You claim the existence of something that has no evidence outside of written text. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. But hey.....I understand......logic and religion don't mix.<quoted text>
I read it all the time. My reading the book has what to do with your proof?
Can you prove that leprechauns don't exist? If not, until you can prove they don't, we'll have to assume they exist also.....and anything else your imagination can conjure up. They all exist because no one can prove they don't. Gotcha.