Her test did not address the sexual attraction confusion.
Hardly a 'theory'.
She simply did not address the glaring difference between orientations.
There is no explanation for homosexuality in evolution. Zip.
It is clear that the redundant sex organs in a ss relationship are pointless and a conflict of design.
Honey, those are facts.
Who said anything about expectations?<quoted text>
Oh, I see. Dr Hooker's study didn't meet up with YOUR expectations. Shuckey darn, Gomer! Do you even know the details of her study? The result was THERE WERE NO DIFFERENCES according to the psychiatrists that reviewed the files.
If there's 'no explanation for homosexuality in evolution,' then why are YOU USING evolution in a feeble-minded attempt to discredit it? Are ye daft?
Conflict of design? ahahahahahahah
Yep, you are stuck on stupid.
Also, my sex organs are HARDLY pointless. What I do with them is NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS. This is America. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Stop being a voyeur.
I simply noted the avoidance of an obvious distinction.
Oh, and your failure to address obvious scientific evidences too.
By the way, you have a butt bugger stuck on your nose.