New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

[Mr Whipple]

really wrote:

<quoted text>
so those, aren't specifics. Please specifically, how is romney better.
For instance Romney was ranked number 47 out of 50 in job creation. That is a specific.
Or Paul Ryan's tax plan will cause an estimated net loss for our GDP due to the lack of tax revenue. That is a specific
So specifically, how is romney better than obama in policy? Or do you not know?

I know that you are still swallowing the Obama snakeoil, so nothing but Obama worship has any meaning for you. Pray to Obama for 4 more years of mental blockage. And please stop squeezing it.

[nac]

democrat wrote:

nac,like I told you,you have to take the good with the bad.Why do you think,your ally Teddy,is saying vote for rmoney?I hope the courts rule NDAA unconstitutional,hell I'd like to see them throw the Patriot Act out also,but I am still voting for Obama,for the same reasons Teddy is voting for Rmoney.He realizes that he has commonality with rmoney.Again,look how liberals shot themselves in the foot in 2000,by throwing away their vote on Nader.If they hadn't Gore wins,and even though they didn't like him,they had more in common with him then they ever did with Bush.

We The People... cannot accept very little "good" as they impose "patriot" act & NDAA tyranny on us. Not good enough for me.

We should never have reached a point where indefinite detainment without due process is acceptable. Our ancestors left Europe to GET AWAY from that type of nonsense. But now we should accept it FROM BOTH PARTIES... because both parties are bad???

NO!!!!!!!!!!

Start thinking about this!

[democrat]

Really,rmoney is a multi-millionaire,and that's enough for the likes of whipple,and his money adoring ilk.All they have are slurs and throwing brickbats.

[Mr Whipple]

democrat wrote:

Really,rmoney is a multi-millionaire,and that's enough for the likes of whipple,and his money adoring ilk.All they have are slurs and throwing brickbats.

Thanks for the slur; now bend over and show me why you're voting for the incompetent and failed community organizing Chicago slacker.

[democrat]

nac,and the first time a terrorist strikes,the people will play holy hell,with whose ever in office,by not doing enough to protect them.The reason these acts are tolerated is because the majority supported and still support them.I don't support them,but there is no viable alternative,and I am not throwing away my vote.I will not do anything that gives Rmoney office.I'd rather have the ndaa with obama,then with Rmoney.Either way it's going to be around.

[nac]

really wrote:

<quoted text>
It says that he doesn't want to lose the ability to question terrorists seeing that removal of that position would not just remove the indefinite detainment but would also remove any form of detainment seeing that congress was idiots and left him no other measure...

It says that he doesn't want to bother with charging AMERICAN CITIZENS with a CRIME before detaining them.

That is not America. The fact that Americans actually support this is truly terrifying.

[democrat]

Mr Whipple wrote:

<quoted text> Thanks for the slur; now bend over and show me why you're voting for the incompetent and failed community organizing Chicago slacker.

Yes Whipple,we know a charmin fellow like you,would never slur anyone,no matter what name he posted under.Am I right Zippy?lol

[nac]

democrat wrote:

nac,and the first time a terrorist strikes,the people will play holy hell,with whose ever in office,by not doing enough to protect them.The reason these acts are tolerated is because the majority supported and still support them.I don't support them,but there is no viable alternative,and I am not throwing away my vote.I will not do anything that gives Rmoney office.I'd rather have the ndaa with obama,then with Rmoney.Either way it's going to be around.

No viable alternative to surrendering our freedom to the boogieman?

I could not disagree more.

Forget about Romney... he's not going to win... and I'm not trying to convince you to vote for him. That's not what this is about.

I want you to start thinking about Obama and what you actually voted (and will vote) for. In 2008, candidate Obama talked just like ME about the patriot act. Would have thrown up at the the thought of the NDAA.

President Obama? Another story all together. Loves the patriot act! Can't believe that a judge says that he can't detain US citizens without due process!

Do you see where we've moved? Do you see where we're headed?

I'm just saying that everyone, partisans on both sides need to start THINKING ABOUT what the NDAA/patriot act really are.

Forget about PARTY, think about COUNTRY. If Obama's NDAA was signed by a Republican, the left (rightfully so) would have gone nuts. Would have had more aneurysms than obamacare could have treated.

