ariel castro is a dem

ariel castro is a dem

Posted in the Keavy Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
dem hate woman

United States

#1 May 9, 2013
Ariel Castro, Cleveland Kidnapper, Is a Registered Democrat (So, why is this important?)
American Thinker ^| 05/09/2013 | By Oleg Atbashian

According to voter registration records, Ariel Castro, the Cleveland kidnapper, is a registered Democrat. He was also the alleged leader among the three Castro brothers, who were arrested this week, and the owner of the house at 2207 Seymour Ave., where the three abducted local women had been kept in captivity for over a decade.

Why is this important? Whenever a crime or a scandal captures national attention, the pattern in the mainstream media is to either identify the culprit as a Republican or hold silence -- in which case we can rest assured that the culprit is a Democrat.

When the identity or the party affiliation is yet unknown, the pattern is to speculate publicly about the possibility of the criminal being a conservative, Christian, white, Republican, and a Tea Party member -- and never that he could be a Hispanic Democrat voter playing bass in a meringue band.

In today's divisive climate, the identity of a perpetrator is always a political issue, especially when a crime is committed by men against women. According to the Daily News, "What the neighbors saw was terrifying and dehumanizing: Naked women on dog leashes, crawling in the dirt. A lady clutching an infant and pounding on a window for help."

If any of the brothers were a Republican, this news would have been trumpeted by the mainstream media as tangible proof of the Republican War on Women -- a narrative invented by Democrat strategists and maintained by the media in a successful effort to defeat Republican candidates in the 2012 election cycle.

However, when a real act of war on women is perpetrated by a Democrat voter in the manner that even the most zealous Democrat strategist couldn't have dreamed up in their worst nightmares --

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
who

Mason, OH

#2 May 9, 2013
Jeffrey Dahmar was Republican!!

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#5 May 9, 2013
To know who he actually voted for, if he even voted you would have to have access to his voting ballot.
If you do have it, turn yourself in to the authorities immediately, because you committed a federal felony.
dem hate woman

United States

#8 May 9, 2013
to the moron W. d russell
How come you never say anything when hehe and chitup without any records have always claim it a Rep but it always turn out to be a dem. Anyone with a brain knows these AH fit the profile of a dem. It just like in chitago where it a known fact that obama voters are killing other Obama voters. I am over joyed that they are killing each other.
tacobonzai

Vancouver, Canada

#9 May 9, 2013
This article is sick. You own a gun, right? Do us all a huge favor and blow your brains out.
dem hate woman

United States

#10 May 10, 2013
tacobonzai wrote:
This article is sick. You own a gun, right? Do us all a huge favor and blow your brains out.
Sorry sick person I don't. I only own a tank.
reckonso

London, KY

#11 May 10, 2013
must be one of them soldiers in the war on women I keep hearing about.
reckonso

London, KY

#12 May 10, 2013
WDRussell wrote:
To know who he actually voted for, if he even voted you would have to have access to his voting ballot.
If you do have it, turn yourself in to the authorities immediately, because you committed a federal felony.
Defending kidnappers and rapist is not putting you democrats in favorable light.
reckonso

London, KY

#13 May 10, 2013
WDRussell wrote:
To know who he actually voted for, if he even voted you would have to have access to his voting ballot.
If you do have it, turn yourself in to the authorities immediately, because you committed a federal felony.
Does it hurt to be so stupid?

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#14 May 10, 2013
reckonso wrote:
<quoted text>
Defending kidnappers and rapist is not putting you democrats in favorable light.
If you can read, you will see that I did not defend anybody.
I only called a t-bagger a lying bag of bull which they all are.
And it is the GOP that is the rape-r-us party.
Carney

Madisonville, KY

#15 May 10, 2013
This is more of obama changing America. Why is this a crime when the dumo's push to legalize all other abominations, i.e. gays, abortionists, murderers(hillary), etc.
Note

Greenbrier, AR

#16 May 10, 2013
Carney wrote:
This is more of obama changing America. Why is this a crime when the dumo's push to legalize all other abominations, i.e. gays, abortionists, murderers(hillary), etc.
Who was President ten years ago when these girls were kidnapped? Not Obama. I also note Carney your a big Stanford fan even though he is a libertine who won because Larry Flynt, Hustler magazine, endorsed him. Talk about abominations and endorse Stanford. Hypocrite is thy name.
lib alwats lie

