Naming the johns: Public records are public
Join the discussion below, or Read more at UnionLeader.com.
#1 Oct 24, 2012
THE JOHNS SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT THEIR FAMILIES BEFORE THEY DID WHAT THEY DID. THEY ARE AS GUILTY AS THE PROSTITUTE BECAUSE THERE WOULD NOT BE PROSTITUTES IF THERE WERE NO JOHNS. THEIR NAMES SHOULD BE PUBLIC RECORD. I FEEL SORRY FOR THE FAMILIES AS I DO ANY FAMILIES WHO HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER THAT COMMITS A CRIME. IT IS A SHAME THAT WIVES AND KIDS WILL SUFFER THE REPERCUTIONS. GOD BLESS THE FAMILIES.
#2 Nov 2, 2012
God Bless the families? I'm sure most of the wives know already, why hide it if your name is coming out? You don't care about the families you just want to feel better than someone. Get a life. If you really were godly you would have more compassion than this senseless comment. I'm all for releasing the names as they are public but this type of comment really bothers me.
#3 Nov 4, 2012
what exactly did this person say that bothers you? They were right in what they said...YOU have problems dude
Add your comments below
|Justin Harris (Mar '06)||Wed||Tired in Sanford||77|
|Taxes Going up again in Sanford||Wed||Tired in Sanford||1|
|kandee collind biggest bitch of all time||Aug 22||false remarks||5|
|ActonTrading Post Lady||Aug 10||goontah||21|
|trump party not||Aug 4||vote for hillary||1|
|Veterans protest alleged Flag code violations i...||Jul '16||Charles Dickens||1|
|Review: Spillers' Farm Store (May '10)||Jun '16||Mama looking out ...||2|
Find what you want!
Search Kennebunk Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC