Food For Thought On Obamanomics

Food For Thought On Obamanomics

Posted in the Joliet Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Neighbor

Northbrook, IL

#1 Nov 26, 2012
Spread The Wealth & Tax The Rich: What these believers are really saying is this – I want to keep my own money, but I want some of yours. I do not put in as many hours at work as you do, I do not have the responsibilities that you do, and I do not make as much money as you do. I did not provide jobs like you did when you had dozens of carpenters build that home, or dozens of workers build your boat. That $4M Romney gave to a charity of his own choice last year, should have gone to the Federal government as tax. I know he paid $4M in tax besides that, but he has the money.
Now Rich is a relative term. To a homeless person you are Rich. You have a home, two TV’s, a computer, furniture, and a car. To this person, the guy with a home & summer cottage, a boat, and two cars is Rich. To this guy, the guy that has a bit more is Rich, and so on, and so on. So, following the Distribute the Wealth Belief, it should be ok for the Homeless guy to walk into your home and take a TV. You have two and he has none. Right? But do you think that’s correct or acceptable?
You see, it all boils down to I want to keep my money, but I want some of yours because to me, you’re Rich. You see, after it’s legal for the Homeless person to take one of your two TV’s, you’re probably not going to want to have two TV’s in time. What do you think our most successful upper 5% folks will do after Obama’s tax & Distribute The Wealth takes place? <Food for thought

As a majority of voters selected Obama's socialist/marxist Spread the Wealth approach, America will move to exactly that. However, as America moves to this, I wonder what the conservative capitalist believers will move to, or rather, where? And if the answer is WHERE, who will remain to pay for the "freebies"? <Discuss intelligently?
Professor

United States

#2 Nov 27, 2012
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money. Obama is much deeper than just a socialist. He hates America . HE DESPISES ITS EXCEPTIONALISM. He will crush us financially, militarily, spiritually. Stripping us of our freedoms every chance he gets. I HOPE HIS SUPPORTERS LOSE THEIR JOBS, HOMES, PRIVATE INSURANCE, AND THEIR SPIRIT. The people who didn't support him, who understand what he is about, don't deserve to suffer
thinking

Streamwood, IL

#3 Nov 27, 2012
Always looks like they dont want to be taxed because they are the ones the are making more then $250,000 though. Forget who is on what side about this dems or rep..... Why should they get a vote on taxes when they are not even getting taxed as much as the poor and middle class? They also get paid for the rest of their lives just for being in the government.... Come on. They even vote themselves raises!
lonesome dove

Chicago, IL

#4 Nov 27, 2012
Neighbor wrote:
Spread The Wealth & Tax The Rich: What these believers are really saying is this – I want to keep my own money, but I want some of yours. I do not put in as many hours at work as you do, I do not have the responsibilities that you do, and I do not make as much money as you do. I did not provide jobs like you did when you had dozens of carpenters build that home, or dozens of workers build your boat. That $4M Romney gave to a charity of his own choice last year, should have gone to the Federal government as tax. I know he paid $4M in tax besides that, but he has the money.
Now Rich is a relative term. To a homeless person you are Rich. You have a home, two TV’s, a computer, furniture, and a car. To this person, the guy with a home & summer cottage, a boat, and two cars is Rich. To this guy, the guy that has a bit more is Rich, and so on, and so on. So, following the Distribute the Wealth Belief, it should be ok for the Homeless guy to walk into your home and take a TV. You have two and he has none. Right? But do you think that’s correct or acceptable?
You see, it all boils down to I want to keep my money, but I want some of yours because to me, you’re Rich. You see, after it’s legal for the Homeless person to take one of your two TV’s, you’re probably not going to want to have two TV’s in time. What do you think our most successful upper 5% folks will do after Obama’s tax & Distribute The Wealth takes place? <Food for thought
As a majority of voters selected Obama's socialist/marxist Spread the Wealth approach, America will move to exactly that. However, as America moves to this, I wonder what the conservative capitalist believers will move to, or rather, where? And if the answer is WHERE, who will remain to pay for the "freebies"? <Discuss intelligently?
Discuss intelligently - in this town? Discussions in Manhattan are based on blind passions, not intelligence, insight and thoughtfulness, or for that matter sensibilities. The proof is in an examination of the town leaders. We have Butters and Elder milking the school system, Pet haplessly running the library, Julie K. gone amuck with the Park District and lastly Borgo and Gibson fleecing the citizens at every turn. All set to a backdrop of Walsh's and their lone commando - Billy Delaney. What a scrapheap of people. And do not forget that Larry M. Walsh was a force supporting Obama for election. And with that, the introspective people of Manhattan now want to analize the discomforts of Obama. I say clean your bedroom first and then go out and do the yardwork. There is a hole in the roof where the rain comes in.
Neighbor

United States

#5 Nov 27, 2012
Thinking & Lonesome? You guys on the right thread??
Professor

United States

#6 Nov 27, 2012
The country is moving towards socialism, while Asia is moving towards capitalism? We are going in the wrong direction. There is something to be said about the phrase...... "You don't know how good you got it until it's gone"
Neighbor

Northbrook, IL

#7 Nov 27, 2012
Like Schumer just stated, "We got a bunh of new people on entitlements. This is no time to reduce them".... <Say what?????
Unincorporated

Frankfort, IL

#8 Nov 27, 2012
Professor wrote:
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money. Obama is much deeper than just a socialist. He hates America . HE DESPISES ITS EXCEPTIONALISM. He will crush us financially, militarily, spiritually. Stripping us of our freedoms every chance he gets. I HOPE HIS SUPPORTERS LOSE THEIR JOBS, HOMES, PRIVATE INSURANCE, AND THEIR SPIRIT. The people who didn't support him, who understand what he is about, don't deserve to suffer
His supporters are fools. That is the beauty of it. He has fooled them into thinking they are working for the greater good when actually they are holding the knife that cuts their own throat. It's genius! He couldn't give a rat's ass who supports him now. He is the king of all he surveys. He has used all the useful idiots up! They no longer have value to him.
Four More Years

New Lenox, IL

#9 Nov 27, 2012
Neighbor wrote:
Spread The Wealth & Tax The Rich: What these believers are really saying is this – I want to keep my own money, but I want some of yours. I do not put in as many hours at work as you do, I do not have the responsibilities that you do, and I do not make as much money as you do. I did not provide jobs like you did when you had dozens of carpenters build that home, or dozens of workers build your boat. That $4M Romney gave to a charity of his own choice last year, should have gone to the Federal government as tax. I know he paid $4M in tax besides that, but he has the money.
Now Rich is a relative term. To a homeless person you are Rich. You have a home, two TV’s, a computer, furniture, and a car. To this person, the guy with a home & summer cottage, a boat, and two cars is Rich. To this guy, the guy that has a bit more is Rich, and so on, and so on. So, following the Distribute the Wealth Belief, it should be ok for the Homeless guy to walk into your home and take a TV. You have two and he has none. Right? But do you think that’s correct or acceptable?
You see, it all boils down to I want to keep my money, but I want some of yours because to me, you’re Rich. You see, after it’s legal for the Homeless person to take one of your two TV’s, you’re probably not going to want to have two TV’s in time. What do you think our most successful upper 5% folks will do after Obama’s tax & Distribute The Wealth takes place? <Food for thought

As a majority of voters selected Obama's socialist/marxist Spread the Wealth approach, America will move to exactly that. However, as America moves to this, I wonder what the conservative capitalist believers will move to, or rather, where? And if the answer is WHERE, who will remain to pay for the "freebies"? <Discuss intelligently?
We have a graduated tax code now. The more you make the higher percentage you pay just like most free countries in the world.
What countries are the rich going to move to without taxes? People renounce their citizenship but a tiny percentage. I have friends that have done it and regret it. Enjoy Guatemala.
lonesome dove

