Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in 2010?

[talking with two tongues]

Leroy Snot wrote:

<quoted text>Why do you republicans love to attack women???

why do demo-corruptics love to attack women

[Lite N Lively]

Leroy Snot wrote:

<quoted text>Why do you republicans love to attack women???

Because they're Sexist Pigs! They have to have us, but they resent it to no end! I've never had sex with a Republican, to my knowledge, but I'll bet that it would be a horribly degrading experience!

[typical]

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
I made two very close Friends on Topix, so I thought. One is still my Friend & the other One turned out to be the "Scoundrel of All Scoundrels", for no valid reason! So, I don't make, what I consider Personal Friends, anymore on Topix! If you're nice to me, I try to reciprocate, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to pretend to agree with you, if I really don't.
If you're mean & cruel to me, I'll give it right back to you OR ignore you, depending on my mood. But, none of it matters to me anymore, I got over that...it took awhile, but I finally wised up & became immune to it!

http://bit.ly/Lftxj4
^^^^^^^^^ please refer to posting #55195

[Lite N Lively]

And to think, I once admired this Man!
----------
"Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Arrests 6-year-old Undocumented Immigrant.

Click here:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/06/17/5...

[Lite N Lively]

talking with two tongues wrote:

<quoted text>
why do demo-corruptics love to attack women

They DON'T!

[Danger_Close]

Really Sassy wrote:

And to think, I once admired this Man!
----------
"Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Arrests 6-year-old Undocumented Immigrant.
Click here:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/06/17/5...

why do you care, Obama says the children can stay.

and FYI. the child was still here ILLEGALLY!

[one cell]

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
Because they're Sexist Pigs! They have to have us, but they resent it to no end! I've never had sex with a Republican, to my knowledge, but I'll bet that it would be a horribly degrading experience!

that's two nice things you said about us today
are you kissing up scud

[Kendall]

one cell wrote:

<quoted text>
that's two nice things you said about us today
are you kissing up scud

you only score on the Racist pig
the rest was just bag bitch air

[Silence]

Mobile_Amused wrote:

<quoted text>
"They're both exactly the same...but I'd rather have Romney."
Hilarious.

that's what I said is it not. The fact is there is resounding evidence that Obama is the most corrupt president in the history of the country, as well he is a democrip.

Romney on the other hand has shown he is corrupt but not to the level Obama is nationally, as Romney is a rebloodican. Out of the two which it obviously seems to have come down to. It will be either Obama or Romney. Obama being a democrip has once again shown his corruption through bills, laws and executive orders he has passed and it would be easily provable to that end. Romney has done the same on a lesser scale as governor, however being as he is a rebloodican when he starts trying to pass these same laws that Obama couldn't push through as the agenda for the take over progresses it will be blatantly obvious to those who are still in the Matrix that the left, right he's in that party were in this party, we have these beliefs, and we have these beliefs simply won't exist anymore. Sure you can package laws, bills, executive orders and name them differently but when they really start seeing the similarities. They can no longer say that this is because of Democrips or Rebloodicans instead they would begin actually looking up this sh*t themselves. That is why I said if either of the two i'd prefer Romney over the lot. I care for neither and will vote for neither, Ron Paul was my first and only choice and now that he's out i'm not going to be voting for anyone this year.

[Silence]

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
You're absolutely right...I didn't stand up for Bush/Cheney on any of the corruption that they did! Too bad that People like you did! Had you not, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in today!

your an idi*t. really your an idi*t

[Grader man]

Mobile_Amused wrote:

<quoted text>
Who was in charge of keeping us safe 11 years ago on 9/11? Your response will be predictable and quite telling.

Who was in charge on December 7th 1941? Your respose will be predicitable and quiet telling.

[Lite N Lively]

Silence wrote:

<quoted text>
your an idi*t. really your an idi*t

There ya go...when you can't dispute it, just resort to Name-calling! You Teapublicans are so good at that because you've had to do it alot. Bush/Cheney's record is indefensible, so what other choice have you had & you know what they say...Practice Makes Perfect!