United States

#17 May 10, 2013
Note wrote:
<quoted text>
Who was President ten years ago when these girls were kidnapped? Not Obama. I also note Carney your a big Stanford fan even though he is a libertine who won because Larry Flynt, Hustler magazine, endorsed him. Talk about abominations and endorse Stanford. Hypocrite is thy name.
No wonder you lib are morons. You fOS dem have run Cleveland for atleast the last 50 years. The police did not do their job. You libtard have no trouble supporting teddy Kennedy when he killed his girlfriend. Or BJ Clinton raping 15 woman. On john Edward having a baby while his wife was dying of cancer. You have no problem when the communist party endorse Obama .Libtard always change the subject. The fact he was a dem and your party enjoy buying his vote each year.
Liberal

Greenbrier, AR

#18 May 10, 2013
We maybe "morons" in your distorted perspective, but we sure beat your party to death in the last election. Bet our next candidate, Hillary, mops the floor with your candidate too. Hillary will succeed Obama and be the first woman president.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#19 May 10, 2013
Liberal wrote:
We maybe "morons" in your distorted perspective, but we sure beat your party to death in the last election. Bet our next candidate, Hillary, mops the floor with your candidate too. Hillary will succeed Obama and be the first woman president.
Rand Paul will beat Hillary, if she makes it out of the primaries.
Liberal

Greenbrier, AR

#20 May 10, 2013
Bronston Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Rand Paul will beat Hillary, if she makes it out of the primaries.
In April 2013 PPP published a poll it conducted to determine Hillary Clinton's chances for 2016. In Kentucky, Hillary was tied with Rand Paul, each getting 45 per cent of polled voters. Hillary ran ahead of Rubio 46 to 40 in Kentucky. If she is this viable in Kentucky, she will be a strong candidate nationally. Bill Clinton was the last democrat to carry Kentucky in a presidential race.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#21 May 10, 2013
Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
In April 2013 PPP published a poll it conducted to determine Hillary Clinton's chances for 2016. In Kentucky, Hillary was tied with Rand Paul, each getting 45 per cent of polled voters. Hillary ran ahead of Rubio 46 to 40 in Kentucky. If she is this viable in Kentucky, she will be a strong candidate nationally. Bill Clinton was the last democrat to carry Kentucky in a presidential race.
PPP? A Democratic pollster? Wow.

I'm a Democrat, I've always voted Democrat including Obama in 2008.

Rand beats Hillary. Hillary might not even win the primary.
alice

Clarksville, TN

#22 May 11, 2013
Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
In April 2013 PPP published a poll it conducted to determine Hillary Clinton's chances for 2016. In Kentucky, Hillary was tied with Rand Paul, each getting 45 per cent of polled voters. Hillary ran ahead of Rubio 46 to 40 in Kentucky. If she is this viable in Kentucky, she will be a strong candidate nationally. Bill Clinton was the last democrat to carry Kentucky in a presidential race.
That same POS pooling co that said the libtard dem was going to win in SC by 10% but ended up losing by 9% that a lie of 19%
Review

Greenbrier, AR

#23 May 11, 2013
alice wrote:
<quoted text>That same POS pooling co that said the libtard dem was going to win in SC by 10% but ended up losing by 9% that a lie of 19%
Actually PPP polls in the last week of the SC race showed Sanford surging. Guess it was the Larry Flynt endorsement that influenced voters.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#24 May 11, 2013
Review wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually PPP polls in the last week of the SC race showed Sanford surging. Guess it was the Larry Flynt endorsement that influenced voters.
That is how every partisan poll works. Rasmussen does the same thing.

Their candidate, either Republican or Democrat, will be measurably ahead for the majority of the race. Then in the last week or two the poll will correct to the ACTUAL numbers, that way they can report after the election that their poll was spot on.

It's a game to influence public opinion, not measure it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Keavy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Walk to Emmaus DECEPTION or NOt? (Nov '12) 38 min John 571
NRA sucks (Dec '12) 2 hr wowed 147
Pain 2 hr Meknows 8
Goins Whayne supply 3 hr know 3
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 4 hr ChromiuMan 148,847
innocent people placed on watch list 6 hr Skie 2
Apartments that allow pets? 8 hr Interested 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Keavy Mortgages