Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2010?

[Informed Opinion]

Will Georgia get its very own Todd Akin?
March 07, 2013

The Republican primary for the open Senate seat in Georgia is shaping up to be a free-for-all ...

So who are the potential candidates?

Paul Broun: Broun recently boasted that he was the “first to call Obama a socialist grabbing government control of health care and redistribution of wealth.� Also Broun,(no fan of science), claimed that “All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and the Big Bang Theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of Hell.�

Tom Price: After the BP oil spill, Price, worried about BP's profits, criticized a deal the company made BP pay $20 billion in damages as a "shakedown".

Phil Gingrey: Gingrey claimed that Todd Akin was “partly right� when he said that “a woman’s body has a way of shutting down so the pregnancy would not occur.� According to Gingrey “We tell infertile couples all the time to just relax. Drink a glass of wine. And don’t be so tense and uptight because all that adrenaline can cause you not to ovulate.�

This is gonna be fun.

[nuff said]

Synergy wrote:

This BRILLIANT man explains EXACTLY why I don't like the Obamas. I totally agree with every word he wrote. It's a little long, but absolutely worth the read.
http://mychal-massie.com/premium/why-i-do-not...
I'm not going to argue with anyone about this. This is how I feel and I don't have to explain my feelings. You have your feelings and I have mine. "nuff said.

You don't have to explain, it’s obvious you are a nut and an egomaniac.
So spare us the bullshit reply, nuff said.

[Bigdave1]

Now I feel safer. J. Carny says that we can defend ourselves from a N.Korean missile attack. I believe everything this guy says don't you? He has to be the worlds greatest spin artist of all times. Why hasn't our President made a comment and assured us that we are safe? Hmmm.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_...

[Synergy]

nuff said wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't have to explain, it’s obvious you are a nut and an egomaniac.
So spare us the bullshit reply, nuff said.

You are going to have to take it to the chaplain because I DON'T CARE what you think of me. To call YOU a nut and an egomaniac would be giving you too much credit. BTW, YOUR posts are the very definition of bullsh*t. Next.

[nuff said]

Chill out, I was just explaining why you do the things you do.
I don't care that you don't care, you are still and egomaniac and a nut. Next????

[Synergy]

nuff said wrote:

Chill out, I was just explaining why you do the things you do.
I don't care that you don't care, you are still and egomaniac and a nut. Next????

I AM chill. You don't have that kind of power over me.(You think you do, so that makes YOU an egomaniac. Just sayin'.)

I think you are a bigger nut than I'll ever be. Do you care? No. So, there ya go. Checkmate.

[Bored]

Informed Opinion wrote:

Will Georgia get its very own Todd Akin?
March 07, 2013
The Republican primary for the open Senate seat in Georgia is shaping up to be a free-for-all ...
So who are the potential candidates?
Paul Broun: Broun recently boasted that he was the “first to call Obama a socialist grabbing government control of health care and redistribution of wealth.� Also Broun,(no fan of science), claimed that “All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and the Big Bang Theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of Hell.�
Tom Price: After the BP oil spill, Price, worried about BP's profits, criticized a deal the company made BP pay $20 billion in damages as a "shakedown".
Phil Gingrey: Gingrey claimed that Todd Akin was “partly right� when he said that “a woman’s body has a way of shutting down so the pregnancy would not occur.� According to Gingrey “We tell infertile couples all the time to just relax. Drink a glass of wine. And don’t be so tense and uptight because all that adrenaline can cause you not to ovulate.�
This is gonna be fun.

Boring.
Riding around in circles on a unicycle going forward and backward.

[Aggie23]

nuff said wrote:

Chill out, I was just explaining why you do the things you do.
I don't care that you don't care, you are still and egomaniac and a nut. Next????

Wow, I'm so impressed. You are qualified to explain to someone you have never met why they do the things they do. Must be so special to be you.

[Informed Opinion]

Bored wrote:

<quoted text>Boring.
Riding around in circles on a unicycle going forward and backward.

Thanks for reading.

[Synergy]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>Unlike that fat wh"re aggie; I know bait when I see it. I was only giving you what you wanted.

