Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#11750 May 17, 2013
winning wrote:
<quoted text>Your side??? Ok. You're probaly broker than anyone on here. LMAO. Your side wouldn't make it a year to pay taxes for "your side". The workers run this country.
I think it's time we revolt against these lazy fat rich folks and take back OUR country
"The workers run this country."

Nope.

"I think it's time we revolt against these lazy fat rich folks and take back OUR country"

Oh, you mean these lazy, fat, rich folks that employ the workers?

BTW, if the workers run this country, why would "we" revolt and take back the country?

Something's not making much sense...
Danger Zone

Atlanta, GA

#11751 May 17, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text> You give that fathead Bob Beckel way too much credit. He is as left wing as they come and will sit there and just make up things to try and color and cover up something that he doesn't want people to hear. He is trying to push the idea that the IRS scandal is the the worst thing for Obama to take care of knowing all along that in all truth it is Benghazi. Anything to take the heat of Benghazi. Remember it was the IRS that came out with the news first with an apology. Why now? Easy to handle that's why. Just fire someone that is already retiring anyway, say it is wrong and that will be taken care of. Nobody but a few lowly office IRS workers will be fired. Have Eric Holder that knows knowing about anything give his attention to a investigation that is going to show very little if anything, and poof, it is taken care of. Just sucker bait and it seems to be working. Soon the news media will be carrying Obamas buckets of c*** again just as usual and everything will be turned back to the Republican Party as they will be labeled witch hunters trying to hurt black people and the poor.
In my mind I still think that this is still a one party system disguised as a two party system and the Republicans do not want a third party any more than the democrats as they are also full of powerful progressives dressed as Republicans. I think these people have shown us over and over just who and what they are.
Scary huh?
Yes, it's scary. You are most correct, stating the IRS scandal is a distraction. They've know it all along, just waiting to use it, to get the focus off Hillary. People just can't see it.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#11752 May 17, 2013
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
Irony
Two points, no shot.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#11753 May 17, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
As compared to whom? Jack the Ripper? lol
http://www.troll.me/images/victory-baby/ima-p...
Danger Zone

Atlanta, GA

#11754 May 17, 2013
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
"The workers run this country."
Nope.
"I think it's time we revolt against these lazy fat rich folks and take back OUR country"
Oh, you mean these lazy, fat, rich folks that employ the workers?
BTW, if the workers run this country, why would "we" revolt and take back the country?
Something's not making much sense...
Winning, lost that one. Slam dunked by Bill.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11755 May 17, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I've answered that question for you before. I said it once. Why say it again?
Are you getting selective amnesia? That's come contagious sh!t.
Interesting. You always fall back on that same response. You've never answered that. Of that I am sure. Go ahead. Humor me. Answer it again.

Why don't you care about the soldiers who are still dying in the middle east? Are their lives not as important?
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#11756 May 17, 2013
Danger Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Winning, lost that one. Slam dunked by Bill.
Are you being a bully? It looks like you're being a bully.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11757 May 17, 2013
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the King of Irony was attempting a play on words, similar to how a lawyer would try a "gotcha" question. Not very well played, though.
Of course, I got that. It was transparent. I was just handing it back to him.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11758 May 17, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
Funny. That is EXACTLY how I have you pictured. I'm RIGHT AGAIN!!!!
Apparently

Commerce, GA

#11759 May 17, 2013
BREAKING: Obama White House Just Caught In HUGE Lie/Contradiction –See Proof Here.

- The Ulsterman Report

theulstermanreport.com


BREAKING: Obama White House Just Caught In HUGE Lie/Contradiction –See Proof Here.

by Ulsterman on May 15, 2013 with 24 Comments in News

Please read the following brief assessment below of just how clear the Obama White House has revealed either its complete complicity in at least one of the many quite serious administrative scandals that are now ongoing, OR, Barack Obama is the most detached and incompetent president to have ever been elected to the office of president, and should resign on such incompetence immediately as he is not mentally fit to be President of the United States…

__________

Please watch this video beginning at the 1:20 mark where Eric Holder explained yesterday that the motivation to seize Associated Press communications records was based upon “A very-very serious leak. Among the most serious leaks –it put American people at risk.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Now read the following excerpt from White House Spokesman Jay Carney explaining WHEN Barack Obama learned of the Associated Press-Department of Justice communications scandal:

Q When did the President find out about the Department of Justice’s subpoenas for the Associated Press?

MR. CARNEY: Yesterday. Let me just be clear. We don’t have any independent knowledge of that. He found out about the news reports yesterday on the road.

So please now consider this reader –the Attorney General of the United States of America publicly informs the media that there was such a significant threat to American security that it required the Department of Justice to revoke the First Amendment rights of a significant media source.

And yet, despite that significant threat to American security, the White House then indicates Barack Obama HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THAT THREAT or the attempt to remedy that threat. That he in fact just learned of his own Department of Justice’s potentially illegal actions against the Associated Press.

NO WAY.

The Obama White House is placing lies atop lies now at such a pace they cannot even coordinate them on a daily basis.

