Sorry your not getting off that easy from me. You speak of "integrity" or lack thereof by a candidate who made a clerical mistake. One that the courts have ruled was not substantial enough to warrant removal from the ballot.How unusual for political games to have been played. I am shocked.
However for the candidate you obviously support you speak of it being done uner the guise of "politics". Which situation stinks more of unethical behavior or lack of integrity. Please even you cant try and pull this one off. The attorney stated that this should not be even considered. There was more than enough past case precedence to show that she would be returned to the ballot. But that information was completely disregarded by one candidate who sat in judgement of another. Even though there is a strong possibility that she may have been the one behind the filing of the objection. Call it integrity, ethics whatever you like, I wouldnt go banging that drum for your candidate at this point.