 4 hr Nan-zilla 3
Debbie W-S and DNC in c/a lawsuit for rigging p... 4 hr Nan-zilla 1
Censorship by Kearns and the website LikeTheDew (Aug '11) 4 hr Don Andrews 78
Is Camden County Commentary dead? 7 hr Rookie 38
The fix is in 10 hr LonePalm 3
Democrats groan after Bill Clinton meets Lorett... 11 hr LonePalm 2
I feel so much safer now 11 hr Gunny 2

Kingsland Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Kingsland Mortgages