Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
OMTE

Douglas, GA

#16314 Jun 23, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Who would you prefer wins this seat?
Anybody but him.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16315 Jun 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I think they maybe all be working together behind our backs. The scandals are dead end roads and Snowden is a wild goose chase. Both sides know the Immigration is the biggest issue. They both seek immigration reform. In return for Democratic support they stand to gain and endless supply of votes. No matter what the cost to the citizens here. They have already began to let their morals slide for votes by promoting gay marriage.(IMO) Their desire to win all future election will be the downfall of this country.(IMO) The republicans are just fueled by greed. They stand to gain the most I'm sure when it comes to profits. They and their buddies will gain huge defense contracts and cheap labor. Everything a far as the smuggling of drugs and illegal immigrants will continue as usual. It will just cost more so they'll make more money there too as well. I'm sure they're thrilled with immigration reform. Aren't you the one that keeps screamin it's a one party government?
I didn't think that you paid any attention to my post. You are correct. I have been saying that it is one party disguised as a two party system.
Now you understand why I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am a conservative with some Libertarian ideals. I am a realist as I see you are becoming. Nothing wrong with that. keep on thinking for yourself.
BTW as you pointed out, the Democrats do get one thing out of a huge increase of new legal aliens votes, and lots of them. But again does it really matter as we have a single party disguised as two parties?
It is all about power and money and changing America to a socialist state.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#16316 Jun 23, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't think that you paid any attention to my post. You are correct. I have been saying that it is one party disguised as a two party system.
Now you understand why I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am a conservative with some Libertarian ideals. I am a realist as I see you are becoming. Nothing wrong with that. keep on thinking for yourself.
BTW as you pointed out, the Democrats do get one thing out of a huge increase of new legal aliens votes, and lots of them. But again does it really matter as we have a single party disguised as two parties?
It is all about power and money and changing America to a socialist state.
Pretty good reason to start looking at "non conforming" candidates.
OMTE

Douglas, GA

#16317 Jun 23, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't think that you paid any attention to my post. You are correct. I have been saying that it is one party disguised as a two party system.
Now you understand why I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am a conservative with some Libertarian ideals. I am a realist as I see you are becoming. Nothing wrong with that. keep on thinking for yourself.
BTW as you pointed out, the Democrats do get one thing out of a huge increase of new legal aliens votes, and lots of them. But again does it really matter as we have a single party disguised as two parties?
It is all about power and money and changing America to a socialist state.
I think the kind of state that is in place and is desired is an Aristocratic state, not a socialist state.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16318 Jun 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I think the kind of state that is in place and is desired is an Aristocratic state, not a socialist state.
I can't say that you are far off, but the rest of nobodies will be under their rule and they will use socialism to guide and control us.
I think they can have both as one will enhance the other. Just MHO.
OMTE

Douglas, GA

#16319 Jun 23, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't say that you are far off, but the rest of nobodies will be under their rule and they will use socialism to guide and control us.
I think they can have both as one will enhance the other. Just MHO.
I think the idea of socialism without corruption is how Jesus intended us to live. We are the reason socialism will never work. We are corrupt, but not evil. Aristocrasy is evil. Capitalism is fueled by greed which isn't much better.
Who

Dahlonega, GA

#16320 Jun 23, 2013
No respect for Obama.

"In a major embarrassment for President Barack Obama, an aircraft thought to have carried Snowden landed in Moscow on Sunday, and the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said he was "bound for the Republic of Ecuador via a safe route for the purposes of asylum."

Earlier, Ecuadorean Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino, visiting Vietnam, tweeted: "The Government of Ecuador has received an asylum request from Edward J.#Snowden."

It was a blow to Obama's foreign policy goals of resetting ties with Russia and building a partnership with China. The leaders of both countries were willing to snub the American president in a month when each had held talks with Obama.

The United States continued efforts to prevent Snowden from gaining asylum. It warned Western Hemisphere nations that Snowden "should not be allowed to proceed in any further international travel, other than is necessary to return him to the United States," a State Department official said."
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#16321 Jun 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I think the kind of state that is in place and is desired is an Aristocratic state, not a socialist state.
brilliant, you know that aristocratic is almost synonymous with fascist.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#16322 Jun 23, 2013
GOP Senators Should Block Immigration Monday, Let Us and Them Read the Bill.

Mike Kelly, R-Penn. "I don't understand the rush. We saw what happened in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Any time you rush anything through that big - this was up to 1,100 pages - I doubt that anybody's really read it and been able to really get through...every piece of it."

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#16323 Jun 23, 2013
Schumer explained, regarding the immigration bill "even if it means abandoning the Hastert rule. He (Boehner) will have no choice as the pressure mounts over the summer."

Shows you what an idiot Schumer is, they all have a choice, do something stupid, do something smart, or do nothing at all, except enforce ALL the immigration laws we already have. What a great idea, why hasn't anyone thought of that yet?
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#16324 Jun 23, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
GOP Senators Should Block Immigration Monday, Let Us and Them Read the Bill.
Mike Kelly, R-Penn. "I don't understand the rush. We saw what happened in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Any time you rush anything through that big - this was up to 1,100 pages - I doubt that anybody's really read it and been able to really get through...every piece of it."
GOP= Greedy Old Party !!!!

