Doctor heads to court after online sex sting

[NewsJunky]

Nancy wrote:

Is this true?
http://riotstories.com/
This is fun, outing PeeJ vigilantes :
Xavier Von Erck : John Phillip Eide
Del Harvey : Alizon Shea
Jay Alternative : Gregg Brainer
Jessica Rabbit : Nila Rae Clark
PJ Alias: Jingles
Role: PJ Follow up vigilante
Quote: "Too much hair dye"
Real Name: Suzy Graham
PJ Alias: Persephone
Role: PJ Follow up vigilante
Quote: "Hi, Kutzler my name. Steve Kutzler .. errrm Stacey"
Real Name: Stacey Kutzler
PJ Alias: The Director
Role: PJ Contributor
Quote: "Damn you found my whiny journal"
Real Name: Kevin Saint
PJ Alias: Philipw
Role: PJ Service Provider / "Webmaster"
Codename: Froghumper
Real Name: Philip Whittaker
PJ Alias: Phoebus Appollo
Role: PJ "Webmaster"
Codename: The Mole
Real Name: Nicholas Lee Wilkins
PJ Alias: Kashmir Goat
Role: PJ Follow Up vigilante
Quote: "When I let my hair grow I look like Hulk Hogan"
Possible Names: Greg Johnson - John Morris

You're either 6 years old or just incredibly immature. Seriously, rocks have more brains than you do. Why don't you go back to playing with your dolls until you have had about 20 more years to grow up, because I really don't expect you to understand just how childish you look on this board.

[frequent reader]

I think we beat the more interesting sock puppets into submission, and they no longer want to come out and play. This is very understandable. Thankfully we have “Nancy,” but it is one of the less interesting characters Wolin has ever produced.

But what else did we expect? We have been beating them down handsomely. Every time Wolin brings up a new persona with another lame theory we kick it in the nuts -- again. Maybe he is learning.

In a very palpable way all the sock puppets, like Wolin himself, suffer from the same problem the cop was pointing out in the arrest and interview scene, when he tells the other cop “he [Wolin] is failing to comprehend.”

Does anyone know where Wolin lives now? Is he still with his wife? Who does he work for? Any new head-rug pictures? Any new “date” reports?

[Serious Offenses]

legal analyst wrote:

Chatting on the Internet is the most normal thing in the world. It's only a crime to those who choose to see it as such. What's a crime? People who have accomplished NOTHING in their lives, like PJ, like some people on this site,trying to tear down those who have sacrificed and worked hard to improve the human condition. Do you know how many years of study it takes to become a oncology specialist in tumors? Do these destructive people know how much emotional, financial, professional damage they've caused?

An oncologist is a specialist who treats malignant tumors. As someone who has been in the field since the 1980's, Wolin would not describe an "oncology specialist in tumors"- it's redundant. It's like the guy who works in the department of redundancy department. I, too believe this is a faker seeking attention and not Wolin.

[Sgt Stedenko]

Serious Offenses wrote:

<quoted text>
An oncologist is a specialist who treats malignant tumors. As someone who has been in the field since the 1980's, Wolin would not describe an "oncology specialist in tumors"- it's redundant. It's like the guy who works in the department of redundancy department. I, too believe this is a faker seeking attention and not Wolin.

I don't think this one is/was Wolin. This is a apparently a preson with an axe to grind against PJ, who probably couldn't care less about Maurice Wolin himself. Probably someone who got busted by them and saw his world come crashing down around him.

"Do these destructive people know how much emotional, financial, professional damage they've caused?"

I don't think it's Wolin, but there are some similarities. Like Wolin,'legal analyst' doesn't want to accept the fact that he caused his own problems. Maybe he made some accomplishments that allowed him some nice benefits, like a higher salary, a primo parking spot and a smokin-hot wife. Then one day he was blind-sided by an internet troll - and in his mind perhaps he's resentful that someone so low in social status was able to cut him down to the level of a common person.

