Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7783 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
See, I told you Right Wingers can't be expected to read entire paragraphs and attend to the subject at hand for more than 38 seconds. Their limited intellectuals skills are why the media created "Sound Bites".
And here's proof of that, but even more entertaining, once again they boast of their limited abilities as if being ignorant and unwilling to learn is a positive attribute.
The great thing is that those who appreciate education and knowledge will always need the sons and daughters of those who don't as affordable domestic help.
Who is supposed to see? Who is going to take the word of a socialist? Where do you get your sorry WORD bites?
So many questions, so few answers.


Informed Opinion

Sunapee, NH

#7784 Apr 26, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>You are the one who's insane; not me. You DO know the definition of insanity, right? That is WHY there is no point in citing more(the same) facts and proof to you. You, on the other hand, keep up the same old fallacies, etc. You libs are such "right fighters". All you do is fillibuster and call it "winning". Your thinking is very twisted, but then most liberal thinking is.
So ... Wing logic is as follows:

We know God despises Gays because the Old Testament says so, because the Word of God is infallible,

but,

we know God doesn't mean the rest of the stuff in the Old Testament, because its silly, and the Word of God is not infallible.

This sayeth Right Wing "logic".

Don't you hate it when the blatant vacuous nature of Right Wing arguments is exposed so clearly and distinctly.

Oh wait ... There is a response.

Pretend you didn't just say the Bible is fallible and Right Wingers get to pick and chose which parts God meant, and which parts he was just kidding.

Yea - That'll improve the quality of your argument.

Or just attack someone for being "Christ like". That's just as helpful to your cause.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7785 Apr 26, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Your last sentence is very interesting. It sounds as if you are breaking one of the rules in the liberal playbook. You are making a disparaging remark about domestic help. You are stating that domestic help is beneath you. You are stating that because they aren't as educated as you, they don't deserve to make as much money as you. You are stating that domestic help doesn't appreciate education. You are insinuating that they had the same opportunity as you, but made the choice to not make much money. You are a fraud; a faux liberal. Poser.
He will claim it's a Freudian slip, he also makes the same claim for not getting laid by his wife.

Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7786 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

Or just attack someone for being "Christ like". That's just as helpful to your cause.
Ha-ha-ha. You're kidding. More like the devil in you.


Informed Opinion

Sunapee, NH

#7787 Apr 26, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>You get a government check. You don't have anything better to do than read those looonnnngggg boring posts and type looooonnnnng boring posts. The rest of us have to get out in the world to keep you liberals in your booze, cigs, flatscreens and lottery tickets. Now, eat another bonbon in honor of us "makers".
Yep, Nice one too.

Gotta love pensions. Always find it ironically humorous that those who would benefit most from returning to pension based retirements are the very ones who fight against unions and pensions.

Ah well, Americans have the right to work hard to make the minority wealthy and who am I to stop them.

Right Wingers are free to push to scrap the very programs that keep them alive - fine with me - but very bad for the country.

Actually, three of us are having coffee waiting to start the day, enjoying pushing the buttons of the Right Wing Wackos waiting to slurp up all their government benefits, while bitching that "the other guy" is getting a government benefit. It's a beautiful day on the beach.
Scott

United States

#7788 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
See, I told you Right Wingers can't be expected to read entire paragraphs and attend to the subject at hand for more than 38 seconds. Their limited intellectuals skills are why the media created "Sound Bites".
And here's proof of that, but even more entertaining, once again they boast of their limited abilities as if being ignorant and unwilling to learn is a positive attribute.
The great thing is that those who appreciate education and knowledge will always need the sons and daughters of those who don't as affordable domestic help.
Wow!! What a small World it is! I am sure you were the custodian at the same school. You were the one who bored a hole in the wall so you could peek through and watch the girls take their showers after gym class. You also used to pee in your mop bucket as a protest against the system. You thought you should be paid the same salary that teachers received. You used to hang out in the boiler room and read your Karl Marx books and look at girlie magazines. Yeah, I am pretty sure that was you.

Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7789 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

Actually, three of us are having coffee waiting to start the day, enjoying pushing the buttons of the Right Wing Wackos waiting to slurp up all their government benefits, while bitching that "the other guy" is getting a government benefit. It's a beautiful day on the beach.

Yep, just like Libtards, always late for the party. Us conservatives having been pushing the libtard buttons since daybreak and we finally get a response,(from you.) First catch of the day, hope your lip is not sore from the hook.

