Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2010?

Posted in the Kingsland Forum

Comments (Page 400)

Showing posts 7,981 - 8,000 of39,451
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8457
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, he would. His bias is loud and clear.
Don't deny the science just because you don't like the results. Brain scans are brain scans.
guest

Flag Pond, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8458
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

1

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
There is an overwhelming avalanche of evidence that the most wealthy and powerful in this country are intentionally and systematically dismantling the middle-class of America and stacking the game in their favor despite the cost to humans, the environment and the fabric of our democracy.
Yet you still contend that anybody that has a problem with that is "jealous" because they aren't rich.
Your mindset is pure insanity.
In a nut shell.....
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8459
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives...
Thank you for the opportunity to repost this link.

You are welcome. And thank you for the opporunity to post another rebuttal.

"The fundamental mistake made by the IPCC was to neglect or pay little attention to natural changes, except for solar changes and volcanic effects, thus eliminating both
the Medieval Warm Period and the LIA (Little Ice Age). The IPCC adopted the so called “hockey stick” figure
in an attempt to demonstrate that the abrupt and unexpected temperature rise during the last century began as a result of the hypothesized manmade causes. If the IPCC had taken the LIA
into account, they would have found that the linear warming began in about 1800~1850,
meaning that the warming may be due to the recovery from the LIA. Their prediction has already
failed during the first decade of the present century, because they ignored the multi-decadal oscillation. They should have studied the causes of the LIA, the multi-decadal oscillation, and
other natural changes and included those processes in the GCMs. The present GCMs are still
very inadequate for the purpose of predicting future
temperature change.
Since they ignored both the LIA and the multi-decadal oscillation and assumed the
temperature rise from 1975 to 2000 to be due mainly to the effects of CO2 (instead of the combination of the linear change and the multi-decadal oscillation) their predicted temperature
rise in 2100 is unreasonably too high.
Climate change studies on the basis of GCMs are a young discipline. There are many
unknown processes and uncertain factors in climate change. It is inappropriate to bring results of imperfect science to the international political stage.
domino

Newnan, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8460
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Obama won in every state that did not require aphoto id and lost in EVERY STATE that did require a photo id in order to vote....Imagine That! He got 247,713 votes in St. Lucie County, Florida where there were only 175,574 eligible voters. Hmmmm! Theres no wonder all these investigations are currently going on.
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8461
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
You really do have a problem understanding the written word don't you? There is no mention of self-insured at all. This is another way to put money aside to cover things insurance doesn't. But, go ahead, keep displaying your ignorance - it isn't the first time and I am confident it will not be the last. This is one thing you should have no problem with, an opportunity for those in the middle class to keep a little more of their money and try to get ahead.
But I guess you have been showing your true colors all along and I just missed it. You are so bitter towards and envious of those you declare to be "rich" that you would rather hurt the middle class then take the chance that some "rich" person somewhere might save a little money too. Damned if you'll let Mr and Mrs Joe Smith be able to save enough money that Suzie can get braces or Joey can go to that special needs school - Mr "Rich Guy" might save some tax money too - can't have that, no matter how many working families will be hurt in the process. Okay, we get it now, thanks for clarifying your position.

Good post. Those socialists libtards hate anyone with money, except Obama the millionaire.
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8462
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
You are welcome. And thank you for the opporunity to post another rebuttal.
"The fundamental mistake made by the IPCC was to neglect or pay little attention to natural changes, except for solar changes and volcanic effects, thus eliminating both
the Medieval Warm Period and the LIA (Little Ice Age). The IPCC adopted the so called “hockey stick” figure
in an attempt to demonstrate that the abrupt and unexpected temperature rise during the last century began as a result of the hypothesized manmade causes. If the IPCC had taken the LIA
into account, they would have found that the linear warming began in about 1800~1850,
meaning that the warming may be due to the recovery from the LIA. Their prediction has already
failed during the first decade of the present century, because they ignored the multi-decadal oscillation. They should have studied the causes of the LIA, the multi-decadal oscillation, and
other natural changes and included those processes in the GCMs. The present GCMs are still
very inadequate for the purpose of predicting future
temperature change.
Since they ignored both the LIA and the multi-decadal oscillation and assumed the
temperature rise from 1975 to 2000 to be due mainly to the effects of CO2 (instead of the combination of the linear change and the multi-decadal oscillation) their predicted temperature
rise in 2100 is unreasonably too high.
Climate change studies on the basis of GCMs are a young discipline. There are many
unknown processes and uncertain factors in climate change. It is inappropriate to bring results of imperfect science to the international political stage.


