voting

United States

#452 May 9, 2010
inverness wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sickened by what I continue to hear about Kevin and Terri. I am very upset with the fear keeping people from speaking up about kevin and terri; but they come on here or talk in small circles of friends. We have serious issues even after the election; because Kevin is still on the board through next May. He is also the President of the board after Floyd decided he had enough of the games.
The board elects its own officers. If we elect the right people next week, chances are we will have a new board president.
Brian

Bexar, AR

#453 May 9, 2010
Is a whiny cry baby. Needs to be men and woman.
lol

Little Elm, TX

#454 May 10, 2010
Brian wrote:
Is a whiny cry baby. Needs to be men and woman.
Kelly G, thanks for your opinion. You might want to look at your daughter first before throwing rocks at others.
concerned

Moline, IL

#455 May 10, 2010
Terri j has been an asset to sage meadows a very big asset to the pool. I think she needs to take a very strong look at her job related to the issues with certain builders and withdraw from the race. I would not put myself in that position by any means.
nutcase

Aubrey, TX

#456 May 10, 2010
Think about it wrote:
<quoted text>
Then consider this. Organized crime likes to buy bars because money can be laundered so easily. Instead of Copeland, what if Troutt sold lots to them, enough for them to throw an election. You want them "running" this community and the restaurant/bar? Do you have any ethical limits on who can vote and who they can vote to represent your home investment interests?
You watch way too much television! How do you know that none of these characters involved aren't already "organized crime"? Now there's a conspiracy for you to think about.
lol

Little Elm, TX

#457 May 10, 2010
Terri's job is commercial sales at Suddenlink. She sells cable, phone, and internet service to the apartment developers. She has major conflicts of interest. Her job selling to Copeland, Onstead, Osment, etc. Her sister in law is best friends with Kelly copeland's girlfriend.

Terri has been an asset with the pool, and that is a very valuable role for her. She needs a non-board position to chair the pool team.
lol

Little Elm, TX

#458 May 10, 2010
one more thing, Terri is very close with Julie W who is troutt's girl. Julie is paid $600 a month to do 30 minutes of work for our board; because Trout and Kevin want her watching the board.
lol

Little Elm, TX

#459 May 10, 2010
This is where Terri works and what she sells, very sad that we keep getting lied to.

http://mysuddenlinkbusiness.com/page.do...
voting

United States

#460 May 10, 2010
lol wrote:
one more thing, Terri is very close with Julie W who is troutt's girl. Julie is paid $600 a month to do 30 minutes of work for our board; because Trout and Kevin want her watching the board.
Agree And to add more fuel to the fire, Teri and Kevin took part in the arrangement to keep Julie W in this position, award her with a raise, and give her the title of "Ex Officio" board member; whatever that means. Maybe the title gave her the privilege of being the listing agent for the sale of the golf course, which has not happened to this point, all this while being in a position of influence with our POA board; an obvious CONFLICT OF INTEREST. These facts should be weighed carefully when we select our new board next week. I do not hold Julie W responsible for improper actions of the board. Those board members who were making these questionable decisions in 2009 are responsible.
ON MORE FACT: Suddenlink is running an ad about every 5 minutes on Channel 6 which clearly exposes Teri's business involvement with these builders and developers such as Troutt, Parker, Copeland, Onstead, etc. She claims that she abstains from voting on any issues which may involve the builders. NOT good Teri for two reasons: 1 Your "PASS" can result in a "hung" board which accomplishes nothing, or in other words, the status quo and 2 By being a board member, you are in the position to use your influence on other board members.
We need board members who can vote on all issues of concern to our residents.
More to come up to election day. Become informed

i have to get in this

Little Elm, TX

#461 May 10, 2010
http://www.era-doty.com/contact.htm

Look at the list of link for Doty Agents that live at Sage or have influence over sage:
-Steve Doty
-Jon Moore
-Cheryl Perry
-Bob Trout
-Julie Webbe

Julie needs to get off the board position.
For Dewayne D and Brian U

United States

#462 May 10, 2010
i have to get in this wrote:
http://www.era-doty.com/contac t.htm
Look at the list of link for Doty Agents that live at Sage or have influence over sage:
-Steve Doty
-Jon Moore
-Cheryl Perry
-Bob Trout
-Julie Webbe
Julie needs to get off the board position.
If anyone is wondering how these folks have INFLUENCE over Sage, keep in mind that those of the above, who live here, also vote here and have friends who they may influence. Now, there is nothing morally wrong with voting for your own self interests, in most cases. The problem is that they are
often voting against the interests of most the Sage residents. Therefore, the obvious conclusion is that we need to turn out in large enough numbers to elect members to the board that will represent the best interests of most of us. I'm told that the builder/developer group of Copeland, Parker, Onstead, Osment,and Troutt will vote a block of about 100 votes for Teri J because she will look upon their continuing development, in and around Sage, favorably. They feel they can depend on her to play a role in stalling actions of the board which may be counter-productive from their standpoint. That is only in her best interest since she is a multi family building rep for Suddenlink as shown on Channel 6 about every 5 minutes.
Tonights meeting

United States

#463 May 10, 2010
A notice was sent by the board giving May 18 as the date for the Get Acquainted with the Board Candidates Meeting at the clubhouse. This meeting is tonight, May 10 from 7:00-10:00 at the clubhouse.
Informed

Chickasha, OK

#464 May 10, 2010
You people have no guts. This is so embarssing to see and watch you slander other indiviuals in your own community. You don't even have 1/4th of your facts straight about the majority of the things you are talking about. I feel sorry for the people who think they have to post this crap in order to win an election. If you want to win why don't you be honest. You need to stop running your mouth and just ask the developers, board members, agents, etc. Do you want to know why there is no-one that really wants to run for a board position. Its because of idots like you.
You people act like you know everything about everybody....you don't even have a clue.
I am embarresed to say I even live here anymore. If this is the kind of election that is going to continuing to slander people then I hope none of you win. You don't deserve to. All you are doing is slandering other people to make sure self appear better! Very sad on your part.
I hope the good ones drop out of the elections and you people are left with the crappy ones to run your opertions. Because it will all go down hill...you will be the laughing stock of sage. Although you already are and you just don't know it. Everyone knows who is posting this crap. Is't so eviedent it's not even funny.
Election

Chickasha, OK

#465 May 10, 2010
The way it is looking to me....the cry babies are Brian, Dewayne and Dr. Lewis.. I don't think anyone else is on here but them and their buddies. Scot is way to smart to be on this site along with Terri. And from my understanding her and Scot both travel. Get a life people.
concerned

Pacifica, CA

#466 May 10, 2010
Election wrote:
The way it is looking to me....the cry babies are Brian, Dewayne and Dr. Lewis.. I don't think anyone else is on here but them and their buddies. Scot is way to smart to be on this site along with Terri. And from my understanding her and Scot both travel. Get a life people.
Apparently, you are on here so what does that make you?
Lets make a deal

United States

#467 May 10, 2010
Informed wrote:
You people have no guts. This is so embarssing to see and watch you slander other indiviuals in your own community. You don't even have 1/4th of your facts straight about the majority of the things you are talking about. I feel sorry for the people who think they have to post this crap in order to win an election. If you want to win why don't you be honest. You need to stop running your mouth and just ask the developers, board members, agents, etc. Do you want to know why there is no-one that really wants to run for a board position. Its because of idots like you.
You people act like you know everything about everybody....you don't even have a clue.
I am embarresed to say I even live here anymore. If this is the kind of election that is going to continuing to slander people then I hope none of you win. You don't deserve to. All you are doing is slandering other people to make sure self appear better! Very sad on your part.
I hope the good ones drop out of the elections and you people are left with the crappy ones to run your opertions. Because it will all go down hill...you will be the laughing stock of sage. Although you already are and you just don't know it. Everyone knows who is posting this crap. Is't so eviedent it's not even funny.
Really. I take it from this that you are not going to disenfranchise our FAIR votes with your 100 builder votes, not paid for thru the dues system. To most of our residents, this is like trying to steal an election. If we were not hitting a raw nerve on this blog, you would not even waste your time defending your position. And we're supposed to ask the builders and developers??? Ask them what??? Here is an invitation to the builders and developers who plan to vote these approximately 100 votes. Come to tonight's meeting at the clubhouse and publicly state that you will not vote lots on which dues have not been paid and authorize the SM election commissioner to delete these lots from the eligible voter's list. Then I will get on this blog and praise all of you for your sense of what's right. Fair enough?
i have to get in this

