HelpMe Gov

Heidrick, KY

#1 Feb 16, 2013
Voting rights even though guaranteed by the laws of the land need to be changed.

No taxes paid in NO VOTE.

The Constitution and voting laws need to be brought up to todays' needs. Not what it was 235 years ago.

Own property or paying taxes. The true citizens need to run the asylum.
HelpMe Gov

Heidrick, KY

#2 Feb 16, 2013
We are really not in favor of banning their vote we just want to make sure the right people are voting. You want a vote jump through the property hoop or the tax hoop. See nobody is banning anyones' right to vote. Only putting in some 21st century adjustments.
Hey

Lexington, KY

#3 Feb 16, 2013
If we could limit the authority government has over our lives it would matter far less who voted for politicians in our elections because politicians would have little say about our daily lives. I'm not optimistic. Too many Americans like control over their fellow citizens to the delight of our masters in government.
HelpMe Gov

Glenpool, OK

#4 Feb 16, 2013
Let's go to a soup kitchen and take a poll on whether the government should supply free food.

Go to a homeless shelter and take a poll on whether the government should provide them a shelter.

Go to the welfare office and take a poll on who wants nincreased benefits.

No skin in the game. NO VOTE.
Hey

Lexington, KY

#5 Feb 16, 2013
Agree. Government cannot provide any of these things without first taking the property of some other American in the first place. Our government once upon a time did not operate in this fashion and would punish those who took another American's property for themselves. Government still punishes those who would privately steal another American's property but reserves the "right" to itself to steal one person's property to give to another.
Hey

Lexington, KY

#6 Feb 16, 2013
I see someone has judged my comments above as clueless and they disagree. I am not at all surprised. This person is obviously not a liberty oriented person and is willing to support a government that would use deadly force against Americans who would be unwilling to submit to having their property taken to give to other Americans.
Saved

Sheridan, AR

#8 Feb 17, 2013
Hey wrote:
I see someone has judged my comments above as clueless and they disagree. I am not at all surprised. This person is obviously not a liberty oriented person and is willing to support a government that would use deadly force against Americans who would be unwilling to submit to having their property taken to give to other Americans.
Well if you think about it the Germans would rat on Jews trying to hide from being killed thinking they would heap up some kind of reward from the nazi government. The same ethics can and will be applied by the Us citizens and the us government. Neighbor against neighbor get used to it we have some low life socialist nazi pigs living among us.
Saved

Sheridan, AR

#9 Feb 17, 2013
One thing is certain the 3rd reich has resurrected in the United States and its been here for a while now. It's so bad you could describe this demonic force as a beast perhaps the same beast described in the old and new testaments. The evil principality that's leading and controlling this nation will devour anyone and everyone that'll stand against it. Look at the facts look at the parallels between hitler and Hussein Obama.
2.(2) The description of the beast of the sea again connects it to images from Daniel 7.
Now the beast which I saw was like a leopard, his feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. The dragon gave him his power, his throne, and great authority.
a. Like a leopard ... a bear ... a lion: In this vision, God used images from Daniel’s vision of Daniel 7 to communicate the identity and nature of this beast to John. Daniel 7 uses four animals (beasts) to describe the course of human government from Daniel’s time until the ultimate reign of Jesus on this earth.
i. The first three animals are a lion (a picture of the Babylonian Empire), a bear (a picture of Medo-Persian Empire), and a leopard (a picture of the Greek Empire). The fourth animal was a dreadful, indescribable beast which shared the most terrifying characteristics of the previous beasts, yet represents the final world empire under the leadership of a Satanic dictator (Daniel 7:7-8).
ii. John presents this beast as the extension of the fourth beast of Daniel 7, connecting his empire with the characteristics of the great empires of the past. This final world empire will have the catlike vigilance of a leopard, the slow and crushing power of a bear, and the authority and ferociousness of a lion.
iii. Since the beasts of Daniel 7 represented empires more than specific men, some have thought that the beast of Revelation 13 is not a person, but a government or a cultural system. Many believe the beast is a broad picture of totalitarian governments, especially the totalitarian states of the 20th century. For example, Mounce writes:“The beast has always been, and will always be, in a final intensified manifestation, the deification of secular authority”(Mounce). But others see the beast as a person, specifically the Antichrist - the final Satanic dictator who leads the world in rebellion against God. Some (like David Hocking) combine the approaches and say that the beast is a modern, world totalitarian government, but the one head that has ten horns is specifically the Antichrist - the leader of this beast of a final satanic dictatorship. But with any empire, especially brief empires, the government is almost totally identified with the ruler. When we think of Germany in the 1930s and 1940s, the figures of Hitler as an individual and Nazi Germany as a state are virtually the same.
b. All the indications in Revelation 13 are that the beast is a man, a human individual, though he is closely identified with his world-dominating government.
i.“The Beast is worshipped as a god; but people never worship an empire as such; neither do they make a succession of emperors into an object of religious devotion. The paying of divine homage to kings has been a common thing in the world’s history, but it has always been rendered to individuals.”(Seiss)
ii. An image is set up of the beast, and the whole world is commanded to worship it. How can one set up an image of an empire or a government? This hasn’t been done in the past, but men have often bowed down to an image of a political ruler.
iii.“This Beast also has a proper name - a name expressive of a particular number, and that number ‘a number of a man;’ which cannot be conceived except on the idea of an individual person.”(Seiss)
iv.“This beast is finally damned. He goes to perdition, into the lake of fire, where he continues to exist and suffer, after passing from this earthly scene (Revelation 17:11; 20:10), which cannot be true of systems of government.”
Saved

Sheridan, AR

#10 Feb 17, 2013
Similiarities between Adolf Hitler & Barack Hussein Obama

Both Hitler and Obama held rallies in outdoor stadiums to excite and inflame the people's passions. Frequently women would faint or break into tears.

Both Hitler and Obama wrote ghost-written autobiographies prior to the start of theri run for political office. Hitler wrote Mein Kampf (My Struggle), and Obama wrote Dreams Of My Father. Both men then wrote a second book talking about their goals
for German and America. Hitler wrote A New World Order, and Obama wrote The Audacity of Hope.

Both Hitler and Obama originally had last names that were changed later in life. Hitler used to be Schickelbruber, and Obama's last name was Soetoro.

Both Hitler and Obama hid their real identies. Hiter had a Jewish ancestry, and Obama
a Muslim one. But unlike Hitler, Obama flaunted his Muslim roots in his start as a politician in order to defuse the inevitable firestorm. His ploy of "hiding in plain sight" worked very well.

Both Hitler and Obama's supporters followed them blindly, and without question

Both Hitler and Obama used political power and coercion to conceal and hide their birth certificates from coming to public view. Hitler made his disappear, and Obama is unwilling and unable to produce his long-form birth certificate.

Both Hitler and Obama advocate using young people as a driving force to create an "army" of youth dedicated to their Ideals. Hitler had his Hitler Youth, and Obama his
Obama Youth Brigade.

Both Hitler and Obama were known for their tremendous oratorical skills

Both Hitler and Obama received Messianic comparisons, and both men had songs of adoration written about them and for them.

Like Hitler, Obama rules in direct disregard to the will and wishes of the people.

Like Hitler, Obama has an obvious distaste for the Jews, and sides with the Muslims every chance he gets.

Both Hitler and Obama were able to mezmerize the people even when it was obvious that what they were saying was not true.

Both Hitler and Obama used domestic terrorists to launch their careers. Hitler had his Brown Shirts from his beer hall days, and Obama had people like Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and Rashid Khalidi.