[Silence]

Danger_Close wrote:

<quoted text>
Lesser of 2 evils syndrome. They are BOTH globalist SCUM. Puppets.

I never said they wasn't. If you would have read my post closer you would have found this "albeit Romney would be just the same" followed by a rant at how if Romney were to be elected the people would notice how both of these political parties are the same he*l bent on there agenda of take over and control. As key laws such as internet censorship has yet to be passed and it is key for the "globalist scum" to proceed with there take over. IF Obama can't get a given measured pass in some form or another and Romney get's in office and he continually tries to pass a different name yet same outcome type of measure then it would be blatantly obvious that these creeps have an agenda to those who still don't believe or research beyond getting off there a*s playing video games and watching globalist news. However I completely agree anyone who conspires against "The People" and there freedoms and continually takes measures at attacking our Constitution then they are complete scum and I personally think that if / when these scum are found guilty for there highly treasonous activity then I personally hope they get capital offence and have to answer to the people directly!

[typical]

hey sassy
both threads have called you an idiot
that makes it unanimous
every time you are tempted to post
please refer to posting #55195
http://bit.ly/Lftxj4

[Silence]

Really Sassy wrote:

<quoted text>
There ya go...when you can't dispute it, just resort to Name-calling! You Teapublicans are so good at that because you've had to do it alot. Bush/Cheney's record is indefensible, so what other choice have you had & you know what they say...Practice Makes Perfect!

Once again making your generalizations what makes you think I was even involved in politics of that era? Idi*t

[Danger_Close]

Swedish Left Party Chapter Wants To Make Urinating While Standing Illegal For Men
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/swed...

Soda Ban: Could Movie-Theater Popcorn Be Outlawed, Too?
http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2012/06/soda-ba...

Should This Milk Be Legal?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/08/dining/08ra...

DO YOU F***ING PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT OUR LIVES ARE BEING MICROMANAGED AT EVERY LEVEL?

All of this crap about republicans and democrats doesn't matter.

[nameless]

Does that mean that when you cant debate the facts you start calling people gay? Yep, that fits your pattern.

[typical]

Leroy Snot wrote:

<quoted text>http://crooksandliars.com/2006/09/23/name-cal...

you are too easy for me
i could beat you with my ipad
and
skating at the same time
go here
http://www.google.com/search...

[Silence]

Danger_Close wrote:

Swedish Left Party Chapter Wants To Make Urinating While Standing Illegal For Men
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/swed...
Soda Ban: Could Movie-Theater Popcorn Be Outlawed, Too?
http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2012/06/soda-ba...
Should This Milk Be Legal?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/08/dining/08ra...
DO YOU F***ING PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT OUR LIVES ARE BEING MICROMANAGED AT EVERY LEVEL?
All of this crap about republicans and democrats doesn't matter.

completely agree it's disgusting. You know the more I expose this in RL I get mixed responses. Oh I'll stock up and hide, or i'll take from someone to survive or I don't believe you or it's this party's or that party's fault get him in there and he'll fix it or my favorite I don't know.It get's really irritating as some still use the left right paradigm too use as an excuse for there ignorance.

[Lite N Lively]

typical wrote:

hey sassy
both threads have called you an idiot
that makes it unanimous
every time you are tempted to post
please refer to posting #55195
http://bit.ly/Lftxj4

Since that Post is bothering you so badly, let me explain it more thoroughly. BTW, I knew how it sounded when I posted it, but I really didn't care at the time.
I don't do anything, intentionally, to attract Men! I don't behave in a way to intentionally attract Men, I don't dress to attract Men, I don't talk to intentionally attract Men, & I don't post in a way to intentionally attract Men.
I do all of the above things because it's the way I like doing them..."I" like doing them, for me & nobody else!
Since I am Single, I don't have anybody to try & please. but, if I did have somebody that I loved, I would do whatever I could, within reason, to try & please them. That's what you do for People you love...and you don't mind doing it because you Love them & want to please them!
Now, does that explain it better? Now, will you stop obsessing over that Post?