HA-ha-ha
domino

Newnan, GA

#7790 Apr 26, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
I expect if he was really a Marine at one time, he is experiencing a conflict of emotions over the question and quote. It does not adhere to his present inconsistencies.
I personally do not believe he was a Marine. I have been around many Marines and they do not have his way of thinking at all. My son is a Marine.
Informed Opinion

Sunapee, NH

#7791 Apr 26, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>You are wrong. The scripture makes it clear. There is no spinning. Perhaps you should read it. It's not about ignoring other scripture. It about what that particular scripture states. You are guilty of the same thing: trotting out other verses as the authority on your position while ignoring the authority of Leviticus 22:18.(Of course, you libs live by a double standard, so I'm not surprised.)
That egg seems very important to you. Heck! You voted for Obama. You can't wear more egg than THAT.
So you are going to Hell:

- You've touched a football;
- You've eaten bacon;
- You've eaten lobster;
- You've got a stuffed fish on the wall;
- You've got pictures on the wall;
- and your wife better have not ever worn jeans;

Don't blame me
- I didn't write the Bible
- I didn't tell you to use it to justify your Anti-Christian hatred of gays.

That's all you.

Hey, it all the Infallible Word of God in the Old Testament - right there with being gay - so what the heck - you might as well get a boyfriend named Bob - you're done in anyway.

Unless, of course, on Right Wing Planet God tells you which abominations He meant, and which ones he was just kidding.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#7792 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
So ... Wing logic is as follows:
We know God despises Gays because the Old Testament says so, because the Word of God is infallible,
but,
we know God doesn't mean the rest of the stuff in the Old Testament, because its silly, and the Word of God is not infallible.
This sayeth Right Wing "logic".
Don't you hate it when the blatant vacuous nature of Right Wing arguments is exposed so clearly and distinctly.
Oh wait ... There is a response.
Pretend you didn't just say the Bible is fallible and Right Wingers get to pick and chose which parts God meant, and which parts he was just kidding.
Yea - That'll improve the quality of your argument.
Or just attack someone for being "Christ like". That's just as helpful to your cause.
You are questioning the wisdom and logic of God.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#7793 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are going to Hell:
- You've touched a football;
- You've eaten bacon;
- You've eaten lobster;
- You've got a stuffed fish on the wall;
- You've got pictures on the wall;
- and your wife better have not ever worn jeans;
Don't blame me
- I didn't write the Bible
- I didn't tell you to use it to justify your Anti-Christian hatred of gays.
That's all you.
Hey, it all the Infallible Word of God in the Old Testament - right there with being gay - so what the heck - you might as well get a boyfriend named Bob - you're done in anyway.
Unless, of course, on Right Wing Planet God tells you which abominations He meant, and which ones he was just kidding.
You are question the wisdom and logic of God.
Informed Opinion

Sunapee, NH

#7794 Apr 26, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>Your last sentence is very interesting. It sounds as if you are breaking one of the rules in the liberal playbook. You are making a disparaging remark about domestic help. You are stating that domestic help is beneath you. You are stating that because they aren't as educated as you, they don't deserve to make as much money as you. You are stating that domestic help doesn't appreciate education. You are insinuating that they had the same opportunity as you, but made the choice to not make much money. You are a fraud; a faux liberal. Poser.
Damn....

It's so hard to keep up with Right Wing hatred and fear,

- They hate Obama because they claim he's a Liberal,(a/k/a "Christ Like");
- Then they hate Obama because he's doing things just like George Bush,(a/k/a Cowardly War Criminal);
- then they hate him because he's a Muslim;
- then they hate him because his Christian preacher says hateful things;
- Then they hate him because his deficit is half Bushes deficit;
Then they hate him because he's cutting the social programs they want cut;

That I get - nobody actually expects a Right Winger to make sense.

But now your attacking someone previously attacked for being a liberal (a/k/a "Christ Like"), for not being a liberal (a/k/a "Christ Like").

I gotta go earn some money to support all my Right Wing friends who are suckling on those government teats.

Take some time and "iron out" who you Right Wingers hate and why).

Maybe your Muslim Taliban buddies can help out when you all go to the Taliban Convention this year - maybe you can hold it at the KKK center - isn't that in Young Harris ?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#7795 Apr 26, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, Nice one too.
Gotta love pensions. Always find it ironically humorous that those who would benefit most from returning to pension based retirements are the very ones who fight against unions and pensions.
Ah well, Americans have the right to work hard to make the minority wealthy and who am I to stop them.
Right Wingers are free to push to scrap the very programs that keep them alive - fine with me - but very bad for the country.
Actually, three of us are having coffee waiting to start the day, enjoying pushing the buttons of the Right Wing Wackos waiting to slurp up all their government benefits, while bitching that "the other guy" is getting a government benefit. It's a beautiful day on the beach.
Just like a lib to brag about how much money they are being given by the government. You are the very definition of a classless liberal. Whom else but a liberal would BRAG about living off the government. It IS a beautiful day when a liberal FINALLY tells the truth.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7796 Apr 26, 2013
domino wrote:
<quoted text>
I personally do not believe he was a Marine. I have been around many Marines and they do not have his way of thinking at all. My son is a Marine.
You are most likely correct.

But we do know he's a flim flam poster.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7797 Apr 26, 2013
Barack Obama was elected president in 2008 because he was not George W. Bush. In fact, he was elected because he was the farthest thing possible from Mr. Bush. On some level he knew this, which is why every time he got in trouble he'd say Bush's name. It's all his fault, you have no idea the mess I inherited. As long as Mr. Bush's memory was hovering like Boo Radley in the shadows, Mr. Obama would be OK.

