Piers Morgan Fan Goes On Shooting Ram...
Fo Show

Mayflower, AR

#45 Feb 11, 2013
Guest wrote:
Well....I was with you on your views right up until your last statement. It has liberal all over it. You tried to hide your left leanings, but you couldn't hold back, could you?
Those aren't just my views, have you not been reading what some die-hard Republicans have been writing about the party? Everybody from Jeb Bush to Bobby Jindall have been talking about the party is going to have to move away from some of the extreme views and embrace a more intelligent approach to reconnect with some of it's core base. Others have been even more open about it and outright saying they have to move away from this anti-intellectual messages. I understand and can appreciate the basic tenents of the conservative Republican of old. The new trend of doubling down on stupid statements is not part of the Republican party I used to disagree with but could respect the argument.
StandUp2TheLeft

Springdale, AR

#46 Feb 11, 2013
Appeasing the Left has got us to this point in time.
Fo Show

Mayflower, AR

#47 Feb 11, 2013
Guest wrote:
Well....I was with you on your views right up until your last statement. It has liberal all over it. You tried to hide your left leanings, but you couldn't hold back, could you?
You like to put liberal on any idea you don't like. Here's the kind of liberal I am. I think the late JFK put it very succintly here:

“If by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a Liberal.”~J.F.K

The anti-intellectualism of the Republican party of late is pretty hard to deny considering you have leaders from within the party saying it's time we get away from these dumbass messages that are hurting us with the mainstream crowd. You can deny that until the cows come home but that's being acknowledged by leaders of the party.
NowUKnow

Springdale, AR

#48 Feb 11, 2013
U.S. COMMUNIST SAYS "LIBERALISM IS SOCIALISM"
NORMAN THOMAS, For many years the U.S. Socialist Presidential candidate proclaimed:

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of "liberalism" they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

He (Thomas) and Gus Hall, the U.S. Communist Party Candidate, both quit American politics, agreeing that the Republican and Democratic parties by 1970 had adopted every plank on the Communist/Socialist and they no longer had an alternate party platform on which to run.
GotAnEyeOnULefti es

Springdale, AR

#49 Feb 11, 2013
StandUp2TheLeft wrote:
Appeasing the Left has got us to this point in time.
GOALS OF AMERICA'S ENEMIES

KARL MARX: "My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism." (Question: Has he succeeded?)

LEV DAVIDOVICH TROTSKY: "Religions are illogical primitive ignorance. There is nothing as ridiculous and tragic as a religious government."

ANOTHER QUESTION: Is Trotsky's or Marx's plan any different than the Humanist Movement's plan? Check below.

AMERICAN HUMANIST MOVEMENT, Doctrinal statement:

"We are humanists ... We are not for God ... We are for socialism."

HUMANIST MAGAZINE, 1983 Jan-Feb. issue. Humanist John J. Dunphy: "I am convinced that the battle for humankind's future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers that correctly perceive their role as proselytizers of a new faith which will replace the rotting corpse of Christianity."
Guest

Jonesboro, AR

#50 Feb 11, 2013
Left2TheBack wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that "PC" now?(caucasianally challenged.)
Ok, I have no axe to grind in this arguement. I hate political correctness!!! Such BS. I also severely dislike Pierce Morgan. He's not even a citizen of this country! He could not vote in the election, yet spouted his opinions all over the place! He needs to just go home! His problem there is that the BBC would not put up with his type of show. If he wants to be taken seriously, become a citizen of this country! Yes, the left leaning media outlets are ignoring the fact that what Pierce Morgan said prompted this shooting. If they could blame it on the right they would be all over it. Even when a shooting happens that really has nothing to do with the true right wing, they pounce and place the blame where it does not belong. Getting the straight news without the opinions of the newscasters would be great. The real meaning of reporting the news is to give it straight and let the people form their own opinion on the matter. If only we lived in that reality!
GotAnEyeOnULefti es

Springdale, AR

#51 Feb 12, 2013
If you want unbiased news about America, you need to go to a source outside of the Lamestream Media.

Usually a Canadian, British news source. They aren't perusing an agenda here.