Link here for the complete article.

http://people.iarc.uaf.edu/~sakasofu/pdf/glob...
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8463
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

domino wrote:
Obama won in every state that did not require aphoto id and lost in EVERY STATE that did require a photo id in order to vote....Imagine That! He got 247,713 votes in St. Lucie County, Florida where there were only 175,574 eligible voters. Hmmmm! Theres no wonder all these investigations are currently going on.

Wow-can you put up a link.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8464
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Cartersville Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm BORED with all your BS. It is hopeless with you so keep on doing what you do best!
Well! I'm just crushed. I don't think I'll EVER get over this. Okay. I'm over it. rotfl

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8465
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

ChicknButt wrote:
Oh My-
I think at this stage we've pretty much put the nail in the coffin of the dissenters with absolute facts.
The problem is, they just don't care. They LIKE the way the lies sound, so they'll knowingly keep clinging to them and repeating them.
Weird, isn't it? Just more proof that we're not dealing with intelligent rational people.
Yeah, you libs have put a nail in the coffin of this country, too. Nice.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8466
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
They just LOVE the Heartland Institute. It keeps telling them what they want to hear. They don't care that we've proven it's paid BS from the Big Energy companies.
The sane reaction to a company like ExxonMobil or Koch Industries intentionally flooding the American marketplace with lies is outrage and boycotts and demands for more transparency and regulations. That would be the sane reaction.
What we see instead is right-wing-whackos running over there begging for more false information. It's pathetic.
Pot-Kettle-Black
domino

Locust Grove, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8467
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow-can you put up a link.
I actually read several Obama facts in a newspaper. This paper is on the net too but by subscription. Its The Miller County Liberal.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8468
May 1, 2013
 
Bored wrote:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/lessons-from-...
In 2009, Syun-Ichi Akasofu (geophysicist and director of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks) released a paper which argued that the recent global warming is due to two factors: natural recovery from the Little Ice Age (LIA), and "the multi-decadal oscillation". The paper was trimmed down and published in 2010 by a new journal called Natural Science, which is published by Scientific Research Publishing, which has been called "what may be the world’s strangest collection of academic journals." Most of the following discussion focuses on the unpublished version of the paper...
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8469
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.skepticalscience.com/lessons-from-...
In 2009, Syun-Ichi Akasofu (geophysicist and director of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks) released a paper which argued that the recent global warming is due to two factors: natural recovery from the Little Ice Age (LIA), and "the multi-decadal oscillation". The paper was trimmed down and published in 2010 by a new journal called Natural Science, which is published by Scientific Research Publishing, which has been called "what may be the world’s strangest collection of academic journals." Most of the following discussion focuses on the unpublished version of the paper...
That pretty well destroys any shred of scientific credibility to Boreds link, besides being extremely informative.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8470
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

domino wrote:
Obama won in every state that did not require aphoto id and lost in EVERY STATE that did require a photo id in order to vote....Imagine That! He got 247,713 votes in St. Lucie County, Florida where there were only 175,574 eligible voters. Hmmmm! Theres no wonder all these investigations are currently going on.
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow-can you put up a link.
domino wrote:
<quoted text>
I actually read several Obama facts in a newspaper. This paper is on the net too but by subscription. Its The Miller County Liberal.
The Miller Country Liberal - Where all the hard-hitting news is reported first - NOT!

What you've said here is actually in the OPINION section of the news paper. It is submitted by a reader.

The first line of the article is "IF THIS IS ONLY HALF TRUE, we are in real trouble."

GET IT? It's NOT NEWS!! It's someone running their mouth and making stuff up!!!

Why can't you people distinguish between the two? It's mind-boggling!!! I really feel sorry for some of you -
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8471
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Link to Domino's OPINION piece submitted by a random reader and mistaken for news.

It said what she wanted to hear though, and she read it in a newspaper - so now in her simple mind it's true.

http://www.millercountyliberal.com/news/2013-...
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8472
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.skepticalscience.com/lessons-from-...
In 2009, Syun-Ichi Akasofu (geophysicist and director of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks) released a paper which argued that the recent global warming is due to two factors: natural recovery from the Little Ice Age (LIA), and "the multi-decadal oscillation". The paper was trimmed down and published in 2010 by a new journal called Natural Science, which is published by Scientific Research Publishing, which has been called "what may be the world’s strangest collection of academic journals." Most of the following discussion focuses on the unpublished version of the paper...

A blogging website, skepticalscience is sort of like topix.

"Skeptical Science is a climate alarmist website created by a self-employed cartoonist, John Cook. It is moderated by zealots who ruthlessly censor any and all form of dissent from their alarmist position. This way they can pretend to win arguments, when in reality they have all been refuted. The abuse and censorship does not pertain to simply any dissenting commentator there but to highly credentialed and respected climate scientists as well; Dr. Pielke Sr. has unsuccessfully attempted to engage in discussions there only to be childishly taunted and censored while Dr. Michaels has been dishonestly quoted and smeared. The irony of the site's oxymoronic name "Skeptical Science" is that the site is not skeptical of even the most extreme alarmist positions."

http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/trut...
Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8473
May 2, 2013
 
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
That pretty well destroys any shred of scientific credibility to Boreds link, besides being extremely informative.

