Real World Economics / Better policies might benefit wind, ethanol

There are 2 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Nov 7, 2010, titled Real World Economics / Better policies might benefit wind, ethanol. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

The national economy is weak, but things were hopping in Moulton Township when I worked on our farm west of Chandler late last month.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Owl Gore

Minneapolis, MN

#1 Nov 7, 2010
Weatherization Went Awry, Audit Shows

Money provided in the stimulus bill for making buildings more energy-efficient is finally starting to flow, the Department of Energy’s inspector general says. But in a report released Tuesday, his office says that in some cases it has been badly spent.

An audit by the inspector general focused on some work done by the Community and Economic Development Association of Cook County, one of 35 agencies in Illinois that are expected to share $91 million over three years. The audit looked at 15 homes and found that 12 failed final inspection “because of substandard workmanship.” In some cases, technicians who tuned up gas-fired heating systems did so improperly, so that they emitted carbon monoxide “at higher than acceptable levels.”

In eight cases, initial assessments of the houses and apartments called for “inappropriate weatherization measures.” In one case an inspector called for more attic insulation but ignored leaks in the roof, which would have ruined the insulation, the audit said. And for 10 homes,“contractors billed for labor charges that had not been incurred and for materials that had not been installed.’’ The stimulus bill, approved early last year, devoted $5 billion to weatherization. Illinois was allotted $242 million to spend over three years and planned to weatherize 27,000 homes. The group audited, known as CEDA, is supposed to spend $91 million on weatherizing 12,500 of those homes.

The federal audit said that Illinois had found a 62 percent error rate when it re-inspected homes weatherized by CEDA. And sometimes CEDA was spending more for materials than an individual homeowner would spend, the audit found. Some of the work created fire hazards, the audit said.

Phone calls to CEDA’s s president and its director of weatherization were not immediately returned on Tuesday.

(Excerpt)

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/wea...

----------

62 percent error rate - "close enough for gubbamint work"!
Peter

Houston, TX

#2 Nov 7, 2010
Owl Gore wrote:
Weatherization Went Awry, Audit Shows
Money provided in the stimulus bill for making buildings more energy-efficient is finally starting to flow, the Department of Energy’s inspector general says. But in a report released Tuesday, his office says that in some cases it has been badly spent.
An audit by the inspector general focused on some work done by the Community and Economic Development Association of Cook County, one of 35 agencies in Illinois that are expected to share $91 million over three years. The audit looked at 15 homes and found that 12 failed final inspection “because of substandard workmanship.” In some cases, technicians who tuned up gas-fired heating systems did so improperly, so that they emitted carbon monoxide “at higher than acceptable levels.”
In eight cases, initial assessments of the houses and apartments called for “inappropriate weatherization measures.” In one case an inspector called for more attic insulation but ignored leaks in the roof, which would have ruined the insulation, the audit said. And for 10 homes,“contractors billed for labor charges that had not been incurred and for materials that had not been installed.’’ The stimulus bill, approved early last year, devoted $5 billion to weatherization. Illinois was allotted $242 million to spend over three years and planned to weatherize 27,000 homes. The group audited, known as CEDA, is supposed to spend $91 million on weatherizing 12,500 of those homes.
The federal audit said that Illinois had found a 62 percent error rate when it re-inspected homes weatherized by CEDA. And sometimes CEDA was spending more for materials than an individual homeowner would spend, the audit found. Some of the work created fire hazards, the audit said.
Phone calls to CEDA’s s president and its director of weatherization were not immediately returned on Tuesday.
(Excerpt)
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/wea...
----------
62 percent error rate - "close enough for gubbamint work"!
Also known as Keynesianism.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kenneth Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
chandler minnesota (May '08) Oct '14 murray10 19
News Exhibit celebrates Tuskegee airmen (Jul '14) Jul '14 Richies Cool Man ... 2
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in Minnesota ... (Oct '10) Jan '14 DutchQ 11
News University of Minnesota medical school strategi... (Feb '13) Feb '13 Sally 1
News Rwanda prosecutor says he'll charge US lawyer soon (May '11) May '11 sock 8
News St. Paul man hit after car stalls on Highway 61 (Apr '11) May '11 Smokified 10
News Fuller Minnesota budget picture to emerge this ... (Mar '11) Mar '11 greedy business 4
More from around the web

Kenneth People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]