Guess we die in Syria Now.
Posted in the Johnson City Forum
#1 Aug 29, 2013
So here we go. Time to feed the hungry war machine. I'm sorry. It's time to killa few million people who have lived under a dictatorship all their lives. S we are going to go bomb them and set them free, eh? Like a Good Right Winged Christian Nation, filled with Christ. Lets drop bibles on them.
Now just watch how quick Phil (I go to church) Roe votes to kill a bunch of people. It's a proven lie that even his campaign ads he lied about giving birth to over 5000 babies. The exact number is 2988. I can see how easily he was mistaken. But he's killed almost a million people in Iraq because he is part of Satans killing machine. And you know what? He knows it.
Down deep he knows that in order to stay in power (which is first priority) he must follow the pattern of killing and justifying the $747 billion annually that we give to the military.
So mommas, get your crying towels. Some of your boys aren't coming home. FOR NOTHING !!! Want one thing change except the baby that Roe birthed? He killed too.
These pro-life MFers are a killing machine.
#2 Aug 29, 2013
In today's world, it will be men and women not coming home, or coming home with disabilities to survive with the rest of their lives. See how much Roe truly supports our veterans.
#3 Aug 30, 2013
Leaders in the Democrat Party; the Party which currently occupies the White House and is thinking seriously about engaging in war against Syria. Listen to what they have said in the past regarding major aspects of this conflict.
If the President takes us to war without Congressional approval, I will call for his impeachment. The Constitution is clear and so am I.– Joe Biden, 2007 “
In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members… It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.”– Hillary Clinton, Oct 8, 2002 Hmm. Am I the only one here thinking that George W. Bush is sitting in his living room in Crawford, Texas, watching the reports on chemical weapons being used in Syria and saying; “No sh*t, Sherlock…”
“Does the mass death by means of chemical weapons of mass destruction on the part of Syria vindicate the W. Bush administration?” Then I remembered they’re on the left, too
This weak President who wants to feel tough now and bomb a few buildings like President Clinton did in 1998 when he lobbed a few cruise missiles into a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. Okay, okay, it was different because “Clinton needed to look ‘presidential’ for a day” as the late Christopher Hitchens once postulated. The bombing of the aspirin factory came just three days after Clinton finally admitted he was being serviced in the Oval Office by an intern right around his daughter’s age. President Obama doesn’t that as an excuse and I doubt Michelle would be the humiliated doormat Hillary was, but there is plenty to distract from now, isn’t there?
We cave to the press and liberals in Congress. We pussy-foot around and 20 years later, 100’s of thousands of children are being displaced and dying a tortured death by gas in Syria.
President Obama is weak. He will never make the tough choice as a Commander in Chief because it doesn’t fit his image. Bombing Syria does nothing but make matters worse and embolden our enemies. There should be a red line around the Oval Office which prevents politicians and con-artists from crossing.
#4 Aug 30, 2013
Funny how the liberals will spin things, isnt it?
Um...Phil Roe is not the President. Obama is the President, and Obama is the one about to start a war with no idea of how to finish it.
(Here is a clue, one either goes all the way with invasion and indefinite occupation, such as Iraq, or one looses, such as Vietnam)
Obama dont know what he is doing.
Obama is the chief architect in this latest disaster. Phil Roe and Corker and Alexander are just the doofuses handing him the bricks.
They are all ridiculous idiots, no argument there. But lets remember who the leader of the goofy troop is...its Obama.
As per usual.
#5 Aug 30, 2013
You would think that we would have learned our lesson from the huge cluster flop that was Iraq.
#6 Aug 31, 2013
Personaly, of I were Obama, I would ask congress that we strike Libya with an invasion such as the world has never seen, we don't shoot a shot unless someone shoots at us. Soon as they do, we blow them to hell. We work our way all the way to tha dictator, drag him out into the town square and hang him by his neck until he is dead. Then ask "who wants to be the next mass murderer?" And then leave
#7 Aug 31, 2013
I dont think there is a dictator in charge of Libya, just the Muslim Brotherhood that Obama put in charge after we toplled Quadafi.
Same ones that had a hand in letting our embassy being attacked at Benghazi. The Obama administration was counting on them to provide securty for our embassy people. They sort of stood aside and did nothing when Al Queda attacked it.
