Obama Has Killed 176 Children With Hi...

Obama Has Killed 176 Children With His Drones

Posted in the Junction City Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Obama Kills Children

Junction City, KS

#1 Dec 23, 2012
http://politix.topix.com/homepage/3897-is-it-...

"176 children have been killed in Pakistan by US drones since Obama took the oath of office. Are those deaths in any way comparable to the ones at Sandy Hook? That's the question asked by Reason's Brian Doherty.

Sandy Hook and drone strikes share one similarity: mechanized killings. The differences, Doherty concedes, are important: one is fighting against terrorists targeting Americans. The other was just an exercise in horror.

But in the minds of anti-drone activists, Doherty writes, the death of children by drone strike is so tragic and unnecessary, it makes the deaths comparable to a gratuitous mass murder."

Kill one child - you're a murderer.
Kill ten children - you're a mass murderer.
Kill 176 children and you are the Democratic President of the United States!

Go Obama!
Jerrys Kids

Junction City, KS

#2 Dec 23, 2012
Obama Kills Children wrote:
http://politix.topix.com/homep age/3897-is-it-fair-to-compare -the-sandy-hook-shooting-to-dr one-attacks
"176 children have been killed in Pakistan by US drones since Obama took the oath of office. Are those deaths in any way comparable to the ones at Sandy Hook? That's the question asked by Reason's Brian Doherty.
Sandy Hook and drone strikes share one similarity: mechanized killings. The differences, Doherty concedes, are important: one is fighting against terrorists targeting Americans. The other was just an exercise in horror.
But in the minds of anti-drone activists, Doherty writes, the death of children by drone strike is so tragic and unnecessary, it makes the deaths comparable to a gratuitous mass murder."
Kill one child - you're a murderer.
Kill ten children - you're a mass murderer.
Kill 176 children and you are the Democratic President of the United States!
Go Obama!
Were you able to bail out your son after the Ogden Gate incident ?
Urdman2

Broomfield, CO

#4 Dec 26, 2012
Why can't the majority of Americans see that there is something seriously wrong with our Leaders?
elephant in the room

Junction City, KS

#5 Dec 26, 2012
Urdman2 wrote:
Why can't the majority of Americans see that there is something seriously wrong with our Leaders?
The majority did see that on Election Day. That`s why the Republican Party and its "leaders" are on the ropes now, gasping after a good ol` country ass whoopin`. LMAO !!!

Since: Jul 12

Junction City, KS

#6 Dec 26, 2012
elephant in the room wrote:
<quoted text> The majority did see that on Election Day. That`s why the Republican Party and its "leaders" are on the ropes now, gasping after a good ol` country ass whoopin`. LMAO !!!
Barry won by less than 1% of the vote. Not exactly a "ass whoopin".
maybe so

Junction City, KS

#7 Dec 26, 2012
The Real FTW wrote:
<quoted text>
Barry won by less than 1% of the vote. Not exactly a "ass whoopin".
True enough, I meant the Party as a whole, especially the TEA Party wing. Repubs are self-imploding and are their own worst enemy. Changing demographics are another huge blow to them.
your aliar

Junction City, KS

#8 Dec 26, 2012
Obama Kills Children wrote:
http://politix.topix.com/homep age/3897-is-it-fair-to-compare -the-sandy-hook-shooting-to-dr one-attacks
"176 children have been killed in Pakistan by US drones since Obama took the oath of office. Are those deaths in any way comparable to the ones at Sandy Hook? That's the question asked by Reason's Brian Doherty.
Sandy Hook and drone strikes share one similarity: mechanized killings. The differences, Doherty concedes, are important: one is fighting against terrorists targeting Americans. The other was just an exercise in horror.
But in the minds of anti-drone activists, Doherty writes, the death of children by drone strike is so tragic and unnecessary, it makes the deaths comparable to a gratuitous mass murder."
Kill one child - you're a murderer.
Kill ten children - you're a mass murderer.
Kill 176 children and you are the Democratic President of the United States!
Go Obama!
What a bunch of horse sh*t. When are you fanatical republicans gonna stop spinning the truth? It didn't work in the election. It doesn't work now. Repubs are a bunch of losers that don't give a damn about their own country.
your aliar