[Serious Offenses]

Sgt Stedenko wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think this one is/was Wolin. This is a apparently a preson with an axe to grind against PJ, who probably couldn't care less about Maurice Wolin himself. Probably someone who got busted by them and saw his world come crashing down around him.
"Do these destructive people know how much emotional, financial, professional damage they've caused?"
I don't think it's Wolin, but there are some similarities. Like Wolin,'legal analyst' doesn't want to accept the fact that he caused his own problems. Maybe he made some accomplishments that allowed him some nice benefits, like a higher salary, a primo parking spot and a smokin-hot wife. Then one day he was blind-sided by an internet troll - and in his mind perhaps he's resentful that someone so low in social status was able to cut him down to the level of a common person.

I agree on all points. Nice job, Sgt. Now, when can we resume our discussion of the really important stuff- you know, like the hard drive...? Are you out there, Bob?

[Brittle Fingers]

Points well taken, but I'm still inclined to believe 'legal analyst' (and possibly 'constitutional advocate') was actually Wolin. I've never truly thought Bob to be Wolin though.

[Joe the Nonce Watcher]

Mo is too busy chasing (underaged) püssy, he has no time to post here, though I believe he does visit the thread from time to time.

[wolin-tracker]

frequent reader wrote:

Any new “date” reports?

If you are referring to Wolin court date -- one month from this Wednesday (Dec. 11 at 9a.m.) for a readiness conference. Jury trial still set to begin Jan. 8 at 10a.m. in Dept. 10 unless Berk appeals Judge Wick's ruling to admit the chat log into evidence.

[Serious Offenses]

wolin-tracker wrote:

<quoted text>
If you are referring to Wolin court date -- one month from this Wednesday (Dec. 11 at 9a.m.) for a readiness conference. Jury trial still set to begin Jan. 8 at 10a.m. in Dept. 10 unless Berk appeals Judge Wick's ruling to admit the chat log into evidence.

Watch for that appeal to land about a week before the scheduled readiness conference. Even if it's denied (which it probably will be) it will buy Wolin a few more months of freedom.

[Born Again Lurker]

Typically a judge has to permit the defense to appeal a pretrial ruling before trial starts. Otherwise, the defense has to wait until the defendant's convicted after trial before an appeal can be filed.

The earlier appeal was by the prosecution. In every jurisdiction, the state cannot appeal an acquittal. If the judge should rule all, literally all, of the state's evidence inadmissible during trial, it's game over for the prosecution.

That's why many critical issues, like admissibility of a defendant's statement to police, are ruled on before trial. Most states permit a interlocutory (pretrial) appeal by the prosecution on a limited list of issues, which almost always includes a pretrial ruling on admissibility.

In other words, Berk can't delay trial with an appeal unless the judge allows it. And with the case this old already, it's unlikely. Most judges take pride n a clear docket, so a four-year-old high publicity criminal case is a big black mark on that docket.

Doesn't mean there might not be other reasons for delay, however. Still, unless Wolin's willing to plead out, this case will go to trial eventually.

[dogstar]

Serious Offenses wrote:

<quoted text>
Watch for that appeal to land about a week before the scheduled readiness conference. Even if it's denied (which it probably will be) it will buy Wolin a few more months of freedom.

Yeah, the filing of (insert bullshit motion here) just before trial is about to start is one of the most used tricks in Berk's bag.

[Serious Offenses]

Born Again Lurker wrote:

Typically a judge has to permit the defense to appeal a pretrial ruling before trial starts. Otherwise, the defense has to wait until the defendant's convicted after trial before an appeal can be filed.
The earlier appeal was by the prosecution. In every jurisdiction, the state cannot appeal an acquittal. If the judge should rule all, literally all, of the state's evidence inadmissible during trial, it's game over for the prosecution.
That's why many critical issues, like admissibility of a defendant's statement to police, are ruled on before trial. Most states permit a interlocutory (pretrial) appeal by the prosecution on a limited list of issues, which almost always includes a pretrial ruling on admissibility.
In other words, Berk can't delay trial with an appeal unless the judge allows it. And with the case this old already, it's unlikely. Most judges take pride n a clear docket, so a four-year-old high publicity criminal case is a big black mark on that docket.
Doesn't mean there might not be other reasons for delay, however. Still, unless Wolin's willing to plead out, this case will go to trial eventually.