Our former Secretary of State (Hillary Clinton) refused to send in reinforcements for our embassy when it was being attacked. She didnt want to offend the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates (who were doing nothing) who were supposed to be in charge of securoty. That would not have been PC for the US to use its own military forces to defend its own embassy.
And you know how it is with Hillary, PC comes first above everything!
Same bunch that took over Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood. The Egyptian people overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood (which made Obama mad), and the Obama policy seems to be one of trying to find a way to fund the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Syrian rebels (which has toes to Al Queda in Syria)..
Thats right, he is funding and arming in Syria, the very groups that attacked and wiped out or embassy in Benghazi.
Great Plan, huh? Arm and fund our enemies overseas, while persecuting American Christians back home?
And now Obama has talked himself into a corner, and will face the prospect of looking like the fool that he is if he doesnt attack Syria.
Or look like an even bigger one if he does.
So, he might think to save face and shoot a few missles into some outhouse out in the desert, and then call that a symbolic victory.
And of course, the liberal media will be there to fawn all over him, and tell us what a great leader he is, and all that crap.
Lets face it folks, Obama has made America a fun-make on the world stage. Our enemies are laughing at us. Our former friends and allies have abandoned us.
Obama cant even put together a one day coalition to bomb a Syrian toilet out in the desert.
His Presidency is a joke. American hasnt been this divided since the Civil War, the national debt has tripled since he took over, and the country is basically going to hell in a hand basket.
#8 Aug 31, 2013
The average military contrctor lobbyist makes 700 times what a veteran with both legs blown off. He sucks up to Roe, wines and dines him, blows him, swallows, and the LEGALLY contributes to his campaign in UNLIMITED And ANONYMOUS funds. His promise to them is to throw money toward defense and vote YES on any war.....
Pro life, my ass. A good republican is one pinned down in a foxhole behind enemy lines against an enemy who doesn't even know where America is on the globe. He's shit his pants and is crying out to God and Mom to please don't let him get shot......the whole time he's too freaking stupid to know he VOTED FOR THIS SHIT BECAUSE HE HATES GAYS.
F him. I hope a grenade lands in the foxhole
#9 Aug 31, 2013
You're hate for Obama is obvious. That hate spreads to his supporters and other Americans. Now we are divided, hopelessly. That divide is what will end America not a single individual. Frankly, I blame FOX NEWS for the demise of America. They are an entertainment channel owned by the one percent who do the bidding of big business and the wealthy. They are in league with Satan and they are owned by an Austrailian criminal who is married to a Chinese whore who is half his age.
4 trillion of that debt was spent blowing your brothers legs off in Iraq for no reason other than to feed the war machine. You have bought the lies in a hopeless fashion. Fox News is more destructive to America than any terrorist group.
#10 Aug 31, 2013
The liberal democrats are faced with a total failurs of Obamas policies, which has led our allies to abandon us, and our enemies to laugh in our faces.
So, of course, they blame Bush and Fox news.
It all rather pathetic, really.
Perhaps our allies saw the debacle of how Obama mishandled the Libya thing, and that left a sour note in thier mouths?
(Hint, it wasnt either Bush, or Fox news, that called the shots in the Libya fiasco. It was Obama)
Perhaps our allies saw how Obama mishandled the outbreak of freedom in Egypt, and how he funded and armed our enemies there? You know, the Muslim Brotherhood that attack Christians all the time? Perhaps that left a sour taste in our former allies mouths?
(Hint, it wasnt Bush, or Fox news, that called the shots on the Egypt fiasco. It was Obama)
Perhaps our allies saw how Obama sided with the Syrian rebels (which includes Al Queda), and how, as per usual, he began funding and arming them? Perhaps that left a sour taste in thier mouths?
(Hint, it wasnt Bush or Fox news that had a thing to do with the Syria fiasco. It was Obama)
And the list of Obama failures goes on and on. So, now that Obama is reaping the fruits of his failures, they have decided to bring out the threadbare old saw of blaming Bush, and Fox news, as a smoke screen to cover up Obamas multitudes of failures.
Maybe you can convince yourselves, but fewer and fewer people are listening to it now.
Your pet President cant even round up a coalition to support him flinging a few missles into the empty desert (to save face) and blowing up a deserted outhouse (like Bill Clinton did in 1998).
I suppose that Clinton fiasco was the fault of Bush and Fox news as well?