Please put party aside for a moment and think about how dangerous it is to give up liberty. Think about the real men that fought for our liberty. What would they say about giving it away for the good of a party?

Giving up due process for the good of a political party? NO!

Start thinking for yourselves!

[Indy]

http://realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/09/24...
Howard Stern Interviews Obama Supporters 2012

[democrat]

Hey,nac,some of us did email our reps and whitehouse saying we weren't happy with this turn of events.but where was everyone else?Same with the pat. act.,some of us did register our distaste for this amendment,but where was everybody else?Like I said,people will raise holy hell and crucify the man who didn't sign it,if we're attacked.This didn't happen in a vacuum,9/11 did happen..I did fight for my country,but in toto,I'm better off with Obama.Where were the people in the primaries?Why didn't the reps. nominate someone who openly opposed both?The answer is,like I said before,the majority of people like these laws.Where is the uproar over the scotus destroying the 4th amendment,with their weakening of the need to obtain warrants?You are never going to have a candidate,with whom you are in total agreement,24/7.

[democrat]

Indy wrote:

http://realclearpolitics.com/v ideo/2012/09/24/howard_stern_i nterviews_obama_supporters_201 2.html
Howard Stern Interviews Obama Supporters 2012

He'd get the same response interveiwing rmoney supporters.Like Mencken once said,No one ever went broke,underestimating the intelligence of the American public.Not an exact quote,but close enough.

[democrat]

nac,you offer criticisms,but no solutions.What would you change?I've all ready stated my solution,control the campaign money.

[Mr Whipple]

democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes Whipple,we know a charmin fellow like you,would never slur anyone,no matter what name he posted under.Am I right Zippy?lol

Correct! The biggest slur of all is being called an Obama supporter.

[Diamond Slim]

Good luck,its harder than you think....

[nac]

democrat wrote:

Hey,nac,some of us did email our reps and whitehouse saying we weren't happy with this turn of events.but where was everyone else?Same with the pat. act.,some of us did register our distaste for this amendment,but where was everybody else?Like I said,people will raise holy hell and crucify the man who didn't sign it,if we're attacked.This didn't happen in a vacuum,9/11 did happen..I did fight for my country,but in toto,I'm better off with Obama.Where were the people in the primaries?Why didn't the reps. nominate someone who openly opposed both?The answer is,like I said before,the majority of people like these laws.Where is the uproar over the scotus destroying the 4th amendment,with their weakening of the need to obtain warrants?You are never going to have a candidate,with whom you are in total agreement,24/7.

Sure, there won't be a candidate that i agree with 100 %... that's obvious.

But at least I'm not willing to give up my freedom & Liberty based on that.

Wake up.

Freedom & Liberty are much better than partisan BS. I don't expect a partisan BS lover to agree... but it is a fact none the less. Hopefully, someday you'll wake up and get it.

[democrat]

nac,thanks for the insults,just for disaagreeing,with a know it all.Like I said,what are your solutions?And voting for a president is also voting for judges,that will have an influence for years.I don't want Roe V Wade overturned,I do want citizens united overturned,I want a pro labor NLRB,I get a better shot at getting what I want if Obama is elected.Again,you offer no solutions,if all you got is criticisms,what's the use.Again,why do you think teddy says he's voting for rmoney?

[Ben Gleck]

New polling company has taken the bias out of the polls and Romney has double digit lead.

[FFS-]

Ben Gleck wrote:

New polling company has taken the bias out of the polls and Romney has double digit lead.

lol, which polling company is that?

doh

[just me]

Healthcare is not a right. Where in the Constitution did you find that it is. Urapeen socialist countries are worse off than we are financially because of the give aways. Who is going to pay for all these rights you socialist, liberal dumbocrats say are guaranteed once the jackass obama steals all of the money from us who work. You people are so stupid. At least Mitt didn't snub Israel's Chief so he could be on Letterman. I want to see the jackasses college records that he won't produce. I want to see the tax returns of the dumbocrat bass turds in obama's inner circle. I don't care where he was born, I just care where he lives now with first leech. No more vacations. May all of you socialist bass turds rot in hell with the fleas of a thousand camels feasting on your dirty bodies.

[liberal]

Wow i guess he told us.
Healthcare isnt a right
ITS THE LAW.
Live with it.