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16325 Jun 23, 2013
Democrats = greedy Old Party!!!
They are all politicians.
The only thing that matters to them is getting reelected and getting rich.
They are part of the one party disguised as a two party system.
The other party is the Republican Party, which is also part of the one party disguised as a two party system.
Republicans+ Democrats = The one party that is disguised as a two party system.
You will come to this same conclusion sooner or later.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16326 Jun 23, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Pretty good reason to start looking at "non conforming" candidates.
You are correct. They want to say that they will give us border security if we allow 30 million people to get away with breaking the laws of this country.
We should have already had good border security years ago. Border security has nothing to do with the illegal aliens that wish to be given amnesty. The only thing in common is that they wouldn't be here in the first place if we had border security. We would not be having this conversation. True?

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16327 Jun 23, 2013
I think this article shows clearly where the President and his administration stands on this immigration bill. They want it really bad.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/us/politics...
Informed Opinion

United States

#16328 Jun 23, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
Every Democrat is prepared to vote for this bill, and at least 10-12 Republicans couldn’t care less about their constituents. They have the votes. They don’t care about the American people. Amazingly, there is a supermajority of Senators who are more in tune with the whims of foreign lobbies than with the security needs of the American people.

Here is what is/isn't in the so called immigration bill.

&#9726;Immediate Amnesty; Security Never

&#9726;Permanent Defacto amnesty

&#9726;Pork

&#9726;Triggers

This is the single worst piece of legislation to come before the Senate since obamacare.
The Republicans and the Democrats are in touch with their corporate owners who love lots of illegals depressing wages for legal workers, and providing even cheaper labor for those who employ illegals.

Profits increase- American workers suffer- but hey- profits increase.

Increased profits and increased political "contributions" - so who can complain?

Well, American workers - but without strong unions -who gives a damn what they want.
Informed Opinion

United States

#16329 Jun 23, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't think that you paid any attention to my post. You are correct. I have been saying that it is one party disguised as a two party system.
Now you understand why I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am a conservative with some Libertarian ideals. I am a realist as I see you are becoming. Nothing wrong with that. keep on thinking for yourself.
BTW as you pointed out, the Democrats do get one thing out of a huge increase of new legal aliens votes, and lots of them. But again does it really matter as we have a single party disguised as two parties?
It is all about power and money and changing America to a socialist state.
Agreed that it's one party disguised as two, but that party doesn't want a socialist state - that would destroy the corporations and the überrich, the owners of one-party America.

Instead it's goal is Fascism - privatizing profits, and socializing costs - the goal of every Fascist state.
Informed Opinion

United States

#16330 Jun 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I think the idea of socialism without corruption is how Jesus intended us to live. We are the reason socialism will never work. We are corrupt, but not evil. Aristocrasy is evil. Capitalism is fueled by greed which isn't much better.
Great post.

Every wonder why it's so hard for people to just agree that it's extremism that creates the problems.

Unregulated capitalism, because it doesn't limit human greed and avarice, always leads to monopolies and Fascism - always has - always will.

Unfettered socialism always leads to poverty because it doesn't take advantage of human greed and avarice.

A mixed economy - regulated capitalism mixed with enough socialism to prevent the formation of oligarchies is the only economic system that ever has worked - or ever will.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#16331 Jun 23, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed that it's one party disguised as two, but that party doesn't want a socialist state - that would destroy the corporations and the überrich, the owners of one-party America.
Instead it's goal is Fascism - privatizing profits, and socializing costs - the goal of every Fascist state.
This is one of your best thought out posts. I am not sure what type of government they are after. It could be Fascist or Communist. I said socialist to be polite. It could be The New World Order, in which the United States, Canada, and Mexico actually become one country with no borders. Just like The European Union. I have read that Africa is trying to form a United African Union. I really have no idea what is the real plans, but it is not going to be good for us whatever they are. The people are just an after thought, if that.
Who

Dahlonega, GA

#16332 Jun 24, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

Every wonder why it's so hard for people to just agree that it's extremism that creates the problems.
Unregulated capitalism, because it doesn't limit human greed and avarice, always leads to monopolies and Fascism - always has - always will.

Seems like you only got one out of 14. Course it's possible you may have it bassakwards, that Fascism may lead to monopolies.

Fourteen Defining
Characteristics Of Fascism

http://rense.com/general37/char.htm
Who

Dahlonega, GA

#16333 Jun 24, 2013

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kingsland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Moreno, THIS is how you can could be elected... 1 hr Jaybama 8
Moreno on Facebook (Apr '13) 1 hr Annonymouse 24
Hubert Roland LETTER from Justice Department 2 hr Mugwump 56
Is Camden County Commentary dead? 3 hr Jorge 16
Dick Morris: Private Aide Ran Hillary's Email S... 15 hr LonePalm 1
Nutter brought up an interesting point about a ... 17 hr Slick 27
obama legacy 21 hr LonePalm 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Kingsland Mortgages