This week something changed. George W. Bush is back, for the unveiling of his presidential library. His numbers are dramatically up. You know why? Because he's the farthest thing from Barack Obama.


Obama fatigue has opened the way to Bush affection.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7798 Apr 26, 2013
"In all his recent interviews Mr. Bush has been modest, humorous, proud but unassuming, and essentially philosophical: History will decide. No finger-pointing or scoring points. If he feels rancor or resentment he didn't show it. He didn't attempt to manipulate. His sheer normality seemed like a relief, an echo of an older age.

And all this felt like an antidote to Obama—to the imperious I, to the inability to execute, to the endless interviews and the imperturbable drone, to the sense that he is trying to teach us, like an Ivy League instructor taken aback by the backwardness of his students. And there's the unconscious superiority. One thing Mr. Bush didn't think he was was superior. He thought he was luckily born, quick but not deep, and he famously trusted his gut but also his heart. He always seemed moved and grateful to be in the White House. Someone who met with Mr. Obama during his first year in office, an old hand who'd worked with many presidents, came away worried and confounded. Mr. Obama, he said, was the only one who didn't seem awed by his surroundings, or by the presidency itself.

Mr. Bush could be prickly and irritable and near the end showed arrogance, but he wasn't vain or conceited, and he still isn't. When people said recently that they were surprised he could paint, he laughed: "Some people are surprised I can even read.""
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#7799 Apr 26, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
“You are absolutely correct, the scripture in Leviticus is quite clear on many things that were important to a culture thousands of years ago.”
Not to put words in your mouth but, you say the same about the U.S. Constitution. In essence you say neither one is relevant to your life today. This tells me you assume yourself and your peers to be the ultimate arbitrator of right and wrong, law and judgment. You assume the only thing that may have effect or control about any of your actions are what you and your peers decide today, history is only for the joy of reading but does not apply to your life.
Many conservatives will shake their heads at your inconsistencies but not me. I would just ask myself “I wonder from which side of his family he inherited his lobotomy.”
“Now you want to trot out a single verse as the authority on your position, while ignoring the authority of all the remaining verses.”
Sort of like you do with many of your postings.
You have perfected the use of the strawman, congratulations.

Never declared the US Constitution is irrelevant, but have stated that it has evolved to meet the demands of a changing world. Hey, looks like the same thing could be said about the Bible, what with one set of cultural mores in the Old Testament, and another in the New.

Care to tackle how one verse in Leviticus can be trotted out as an authoritative justification while the remainder of the Book is ignored as just so quaint.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#7800 Apr 26, 2013
Scott wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
OK! Now I am about 90% certain. You were my teacher in High School. Unfortunately, I was one of many who slept through your class. As I recall, the only person who could stay awake was Freddie Philpot who sat in the front row. He also had 10 cups of coffee before your class so he could stay awake. You were also the teacher who, while trying to quit smoking, unconsciously puffed on a piece of chalk. I remember you always looking angry and you never smiled. We could never figure out if you were a man or a woman. Your post just conjured up some old school memories.
Sorry pal, never was a teacher, but I suspect there were many classes you slept through.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#7801 Apr 26, 2013
Scott wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow!! What a small World it is! I am sure you were the custodian at the same school. You were the one who bored a hole in the wall so you could peek through and watch the girls take their showers after gym class. You also used to pee in your mop bucket as a protest against the system. You thought you should be paid the same salary that teachers received. You used to hang out in the boiler room and read your Karl Marx books and look at girlie magazines. Yeah, I am pretty sure that was you.
Wow!
You're on a roll today. If you were bowling, you would be scoring perfect. As is, you're getting a strike with every post.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#7802 Apr 26, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You have perfected the use of the strawman, congratulations.
Never declared the US Constitution is irrelevant, but have stated that it has evolved to meet the demands of a changing world. Hey, looks like the same thing could be said about the Bible, what with one set of cultural mores in the Old Testament, and another in the New.
Care to tackle how one verse in Leviticus can be trotted out as an authoritative justification while the remainder of the Book is ignored as just so quaint.
Ahhhh, IO's alter ego. Can you tell us how you can ignore that one verse? Personally, I'm not ignoring any of the scripture. I am simply pointing out that Leviticus 22:18 can't be ignored either. You liberals just never get tired of yourselves and your spin. Too funny.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jesup Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jamie Adams May 16 Timmy 1
Patrica Rice post me your phone # May 10 concerned friend 3
Bert Guy (May '16) May 9 Doc 6
The Billy Crowder Case (Mar '12) Apr '17 Moondaizey 141
donna white. daughter of geneva and ted white Apr '17 sbhvkc 2
Free animals (Nov '15) Apr '17 terrilucas 2
Shavonne Wells Mar '17 LAURIE 1

Jesup Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jesup Mortgages