Can't Berk request a stay and a writ of mandate regarding a motion en liminie or exclusion of the chat logs in the CA first appelate district court in dispute of Wick's ruling?

[Born Again Lurker]

Serious Offenses wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't Berk request a stay and a writ of mandate regarding a motion en liminie or exclusion of the chat logs in the CA first appelate district court in dispute of Wick's ruling?

A Writ of Mandate (California's term for what we call a "writ of mandamus" everywhere else) in CA is essentially an interlocutory appeal. Berk could file one, but the turnaround on them is fast (sometimes only a few days).

You're right, though, that filing one on the eve of trial would at least kick the case out to the next trial setting, a few more months down the road, even if the Supreme Court got back to them within a week or less.

Ultimately, there are any number of ways trials can be delayed. I knew one nutball attorney who'd go off his diabetes meds when he wasn't ready for trial. He'd literally hospitalize himself in order to delay a case.

Then again, there was another guy who checked himself into a hospital for "hypertension" before his tax evasion trial. The federal judge had the marshals see what was wrong with him, and when they learned it was only hypertension, the judge locked the guy up in the court's cellblock to "relax." Trial went on as planned in that case.

(but the defendant later sued and settled with the hospital for releasing his medical records without his consent or a proper subpoena - so it's not all good news).

[Brittle Fingers]

This thread has REALLY quieted down. I miss the sock puppets. Mo-Wo and/or Bob.....come back.....

[Sgt Stedenko]

Brittle Fingers wrote:

This thread has REALLY quieted down. I miss the sock puppets. Mo-Wo and/or Bob.....come back.....

Well it looks like Perverted Justice has been pretty busy. They've posted almost 100 new convictions during the past few weeks. There's a notice on their website that says they're really over 500, but they haven't all been posted yet.

[Brittle Fingers]

Sgt Stedenko wrote:

<quoted text>
Well it looks like Perverted Justice has been pretty busy. They've posted almost 100 new convictions during the past few weeks. There's a notice on their website that says they're really over 500, but they haven't all been posted yet.

Perhaps Bob got caught in one of their stings....? lol

[Serious Offenses]

From datehookup.com :
I am comfortable in almost any setting. From the formal black-tie affair to a casual night at the local dive bar, I try to find humor and fun in almost everything and every place I go. I'm tall, fit, and try to stay that way. If its skiing, or hiking or just swimming at the beach, I am constantly active. Travel is a big part of what I do but also I find it immensely relaxing and a way to not only escape but to learn about the rest of humanity.

I have my own consulting business and work hard to maintain it. The fruits are the flexibility of having my own hours, travel schedule and vacations.

The perfect relationship combines what I love to do with someone who is equally fulfilled by these things. Maybe its old fashioned but she will like doors being opened from her, and to walk on the inside of the curb. She will appreciate the challenge of being with someone who is busy, well read, but she can also bring much into the relationship to make the whole greater than each part. She won't mind that he is the occasional bad boy and in fact looks forward to it.

Who is my perfect match? She is tall, blonde and statuesque. No wait, that's Nordic Barbie. How about short, works in a winery and has a flat head? Ok that's a bad punch line from a joke. Seriously, you should be smart, as opposed to learned (and you will know the difference); be able to describe yourself, truthfully, as either feisty, fiery or quirky; and be passionate about something even if its the blend of coffee you drink.

If you see yourself here, lets explore how we could make it happen. If not, good luck with your search.
Thetalldoc007
Bad boy...huh? Is that what he calls it?