Either Barack Obama did in fact know of his DOJ’s actions against the media, and then had his administration lie about it, or he has an administration that does not even bother to inform him of a significant threat to the United States.

So which is it Obama White House? And at this point does it even matter? You have now made it clear to the American people you are a repeated liar, an absolute incompetent –or both.-UM

__________

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11760 May 17, 2013
Apparently wrote:
BREAKING: Obama White House Just Caught In HUGE Lie/Contradiction –See Proof Here.
- The Ulsterman Report
theulstermanreport.com
BREAKING: Obama White House Just Caught In HUGE Lie/Contradiction –See Proof Here.
by Ulsterman on May 15, 2013 with 24 Comments in News
Please read the following brief assessment below of just how clear the Obama White House has revealed either its complete complicity in at least one of the many quite serious administrative scandals that are now ongoing, OR, Barack Obama is the most detached and incompetent president to have ever been elected to the office of president, and should resign on such incompetence immediately as he is not mentally fit to be President of the United States…
__________
Please watch this video beginning at the 1:20 mark where Eric Holder explained yesterday that the motivation to seize Associated Press communications records was based upon “A very-very serious leak. Among the most serious leaks –it put American people at risk.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Now read the following excerpt from White House Spokesman Jay Carney explaining WHEN Barack Obama learned of the Associated Press-Department of Justice communications scandal:
Q When did the President find out about the Department of Justice’s subpoenas for the Associated Press?
MR. CARNEY: Yesterday. Let me just be clear. We don’t have any independent knowledge of that. He found out about the news reports yesterday on the road.
So please now consider this reader –the Attorney General of the United States of America publicly informs the media that there was such a significant threat to American security that it required the Department of Justice to revoke the First Amendment rights of a significant media source.
And yet, despite that significant threat to American security, the White House then indicates Barack Obama HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THAT THREAT or the attempt to remedy that threat. That he in fact just learned of his own Department of Justice’s potentially illegal actions against the Associated Press.
NO WAY.
The Obama White House is placing lies atop lies now at such a pace they cannot even coordinate them on a daily basis.
Either Barack Obama did in fact know of his DOJ’s actions against the media, and then had his administration lie about it, or he has an administration that does not even bother to inform him of a significant threat to the United States.
So which is it Obama White House? And at this point does it even matter? You have now made it clear to the American people you are a repeated liar, an absolute incompetent –or both.-UM
__________
Yep! This is being reported on other stations, as well. Heard it a couple of hours ago. This is getting deep. Really deep.
Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11761 May 17, 2013
Danger zone wrote:
Excuses, Excuses. The governement is just sooo big, he can't possibly know what everyone is doing.... Didn't the man with the plan, campaign on the very promise of, "no more big government", "transparency"? Now, since he's failing miserably, let's FINALLY ask about a republican plan.... They're ain't a runway big enough to turn this disaster around on the republicans, "What is the republican plan"? Are you kidding???? I'm not stupid enough to be to be reeled in to a SENSELESS debate.... Barack HUSSEIN Obama ocuppies the WH, ask these questions of HIM !!!!
Let's see,

Your angry because the IRS examined the Right Wing Wackos tax breaks get challenged.

Then when Obama fires the guy who allowed the Right Wing Wackos to get challenged.

Does that make any sense even to you ?

Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11762 May 17, 2013
Oh my wrote:
THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2013 12:55 PM EDT
Joe ScarboroughÂ’s IRS hypocrisy
The MSNBC host is outraged about the Tea Party's treatment, but sought to "yank" NAACP's tax-exempt status in 2003
BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/joe_scarborou...

This week, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough joined the chorus of those decrying the IRS for targeting Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny in applying for nonprofit status.“You can’t allow the government to tread on political speech,” Scarborough said.“The Internal Revenue Service — the taxman — to go after their political beliefs.… I can’t imagine much worse than this,” he added.

Targeting nonprofit groups because of their political beliefs is wrong — pretty much everyone agrees on that. So today’s Scarborough must be outraged by his 2003 self, which gave this monologue on his show “Scarborough Country” on July 13, 2003:

The leader of the NAACP bashes President Bush and the Republican Party. Why is this clearly partisan group still being funded by your tax dollars?[...]

[T]he NAACP continues to get a free ride off of taxpayers because of the tax-exempt status thatÂ’s conferred to them by our federal government, now, this despite the fact the NAACP produced and ran the most vicious campaign attack ad in the history of televised presidential campaign.[...]

As Americans, NAACP members are free to speak their mind any time, day or night. But they shouldnÂ’t be getting a tax-free ride on the backs of hard-working Americans who donÂ’t get such preferential treatment. President Bush and members of Congress should have the guts to yank the tax-exempt status away from these left-wing activists. And while theyÂ’re at it, take away the tax exempt status of any right-wing activist who thumb their noses at the law as brazenly as does the NAACP.

In a broad sense, Scarborough was right. Blatantly political groups should not be protected by a tax-exempt status that lets them conceal their donors (even official political groups, organized under section 527 of the tax code, are tax-exempt, but they are regulated by the FEC and have to disclose lots of information).