Or, a non controlled news source that doesn't filter what the sheeple can and can't know.
GUEST

Stevens Point, WI

#52 Feb 12, 2013
guEst wrote:
Well ,it is against the constitution to have a standing army in peace time.
Hahahha it was just fine azz long as it was Under a GOP dictatorship right????Not a single Complaint when the Village Idiot took us to War...Right???.You so Called Conservative Ultra Right Baggers Suck and have even less of a clue azz to how the world Works then the Idiots you all are.
Punisher

Jonesboro, AR

#53 Feb 12, 2013
GUEST wrote:
<quoted text>Hahahha it was just fine azz long as it was Under a GOP dictatorship right????Not a single Complaint when the Village Idiot took us to War...Right???.You so Called Conservative Ultra Right Baggers Suck and have even less of a clue azz to how the world Works then the Idiots you all are.
I complained when he took us to war. I complained when he undercut the 4th amendment. Both parties have forced me to take a libertarian viewpoint. Too much government from the pachyderms as well as the jackasses.
guEst

Springdale, AR

#54 Feb 12, 2013
GUEST wrote:
<quoted text>Hahahha it was just fine azz long as it was Under a GOP dictatorship right????Not a single Complaint when the Village Idiot took us to War...Right???.You so Called Conservative Ultra Right Baggers Suck and have even less of a clue azz to how the world Works then the Idiots you all are.
You can't have a New World Order without all parties taking part.

Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria were not playing ball.

The World Police (US) is making them comply. Aren't you proud.
LeftistScum

Springdale, AR

#55 Feb 13, 2013
guEst wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't have a New World Order without all parties taking part.
Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria were not playing ball.
The World Police (US) is making them comply. Aren't you proud.
How's that for a "clue?"
Guest

Jonesboro, AR

#56 Feb 15, 2013
I like watching the BBC on PBS. Our news outlets need to take some lessons from them. Report the news story just as it happened. Straight fact! No opinions and no twisting it to meet your leftist (which all news outlet except one does)agenda. Also no opinion and no twisting to the only right wing network.
HardTruth

Jonesboro, AR

#57 Feb 15, 2013
GUEST wrote:
<quoted text>Hahahha it was just fine azz long as it was Under a GOP dictatorship right????Not a single Complaint when the Village Idiot took us to War...Right???.You so Called Conservative Ultra Right Baggers Suck and have even less of a clue azz to how the world Works then the Idiots you all are.
Guess you didn't watch or listen to any real right wing media. Just believed what the leftist media(which is all but one) told you what their opinion was of what the conservatives were speaking of and what was actually being reported by the conservatives. Since all our news networks are biased, with only one leaning conservative; you never heard the true story behind what the conservatives were for or against. All you can do is call names because you have no idea what the Republicans thought of these matters. You do not have a legitimate leg to stand on.
HardTruth

Jonesboro, AR

#58 Feb 15, 2013
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>
I complained when he took us to war. I complained when he undercut the 4th amendment. Both parties have forced me to take a libertarian viewpoint. Too much government from the pachyderms as well as the jackasses.
The only problem I have with the libertarians are that they only take votes away from the Republican Party! Not from the democrats! That means we will keep handing the presidential race to the democrats. The libertarian party is not large enough or strong enough yet, even with gaining those lost Republican votes. The libertarians are strong enough to take state legislators seats, governors seats and U.S. congressional seats. That's quite a feat for a young party! But the libertarians cannot get the presidential seat yet. That is what I was referring to by stating the libertarians are helping democratic presidential candidates win by taking republican votes. The democrats are not budging. Libertarians are not getting democrats votes, hereby suggests the libertarians are helping the democrats win the presidential seat! It is going to take a long time for the libertarians to ever reach that point. Who do the libertarians want to work with in the White House, a democrat or a republican? A libertarian is not an option at this time.
Guest

Desoto, TX

#59 Feb 16, 2013
Fo Show wrote:
<quoted text>
You like to put liberal on any idea you don't like. Here's the kind of liberal I am. I think the late JFK put it very succintly here:
“If by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a Liberal.”~J.F.K
The anti-intellectualism of the Republican party of late is pretty hard to deny considering you have leaders from within the party saying it's time we get away from these dumbass messages that are hurting us with the mainstream crowd. You can deny that until the cows come home but that's being acknowledged by leaders of the party.
You are so intellectual that you have to quote someone instead of expressing your own ideas. You are a genius.

It cracks me up that you liberals want to call conservatives ignorant, dumb, etc., but in the next breath you want to bitch that they have all the money. If the dumb, ignorant people have all the money, where does that put you liberals? I would be happy to compare my education, professional success, personal wealth, and normal family against yours whenever you would like to visit.

I believe people need to worry about their health, make good decisions, and pay for their own insurance. It's not my responsibility to pay for mine and yours also.

I believe you need to plan out your life. It's not my responsibility to buy you a house, pay for your kids, and give you a check because you don't have the skills to make a living.

If you really believe in civil liberties, you wouldn't be on here promoting or agreeing with gun control, bashing Christians, and in favor of censoring those you don't agree with.