Junction City, KS

#9 Dec 26, 2012
The Real FTW wrote:
<quoted text>
Barry won by less than 1% of the vote. Not exactly a "ass whoopin".
No, but it's THE majority so quit acting like a cryin azz bee-otch.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10 Dec 27, 2012
The Real FTW wrote:
<quoted text>
Barry won by less than 1% of the vote. Not exactly a "ass whoopin".
Um, he won by a greater percentage than The chimp beat John Kerry by in 2004 and therefore has more of a mandate.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#11 Dec 27, 2012
Obama Kills Children wrote:
http://politix.topix.com/homep age/3897-is-it-fair-to-compare -the-sandy-hook-shooting-to-dr one-attacks
"176 children have been killed in Pakistan by US drones since Obama took the oath of office. Are those deaths in any way comparable to the ones at Sandy Hook? That's the question asked by Reason's Brian Doherty.
Sandy Hook and drone strikes share one similarity: mechanized killings. The differences, Doherty concedes, are important: one is fighting against terrorists targeting Americans. The other was just an exercise in horror.
But in the minds of anti-drone activists, Doherty writes, the death of children by drone strike is so tragic and unnecessary, it makes the deaths comparable to a gratuitous mass murder."
Kill one child - you're a murderer.
Kill ten children - you're a mass murderer.
Kill 176 children and you are the Democratic President of the United States!
Go Obama!
More cut and paste spam from Jerry. What a maroon.
U Dont Get It

Junction City, KS

#12 Dec 27, 2012
Cut and paste? So what? Truth is truth.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mid...

Obamas US Cluster Bombs Killed 35 Women and Children

"Thirty five women and children were killed by an American cruise missile armed with cluster bombs which struck an alleged al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen"

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#13 Dec 27, 2012
U Dont Get It wrote:
Cut and paste? So what? Truth is truth.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mid...
Obamas US Cluster Bombs Killed 35 Women and Children
"Thirty five women and children were killed by an American cruise missile armed with cluster bombs which struck an alleged al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen"
What an idiot you are, jerry. If it was still The Chimp in the White House you'd be saying he was showing extraordinary leadership as a "Wartime President". You are a hypocritical coward.
selective criticism

Junction City, KS

#14 Dec 27, 2012
U Dont Get It wrote:
Cut and paste? So what? Truth is truth.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mid...
Obamas US Cluster Bombs Killed 35 Women and Children
"Thirty five women and children were killed by an American cruise missile armed with cluster bombs which struck an alleged al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen"
You probably agree with those right wing lunatics who love to say "Let`s nuke that whole country and make it a parking lot. " There were thousands of women and children killed in the Iraq debacle, and not a peep out of the Right about it. Drones cause way less collateral damage than invasions, civil wars, and endless occupations.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#15 Dec 27, 2012
selective criticism wrote:
<quoted text>You probably agree with those right wing lunatics who love to say "Let`s nuke that whole country and make it a parking lot. " There were thousands of women and children killed in the Iraq debacle, and not a peep out of the Right about it. Drones cause way less collateral damage than invasions, civil wars, and endless occupations.
Thus the dilemma of the Republicans: selective morality is required because it's all right when they do it. The chimp killed more women and children with his harebrained polices than Obama could if he tried. They are authoiritarian conformists when they control the executive, but selective pacifists when not. They must kowtow to nutjobs like Ted Nugent and their base as exemplified by the scumbag Jerry.
Racism is funny

Junction City, KS

#16 Dec 27, 2012
selective criticism wrote:
<quoted text>Drones cause way less collateral damage than invasions, civil wars, and endless occupations.
Plus those were brown childre so they don't matter like when someone kills a bunch of little white kids.
Obama Emulating Dubya

Junction City, KS

#17 Dec 27, 2012
selective criticism wrote:
<quoted text>There were thousands of women and children killed in the Iraq debacle, and not a peep out of the Right about it.
So your argument comes to "Since Bush killed some kids during Iraq, it's just fine with me that Obama kills kids with drones?"

