Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

[You are correct]

none here either.

What are you afraid of wrote:

One has to have a logical statement to begin with in order to give a logical response. There isn't one here.
<quoted text>

[justsick]

This is just sick.

[Rainbow Kid]

justsick wrote:

This is just sick.

What are you doing?
.
;o))

[Yes]

I agree

You are correct wrote:

none here either.
<quoted text>

[Vote]

Vote it down

[KiMare]

Right wrote:

You are absolutely right! This argument has baffled me. Why do straight people care? What is the difference between this and saying, for example, if you have brown eyes, you can't be legally married? They always through in the bible too. The bible talks about slaves, we don't have slavery anymore. I have not heard one logical argument for why this group of people should be denied this right.
<quoted text>

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are a defective failure of the very basic purpose and goal of evolution.

Marriage has been present in every single culture in human history, from start to finish. Gay couples have never been accepted in any culture from start to finish. Nor have they established themselves and spread as an acceptable relationship. This is apart from any single religion or belief system.

It is simply idiotic to equate the diverse union of male and female with the redumbant partnership of duplicate genders. The relationship of a male and female are rooted in the very foundation of life, restoration of a single genderless life form.

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

Do you want more? Perhaps the distinction of natural sex vs Pete and RePete?

SMile.

[KiMare]

KiMare wrote:
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!

Right wrote:

It is not logical to counter an illogical argument with logic. Perhaps that is why he didn't counter. The funny thing with referencing statistical information is that the numbers can be easily skewed to whatever outcome the analyzer chooses. For every thing referenced, one could easily find another study that disproves all those previously documented. Take for example the information posted above regarding the woman raised by gay parents. I could easily find many instances where a young woman could not bring home a boyfriend because her straight mother would hit on them, or even female friends, because her father acted inappropriately with them.
<quoted text>

Are you a blonde? "It is not logical to counter a wrong assertion with logic?"

I'd suggest you have no counter because it is perfectly logical. Simply in it's analogy and indisputable...

Humor me and try.

By the way, I gave no statistics or studies.

Smirk.

[KiMare]

Right wrote:

When did it become necessary to bear children in our to be married? So you are saying those unable to bear children are not allowed to be married? A women that has had a hysterectomy cannot be married? A man that is sterile cannot be married? A woman post-menopausal cannot be married? Keep reaching.
<quoted text>

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.

STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!

Snicker.

[KiMare]

What are you afraid of wrote:

Show your ignorance some more. How someone dresses or what they look like has nothing to do with their sexual preference. There are plenty of "straight" men that enjoy wearing women's clothing. So you would have all women ordered to wear skirts?
<quoted text>

Which brings up the question, Why does a butch lesbian dress and act like a man to attract another lesbian?

Smile.

[KiMare]

What are you afraid of wrote:

Very good post. How can you possibly legislate morality? If they did shouldn't we all be living as the Amish?
<quoted text>

You mean like legislating against murder and robbery?

You really are blonde, aren't you.

Smirk.

[KiMare]

What are you afraid of wrote:

Just because you are incapable of understanding a comment, that doesn't make it stupid, dismissive, diversionary, or deceitful.
If marriage is such a sacred, unique relationship, designed to protect and encourage a "natural" family why are there divorces? Among people that are married multiple times, which one was the sacred one?
<quoted text>

I understood the comment perfectly. That is why I described it accurately.

Because some people violate a vow it delegitimizes those who don't?

Been married 36 years. Happily most of that time.

Smile.

[KiMare]

KiMare wrote:
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Still, no logical response.
Anyone???

What are you afraid of wrote:

One has to have a logical statement to begin with in order to give a logical response. There isn't one here.
<quoted text>

Please, explain to me why. I really, really would like to hear your explanation...

Smile.

[TXgurl]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
<quoted text>
Are you a blonde? "It is not logical to counter a wrong assertion with logic?"
I'd suggest you have no counter because it is perfectly logical. Simply in it's analogy and indisputable...
Humor me and try.
By the way, I gave no statistics or studies.
Smirk.

STILL no valid reason why you think you should dictate how others live their lives... I guess it is because you don't have one of your own.

[Dusty Mangina]

TXgurl wrote:

<quoted text>
STILL no valid reason why you think you should dictate how others live their lives... I guess it is because you don't have one of your own.

He's got me, though! A perfectly good, unused vagina.

[Fishpock]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean like legislating against murder and robbery?
You really are blonde, aren't you.
Smirk.

Are you capable of making a single comment without being a condescending little prick? Is there something wrong with making a strong argument and letting it stand for itself, debating like an adult? Why do you try so hard to push buttons and piss people off?

[Dusty Mangina]

Fishpock wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you capable of making a single comment without being a condescending little prick? Is there something wrong with making a strong argument and letting it stand for itself, debating like an adult? Why do you try so hard to push buttons and piss people off?

Classic trolling behavior on Kimare's part. The retired pastor loves to get a rise out of others. It gets his tiny wiener turgid.

[QueerQuill]

Fishpock wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you capable of making a single comment without being a condescending little prick? Is there something wrong with making a strong argument and letting it stand for itself, debating like an adult? Why do you try so hard to push buttons and piss people off?

That would require him to have a strong argument to stand on. He resorts to such tactics because he has nothing else.

[Fishpock]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Snicker.

How is it abusive? Explain.

[Dusty Mangina]

Fishpock wrote:

<quoted text>
How is it abusive? Explain.

Oh Lordy, you're going to end up being sorry that you asked. Such a string of nonsensical B.S. you're in for.

Fasten your seatbelt because Kimare's going to spin a yarn.

[YouAreWrong]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
Snicker.

Your analogy doesn't even make sense you fool.