Maxon-Dixon casino files eight-volume...

Maxon-Dixon casino files eight-volume legal appeal against gaming board

There are 9 comments on the Evening Sun story from Oct 22, 2011, titled Maxon-Dixon casino files eight-volume legal appeal against gaming board. In it, Evening Sun reports that:

In an exhaustive eight-volume legal appeal, officials behind a Gettysburg-area casino proposal outline a litany of complaints against the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and its April licensing decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Evening Sun.

Nile

United States

#1 Oct 28, 2011
Go casino. Doubtful this will work but hey.
NowThatsEntertai nment

Newville, PA

#2 Oct 28, 2011
I agree Nile. A blind man could see the inconsistencies and questionable actions during this most recent process. While I doubt too that this will overturn the decision for Nemacolin in my opinion it will shine that bright light on the Gaming Commission so that such actions will not be tolerated in future efforts. This will even the playing field for ALL future applicants and decisions will be made based on the strength of the applicants, and not by the influence of politicians and special interest groups.

And I also agree Nile, we will never know unless we try. And at 8 volumes of evidence it sounds like someone was doing their homework.
Fire Marshal Bill

Gettysburg, PA

#3 Oct 28, 2011
NowThatsEntertainment wrote:
I agree Nile. A blind man could see the inconsistencies and questionable actions during this most recent process. While I doubt too that this will overturn the decision for Nemacolin in my opinion it will shine that bright light on the Gaming Commission so that such actions will not be tolerated in future efforts. This will even the playing field for ALL future applicants and decisions will be made based on the strength of the applicants, and not by the influence of politicians and special interest groups.
And I also agree Nile, we will never know unless we try. And at 8 volumes of evidence it sounds like someone was doing their homework.
I have to go along with this. Eight pages, they must have something that looks a bit irregular. And I also agree that I don’t think we will see any change in the decision, but maybe in the future things will be a bit more above board, and things will be looked at on actual fact rather than special interest groups that really have no dog in the fight.
NowThatsEntertai nment

Newville, PA

#4 Oct 28, 2011
Fire Marshal Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to go along with this. Eight pages, they must have something that looks a bit irregular. And I also agree that I don’t think we will see any change in the decision, but maybe in the future things will be a bit more above board, and things will be looked at on actual fact rather than special interest groups that really have no dog in the fight.
Just have to correct one thing Fire Marshall Bill, there are 8 volumes of evidence, not 8 pages. I also find it interesting that instead of commenting someone out there just chooses to get happy with the spam judge button.
Fire Marshal Bill

Gettysburg, PA

#5 Oct 28, 2011
NowThatsEntertainment wrote:
<quoted text>
Just have to correct one thing Fire Marshall Bill, there are 8 volumes of evidence, not 8 pages. I also find it interesting that instead of commenting someone out there just chooses to get happy with the spam judge button.
Sorry my fault, please excuse me for confusing pages with volumes. And I wonder if anyone can guess who is judging the comments?
NowThatsEntertai nment

Newville, PA

#6 Oct 28, 2011
Fire Marshal Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
And I wonder if anyone can guess who is judging the comments?
Now there you go with those hypothetical questions again.(<:
Pete

Tuckahoe, NY

#7 Oct 29, 2011
Now Thats Entertainment;No,FMB's was a question.But,don't let simple things like that stop you from bloviating.
Pete

Tuckahoe, NY

#8 Oct 29, 2011
Nile;In the article they said Mason Dixon did not receive one vote.Shouldn't you get in touch with them to let them know Mason Dixon(according to you)had support from the member's.
Nile

Gettysburg, PA

#9 Oct 29, 2011
Pete wrote:
Nile;In the article they said Mason Dixon did not receive one vote.Shouldn't you get in touch with them to let them know Mason Dixon(according to you)had support from the member's.
Please try to ratchet up your understanding a bit Pete if you want to continue this. At least open your mind and try to understand.

I acknowledge that in the public vote MD got no votes. That is fact.

I am just pointing out that the FACT that the final vote took a long time to come about and which indicates the decision was not a cut and dry one for Nema. If it was then they would have voted long before they did. Neither you nor I know where the allegiances lied but to say MD had no support is not the fact you make it out to be. We don't know.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

King of Prussia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ahh Sharon Fedak n Ridattis n Burkey family's Feb 18 someone else they... 1
2-14! 14 reasons to evil Sharon Fedak n Redatti Feb 14 happy v day 1
sharon lynn fedak (Apr '16) Feb 7 Everybody knows ... 35
Sharon L Fedak house of horror & thieves. Feb 7 Everybody knows 3
Sharon Lynn Fedak and clan Feb 7 Jake 3
Sharon Fedak- Dennis Ridatti Jan 30 Frauds period 17
News Alleged Delco Nostra leader waives preliminary ... (Nov '08) Jan 27 yidfellas v USA 71

King of Prussia Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

King of Prussia Mortgages