Axing straight-party option in judicial races won't produce better-informed voting
There are 2 comments on the Star-Telegram.com story from Nov 19, 2012, titled Axing straight-party option in judicial races won't produce better-informed voting. In it, Star-Telegram.com reports that:
Admit it: If you looked at that long list of court races on your ballot at all, you probably bypassed most of them.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Star-Telegram.com.
#1 Nov 24, 2012
Is the pugs upset
Do the pugs like their candidate
What is wrong with straight democratic voting
I am a yellow dog Democrat
#2 Nov 24, 2012
That is why I didn't go straight Democrat vote. I went through and looked at each one. If a Democrat was not running, but another party was running against a Republican, then I voted for the other party.
Our justice system has got to change. I don't feel it will happen too often with a Republican judge. The problem was that too many times a Republican was running with no one running against him.
Add your comments below
|Rhonda Phillips||May 23||yupyup||2|
|Police: Sitter often left babies alone (Aug '06)||May 18||JlS||24|
|Mike Abel (Jan '09)||May 15||Kitty||2|
|Voters to decide on $208 million Carroll school...||Apr '17||Southlake Refugee||1|
|Looking for chad a isaacs? (Apr '13)||Mar '17||Victims of Chad I...||125|
|Colleyville,Texas Murder of Anita Fox (Mar '15)||Mar '17||Clark||134|
|Keith Caputi||Mar '17||Kim||1|
Find what you want!
Search Keller Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC