Posted in the Junction City Forum
#1 Mar 19, 2013
Scott Johnson berates the lady city attorney at every meeting citing conflicts of interest. Laughable considering his votes on development issues that directly affect his business, his cousin's interest in adjoining building (gatherings is partly owned by his cousin), competitors business issues that come before the commission, etc. Don't he and mushroom head, Larry Ruiz supporter Deb remember that we were using a local attorney when all those development agreements were signed on all the new subdivisions? Hello?Anyone home?
#2 Mar 20, 2013
I'm no scott Johnson supporter but I would question logan's reluctance to speak up on matters of business that affects the city. Her contention is that she is there only for legal advice not business advice but sometimes the two, business and legal, are integrated, intertwined or blend together. It's at these times I have to question what good advice she has given and in turn, her loyalty to this city. Also knowing that her firm represents those that have "gotten over" on the city doesn't sit well with me either. I think it is time to shop around for someone that is going to look out for us, not themselves.
#3 Mar 20, 2013
The one whos repeatedly voted where theres been a conflict of interest is Scott Johnson. Its the pot calling the kettle black.
Add your comments below
|Where is Ms Beaty||16 hr||Bend over||28|
|Fortysixth POTUS (Dec '17)||Thu||Woe is Kansas||75|
|Jc walmart jerks us again||Wed||Bend over||7|
|Keep a Word -- Drop a Word Game (Mar '10)||Jun 16||1CoolCat||5,945|
|Lauren Darland||Jun 5||Not in the least||7|
|do anybody know bro westberg at faith tabernacle (Jun '11)||Jun 5||Screwy Louie||65|
|is the son's of silence taking over junction ci... (May '15)||Jun 1||truth||60|
Find what you want!
Search Junction City Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC