"preponderance" ? lol<quoted text>
No but the physical evidence backs Zimmerman's story. That is the entire trial. Zimmerman's story never varied from the physical evidence. So after a preponderance of the evidence they had NO DOUBTS. INNOCENT.
His story never varied because he's had police training and had it all written down so that he could always remember what he'd originally said.
I have some new rocks in case your brain wears the one out it has now?