Obama comps Hold off layoffs til after election taxpayers will cover fines

Posted in the Jonesboro Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Otis

Trumann, AR

#2 Oct 5, 2012
i voted for this man but not this year.
Tammy

Trumann, AR

#3 Oct 5, 2012
Obama campaign doesn't want thousand upon thousands fo workers to realize they are about to be laid off until after the election is over. How is this even legal and how can they get away with this it's not reported main stream, but it's everywhere if you search. O God help us defeat this liar and cheat.
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#4 Oct 5, 2012
Otis wrote:
i voted for this man but not this year.
What Otis/Tammy? Not even a link to World Net Daily to back up this nonsense?
Otis

Trumann, AR

#6 Oct 5, 2012
There you go just do a search it's true.
Tammy

Trumann, AR

#7 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy

Trumann, AR

#8 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy

Trumann, AR

#9 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy

Trumann, AR

#10 Oct 5, 2012
Wow even topix is trying to hide the facts.....wow
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#11 Oct 5, 2012
I saw this earlier this week on CNN. How is this even legal? Dubya must be proud of Obama.
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#12 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy wrote:
http://jazzman646.newsvine.com /_news/2012/10/03/14203974-oba ma-administration-to-contracto rs-hold-off-announcing-layoffs -until-after-the-election-and- taxpayers-will-cover-your-fine s-and-costs
That's link to a blog with an article by Michelle Malkin. Sorry - you'll have to do better than that.
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#13 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy wrote:
http://thehill.com/blogs/defco n-hill/industry/259305-omb-tel ls-contractors-once-again-dont -issue-layoff-notices
This article doesn't support you thread title (whatever the heck that means. Could your restate it in English please?)
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#14 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy wrote:
http://alwaysrightonleftcoast. wordpress.com/2012/09/29/obama -strives-to-hide-military-layo ffs-until-after-election/
A flat out right wing blog. The truth is the Obama administration is right to not issue layoff notices based on sequestration cuts that have not taken effect. If they do take effect then issue the notices. But they won't - a compromise will be reached or funding will be found.

Layoff notice do not affect unemployment numbers before the election anyway.
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#15 Oct 5, 2012
Tammy wrote:
Wow even topix is trying to hide the facts.....wow
Cool your conspiracy jets. Some websites won't allow their links to be posted on Topix due to copyright issues. Nobody is hiding anything when this happens.

Since: Aug 10

Cathouse Mouse

#16 Oct 5, 2012
So, it is now the newly confounded talking point that 4 weeks before the election, leading by 101 electoral votes,(48 more than needed to win) the President, conspired with the Bureau of Labor Statistics to juggle the numbers for him?

Do you folks want to know how extroidinarily bafoon that is?

The last time there was any discrepancy involving the integrity of the Bureau of Labor Statistics was in 2008 when a monthly jobs report was accidentally released 25 seconds ahead of time.

There was an extensive investigation into the matter that led to even more security measures for this Institution.

There has been no incident since.

So,..... really?

Since: Aug 10

Cathouse Mouse

#17 Oct 5, 2012
^^^ OOPS ^^^

wrong thread.

Sooooo,... never mind.
guest

United States

#18 Oct 6, 2012
guest wrote:
The truth is the Obama administration is right to not issue layoff notices based on sequestration cuts that have not taken effect.
You're wrong. The WARN act requires employers to give a 60 day notification before major layoffs. Obama has promised to vastly cut military spending beginning Jan. 1. That means every defense contractor knows they will be laying people off. Notices are required by law to be sent out before the end of October.

This is just another example of Obama violating the law. He thinks he's better than everyone else and doesn't have to play by the same rules.
Otis

Trumann, AR

#19 Oct 6, 2012
just want people to know im a 60 year old black man and i know now that he is doing what ever it takes to win. I found this site everwhere not just a few racist sites this really happend. how can he hold back these numbers? answer that
Karl

United States

#20 Oct 8, 2012
Otis, I'm glad you have seen what is going on in our time. I too voted for obama, but will not this time as i believe he and his party are killing our country.
Lisa

United States

#21 Oct 9, 2012
Looks like the dems are fat fingering the numbers to get re-elected
Chris

Blytheville, AR

#23 Oct 9, 2012
If obama is re-elected the US will be broke

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jonesboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
3rd at unilever (Nov '12) 3 min Guest 171
Asa = Bad for Arkansas 4 min Obola 45
It's time for 16 year olds to vote. 4 min I Support 42
Arkansas Early Voting - Rock the Vote! 7 min Obola 123
Palin Family Throwdown 8 min Disclaimer 266
ebola hits dallas 11 min Disclaimer 672
T - 29 Days until Midterm Elections 25 min Disclaimer 238
church and state 8 hr Barton Farley 58
Jonesboro Dating
Find my Match

Jonesboro Jobs

Jonesboro People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Jonesboro News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Jonesboro

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]