Hey Stumpy, it dont take much to impress you.

I'm going to put myself on trial here on topix. I will be calling witnesses. The trial will consist of whether or not I think man is involved or responsible for the present climate changing. The trial will also focus on how many can tell truth from fiction. Sort of like "Ripleys believe it or not."

I will call as my first witness OMTE, mainly because he dont say much.

I will not be calling IO, as we dont need any long tirades of the sky is falling and it's all the conservatives fault. Nor will I be calling Oh my as we dont need any long cut and paste in the transcript.

I will call ChickenButt(he does have a sense of humor), Aggie, BigDave, Columbus native, and any other volunteer who wants to be a part of the trial testimony.


My first question is to OMTE. Did I, or did I not, acknowledge man does have a hand in global warming?


Second question. Did I or did I not make a statement similar to this, "Many factors affect global climate change, including wind currents, water participation, ocean currents and temperatures, and numerous other natural conditions."??

Did I or did I not use biased websites to support my post? Did others use said same type biased websites to report their rebuttals?

Did I or did I not use the IPPC website as source also?

other questions will follow if needed.




Bored

Dawsonville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8474
May 2, 2013
 
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The Miller Country Liberal - Where all the hard-hitting news is reported first - NOT!
What you've said here is actually in the OPINION section of the news paper. It is submitted by a reader.
The first line of the article is "IF THIS IS ONLY HALF TRUE, we are in real trouble."
GET IT? It's NOT NEWS!! It's someone running their mouth and making stuff up!!!
Why can't you people distinguish between the two? It's mind-boggling!!! I really feel sorry for some of you -

Sort of like this opinion piece.
Informed Opinion

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8475
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>You really do have a problem understanding the written word don't you? There is no mention of self-insured at all. This is another way to put money aside to cover things insurance doesn't. But, go ahead, keep displaying your ignorance - it isn't the first time and I am confident it will not be the last. This is one thing you should have no problem with, an opportunity for those in the middle class to keep a little more of their money and try to get ahead.

But I guess you have been showing your true colors all along and I just missed it. You are so bitter towards and envious of those you declare to be "rich" that you would rather hurt the middle class then take the chance that some "rich" person somewhere might save a little money too. Damned if you'll let Mr and Mrs Joe Smith be able to save enough money that Suzie can get braces or Joey can go to that special needs school - Mr "Rich Guy" might save some tax money too - can't have that, no matter how many working families will be hurt in the process. Okay, we get it now, thanks for clarifying your position.
Now don't worry.

You and the rest of the Right Wing parasites can still get free medical care by showing up at a hospital and demanding care.

We normal Americans won't allow you to be turned away because you were to greedy or selfish or stupid and refused to buy medical insurance; but, we will be requiring you to support yourself in the near future, as painful as Right Wingers find that to be.

It'll be OK

Just pretend you'd a grown up.

Meanwhile, the rest of us will also try to pay for your wars and tax breaks you enjoy - because someone has to be the adult.

Stay safe - it costs those of his responsible adults a fortune when the children get hurt, old, or a sick.
domino

Newnan, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8476
May 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The Miller Country Liberal - Where all the hard-hitting news is reported first - NOT!
What you've said here is actually in the OPINION section of the news paper. It is submitted by a reader.
The first line of the article is "IF THIS IS ONLY HALF TRUE, we are in real trouble."
GET IT? It's NOT NEWS!! It's someone running their mouth and making stuff up!!!
Why can't you people distinguish between the two? It's mind-boggling!!! I really feel sorry for some of you -
Well since you know everything, "NOT," Why dont you put forth the effort and google it further. As usual you took the beginning out of context. It is true. You Dems just cant face the truth! That has actually been on the news.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 7,981 - 8,000 of39,451
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

5 Users are viewing the Kingsland Forum right now

Search the Kingsland Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Statement from Master Peeples 1 hr Called it years ago 30
GBI currently investigatng Pak's Karate for chi... (Oct '13) 1 hr Called it years ago 910
Western States gather to discuss Federal land t... 1 hr Zack 4
city dock 2 hr Tommy Weaver 49
convicted sexual offender working for culligan ... Fri Give more info 9
What is Wrong With Teachers Apr 17 concerned parent 2 4
Why all the yard signs Apr 16 Anon 14
•••
•••
•••
•••

Kingsland Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Kingsland People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••