Chicago, IL

#10 Nov 27, 2012
Unincorporated wrote:
<quoted text>
His supporters are fools. That is the beauty of it. He has fooled them into thinking they are working for the greater good when actually they are holding the knife that cuts their own throat. It's genius! He couldn't give a rat's ass who supports him now. He is the king of all he surveys. He has used all the useful idiots up! They no longer have value to him.
You are correct - oh unincorporated one!
Four More Years

New Lenox, IL

#11 Nov 27, 2012
Professor wrote:
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money. Obama is much deeper than just a socialist. He hates America . HE DESPISES ITS EXCEPTIONALISM. He will crush us financially, militarily, spiritually. Stripping us of our freedoms every chance he gets. I HOPE HIS SUPPORTERS LOSE THEIR JOBS, HOMES, PRIVATE INSURANCE, AND THEIR SPIRIT. The people who didn't support him, who understand what he is about, don't deserve to suffer
Give it up you lost. You are a sore loser and wishing ill will on anyone is childish and mean spirited.
lonesome dove

Chicago, IL

#12 Nov 27, 2012
Why do think Obama was crying before his re-election staff - for the cameras to record? Perhaps because he just pulled off the biggest ponzi scam on them'all. May good things reign down on you.
Professor

United States

#13 Nov 27, 2012
Four More Years wrote:
<quoted text>
Give it up you lost. You are a sore loser and wishing ill will on anyone is childish and mean spirited.
Obama don't care about the budget, unemployment, jobs, the debt, His goal is to drive those numbers through the roof and destroy America. The fools that don't see that and voted for him when it's so obvious what his is doing should suffer and lose everything for being so stupid. The people that recognized Obama's destruction, warned others, and didn't support him shouldn't suffer.
lonesome dove

Cicero, IL

#14 Nov 28, 2012
Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama don't care about the budget, unemployment, jobs, the debt, His goal is to drive those numbers through the roof and destroy America. The fools that don't see that and voted for him when it's so obvious what his is doing should suffer and lose everything for being so stupid. The people that recognized Obama's destruction, warned others, and didn't support him shouldn't suffer.
You so right. It is amazing the numbers of people who are blind to this notion. Remeber, Obama sent word to Putin that he will have more flexibility after he wins reelection. Some might say that in of itself is treasonous.
WTF

Wauconda, IL

#15 Nov 28, 2012
Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama don't care about the budget, unemployment, jobs, the debt, His goal is to drive those numbers through the roof and destroy America. The fools that don't see that and voted for him when it's so obvious what his is doing should suffer and lose everything for being so stupid. The people that recognized Obama's destruction, warned others, and didn't support him shouldn't suffer.
Where the F were you during the Bush era?
Neighbor

United States

#16 Nov 28, 2012
No wonder Obama manipulates these lemmings so easily!

Ok, for the last time. Bush is not running for anything, and has not been in office for 4 years. He's gone. It's all Obama.

Man, we have to keep reminding these folks....
Right on point

Mokena, IL

#18 Nov 28, 2012
WTF wrote:
<quoted text>
Where the F were you during the Bush era?
Couldn't have said it better!
Professor

United States

#19 Nov 29, 2012
WTF wrote:
<quoted text>
Where the F were you during the Bush era?
I was busy working, counting my money, enjoying my prosperity and freedom. Just like you and everybody else were
lonesome dove

Chicago, IL

#20 Nov 29, 2012
Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
I was busy working, counting my money, enjoying my prosperity and freedom. Just like you and everybody else were
Who are you, Professor Allen Combs?
lonesome dove

Chicago, IL

#21 Nov 29, 2012
Or possibly Professor Jon Stewart?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Joliet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
There's a name for Trump's brand of politics: 31 min You are wrong ori... 19
Will the REAL Lway taxpayers unite! (Nov '15) 38 min Closing 3,359
Real Donald Trump 1 hr Build The Wall 5
The Coddled 1 hr You Are Wrong 5
Two Thirds of all Americans would struggle to c... 1 hr Shark News 10
Trump Will Win 2 hr Shark News 17
Lockport Pharmacist made 2.4 million in phony d... 3 hr FYI 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Joliet Mortgages