If this makes me a conservative, I'm proud to be one. BTW, the above are my words. I didn't have to quote someone else to make my points.

Your turn.
NowUKnow

Springdale, AR

#60 Feb 16, 2013
HardTruth wrote:
<quoted text>
The only problem I have with the libertarians are that they only take votes away from the Republican Party! Not from the democrats! That means we will keep handing the presidential race to the democrats. The libertarian party is not large enough or strong enough yet, even with gaining those lost Republican votes. The libertarians are strong enough to take state legislators seats, governors seats and U.S. congressional seats. That's quite a feat for a young party! But the libertarians cannot get the presidential seat yet. That is what I was referring to by stating the libertarians are helping democratic presidential candidates win by taking republican votes. The democrats are not budging. Libertarians are not getting democrats votes, hereby suggests the libertarians are helping the democrats win the presidential seat! It is going to take a long time for the libertarians to ever reach that point. Who do the libertarians want to work with in the White House, a democrat or a republican? A libertarian is not an option at this time.
The major backers of the Left are in fact the major backers of the right.

Two heads of the same beast.
Fo Show

Mayflower, AR

#61 Feb 16, 2013
Guest wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so intellectual that you have to quote someone instead of expressing your own ideas. You are a genius.
It cracks me up that you liberals want to call conservatives ignorant, dumb, etc., but in the next breath you want to bitch that they have all the money. If the dumb, ignorant people have all the money, where does that put you liberals? I would be happy to compare my education, professional success, personal wealth, and normal family against yours whenever you would like to visit.
I believe people need to worry about their health, make good decisions, and pay for their own insurance. It's not my responsibility to pay for mine and yours also.
I believe you need to plan out your life. It's not my responsibility to buy you a house, pay for your kids, and give you a check because you don't have the skills to make a living.
If you really believe in civil liberties, you wouldn't be on here promoting or agreeing with gun control, bashing Christians, and in favor of censoring those you don't agree with.
If this makes me a conservative, I'm proud to be one. BTW, the above are my words. I didn't have to quote someone else to make my points.
Your turn.
I use that because neo-cons like to lump anything they don't like into the liberal category and try and spin it into a negative light. I don't know where you get your 'civil liberties' soapbox speech from or what it has to do with anything. You seem to have that Fox news perspective that liberals want to run out and give away tax dollars to deadbeats and encourage people not to work. That's just laughable. I disagree with conservatives on several points but that doesn't mean I think they're all idiots. In the pre-Karl Rove days, people could disagree and respect each other's opinions without agreeing with them. I think most people want pretty much the same things from government but have differing opinons on how to get there.
Punisher

Jonesboro, AR

#63 Feb 16, 2013
Fo Show wrote:
<quoted text>
I use that because neo-cons like to lump anything they don't like into the liberal category and try and spin it into a negative light. I don't know where you get your 'civil liberties' soapbox speech from or what it has to do with anything. You seem to have that Fox news perspective that liberals want to run out and give away tax dollars to deadbeats and encourage people not to work. That's just laughable. I disagree with conservatives on several points but that doesn't mean I think they're all idiots. In the pre-Karl Rove days, people could disagree and respect each other's opinions without agreeing with them. I think most people want pretty much the same things from government but have differing opinons on how to get there.
I want the federal government out of my life and l want to keep at least 80% of every penny I earn. If that means toll roads, and sales taxes, that's fine. It's that what you want from the government?
Guest

Desoto, TX

#64 Feb 16, 2013
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>
I want the federal government out of my life and l want to keep at least 80% of every penny I earn. If that means toll roads, and sales taxes, that's fine. It's that what you want from the government?
I totally agree.
Guest

Mayflower, AR

#65 Feb 16, 2013
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>
I want the federal government out of my life and l want to keep at least 80% of every penny I earn. If that means toll roads, and sales taxes, that's fine. It's that what you want from the government?
Not really but I can appreciate the libertarian perspective. Personally, I want only as much government as required to administer the services we all need and then as deemed necessary by the voters. I think all of us would like to keep a lot bigger percent of our taxes and most of us have a vague opinion on a better tax system. I doubt if any of us are called upon by Congress to offer suggestions though!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jonesboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trasha D 3 min Guest 13
Daycare 43 min Amyjk21 1
Outraged Americans Demand Obama Impeachment, D... 59 min liberals lie chea... 15
Obama crushes Russia! 1 hr liberals lie chea... 21
Trump Thumpers 1 hr liberals lie chea... 40
Obama Slams Disclaimer 1 hr liberals lie chea... 7
Poll Did you vote today? (Jun '10) 1 hr Now_What- 33,335

Jonesboro Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jonesboro Mortgages