Sucks to be a child under your care.
Backatcha

Junction City, KS

#18 Dec 27, 2012
The Kangaroo wrote:
<quoted text>
Thus the dilemma of the Republicans: selective morality is required because it's all right when they do it.
Thus the dilemma of the Democrats: Selective morality. Democrats curse Bush for his actions and praise Obama for the same actions.

Hmmm. I guess it's alright when they do it.

I wonder when Obama is going to get around to closing down GITMO like he promised as one of his first term "immediate" actions?

I guess building them a $750,000 soccer field is kinda the same.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/01/guan...
Jerrys Kids

Junction City, KS

#19 Dec 27, 2012
Racism is funny wrote:
<quoted text>
Plus those were brown childre so they don't matter like when someone kills a bunch of little white kids.
Now Bobby Jack`s pulling the old race card. Yawn.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#20 Dec 27, 2012
Backatcha wrote:
<quoted text>
Thus the dilemma of the Democrats: Selective morality. Democrats curse Bush for his actions and praise Obama for the same actions.
Hmmm. I guess it's alright when they do it.
I wonder when Obama is going to get around to closing down GITMO like he promised as one of his first term "immediate" actions?
I guess building them a $750,000 soccer field is kinda the same.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/01/guan...
I haven't seen Obama praised for this by Democrats
U R Not Looking

Junction City, KS

#21 Dec 28, 2012
The Kangaroo wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't seen Obama praised for this by Democrats
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/...

"Time Magazine's Joe Klein, a stalwart Obama supporter, offered one of the most nakedly sociopathic defenses yet heard of these killings. This exchange, which begins at roughly the 7:00 minute mark on the video embedded below, is quite revealing in several respects."

.
.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-04/pane...

“The United States was attacked on 9/11, and we know who attacked us.”

(Bloomberg)-- U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta talks about U.S. foreign policy, conditions in Afghanistan and the defense budget. He speaks on Bloomberg Television's "Conversations with Judy Woodruff." (Source: Bloomberg)
.
.
“We know that al-Qaeda was behind it,” Panetta said.“And we are going to do everything we can, use whatever operations we have to, in order to make sure that we protect this country and make sure that that kind of attack never happens again.”

“The United States is going to defend itself under any circumstances.”

Drone attacks against sanctuaries of the Taliban and other militant groups in Pakistan are carried out by the Central Intelligence Agency, which Panetta previously headed. Pakistani officials have opposed the strikes, saying they violate their nation’s sovereignty and have killed civilians."
.
.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/asia/paki...

Drone strikes kill, maim and traumatize too many civilians, U.S. study says

"The study by Stanford Law School and New York University's School of Law calls for a re-evaluation of the practice, saying the number of "high-level" targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low -- about 2%.

The report accuses Washington of misrepresenting drone strikes as "a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the U.S. safer," saying that in reality, "there is significant evidence that U.S. drone strikes have injured and killed civilians."

It also casts doubts on Washington's claims that drone strikes produce zero to few civilian casualties and alleges that the United States makes "efforts to shield the drone program from democratic accountability."

.

(Obamas Security Adviser) Brennan:

"We only authorize a strike if we have a high degree of confidence that innocent civilians will not be injured or killed, except in the rarest of circumstances," he said.

Despite the "extraordinary precautions" taken by the United States, Brennan said, civilians "have been accidentally injured, or worse, killed in these strikes."

Heil Obama

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Junction City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Health Dept 1 hr Jc_lifer 1
Used Car Salesman Mick Wunder 3 hr agreed 13
Keep a Word -- Drop a Word Game (Mar '10) Thu Doug77 5,807
The proposed new JCHS building Mar 22 Dadgummit 19
What Is The Solution? Mar 14 Big Tussie Jackson 37
Make JC Great Again Mar 13 Tired Taxpayer 10
Grandview Plaza Police Growing Mar 8 oh yeah 3

Junction City Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Junction City Mortgages