Little Elm, TX

#468 May 10, 2010
Lets make a deal wrote:
<quoted text>
Really. I take it from this that you are not going to disenfranchise our FAIR votes with your 100 builder votes, not paid for thru the dues system. To most of our residents, this is like trying to steal an election. If we were not hitting a raw nerve on this blog, you would not even waste your time defending your position. And we're supposed to ask the builders and developers??? Ask them what??? Here is an invitation to the builders and developers who plan to vote these approximately 100 votes. Come to tonight's meeting at the clubhouse and publicly state that you will not vote lots on which dues have not been paid and authorize the SM election commissioner to delete these lots from the eligible voter's list. Then I will get on this blog and praise all of you for your sense of what's right. Fair enough?
Well purposed and laid out. We have some drama queens that are attacking both sides, but it is good that others are sticking to the ISSUES.
Fair elections

United States

#469 May 10, 2010
legal is legal wrote:
If I were Terri, or any other candidate, I would accept any and all votes. No one should be asking her to sign a pledge or refuse votes, they should be taking it up with the board who sets the proceedures for elections. I think the election should allow one vote per property with paid dues, but apparently that is not how it is going to be. Don't blame the candidate for the way the election rules are written, the Board could have at least tried to correct this before this election but it appears that they didn't.
There was double speak on the part of some board members on this issue. Their power is dependent on their ability to control the outcome of this election and they appear to be on the verge of achieving their goals.

At this stage, it is too late to change the rules thru board action for this election. We should still strive for an agreement with all five (5) candidates stating that they will not accept these unfair and improper votes. If all five sign the document, the election commission may be able to set these votes aside and not count them in the legal totals. Will any of the candidates go public on this matter?
i have to get in this

Little Elm, TX

#470 May 10, 2010
Informed wrote:
You people have no guts. This is so embarssing to see and watch you slander other indiviuals in your own community. You don't even have 1/4th of your facts straight about the majority of the things you are talking about. I feel sorry for the people who think they have to post this crap in order to win an election. If you want to win why don't you be honest. You need to stop running your mouth and just ask the developers, board members, agents, etc. Do you want to know why there is no-one that really wants to run for a board position. Its because of idots like you.
You people act like you know everything about everybody....you don't even have a clue.
I am embarresed to say I even live here anymore. If this is the kind of election that is going to continuing to slander people then I hope none of you win. You don't deserve to. All you are doing is slandering other people to make sure self appear better! Very sad on your part.
I hope the good ones drop out of the elections and you people are left with the crappy ones to run your opertions. Because it will all go down hill...you will be the laughing stock of sage. Although you already are and you just don't know it. Everyone knows who is posting this crap. Is't so eviedent it's not even funny.
This is either Copeland's friend, Terri's friend, someone at Doty real estate, Troutt's friend, or Terri's mom.

It is quite funny to hear the lies, last year NObody ran/opposed open board postions; so we didn't even have an election. This year we have a field of 5 candidates with some very strong credentials. The credentials and past performance of some of these candidates scares the builders and troutt.
i have to get in this

Little Elm, TX

#472 May 10, 2010
Election wrote:
The way it is looking to me....the cry babies are Brian, Dewayne and Dr. Lewis.. I don't think anyone else is on here but them and their buddies. Scot is way to smart to be on this site along with Terri. And from my understanding her and Scot both travel. Get a life people.
Stick to the issues and stop the personal attacks. Let's try to work on negating the influence of the Builders and troutt upon our future. They are going to try to control another election, and we must stand up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jonesboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jan Morgan for Governor!!!! 13 min guest 13
Why do men in relationships look at porn? (Sep '09) 21 min FUdude 301
News Reward Being Offered In Amanda Tusing Murder Case (Mar '08) 35 min guest in jonesboro 181
Best bbq in Jonesboro 49 min guest in jonesboro 12
Trump's Health 1 hr lefties are liars 10
Dumpy Trump 1 hr Guest 13
Gallup, Trumps first year 1 hr Rupertisatraitor 3

Jonesboro Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jonesboro Mortgages