But at least the NAACP has a clear social mission outside of politics. ItÂ’s impossible to say the same of many of the 510(c)4 groups like the ones the IRS targeted. For instance, what does the Karl Rove-linked Crossroads GPS do aside from run ads attacking Democrats? Not much.

Ironically, Scarborough was trying to argue in his 2003 monologue that the IRS used a double standard in questioning the tax-exempt status of the Christian Coalition but not the NAACP. The IRS and the Christian-right group fought a protracted legal battle over its tax-exempt status, while the tax agency did open an investigation into the NAACP after the 2004 election.

In 2000, a number of lawmakers, including Scarborough, a former Florida Republican congressman, along with Sen. Susan Collins and former Sen. Strom Thurmond forwarded requests from constituents to the IRS asking that the agency look into the NAACPÂ’s tax-exempt status. The lawmakers did not make the request themselves.
Don't you understand that it's ok to challenge leeeeeeeenerals tax status, but it's not ok to challenge Right Wing Wackos tax status.

It's so simple.
Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11764 May 17, 2013
Death Panel wrote:
Long before the Internal Revenue Service revealed it had improperly targeted conservative 501(c)(4) groups, a group of Democratic senators led by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, urged the IRS to do just that.
Schumer along with Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jeff Merkley, Tom Udall, Jeanne Shaheen and Al Franken, penned a letter calling on the agency to cap the amount of the political spending by groups masquerading as “social welfare organizations.”
Do you really expect anyone with an IQ above a tire iron to take a post seriously authored by a guy who calls himself "Death Panel" ?

Really ?
Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11765 May 17, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>I LOVE that Rush has the freedom to say insane, dangerous, idiot things in this country.

I'm terribly disappointed that we have people stupid and irresponsible enough to actually listen to his insane and short-sighted viewpoints.

Wait - you're not a rush fan, are you?
Great post.

Articulate, spot on, and persuasive.
Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11766 May 17, 2013
Death Panel wrote:
<quoted text>I'm watching the Congressional Hearings.

What are you doing?
Some of us are working at our jobs to support ourselves, our families, and pay taxes.

Wait, I forgot.

Right Wing Wackos aren't familiar with that activity.
Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11767 May 17, 2013
Danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, it's true. The White House should be re-opened to the public for this very reason, automatic spending cuts should include "party night", not stopping WH tours... It's actually sickening.
Wow- your really upset you can't visit Obama in the White House ?

You must secretly love the guy.

Come on - admit it.

Secretly, your not a Right Wing Wacko deep down - why, I bet you read a newspaper ..... once.

Danger Zone

Atlanta, GA

#11768 May 17, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see,
Your angry because the IRS examined the Right Wing Wackos tax breaks get challenged.
Then when Obama fires the guy who allowed the Right Wing Wackos to get challenged.
Does that make any sense even to you ?
I'd rather they put Hillary in the Hot Seat for her complete failure of handling the Benghazi attack, FIRST.
THEN go after Eric Holder & Obama. Yeah, that makes EVEN better sense. Don't you think?
Informed Opinion

Marco Island, FL

#11769 May 17, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>You're just like IO, you think people will read the long post crap you put here. NOT SO!

I read maybe 1 or 2 lines and thought....What the heck is this boy smoking or drinking.
I love how Right Wing Wacko proudly announce their inability to attend to posts that exceed a few words.

Next you'll proudly announce Right Wing Wackos inability to formulate an articulate, well- reasoned argument.

Ah .... never mind .... the obvious needs no confirmation.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#11770 May 17, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep! This is being reported on other stations, as well. Heard it a couple of hours ago. This is getting deep. Really deep.

The real problem is just what is going to be done about any of this? Since the Progressives totally control the Department of Justice and all of the Government law enforcement agencies. They seem to have total control over our military as of now.
Just what resources do are left to the American people to do anything about any of this as it is obvious that the Obama Administration could really care less about Americas freedoms, liberties and our Constitution. This government is about as transparent as Russia's Communist government.
I would like to know who is going to kick these people out or make them pay for their crimes, lies and coverups. How can the rule of law be enforced if there is no law enforcers?
The fox is guarding the chicken house, making up the rules as they see fit, and using any type of force needed to keep themselves in power. Do you think that most of the Progressives in Congress are going to do anything? All they do is lie and talk while still moving the agenda of a Socialist Communist government ahead. They actually have no fear of much of anything at this time. What are you going to do about it anyway?
I hope that I am wrong but this whole thing is like a three part play being acted out for the benefit of the under informed American people.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kingsland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ted Koppel smacked Sean Hannity to his face 6 min June 1
1 out of 3 days at a Trump property 16 min June 6
Salt, Pepper, and Thyme 2 hr buh buh 10
A Black savage identification course for Liberals (Jul '14) 3 hr Jorge 306
RINO's Lied Again 8 hr patooey 8
Trumpcare DOA? 13 hr Really 17
The Right Way To Promote Tourism (Mar '13) 23 hr Jorge 38

Kingsland Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Kingsland Mortgages