So what, you don't expect Foulds to defend herself, Your claiming the results of the consultant firm are because she being a good PR person yet you have problems with her Public Relations? I have news for you, PR STANDS for Public Relations.<quoted text>
You completely missed the point. The council hired consultants who only had one previous government client. Val turned on her charm, and yes, the consultants told council that they are the problem. What do you expect when you have an expert PR person (Val) presenting herself as the victim? Everything you read now she blames on "not having direction" from council. The consultants gave her exactly what she wanted - an excuse - and she will use that until either she decides to retire or the council grows some nerve. And I want to know why Farneth only gave one side of the story.
Your also letting the consultant firm off the hook (because Foulds is a good PR person) by saying they have only had one other governmental client.
By the same token you are putting down the council for their choice in consultant groups and putting them down for not accomplishing Your agenda!
Do you even think before you type?
As for this reporter, What is the other side of the story that he missed? Why don't you submit an article telling that side, Because if you have told it, I'm missing it too. Unless your talking about all your assumptions.
Please enlighten us!
It seems to me that all you have to say is negative and you are attacking everyone. I really hope you, with all your wisdom, get off your butt and run in the next election. I believe Brubaker is still an appointed member, which means she has to run to fill the seat at the next available election. There is your chance to turn this town around!