[Sgt Stedenko]

Serious Offenses wrote:

From datehookup.com :
I am comfortable in almost any setting. From the formal black-tie affair to a casual night at the local dive bar, I try to find humor and fun in almost everything and every place I go. I'm tall, fit, and try to stay that way. If its skiing, or hiking or just swimming at the beach, I am constantly active. Travel is a big part of what I do but also I find it immensely relaxing and a way to not only escape but to learn about the rest of humanity.
I have my own consulting business and work hard to maintain it. The fruits are the flexibility of having my own hours, travel schedule and vacations.
The perfect relationship combines what I love to do with someone who is equally fulfilled by these things. Maybe its old fashioned but she will like doors being opened from her, and to walk on the inside of the curb. She will appreciate the challenge of being with someone who is busy, well read, but she can also bring much into the relationship to make the whole greater than each part. She won't mind that he is the occasional bad boy and in fact looks forward to it.
Who is my perfect match? She is tall, blonde and statuesque. No wait, that's Nordic Barbie. How about short, works in a winery and has a flat head? Ok that's a bad punch line from a joke. Seriously, you should be smart, as opposed to learned (and you will know the difference); be able to describe yourself, truthfully, as either feisty, fiery or quirky; and be passionate about something even if its the blend of coffee you drink.
If you see yourself here, lets explore how we could make it happen. If not, good luck with your search.
Thetalldoc007
Bad boy...huh? Is that what he calls it?

This is actually a pretty good profile. I think it's interesting that he describes himself as "well read" while his ideal match should be "smart, as opposed to learned..." It almost seems as if these two points contradict each other.

Anyway - if the author is indeed Wolin - this profile underscores something that I still can't fathom; what on earth was he doing in a Yahoo chat room talking to a decoy from PJ? With a profile like that, and with his income, he was probably getting plenty of responses from adults.

[Premium]

Adults would be more likely to figure out that he was married and full of cr*p. Teenage girls are easier to fool.

[frequent reader]

Serious Offenses wrote:

From datehookup.com :
I am comfortable in almost any setting. From the formal black-tie affair to a casual night at the local dive bar, I try to find humor and fun in almost everything and every place I go.
Thetalldoc007

So he tries to find “humor and fun” in almost every place. Good. Some old and some new challenges:

1. entering the house through the garage. No smile.
2. starting to pour frozen lemonade. A smirk?
3. seeing the cameras. Deep frown.
4. seeing the cops. Bitching and abusing dark glasses.
5. being cuffed. Blubbering "I wasn't doing anything."
6. having his pockets riffled through by cops. No fun.
7. sitting with the cops. Catatonic. He was "failing to comprehend."
8. interviewed by Officer Nelson. No smile.
9. calling the wife for bail money. Never a fun thing.
10. finding out that he got deceived by an adult male into thinking he was dealing with a 13-year old girl. No fun at all.
11. hiring Berk. No fun.
12. getting Berk's bills. No fun.
13. paying Berk’s bills. No fun.
14. getting appeals tossed. No fun.
15. wife's reaction to all this. No fun.
16. his daughters' reaction to all this. No fun.
17. the public’s awareness that his urges are considered deviant, or at least criminal, in our society. Not fun.
18. having the physician’s board suspend his license. No fun.
19. showing up at this discussion site and having to create sock puppets. Fun?
20. having his sock puppets pummeled by basic common sense. No fun.
21. waiting for the trial. No fun.
22. thinking about the trial. No fun.
23. thinking about the natural developments after trial, like jail. No fun.
24. thinking about being someone's girlfriend without being asked. Fun?
25. thinking about beatings when locked up (convicts don not like sexual predators). No fun.
26. thinking about a life-long sexual predator tag. No fun.(Except maybe he will put a sign saying so outside where he lives so as not to get annoying kids asking for candy on Halloween.)
27. thinking about his job prospects where his clients have to hide the fact that they are hiring him for fear of repercussions. No fun.
28. thinking about a lifetime of wondering if his next relationship will again be busted by a simple Google search of his name. No fun.
29. awareness of a lifetime of people looking at him sideways. No fun.

So this finding “humor and fun” in almost every place may be a tall order for the tall dreamy doc.