You're a Rhodes Scholar, huh?

[Anonymous]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>Unlike that fat wh"re aggie; I know bait when I see it. I was only giving you what you wanted.

Why the degrading of women? I find it repulsive and uncalled for. It's better to remain quiet than spew hatred.

[Anonymous]

Maybe you should join "the bird" who kept flying in similar circles and just disappeared. Poof. Gone. I think you mentioned you missed him...

[Chicken Little]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>
I AM chill. You don't have that kind of power over me.(You think you do, so that makes YOU an egomaniac. Just sayin'.)
I think you are a bigger nut than I'll ever be. Do you care? No. So, there ya go. Checkmate.

Only an egomaniac would say something like checkmate when they clearly lost an argument. Funny stuff, this Topix...

[Aggie23]

glorya wrote:

<quoted text> Why the degrading of women? I find it repulsive and uncalled for. It's better to remain quiet than spew hatred.

It usually is a way for insecure men to try and compensate for their various inadequacies. The troll in question is best ignored and really isn't worth wasting time with. The "best" he can come up with is vulgarity and profanity, the last resort of those with no substance. But that "uncle tom" comment was so gutter dredging that it had to be addressed. Time to go back to ignoring.

[jeb stuart]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>I agree 100%.

not to disagree with you or dave,but just who is it that has determined n.korea has the ability to launch a nuke at the u.s.? their threats are much more likely just more feeble attempts at blackmail.even their one powerful ally,china,has began to back away from them.i doubt seriously if they could defeat their rivals to the south (s.korea)much less launch a nuke at the u.s.their threats are more likely aimed at attention and sympathy against the santions imposed against them.i wouuld ignore them and impose even harsher santions,unless and until it is determined that they do actually have such ability.in that case,i would not be opposed to a first strike annihilation,but i believe that is several yrs. down the road.meantime,let them starve.i know this may sound mean but i believe it preferable to the alternatives.

[Synergy]

Chicken Little wrote:

<quoted text>
Only an egomaniac would say something like checkmate when they clearly lost an argument. Funny stuff, this Topix...

Only an egomaniac would post a reply like yours. I've lost no argument. I've not argued. YOU, on the other hand, are giving yourself credit for winning something that never happened. That makes YOU an egomaniac. Funny stuff, you.

[Synergy]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>That's not the first time I've been accused of that. Thanks.

So, there are TWO of us with such a sense of humor?????? Awesome.

[jeb stuart]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>I agree 100%.

more on same,they're have been numerous attempts by any countries and entities to help n.korea.they have all ended in frustration because the n.koreans will not allow any type of supervision in seeing that the food is disdributed among the masses.any aid that is given is only used too strengthen their miltary.they are conidered to be a 'hermit society' because of their extreme isolation.the few who have managaed to escape tell tales of horror about the "kims" requime.it is more likely that any attempt to launch a missle at the u.s. now would end up hitting china,russia or God knows where.

[Nasty Aliens]

How about one of those nice people that live on International Drive in Atlanta.

[OMTE]

jeb stuart wrote:

<quoted text>not to disagree with you or dave,but just who is it that has determined n.korea has the ability to launch a nuke at the u.s.? their threats are much more likely just more feeble attempts at blackmail.even their one powerful ally,china,has began to back away from them.i doubt seriously if they could defeat their rivals to the south (s.korea)much less launch a nuke at the u.s.their threats are more likely aimed at attention and sympathy against the santions imposed against them.i wouuld ignore them and impose even harsher santions,unless and until it is determined that they do actually have such ability.in that case,i would not be opposed to a first strike annihilation,but i believe that is several yrs. down the road.meantime,let them starve.i know this may sound mean but i believe it preferable to the alternatives.

What about the 28,500 american troops that are stationed in South Korea? I don't think they'd need a long range missile to hit them. There was a guy on Fox News lastnight saying; that he believed it was more likely that they'd share this technology with terrorists and smuggle a bomb here piece by piece. That they'd then call the White House and ask them if they wanted to deal then. I agree with Dave. If someone tells me they're going to shoot me and I whether I believe they have a gun or not; I'm going to lay that a$$ down.