Like Hitler, Obama advocates using murder as a means of population control.
Still think it's an unfair comparison? You won't after watching this -
Saved

Sheridan, AR

#11 Feb 17, 2013
1 "Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes." "We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land." The stripping away of land from private owners. Liberalism today demands "eminent domain" on property.
2 "A heavy progressive or graduated income tax." "We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army." The points raised in the Nazi platform demand an increase in taxes to support them. Liberalism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes.
3 "Abolition of all rights of inheritance." "That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished." Liberalism today demands a "death tax" on anyone inheriting an estate.
4 "Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels." "We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately." The Nuremburg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property.
5 "Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." "We demand the nationalization of all trusts." Central control of the financial system.
6 "Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State." "We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper..." Central control of the press. Liberals today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News.
7 "Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c." "In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. "
Saved

Sheridan, AR

#12 Feb 17, 2013
History will repeat itself what do you believe?
the black widow

United States

#14 Feb 18, 2013
HelpMe Gov wrote:
We are really not in favor of banning their vote we just want to make sure the right people are voting. You want a vote jump through the property hoop or the tax hoop. See nobody is banning anyones' right to vote. Only putting in some 21st century adjustments.
so a disabled person would lose their right to vote? perhaps we should go a step further and make it that only those who can exercise lateral thinking have the right to vote. after all, if you can't see the big picture you can't make correct decisions. of course that would knock out conservatives. that rigid thinking you're cursed with. guess we could call it your disability. we are really not in favor of banning your vote. we just want to make sure the right people are voting.
HelpMe Gov

Heidrick, KY

#15 Feb 18, 2013
the black widow wrote:
<quoted text>so a disabled person would lose their right to vote? perhaps we should go a step further and make it that only those who can exercise lateral thinking have the right to vote. after all, if you can't see the big picture you can't make correct decisions. of course that would knock out conservatives. that rigid thinking you're cursed with. guess we could call it your disability. we are really not in favor of banning your vote. we just want to make sure the right people are voting.
How about the second amendment? Hands off my rights too?
the black widow

United States

#16 Feb 19, 2013
HelpMe Gov wrote:
<quoted text>
How about the second amendment? Hands off my rights too?
I support the second amendment. However, citizens have no real use for assault rifles. If the government decided to turn on the u.s. citizens they wouldn't invade with assault weapons. We would be gassed or poisoned into submission. Not a shot would be fired.
HelpMe Gov

Glenpool, OK

#17 Feb 19, 2013
the black widow wrote:
<quoted text>I support the second amendment. However, citizens have no real use for assault rifles. If the government decided to turn on the u.s. citizens they wouldn't invade with assault weapons. We would be gassed or poisoned into submission. Not a shot would be fired.
Good. You have no use in voting.
the black widow

United States

#18 Feb 19, 2013
HelpMe Gov wrote:
<quoted text>
Good. You have no use in voting.
So you think your assault weapon will save you from the government? You think people owning those weapons will keep the wolf from our doors? Cling to your myth. At one time your thinking was accurate. But times have changed along with weapons. You will never own the weapons available to the government. A well educated citizenry is the only way to keep your freedom. Individuals need to know their own weaknesses as well as what what makes other people tick. You don't get that with a population that raises their kids to play video games while our educational system plummets in comparison to developing countries.
hehe

Somerset, KY

#19 Feb 19, 2013
HelpMe Gov wrote:
Voting rights even though guaranteed by the laws of the land need to be changed.
No taxes paid in NO VOTE.
The Constitution and voting laws need to be brought up to todays' needs. Not what it was 235 years ago.
Own property or paying taxes. The true citizens need to run the asylum.
Yesterday you were whining that Obama wanted to change the Constitution - now, You're suggesting we change it...
Make up your mind

hehe
Conservatives only want change to suit them and no-one else...
cracks me up

Republicans want us to go back 200 years, only rich white male landowners can vote - they really crack me up

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Keavy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
lawyers 20 min Warren Scoville 2
Rootbeer stand RAISED prices 22 min customer also 7
clinton did not pay taxes on income 54 min Hillary for Jail ... 9
London Krogers ALWAYS out of sale items 58 min Travis 7
Cromer, Gov. candidate, accused 1 hr Voter 10
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 1 hr Chilli J 136,725
Is it legal to have a video camera pointed at y... (Aug '12) 3 hr 4 your Information 132
More from around the web

Keavy People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]