#11 Aug 31, 2013
You are aware that Obama is the war monger when it comes to Syria? This is pure hurt feelings, let's put the muslim brotherhood in charge of the world Barry Obama.
#12 Aug 31, 2013
You're one ill thought out Obama action behind. He's already turned Libya over to the muslim brotherhood. Now he's trying to do it in Syria. Try to keep up.
#13 Aug 31, 2013
agree with everything you said, except to point out that Senator "Bomb em Bob" Corker is the main cheerleader for the president.
#14 Aug 31, 2013
Political parties what a joke! Why are people so loyal and will change their beliefs based on who's in office regardless of the circumstances. Don't waste your time typing your rhetoric! Take that time and learn some respect and honesty!!
#15 Aug 31, 2013
Corker is trying to look presidential,(hint, hint).
#16 Aug 31, 2013
If you want to lay blame, look at the socialist liberal you more than likely put in office.
#17 Aug 31, 2013
#18 Aug 31, 2013
This is just fkn pathetic.
Obama says the chemical weapons pose a threat to our national security and that the job of punishing the Syrian government has fallen on the USA.
Really?? This arrogant clown ran his yap with that red line crap and now he's afraid he's gonna look like a puss.
They said the government has a "high confidence" as a justification for bombing another country. They provide little to no proof and claim what they did release is just a small fraction of the proof they have. WTF? You want to convince the world a bombing is justified then why the hell don't they show us all the proof?
High confidence is not irrefutable proof which is the only thing that should be used as justification for a globally sanctioned response.
Personally I think we got no business dickin around with those people and their internal issues.
#19 Sep 1, 2013
Obama did run his mouth to look "Presidential" and all of that, with his big "Redline" talk.
And now that his bluff has been called,... he hesitated,... he soiled his linens and wet on himself...(while our allies abandoned us and our enemies laughed in his face)...and then he quickly went on another vacation and passed the buck on to Congress.
What a leader?
The democrats in Congress (and the Republican Rinos, like Corker) will give him the go ahead for an attack.
I wonder if anybody in Washington has thought about what happens AFTER we attack Syria?
What if Syria responds with a massive Chemical or nerve gas attack on Israel? If the Israeli casualties are numbered in the tens of thousands?
And then Israel responds with the old Hiroshima trwatment on Syria, and incinerates Damascus?
And the Russian naval base at Tartus (in Syria)? If that gets the Hiroshima treatment too, from somebody? Well?
And our task forces off shore,... if they get it?
And then nukes are flying around in all directions? Maybe America has only about 72 hours left to live before we get it from somebody?
What then, Mr President?
Should we interrupt Obamas golf game, and ask him to make another decision?
Has anybody in Washington thought this stuff through? Have they seen the extreme danger that we are in?
I really dont think so. I believe that the career politicians in Washington are so arrogant (blindly so) that they actually believe that they are in complete control of every move, and that our opponents are incapable of making any move that we do not anticipate and approve of.
I really think they are that stupid.
Obama and Corker alike. But Corker is just an Obama flunky. Obama is the President. He is the one who can do us the most harm.
They really dont know that we are in grave danger. It hasnt dawned on them.
If Obama would have thought this stuff through months ago (like we should expect our President to have done already),then he never would have run his mouth and talked himself into a corner with his big "Redline" talk.
We have no leadership in Washington, except for one guy...
There is the only guy in our government that has a clue as to what is the right thing to do. He can see things cleraly, while Obama and Corker (and the rest of them) are giving such a muddled and dangerous response.
#20 Sep 1, 2013
yes probably in next mindless, longterm bloody conflict. By the way, this conflict can be transformated in full world war III. There were already two global wars and reasons of it were completely ill.
Add your comments below
|Still no horses allowed the Tweetsie Trail (Aug '14)||7 hr||Horse Glue||79|
|Rusty Crowe's Hypocrisy||7 hr||TN Dem||20|
|Toe Sucking (Oct '13)||16 hr||nipple weakeness||26|
|NutriMost - New Diet Scam (May '14)||20 hr||DonotbesoNaive||485|
|Freemasonry in Johnson City||20 hr||Interesting||8|
|WJHL - Sara Diamond vs. Kylee McGivern||23 hr||big fan||2|
|Mahoneys, Johnson city, (Nov '07)||Tue||American Worker||107|
Find what you want!
Search Johnson City Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC