Boy Scouts sue Philadelphia over rent, policy barring gays

[Unreal]

Chris Vogel wrote:

<quoted text>
Sugar ti.ts their you go again no real argument or ligament position just name calling.
You know you have won the argument when all the person can do is correct your grammar, LMAO
I own you sugar ti.ts

Awww if you want to think so, well, I'm guessing you don't have much. Go for it! Make yourself feel better and tell yourself you've won. It's scary, though, to see that you say I'M the one who's name calling. Really? Do you even OWN a mirror?(Or that might be too scary... I could understand that, too.)

Oh, and the grammar correction? That's the easiest part. The harder part is explaining 1,000 times why you're wrong and still not having you get it. Well, it's just not worth my time.

Oh, here I go responding to you. Sorry. That won't happen again. What a waste.

[Moronic Neighbors]

Boy Scouts wrote:

<quoted text>
Praise Be viva folk lore & myth...your choice to live in fear. God Bless

If you go back a few pages there are two posts of links for all the facts I mentioned.
Maybe your misinformed brain calls things 'myths' to compensate gor your lack of info, fool.

[Unreal]

Chris Vogel wrote:

<quoted text>
Sugar ti.ts their you go again no real argument or ligament position just name calling.
You know you have won the argument when all the person can do is correct your grammar, LMAO
I own you sugar ti.ts

Oh, sorry, I forgot to ask:

what, exactly, is a "ligament" position? Is that when you bend your knee a certain way?

You'd only "own" me, dear, if you had a cohesive argument. You don't. You're spewing hatred and ignorance. Go to it. It's your one skill, I bet. Bye.

[BlueLamp]

Moronic Women wrote:

<quoted text>
No, its God's choice that we live in righteousness.
Homosexuals, as well as many others in our culture, are NOT!
God's choice is an offer out of His perfect love, not the spoiled love as the fallen world knows.
'Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom'.
'Fear of the Lord' in the Old Testament is used as a designation of true piety. It is a fear conjoined with love and hope, and is therefore not a slavish dread, but rather filial reverence. A holy fear is enjoined also in the New Testament as a preventive of carelessness in religion, and as an incentive to penitence.
Why not try it? You can only gain from it.

I try not to let the Christian bible define "sin" for me since it condones slavery(Lev. 25:44), beating slaves(Exodus 21:20), incest(Genesis 19:33-36), rape victims being required to marry the rapist(Deuteronomy 22:28-29), treating women and children as property(Genesis 19:8, 1 Timothy 2:11-14, 1 Corinthians 14:33-35), requires battered women to remain married to abusive husbands(Matthew 19:9, 1 Corinthians 7:10-12), condones jihad type warfare where all children are killed save the virgins who are a 'reward'(Numbers 31:15), and makes no mention at all of child molestation, the worst possible crime.

[Moronic Women]

BlueLamp wrote:

<quoted text>
I try not to let the Christian bible define "sin" for me since it condones slavery(Lev. 25:44), beating slaves(Exodus 21:20), incest(Genesis 19:33-36), rape victims being required to marry the rapist(Deuteronomy 22:28-29), treating women and children as property(Genesis 19:8, 1 Timothy 2:11-14, 1 Corinthians 14:33-35), requires battered women to remain married to abusive husbands(Matthew 19:9, 1 Corinthians 7:10-12), condones jihad type warfare where all children are killed save the virgins who are a 'reward'(Numbers 31:15), and makes no mention at all of child molestation, the worst possible crime.

Sounds like you don't like accountability except on your terms like most sinners who use the same contortions of scripture as you just pulled. Get lost with that nonsense, fool. No one in their right mind believes that crap you just peddled would fit into the modern world as an expression of current biblical thought. You've mixed and mischaracterized all of those passages into a discredited mess.

[BlueLamp]

Moronic Women wrote:

<quoted text>
Sounds like you don't like accountability except on your terms like most sinners who use the same contortions of scripture as you just pulled. Get lost with that nonsense, fool. No one in their right mind believes that crap you just peddled would fit into the modern world as an expression of current biblical thought. You've mixed and mischaracterized all of those passages into a discredited mess.

Sounds like you don't care about accountability or you would easily and enthusiastically give an accurate account of what those verses actually say.

Since you can't, I'll assume that I'm right about what they say and you worship a sick and immoral God who can't be defended as moral, just or even omnipotent.

[Headlines Exposed]

Moronic Women wrote:

<quoted text>
Sounds like you don't like accountability except on your terms like most sinners who use the same contortions of scripture as you just pulled. Get lost with that nonsense, fool. No one in their right mind believes that crap you just peddled would fit into the modern world as an expression of current biblical thought. You've mixed and mischaracterized all of those passages into a discredited mess.

BlueLamp did the same thing on several other boards. And when I asked him to go deeper, he could not and simply repasted the same paragraph.

Only a veneer.

[BlueLamp]

Headlines Exposed wrote:

<quoted text>
BlueLamp did the same thing on several other boards. And when I asked him to go deeper, he could not and simply repasted the same paragraph.
Only a veneer.

Go deeper. How? What do you mean?

You're a liar and that's the only thing that's getting deeper.

Maybe you should explain yourself. I'm not the one that will end the debate with baseless meaningless assertions, that will be you, because your side of the argument doesn't even approach justification.

[confused]

Tony C wrote:

<quoted text>
Notice how the creeps eventually start to back off to make themselves look not-so-bad?
Sorry, you made your bed. You're a jerk.
And I need to get off these boards because at the moment, I'm failing as a Christian. Because I hate your *****cking guts. And I DO wish ill for you. I'm talking cancer, miscarriages, mosquito bites and flat tires - all of it.
And that's a clear sign I need a little holiday from these boards. I need to pray for God's forgiveness for hating your guts even after what you and your ilk have put forth on these boards. Your lies, your obnoxious statements, your worthless opinions, your slander, your ignorance, your idiocy and everything else.
And that goes for your other little buddies on the dark side as well - who think they're "just saying" or "not hating but..." or any of that other ****.
Out.

7000 posts! 7000...a mind-boggling number. dont u have anything better to do?

[Common Sense]

LMAO! You wrote, "For one, the religion you are describing is mythology. It's not Christianity (which is real)."

Hahahaahahaha!!! Classic.

Right Wing Conspiracy wrote:

<quoted text>
No Alan, you are all over the place.
For one, the religion you are describing is mythology. It's not Christianity (which is real). Maybe it's just something you made up or readily accept b/c it makes you feel good.
Secondly, the girl scout example is more than relevant. Of course the government would never be able to get away force them to have to have young male counselors, b/c of the risk involved. It would be political suicide.
Plus, heterosexual men are okay w/ it b/c we understand what can happen. It's not all heterosexual men, but there are those who do. We don't try to cover it with false propaganda and make excuses that it can't happen like gay activist groups do b/c admitting that there are homosexuals that do this hurts their agenda.
We should have learned what from the Catholic priest situation, but a lot of people need to catch on.

[Common Sense]

That is like saying, I don't believe in ghosts because they are make believe. Neither does my imaginary friend who is real.

Classic. What arrogance to think your beliefs are superior to everyone elses. How lonely must it be for you to live in a world surrounded by so many who foolishly refuse to believe the one and only "truth" like you.

True faith does not require you to put down other's beliefs. It you were so sure about your God, then you wouldn't feel so threatened by others beliefs. You are a hypocrite of the worst sort.

[Right Wing Conspiracy]

Common Sense wrote:

That is like saying, I don't believe in ghosts because they are make believe. Neither does my imaginary friend who is real.
Classic. What arrogance to think your beliefs are superior to everyone elses. How lonely must it be for you to live in a world surrounded by so many who foolishly refuse to believe the one and only "truth" like you.
True faith does not require you to put down other's beliefs. It you were so sure about your God, then you wouldn't feel so threatened by others beliefs. You are a hypocrite of the worst sort.

Funny, I didn't put down anyone else's belief. The quote you referenced wasn't putting down another's belief, but in defense of my own. Go back and read it. What I called mythology were suggestions that God had sex with Mary and the suggestion that Jesus had a gay affair, and then used the term mythology themselves to describe the religion.

Show me any quote where I put down another person's religous beliefs.

What I find funny is that you call me a hypocrite, but your post reeeks of doing everything you call me a hypocrite for. LOL

[Right Wing Conspiracy]

Actually, that should say everything you falsely accuse me of being a hypocrite for.

[Common Sense]

By saying your faith is the "real one," you are belittle all other world faiths. Are you that dense?

Right Wing Conspiracy wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny, I didn't put down anyone else's belief. The quote you referenced wasn't putting down another's belief, but in defense of my own. Go back and read it. What I called mythology were suggestions that God had sex with Mary and the suggestion that Jesus had a gay affair, and then used the term mythology themselves to describe the religion.
Show me any quote where I put down another person's religous beliefs.
What I find funny is that you call me a hypocrite, but your post reeeks of doing everything you call me a hypocrite for. LOL

[Right Wing Conspiracy]

Common Sense wrote:

By saying your faith is the "real one," you are belittle all other world faiths. Are you that dense?
<quoted text>

Actually, I was more PC than saying the "real one", and said my religion was real. I left my personal religous beliefs out of it to focus on other reasons why certain groups should be able to exclude certain people.

So go ahead, try to show where I said something different. I merely defended my religion when it was attacked w/ outrageous offensive assertions.

For you to use the term arrogance is outrageous. Even if someone says they believe one religion is the rewal one, they are expressing a belief. Just b/c someone's belief disagrees w/ you doesn't mean they are arrogant and a hypocrite. In fact it's more arrogant and hypocritical for someone to accuse someone just b/c they say something that person disagrees with.

[the last good bye]

it happens today. good bye all.

[Tired]

Chris Vogel wrote:

<quoted text>
do you think that humans would be here right now if all our ancestors were homosexual? Do you believe in evolution?

This arguement really doesn't work... Let's substitue some other items in, like would we all be here if all of our ancestors were female? Or how about would we all be here is our ancestors were all roman catholics priests?

[Tired]

TNT wrote:

<quoted text>
So, you have a husband. You must be the wife? What a crock. If dogs try that nonsense they get an azzwhoopin. The laws of nature are inviolate. Except for a few demented humans.

It isn't a human only occurance... homosexuality has been seen in the animal kingdom.

[Tired]

Moronic Neighbors wrote:

<quoted text>
Late 50's

You were acting like your 5...

[UnbelievableFL]

protective mutha wrote:

<quoted text>Gay men make great baby sitters then don't they? I'm taking a poll, how many would leave their precious ones with just any homosexual male. And when they are away from me all the way out in the woods. Plenty of creepy crawlies around. I'm not talking about snakes either. I know how homosexuals can't control themselves. If one ever became a scout leader he'd think he'd won the lottery. Hot diggity.

I wouldn't leave children with just anyone, but I would choose an openly gay man over a heterosexual male. In reality, openly gay are much less likely to molest children than men who are living a heterosexual lifestyle.

But again, if you want to keep your head buried in the sand, continue to ignore reality.