DHS buys 7000 full-auto assault rifle...

DHS buys 7000 full-auto assault rifles,...

Posted in the Jonesboro Forum

Dangerous2BRight

Springdale, AR

#1 Jan 28, 2013
DHS buys 7000 full-auto assault rifles, calls them ‘personal defense weapons’

Mike Adams
Natural News
Jan 28, 2013

In yet another huge blow to the rhetoric and narrative of the Obama administration and its desire to disarm the American public, a DHS bid has been uncovered (see documents below) showing that the Department of Homeland Security recently put out an offer to purchase 7,000 full-auto “assault weapons” to be used domestically, inside the USA.

Keep in mind that President Obama is on the record saying,“AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals; that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”

But it seems he really means they don’t belong on the streets of our cities unless they are in the hands of homeland security enforcers, in which case they can be FULL-AUTO assault weapons.

The DHS bid for 7,000 full-auto assault weapons is found by clicking here. The original credit for discovering this goes, to my best knowledge, to Awr Hawkins at Breitbart.com .

In the hands of the government, they’re called “Personal Defense Weapons”

The juiciest part of this bid is the use of the phrase “Personal Defense Weapons” to describe the full-auto AR-15s being purchased by DHS.

Apparently, when YOU hold an AR-15, it’s an “assault rifle.” But magically, if you hand that same rifle to an armed government homeland security enforcer, it instantly transforms itself into a “personal defense weapon.”

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-buys-7000-full-au...

This must be the "Civilian Army" Obama was talking about.
MustBAMistake

Springdale, AR

#3 Jan 29, 2013
It goes with the IRS having A-10's...pay your taxes or else.
guest

Johnson City, TX

#4 Jan 29, 2013
No libtard replies yet?
MustBAMistake

Springdale, AR

#5 Jan 29, 2013
guest wrote:
No libtard replies yet?
When you shine the light of truth on the Liberals, they run and hide in the darkness.
guest

Johnson City, TX

#6 Jan 29, 2013
I'm curious as to how having someone raise their right hand, say "I do", then hanging a badge on a uniform shirt they're wearing renders them impervious to mental instability and magically endows them with a Zen-like ability to competently handle firearms any better than anyone else? It can't be training, because I've put more training rounds down range in six months than most cops will in their lifetimes.
MustBAMistake

Springdale, AR

#7 Jan 29, 2013
guest wrote:
I'm curious as to how having someone raise their right hand, say "I do", then hanging a badge on a uniform shirt they're wearing renders them impervious to mental instability and magically endows them with a Zen-like ability to competently handle firearms any better than anyone else? It can't be training, because I've put more training rounds down range in six months than most cops will in their lifetimes.
The only thing they may say "I do" to is following government policy...They have NO lawful authority.
MustBAMistake

Springdale, AR

#8 Jan 29, 2013
Color of Law

"Color" means "An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facia or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance, a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing a lack of reality; a disguise or pretext. See also colorable." Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, on page 240.

"Colorable" means "That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit feigned, having the appearance of truth." Windle v. Flinn, 196 Or. 654, 251 P.2d 136, 146.

"Color of Law" means "The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state is action taken under 'color of law.'" Atkins v. Lanning. D.C.Okl., 415 F. Supp. 186, 188.

If something is "color of law" then it is NOT law, it only looks like law. If you go to the website for the Office of Law Revision Counsel, you will see that most of the titles of the United States Code are "prima facia evidence of the laws of the United States".

"prima facia" means "At first sight; on the first appearance; on the face of it; so far as can be judged from the first disclosure; presumably; a fact presumed to be true unless disproved by some evidence to the contrary." State ex rel. Herbert v. Whims, 68 Ohio App. 39, 38 N.E.2d 596, 599, 22 O.O. 110. Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition page 1071.

Prima facia and color of law both go hand in hand, because if a law is prima facia evidence of the laws of the United States, that means it is color of law, by definition. In other words the bureaucrat presumes that the law applies to you until you defeat their presumption.
guest

Johnson City, TX

#9 Jan 29, 2013
Still no libtard comments???

!"Curious"!.
MustBAMistake

Springdale, AR

#10 Jan 29, 2013
But, plenty of "Libtard" "Judge It"s.
guest

Johnson City, TX

#12 Jan 29, 2013
MustBAMistake wrote:
But, plenty of "Libtard" "Judge It"s.
LOL...It must be like salt in an open wound for them.
Try2BMoreAmerica n

Springdale, AR

#13 Jan 30, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL...It must be like salt in an open wound for them.
You could almost see the festering pustules appearing all over their bodies.
guest

Jefferson, TX

#14 Jan 30, 2013
How is the notion; "getting these guns off our streets" aided when the very same Marxist libtard government pushing that idea is putting 7,000 "REAL" assault rifles out there? Their hypocrisy is incredible.
Back2TheLeft

Springdale, AR

#15 Jan 30, 2013
What isn't a surprise is their play on words.

Fully automatic in government official hands = Personal Defense Weapons

Semi-Automatic in the citizens hands = Assault Weapons

Only the freedom challenged would buy this crap.
guest

Jefferson, TX

#16 Jan 30, 2013
Back2TheLeft wrote:
What isn't a surprise is their play on words.
Fully automatic in government official hands = Personal Defense Weapons
Semi-Automatic in the citizens hands = Assault Weapons
Only the freedom challenged would buy this crap.
They must not have been paying attention to "Hair-plug Joe" Biden when he said all they really need is a shotgun.
Left2TheBack

Springdale, AR

#17 Jan 30, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
They must not have been paying attention to "Hair-plug Joe" Biden when he said all they really need is a shotgun.
Wait for the "Judge It"s now.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jonesboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trump cancels summit with North Korean leader K... 7 min guest 19
Poll Did you vote today? (Jun '10) 51 min Reality Check 43,295
You got to get up and Try. 53 min Classylady 29
nra 1 hr Guest 7
Small town girl 1 hr Guest 2
Amanda Hannsen 3 hr Guest 1
Apology 3 hr Guest 1
Amanda Hanson 4 hr Guest 44
why weren't the school shooters shot? 10 hr guest 58

Jonesboro Jobs

Personal Finance

Jonesboro Mortgages